2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
No title available
taylor price
YOU ARE THE REASON
Not today Justin
EXPECTATIONS
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

#extradirty

shark vs the universe
NASA

roma★

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
Doug Jones
No title available
sheepfilms
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Cosimo Galluzzi
🪼
art blog(derogatory)
seen from Italy

seen from Taiwan
seen from Germany
seen from Spain

seen from Colombia

seen from Brazil

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Spain
seen from Ecuador
seen from Germany
seen from India
seen from Vietnam
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from United States
@velvetthunder-deathblade
people are like "if you put crabs in a bucket they can't escape because they keep pulling each other back in, this is called crab bucket mentality and describes why people don't help each other" and never acknowledge that crabs do not naturally occur in buckets, a human with more power had to put them there
Let me talk to you about books. Specifically, one book. This book. This book deals with debunking “Neurosexism,” which is a very fancy term for all of that evolutionary psychology bullshit that people spill about those “brain differences” between boys and girls. This book debunks such myths as:
Boys are better at math than girls
Women make crappy lawyers/business CEOs/etc, as their brains are not cut out for aggression.
Men make crappy counselors/primary school teachers/primary parents/etc, as their brains are not cut out for empathy.
MEN ARE BUILT FOR GOING OUT AND HUNTING WHILE WOMEN ARE BUILT FOR STAYING HOME AND BABYMAKING IT’S NOT SEXISM IT’S JUST BIOLOGY
And many other such myths.
Neurosexism and gender perceptions in multiple races (as this is not a singularly white experience, just as the western world isn’t a singularly white experience)
Sex discrimination in the workplace, and how women are (or, more often, are not) allowed to behave
How science is used (badly) to support many of these claims
Experiences of trans* people, both through interviews and empirical studies.
Furthermore, this book covers topics such as: AND FINALLY - It is all brilliantly researched, cited, compiled - and it’s easy to read! Cordelia Fine actually manages to be funny while writing this, which I think is important, because it makes all of this information infinitely accessible.
Here’s a PDF for those that cannot afford it/are frightened to buy it.
I read this book and it is legit SO GOOD. Super methodical and super intelligent.
Imagine a world where your phone is too big for your hand, where your doctor prescribes a drug that is wrong for your body, where in a car accident you are 47% more likely to be seriously injured, where every week the countless hours of work you do are not recognised or valued. If any of this sounds familiar, chances are that you're a woman. Invisible Women shows us how, in a world largely built for and by men, we are systematically ignoring half the population. It exposes the gender data gap – a gap in our knowledge that is at the root of perpetual, systemic discrimination against women, and that has created a pervasive but invisible bias with a profound effect on women’s lives. Award-winning campaigner and writer Caroline Criado Perez brings together for the first time an impressive range of case studies, stories and new research from across the world that illustrate the hidden ways in which women are forgotten, and the impact this has on their health and well-being. From government policy and medical research, to technology, workplaces, urban planning and the media, Invisible Women reveals the biased data that excludes women. In making the case for change, this powerful and provocative book will make you see the world anew.
The reasons why many men pay for sex are revealed in the interviews that make up a major new piece of research
This entire thing should be a must-read for anyone who has the standard liberal feminist stance on “sex workers” and their “career choices”, or for any radical feminists who are looking for yet more evidence that prostitution is a degradation and that johns are scum.
Some choice excerpts:
“[O]f 700 men interviewed […] just over half were either married or in a relationship with a woman.”
[One participant] said: “I want my ideal prostitute not to behave like one,” he said, “to role-play to be a pretend girlfriend, a casual date, not business-like…”
“I asked [one participant] how often he thought the women he paid enjoyed the sex. ‘I don’t want them to get any pleasure,’ he told me. ‘I am paying for it and it is her job to give me pleasure. If she enjoys it I would feel cheated.’”
“When asked what would end prostitution, one interviewee laughed and said, ‘Kill all the girls.’”
“Almost half said they believed that most women in prostitution are victims of pimps (“the pimp does the psychological raping of the woman,” explained one), lured, tricked, or trafficked. But they still continued to visit them.”
“One of the most interesting findings was that many believed men would “need” to rape if they could not pay for sex on demand.”
“Visiting an area where prostitution is legal or openly advertised [such as Amsterdam or Thailand] had given them a renewed dedication to buying sex when they returned to the UK.”
