Finding My Way Out of The Evangelical Church
God’s unconditional love is often preached from the evangelical pulpit. For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten son (John 3:16 ) is the hook that pulls many an unbeliever into the church. As far as the message goes, its a good one, perhaps the best. But does the evangelical church really believe its own messaging as it pertains to God’s unconditional love?
As a former evangelical and an observer of the church at work in the world, I’d have to say no. It took me a while to figure this out and I eventually left because I never experienced the unconditional love I was promised once I became a member.Â
Rumors of unconditional love haunted me while I was in the church. God loved me enough to save me while I was a sinner, but once I was “saved,” this love eluded me. My time was occupied with living right and looking right, and witnessing to unbelievers. I became involved with church programs, bible studies, and youth ministry. As a parent, considerable effort was put in to making sure my kids spent time with Christian friends so they wouldn’t fall off the deep end by believing in evolution when they became adults.
Although we talked about God a lot, I don’t recall feeling loved or cared for by anyone; nor feeling that I now loved others more deeply. On the contrary, I felt more connected to people and less judgmental before I was saved.Â
Now, I was steeped in an us against them mentality, us being my church community and them being the world of the lost. The world was the enemy we were supposed to love. Be in the world but not of the world, we were warned, which seemed incompatible with God so loved the world. I was confused and deep, down I was unsure if what the church offered me was any better than the world, which didn’t even pretend to love me unconditionally or at all.
What the evangelical church did offer me was a ticket to a future paradise. Once I possessed this ticket, I spent most of my time with other future paradise dwellers like myself because to do otherwise would mean mixing with people from the wrong side of the spiritual tracks.Â
Hanging with outsiders was acceptable only when courting them to join up with us (believers). I mean, you could talk to them  and socialize on a superficial level but you had to guard your time wisely and not get caught up with worldly activities, especially if these activities took your focus off God and your church.Â
People were projects to convert and to lead to salvation. Interaction had less to do with loving others and more to do with getting them into the winners’ circle. It seemed more like salesmanship than unconditional love, and even worse, insincere.
In a broad sense I didn’t have to look very far outside the churchyard to experience intolerance and condemnation of any other individual who didn’t believe exactly as evangelicals believed in our literal interpretation of the bible. But the intolerance was covered up by the language of conversion. If a sinner’s heart was hardened towards God, it’s not God’s fault if he refused to believe.
I learned that accepting a verbal gospel was highly valued above everything else. Talking about the Lord and worshipping Him meant more than following Him. Adherence to a verbal gospel trumped giving to the poor, accepting the immigrant, loving your enemies and turning the other cheek, being a peace maker, etc  as long as Jesus was invoked as a talisman in every thought, word and action as in: the Lord laid it upon my heart, the Lord told me to do this, the Lord directed me to take this job, etc. Independent reasoning and personal responsibility for having an original thought had no significance to the evangelical believer. God-Speak took over all personal conversation.
Evangelicals are certain no one is saved except people who believe as they do. This sense of righteousness is masked by false humility claiming it is God’s will, not theirs, for their exclusivity regarding salvation because it says so in the Bible. Catholics, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, gays, members of main line protestant churches, atheists, agnostics, secular humanists,  and all other ________s are beyond the pale of salvation and are destined to burn in hell. To be a non-christian is the worst thing you can be.
Popular or secular culture is the enemy. Believers see themselves as set apart or above the secular culture even if they drive a hummer, own a big screen TV, shop at Walmart, own guns, operate a hedge fund in the Bahamas, hate Muslims, are divorced or cheat on their taxes. They are forgiven for all offenses past, present and future because of their acceptance of Jesus as their personal savior, unlike unbelievers, however law abiding and well intended they might be. Evangelicals wear their narrow-mindedness as a badge of honor, calling it the narrow gate, and obedience to the Lord.
The narrow gate is belief in Jesus as Lord, literally. If your belief in the literal interpretation of Christ is not total, or if you only ascribe to His teachings, well then you are SOL.  Some evangelicals feel sad about these lost souls but in my experience most don’t because the longer they are in the “church”, the less real contact they have with anyone on the outside whom they really care about in an intimate way. We will be so happy in heaven, we won’t even miss them because it is impossible to be sad when we are with the Lord.
