what’s Good

the name’s megan. 20s. she/her this is my main! check out my btvs side blog: sspoike & my hr side blog: rozyhollanov

[terramosh]

[parasocialanxiety]

I see a child run out in front of this car and I throw a black lace shawl over their shoulders, saving their life

[undeadsucker]

trent rezdog would be like i scratched myself today... to see if i have fleas

[starofhisheart]

Happy pride to those 5 seconds where Charlie Swan thought Jacob was coming out to him in the most insane way possible

[kaylmao]

has anyone seen my pet bacteriophage its name is styrofoam and its about [hand touching the floor] this tall

[bovid-beauty]

"Fascism"—New Federal Rule Would Require Federal Funding Recipients To Deny Trans People Exist

The rule could have heavy impacts towards trans people across society.

Last week, the Trump administration quietly released a sweeping new federal rule that would use funding threats to force institutions across the country to reject transgender people. The 400-page proposed regulation would codify the administration's anti-trans executive orders into binding federal policy, imposing a blanket prohibition on federal funds going toward "gender ideology"

The proposed rule, formally titled "Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance," rewrites the government-wide framework governing all federal grants across every agency. Among its most consequential provisions, it requires that before a federal grant recipient can receive money, the award must pass a "pre-issuance review" conducted by a political appointee—not a career expert or peer reviewer—to ensure it is "consistent with applicable law, Federal agency priorities, and the national interest." The regulation explicitly instructs these appointees to screen for "denial by the recipient of the sex binary in humans or the notion that sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic." [...] An institution that acknowledges transgender people exist—through its policies, its training, its healthcare, its bathroom access, its HR procedures, its name-change processes—could be deemed to "deny the sex binary" or to “support the notion that sex is mutable” and have its federal funding blocked.

Importantly, the gender ideology prohibition has no age limitation—hospitals could be targeted not just for providing care to minors but for providing gender-affirming care to adults, because prescribing hormone therapy to a transgender patient of any age could be deemed promoting the belief that "sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic."

[loveridden1999]

problematic sudoku solving skills gap

[featuringmarkhoppus]

[heartsl0b]

road trip

[havanaberry]

A Rabbit's Foot presents: The Metamorphosis of Havana Rose Liu

[4waystreet]

tone it down with the rpf will ya

simon and garfunkel fucked irl

[adaine]

the death of dvds is so fucked. what about bonus features

[adaine]

far far away idol would never happen now

[mismedleym]

visitation by an angel (revisited)

[maidthings]

i really like how the milkman exists as an entirely fossilized character who now serves no purpose other than to fuck people's wives for the punchline

[yelliedraws]

guess that's showbiz!

[zoesupreme]

generational abyssmal dogshit coming down the pipe

[zoesupreme]

he's so real tho

[quix5gg]

happy pride month especially to them

[segamascott]

[saucefunk]

sinners zine digital pdf is now LIVE and i’m so excited to share my piece for this project! this is my favourite thing i’ve drawn to date