“[One participant] said: ‘Look, men pay for women because he can have whatever and whoever he wants. Lots of men go to prostitutes so they can do things to them that real women would not put up with.’”
Emphasis added.
The johns interviewed were a very foul mixture of “The girls don’t even pretend to like me, it’s all robotic and mechanical” and “I buy access to these women so I can treat them like dirt and i want them to know it.” One of the johns interviewed even said a prostituted woman asked him to help her, said she had been tricked and brought to London on false pretenses, but he just had sex with her and left because she might have been lying to him. I mean… if anyone needs any more proof that men who buy women hate us, don’t care for us, don’t care about anything except their own feelings and their own orgasms, JUST ASK THE JOHNS. They tell on themselves all the damn time but for some reason certain people don’t want to hear it.
http://the-invisible-men.tumblr.com/
http://invisible-men-canada.tumblr.com/
This is who pro-prostiution “anti-SWERF” people fight for.
Brene Brown ebooks
Video
LIBFEM BULLSHIT. OMFG. I can’t even deal with this right now. Can someone else take this one?
Ana makes more money each year she gains experience in her career
Julia loses money each year because she is seen as an object that is “used up” by her job
Ana’s occupational hazards include repetitive motion injuries and construction accidents, and she is protected by OSHA and workers compensation laws if something happens
Julia’s occupational hazards include rape, pregnancy, beatings, rectal prolapse, murder, PTSD, and sexually transmitted diseases. OSHA does not care.
Ana isn’t offered extra money for failing to wear a hardhat in construction zones
Julia is offered extra money for having sex without a condom
If Ana turns down a client they will go to someone else that can also safely turn them down
If Julia turns down a client they may react violently, or they will go to someone who can’t turn down clients
Ana’s colleagues are like her- they are highly paid and well educated. they all have many options besides being architects. Most of them are men.
Julia’s colleagues are forced into their jobs and have few (if any) options. Almost all of them are women and children.
[Screenshot taken of this commentary]
“In a study submitted at trial with 854 women in 9 countries, including Canada, 89% of women interviewed said they wanted out of prostitution. In another study submitted at trial conducted in the downtown eastside of Vancouver, 95% of prostituted women interviewed said they wanted out of prostitution“
Here are some statistics of what goes on in porn and the industry from an LA based survivor organization
Also read: Why Sex Work Isn’t Work
Also a reminder that “sex work” is not a neutral or objective term but a liberal one (tied in with economics) that specifically comes out of the 1970s United States pro-prostitution movement and is about an ideology that promotes the sex industries by using language to gloss over its harms:
Many in favor of the legalization of prostitution refer to it as “sex work” and employ concepts such as “consent,” “agency,” “sexual freedom,” “the right to work,” and even “human rights” in the course of making their defense.[1] Consider some of the common claims defenders of legalization advance: sex work is work just like any other form of work, only the social shame and stigma around sex prevent people from seeing it as such;[2] many (most) women[3] who sell sex chose to be there, so we should respect their choice and agency, after all they are in no different a position than someone who chooses a minimum wage job without better alternatives;[4] women choosing to sell sex is an example of sexual freedom and rejecting repressive norms that limit women’s sexuality,[5] so we should respect their sexually autonomous choices to sell sex for a living. - Why Sex Work Isn’t Work by Lori Watson
Also, many of the formerly prostituted do not support being called “sex workers” or them being prostituted being called “sex work.”
“In January 2014, 61 South Asian victims and survivors of prostitution as well as women’s groups representing communities marginalized by caste, class and ethnicity and antitrafficking organizations helping girls and women “trapped in bonded labour and other forms of servitude” wrote to Mlambo-Ngcuka to protest the new UN Women policy of avoiding the word prostitution.
“We do not want to be called ‘sex workers’ but prostituted women and children, as we can never accept our exploitation as ‘work,’ ” the letter signers wrote. “We think that the attempts in UN documents to call us ‘sex workers’ legitimizes violence against women, especially women of discriminated caste, poor men and women and women and men from minority groups, who are the majority of the prostituted.”
They are still awaiting an answer from UN Women, Gupta said.
Censoring comment about violence against girls and women is not new in the Commission on the Status of Women or in the UN more broadly. Nafis Sadik, the outspoken executive director of the United Nations Population Fund, or UNFPA, from 1987 to 2000, said in an interview in 2013 that there had been numerous attempts to silence her, often from pressure by governments.” — Prostitution: A Word That UN Women Does Not Want to Hear | March 31, 2015
Cherry Smiley’s AWAN address to the 55th Session of the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) at the UN in 2011.