How can you miss someone you don’t know and with whom you never spend any time? And how can you spend time with someone if all your time is devoted to your church programs in the company of other christians like yourself?Â
How does this behavior reflect unconditional love in a meaningful way when you only rub elbows with “others” during a short term mission trip or church outreach event? Or pity them because they don’t share your beliefs? Or try to convince them they have to believe what you believe in order to be worthy? Sounds like spiritual quid pro quo to me.Â
Sometimes you pray for a co-worker who doesn't know the Lord or endure spending time with an unfortunate, unsaved family member to whom you must be a “good witness,” because the whole purpose of any relationship with any unbeliever is to evangelize, not to hang out with him just because you like him for who he is. There is nothing unconditional about this kind of evangelistic set up. Let me act like I really care about you so you will see how cool being a Christian really is.Â
I remember being confused by this conditional, unconditional love at a Bible study I once attended. We were talking about Jews and how much God loves them as His chosen people. Â Someone asked the inevitable what about the holocaust question. The group leader actually said that if the Jews had only called on the name of Christ during WWII, God would have spared them from the horrors of the holocaust.
The Bible says Jews are “stiff necked stubborn people” who repeatedly rejected God throughout human history. Remember the golden calf? The bottom line is that Jews who perished in the holocaust are in hell, after all they suffered at the hands of the nazis, because they didn’t accept Christ as their Lord and Savior. Ask any evangelical Christian and he will tell you this is true. Some might stutter and seem slightly apologetic about Jews being in hell, but most will dismiss their feelings, deferring to God’s justice, not theirs, with pious conviction. Who are we to judge the mind of God?
By these standards, God seems more fascist than savior. Why should any Christian lament the holocaust at all if God just completed the job that Hitler started on this side of eternity by burning Jews in the afterlife?
I looked around at the Bible study group and asked a question that eventually led me to leave the church: Do I really want to spend eternity with people who believe such things? As one among them, I felt as if I were a member of some kind of retro-Inquisition. Their attitude about Jews and salvation was not fueled by compassion but by a righteous sense of tribalism for the “lost, misguided  (materialistic) Jews who rejected their savior.” But yet, these same fundamentalist Christians were politically, if not militantly, pro-Israel because they believe Jesus is coming back and he really needs that strip of real estate in the Middle East.
The evangelical church I attended was populated by a fair amount of former catholics including myself. It was an ordinary practice to hear catholic bashing from the pulpit. One minister, who was a former catholic, really loved to let the papists have it. He preached an entire hour one Sunday on the evils of the Catholic doctrine that encouraged parishioners to be good catholics. Goodness, he said,  was impossible without an evangelical belief in Christ.Â
Far from being inspired, by my pastor’s anti-Catholic sermon, I felt great sympathy for anyone who struggles, to be good and to do good. I wondered why God’s unconditional love was being withheld from catholics who believed in the value of good works but was granted to evangelicals who were contemptuous of catholic good works because they lacked the correct branding. Good works are like filthy rags to God if you are not among the truly saved, I was told. It all sounded so hopeless on one hand and self congratulatory on the other. I knew only one thing for certain upon hearing this message, -that I didn’t feel the love.
Goodness as a virtue may be impossible without God, but preaching about God while maligning others who are engaged in good works doesn’t transform anyone, ignite great faith or help people to love well. I began to move one foot towards the door.
My other foot soon followed after hearing a sermon that discouraged believers from following their dreams. A youth pastor was cited as an example of someone who gave up his dreams for the church. For most of his childhood and young adult life this youth pastor dreamed of becoming a doctor but realized his personal ambitions were selfish compared to preaching the gospel to teenagers. He made the ultimate sacrifice by turning his back on his dream to attend medical school and became a youth pastor instead. His career choice was extolled as a paradigm of Christian virtue. The minister made the youth pastor stand up and instructed the congregation to give him a round of applause. God requires no less of us, the preacher claimed, then to give up our dreams for His glory.
While I didn’t have a problem with this young man’s personal career choice, I cringed inwardly at the mandate to give up your dreams. What if Joseph had given up his dreams? What if Dr. Martin Luther King had given up his? What if a young person sitting in the congregation really wanted to be a doctor or a cancer researcher?
What if.. God was the generator of our dreams and desires and not their executioner?
As the pastor droned on about what it takes to become a fully devoted follower of Christ, the sermon reached its predictable climax: God wants you to give up your money for the church as well as your dreams. And by the way, don’t expect God to answer your prayers if you don’t tithe; it’s against His principles. Stated simply, God’s will can be manipulated through tithing, more than prayer, because He won’t even hear your prayer if you don’t show Him the money.
While attending a Christian concert some years ago I was moved to adopt a Haitian child through a compassionate organization that promoted the unconditional love of Jesus Christ. Monthly donations would go towards the adopted child’s food, shelter and education. The compassionate organization would pay for all these services but there was a catch: the child’s family had to attend weekly Bible studies and church services in order to receive help.Â
At first, this didn’t bother me much, but as time went on and I wrote out the monthly checks, I began to think of the hundreds, maybe thousands of Haitian children who didn’t attend Bible studies or church. Weren’t they worthy of food, shelter and a good education too? How can a compassionate organization chose to help some children and not others on the basis of where they worship?
