faelight as horses. if you even care
YOU ARE THE REASON
Cosimo Galluzzi

#extradirty
taylor price

blake kathryn

Andulka
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Sweet Seals For You, Always

izzy's playlists!
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!

ellievsbear

No title available

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Sade Olutola
cherry valley forever
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
RMH
KIROKAZE
Show & Tell
seen from Monaco

seen from Finland

seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Spain

seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from Indonesia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Bangladesh
@wolf1578
faelight as horses. if you even care
some elf bullshit happened
The Silmarillion Abridged
It is hard to wash the blood off your hands if the water is full of it...
Some more dark folkloric Maglor for @tolkienhorrorweek !! I made another illustration of this same concept before -- but I had this other sketch in the WIP back-burner as well, and what better time to finish it but now, during the spookiest time of the year! Look at him scarily hiding in the shadows...
As always, kudos to the lovely @silme-lorien for coming up with the original concept, and for the inspiration!
Photo from Pacific Whale Research
Was having Elwing and Eärendil Feelings after reading this excellent post from @riding-with-the-wild-hunt and it coincided with me wanting to attempt my more realistic style with watercolour brushes instead of oils. Eärendil beard justification: he was a sailor, buddies with Cirdan, and 'his heart was with men' and most importantly, is my monkey in my circus. Also, he's meant to closely resemble my Elrond, just blonde and sunburned.
Words from my Elwing fic, she that was young and fair.
art commission info
Galadriel and the Two Trees :)
MAEDHROS FËANORIAN: Treelit Little Shit Era
The very lovely @feyandferal commissioned me for a portrait of Maedhros during the Years of the Trees, and even better, let his hair take centre stage! So for your enjoyment and his, enjoy Maedhros in his prime arrogant prince era, the little smirk of a man who has never heard the word ‘no’ in his life. His hair as vivid as I can get it, because this is a man who was pretty much called ‘carrot top’ for half his life 😭
Pictured here contemplating how to get you involved in his campaign against anti-redhead sentiment in Valinor (there is none: he’s just annoyed his dad was running around after Galadriel’s hair as if he isn’t right there with an even better mane, which spent even longer in Treelight, Atya 😡)
Thank you so much for commissioning him, Arte!
COMMISSION INFO HERE, 3 SLOTS LEFT
"maedhros should be known for something in tirion other than being pretty--"
make him invent library concepts and interlibrary loans and cataloguing languages. this man begs for the library. he yearns for it. the library as a concept may have existed but they were all private libraries. special libraries. you know what maedhros should do? invent the fucking public library.
FINROD FELAGUND [MARK II]
A pretty rushed piece that I started because I wanted to try out some specific lighting directions (essentially light being ‘caught’ by golden hair, then strained and refracted and thus the lit side of the face seeming shadowed and vice versa) with it, and midway through I decided it would be very fun if Finrod was re-embodied with his monsterfucking werewolf-killing scars!
Man’s truly been through the wringer and came out hotter for it. Everyone say thank you Mr Werewolf for the sexy little snarl 😇
commission info etc
Aredhel Ar-Feiniel & Maeglin in Nan Elmoth
Cirdan actually found Gil-Galad as a baby playing amongst the rotisserie chicken at his local costco
#ereinion because he was sitting on a bag of king's Hawaiian rolls (@thecactifindahome)
Hey btw, another worldbuilding thing: You can, and actually should have weird and impractical cultural things. They’re not inherently unrealistic, for as long as you address the realistic consequences as well.
Let’s say you’ve got a city where there’s tame white doves everywhere. They’re not pests, they’re regarded as sacred, holy protectors of the city, and the whole city cares for them and feeds them like they’re pets. They’re so tame because it’s a social taboo to hurt or scare one. Nice pretty doves :)
Then someone points out that even if they’re not seen as pests, doesn’t having a completely unchecked feral pigeon population - that not only isn’t being culled, but actively fed and cared for - mean that there would be bird shit absolutely all over the place?