[Gifset source]
“Please be aware that the term ‘sex work’, which is found in your public policies and documents, came out of the US sex trade of the 1970’s. It was invented with the particular aim of normalising and sanitising prostitution for the public and for lawmakers in particular, and you have done a great service for those who profit from prostitution by your acceptance and adoption of it. Simultaneously you have also – inadvertently, we acknowledge – levelled a painful insult against us. We are, all of us, sex-trade survivors; the living witnesses of a dehumanising trade, and any acceptance of our abuse as ‘work’ further dehumanises us.“ — Open Letter from Survivors, Alliance of Women for the Abolition of Prostitution
Rachel Moran on the terms "Sex Work" and "Sex Worker".
[Gifset source]
Let me just stop here for a second to point out “Ana is an architect”. NOT IN THAT DRESS AND THOSE SHOES SHE’S FUCKING NOT! YOU WEAR STEEL-TOED BOOTS ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OR YOU AREN’T ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE! Not that I should expect any kind of accuracy from people who think prostitution, porn, and stripping are all “a job like any other!” but fuck! My grandmother literally turned a woman around for trying to come onto the construction site in shoes like that.
And you don’t wear dresses like that to a construction site either. They WILL get dust and dirt and mud all over them. But ALSO, a dress is an extremely impractical thing to be wearing at a drafting table! My grandmother was forced to wear dresses early on in her career and it was awful. They said that was the dress code for women, no ifs, ands, or buts about it. But ties were also a part of the dress and sex wasn’t specified for that, so my grandmother wore a dress and tie until they finally let her wear pants. But this ad wants to convince me of its position by showing an “architect” in a tight as fuck dress and high-heeled shoes carrying blue-prints and visiting a construction site???
/rant
They did it as a “gotcha!” Like “Bet you thought Ana was the prostitute!” You know. Cause she’s in heels and a tight dress.
I couldn’t even search who produced the “PSA” cause all that kept coming up was porn results. Go figure.
the term “sex worker” is less than useless since it encompasses everything from prostituted women and children to the men who are trafficking them, porn directors and producers, male porn stars who abuse their female co-stars, etc. How can you use a term that puts both the victims and the perpetrators in the same category?
“sex workers” are not a cohesive group, even if it didn’t include pornographers and pimps its incredibly naive to think someone who sells/has sold nudes should be allowed to speak on behalf of someone who’s being/been paid to be raped. Those are two wildly different situations despite both being coercive, and you’re doing a great disservice to women and children in prostitution by putting the two in the same category and allowing the former group to speak over the latter and set the tone of the debate.
So, as discussed in a previous ask, I have gathered all my feminist ramblings in one PDF, including some posts that were still languishing in my drafts; you can download the document here if you are interested. To the surprise of no one who knows me, it is the size of a small book. If there are any problems with the download, please let me know on my new blog, as this one is no longer active. But don’t message me to criticise the mean lesbian opinions you will find in there because I don’t care to hear about that.
so you can’t tell anybody how their sexuality works because that is whatever-phobic and gatekeeping identies is bad, but you can tell (or guilt, threaten, correct, etc) lesbians and gay men to learn to like the opposite sex. Does anybody notice how reciting the definition of homosexuality gets you labeled a bigot or do we need another sign of homophobia on the left
(◕‿◕✿) facts about divorce for feminists and MRAs:
in most (51%) of cases, both parents decided on their own (out of court) that the mother was to receive full custody
in 29% of custody cases, the decision was made without any third party involvement
in 91% of cases, the decision for the mother to have custody was made without court involvement
of those who go to court, 70% of men who seek custody of their child receive it
of those 70%, 1/3 of the cases cited domestic abuse as part of the reason for divorce
women who mention having been victims of domestic abuse in court are less likely to receive custody of their children than women who didn’t
i’m tired of seeing posts on feminism by both feminists and MRAs citing “gender bias in custody cases” as a problem we need to solve. women aren’t unfairly receiving custody more often. abusive men are unfairly receiving custody.
the fact is, if my dad had actually attended his court ordered anger management type classes, i would legally have been required to spend a portion of my time with him until i turned 18, even though he beat my mother and abused me.
don’t let anyone make you think that the scale isn’t still tipped toward men in a court of law.
sources: (1) (2)
Another fun fact : contrary to the MRA claim that women make false allegations of abuse to get leverage in divorce/custody cases, evidence shows allegations of abuse are actually rare, and substantiated in most cases. Out of the accusations that were found to be deliberate lies by the courts, most were fabricated by men (21%) vs women (1.3%).