Even now, some fifteen years after I left the evangelical church, I am confronted by their lack of unconditional love which is supposed to be central to their message. Through my job at a local non-profit woman’s center I come into contact with some very needy people who often lack basic human needs.  One such woman had two very young children and was in grave financial trouble. Her six year old son had outgrown all of his clothes and needed some new/used pants and shirts for school.
 The young woman of whom I speak barely had money for food. She was disabled with chronic liver disease and her husband was out of work. She worried that kids would make fun of her son if he started school with ill fitting clothes.
When she called I put her in touch with a local evangelical church that had a benevolence center in the same county where she lived, although not in the same neighborhood.Â
But the church refused to help her because she lived a few miles beyond their serving area. I was flabbergasted because the church and its benevolence center were located in a very affluent community where most folks wanted for nothing. This church refused to give her assistance, they claimed, because she  didn’t live close enough for them to disciple, even though they admittedly had the means to help.
Now, people travel from miles around to attend this mega church that hosts the benevolence center. The pastor’s sermons are broadcast on a radio program with a stalwart signal throughout a major metropolitan area, inviting people to visit his church. I know for a fact they would never refuse a donation if it came from someone who didn’t live in the same neighborhood.Â
But yet they turned away a poor woman because she wasn’t a viable candidate for discipleship. She would be too hard to track after they met her need, I was told. They preferred to spend their time and resources on people who were willing to be discipled over the long haul.  My client was denied help because she was deemed a bad risk for discipleship purposes. This benevolence, if you can call it that, was dispensed with firm conditions.
I learned a lot that day about the benevolence center not being benevolent as in being a true blessing to others. Benevolence center is a misnomer in this case and the building should be aptly named the Discipleship Center since charitable giving is contingent upon the poor qualifying as discipleship material.Â
“Or what man is there among you who, when his son asks for a loaf, will give him a stone?”
They didn’t even offer her a stone. They didn’t even refer her to another agency or put the word out among church members for my client’s plea for her son. Ironically I contacted a local chapter of the unsaved Jewish Family Services and a main line denomination Christian Caring Center that agreed to help with no strings attached and without an agenda for church discipleship.
There’s always an agenda with hard line evangelicals. Its the old bait and switch no matter how you look at it.They will say they are motivated by compassion lest anyone perish without being saved, but such compassion, if you will, is fraught with all kinds of spiritual arrogance. I’ll act as if I love you so you will let me disciple you! Love for the sake of love seldom happens for the other. Sounds pretty conditional, more than that, it’s misleading.Â
If I had known that the benevolence center was a store front for recruiting disciples, I never would have contacted them in the first place. Such subterfuge is disrespectful and condescending to the people who come there for help. Where’s the unconditional love?
While I don’t begrudge a church or charitable center for having rules and guidelines by which they must operate, I do take exception about them claiming to be something they are not though, agents of the unconditional love of Christ.Â
Do what you have to do, follow your rules, recruit more people, help those you deem worthy, reject those who are not worthy of your help, but don’t do it in the name of God’s love.Â
Because it has nothing to do with love. It has to do with your program and whatever power you wield to run your program.Â
Don’t sucker people into believing your church offers them love when you are really trading goods for potential church membership in one of the wealthiest communities in the state. Feel good about using material goods to draw the have-nots into your sphere of influence and through the doors of your church. Any ad agency will tell you it’s the American way, but it is not the gospel, the good news of God’s unconditional love.
When I entered the evangelical church, I was hungry for God’s love. I wanted something real, something good that could sustain me through my life now and perhaps in the one to come. I must admit that I never really understood what accepting Jesus was, and was never so certain as other folks seemed to be about being saved. Some essential ingredient to unconditional love was missing.Â
 In the end, being saved was a blend of arrogance and narcissism, and a religious way of covering my own ass. As an evangelical, I don’t think I learned to love others well, which seems in retrospect to be more important than personal salvation.
I think now that it is the work of a lifetime to accept Jesus and to love like He loved. If God is worth pursuing, it can only be because He really does offer us unconditional love, regardless of who we are or what we believe. I have faith that God’s love does surpass all human understanding and eliminates no one. Love must act and look like Love or it isn’t Love at all.Â
As I gradually turned away from the evangelical church with more questions than answers, I felt at last, authentic.Â
What if Jesus came to show us that love is truly its own reward? What a surprise to learn that I am excited to find out.