They're right and they should say it
Are you shitting me
Me @ my teachers when they call me by my sister’s name
Radclub Library
Andrea Dworkin, Our Blood
Andrea Dworkin, Woman Hating
Andrea Dworkin, Intercourse
Andrea Dworkin, Letters from a War Zone
Andrea Dworkin, Life and Death
Andrea Dworkin, Pornography, Men Possessing Women
Andrea Dworkin, Right Wing Women
Angela Davis, Are Prisons Obsolete
Angela Davis, Beyond the Frame, Women of Color and Visual Representation
Audre Lorde, Zami, Sister Outsider Undersong
Catharine A. MacKinnon et Andrea Dworkin, In Harm’s Way, the Pornography Civil Rights Hearings
Catharine A. MacKinnon, Feminism Unmodified, Discourses on Life and Law
Catharine A. MacKinnon, Only Words
Catharine A. MacKinnon, Points Against Postmodernism
Bell Hooks, Ain’t I a Woman?
Janice G. Raymond & Donna M. Hughes, Sex Trafficking of Women in the United States
Sheila Jeffreys, Beauty and Misogyny
I’m reblogging myself but it’s a useful post
online library so far:
margaret atwood
the brontës (the complete works is a MASSIVE file fyi)
anne carson
hélène cixous
bell hooks
clarice lispector
audre lorde
virginia woolf
compilations
feminist theory
academic writing (both books and articles)
everything here is in pdf format so you should be able to download and read it on any device. it’s slow going because i have a lot of epubs that i have to convert before uploading and the folders i’ve listed here are neither complete nor comprehensive, but it’s a start!
the library link with all folders is now in my description. further updates:
angela davis
angela carter
florence welch
louise glück (some of these are epubs atm, but for some reason they won’t convert.)
i also:
added a disclaimer to the feminist theory folder
masterpost of masterposts!
anti porn stats
Marsha P Johnson
Stonewall riots
anti porn stats + receipts
(I will be adding more to this, I can only copy a few links at once)
brain sex debunked
masterpost of anti porn masterposts
female oppression in the United States
discover radical feminism
razors behind stickers debunked
fucked up the first time cause i'm a dumb ho but
intersex conditions
tra receipts (misogyny + mostly homophobia): 1, 2, 3
women are biologically superior
silenced by trans politics
pre stonewall lgb history
brain sex debunked again (different post)
ftm tips
also! just a reminder that the cherry picking post (tra receipts 1) is always updating, so check the notes every now and then to see if it's got any recent additions
Here’s something to chew on.
about me.jpg
honestly
In case you wanna read the article this quote is from: http://rolereboot.org/culture-and-politics/details/2016-05-daughter-know-ok-angry/
Adaptable girls find socially acceptable ways to internalize or channel their discomfort and ire, sometimes at great personal cost. Passive aggressive behavior, anxiety, and depression are common effects. Sarcasm, apathy, and meanness have all been linked to suppressed rage. Troublesome behaviors, such as lying, skipping school, bullying other people, even being socially awkward are often signs that a teenager is dealing with anger that they are unable to name as anger.
Girls, taught to ignore their anger, become disassociated from themselves.
Anger is so successfully sublimated that girls lose the ability to understand what it feels and looks like. Is her heart racing? Does she feel flushed or shaky? Does she clench her jaws at night? Is she breaking out in hives? Does she cry for no reason? Laugh inappropriately during difficult conversations? Fly off the handle over something that seems inconsequential? You can see where I’m going here…those crazy girl hormones, right? Better to just think of it as a phase.
For too many women, however, the phase never ends. It’s lives spent never expressing anger at all and believing that they don’t have the right or ability to do so without great risk.
While anger in girls and women is overwhelmingly portrayed as irrational, it is, in fact, completely rational.
Girls learn to filter their existences through messages of powerlessness and cultural worthlessness. Girls might be more inclined to depression because coming to terms with your own cultural marginalization and irrelevance is depressing.
This doesn’t mean giving children, girls or boys, a pass for violent, disruptive, or entitled behavior.
[But] girls need to know—and should be told explicitly—that it’s alright to feel anger.
Women are overmedicated because drug dosage trials are done on men, study finds
“In a study of children aged 2-5, parents interrupted their daughters more than their sons, and fathers were more likely to talk simultaneously with their children than mothers were. Jennifer Coates says: “It seems that fathers try to control conversation more than mothers… and both parents try to control conversation more with daughters than with sons. The implicit message to girls is that they are more interruptible and that their right to speak is less than that of boys.” Girls and boys’ differing understanding of when to talk, when to be quiet, what is polite and so on, has a visible impact on the dynamics of the classroom. Just as men dominate the floor in business meetings, academic conferences and so on, so little boys dominate in the classroom - and little girls let them.”
— X