A part of you wants to say no, because these are your nice, pretty doves. To explain that there’s a reason why they’re not shitting all over the place, maybe they’re super-intelligent and specifically bred and trained to not shit all over the place. The logistics of how, exactly, could anyone breed and train a flock of feral birds go unaddressed.
An even worse solution would be to not have those birds, editing them out of the world. No, they spark joy, you can’t just toss them out!
Now, consider: Yes, yes they would, but the city also has an extensive public sanitation service that’s occupied 90% of the time by cleaning bird shit off of everything. One of the most common last names in the area actually translates to “one who scrapes off dove shit”, and it’s a highly respected occupation. And thanks to the sheer necessity of constantly regularly cleaning everything, the city enjoys a much higher standard of cleanliness, and less public health issues caused by poor public sanitation.
The doves do protect the city. By shitting fucking everywhere.
While I absolutely love your idea, I just want to say that you can easily reduce public bird shitting from Pigeons by offering them comfortable lodgings where they can sleep and feed. Sure, you need to clean THOSE, but the pigeons shit a lot less all over town.
The Augsburg concept has one big pigeon house every 500m in which wild pigeons are fed, protected from weather and have nesting opportunities. Cities doing that have WAY less uncontrolled populations (since they can take out eggs if they feel they need reduce the population), way less shit AND a healthy population since it’s easier for veterinarians to notice and get to sick animals.
So I’d say one can of course still keep your general idea……but there’s also those MASSIVE palace-like pidgeon houses and only the most worthy are allowed to enter and directly interact with the pigeons (feed them, heal them, clean their lodgings). One big entrance for the human servants (priests??) and millions of small holes for the pigeons.
In fact, one could potentially turn your idea around IN THE PIDGEONS FAVOR. So your world is like ours and most major cities have a big feral pigeon population. And most of those cities HATE the pigeons and try to fight them and stuff. And they think that pigeon worshipper town is frigging cuckoo. BUT when comparing, then pigeon worshipper town is ridiculously clean and beautiful. No bird shit everywhere, no ruined house facades and statues from erosion through bird poop. Pigeon haters go “how tf are you so clean, you have birds EVERYWHERE???” and the worshippers shrug and show their little bird temples spread around town that keep their precious birdies AND their town pretty.
I think this is a really good example of how research can greatly improve your worldbuilding! You don’t have to be perfectly accurate - it is fantasy after all - but the real world is so much more clever and beautiful than any of us know
advice that’s stuck with me: you don’t have to work inwards to justify a premise (e.g., ‘how would it ever be plausible to use snakes as currency’) as long as you work outwards in interesting ways from that premise (e.g., ‘how would a society that used snakes as currency look different? what would they use for wallets?’)
I love this idea that OP thought there wasn’t a town that had already handled it’s “We fucking love birds you guys, like for fucking reals” problem already through sheer human chutzpah.
Humans are THE pack binding specie. A way will be found.
Green Sea Turtle (Chelonia mydas), family Cheloniidae, Gujarat, India
ENDANGERED.
photograph by Aadit Patel
I've seen a bunch of really bad takes going around about internet safety, how parents/adults have a responsibility to shepherd everyone else's kids, and how it's all just "stranger danger" again when you don't want to give out personal information.
Stranger Danger from an 80s - 90s kid who lived it
We talked to strangers. We talked to a LOT of strangers. We just knew how to do it safely.
"Don't talk to strangers" was not about never talking to people you didn't know. It was largely about sussing out appropriate help. For instance when I was little, I was always told that if I got lost in a store, I should go to the front of the store, find the checkout counter or customer service desk and ask for help, NOT just walk up to some random person in the store. When I was older I was taught that if I felt unsafe while walking alone I should duck into a store and ask the employees there to call my mom (remember, no cell phones).
I was taught to be very wary of someone randomly coming up to me to offer food or gifts andnot to get in a car with someone I didn't know who offered a ride, which if you think about it if you've ever been in a major city is a good way to avoid a lot of scams, not just kidnapping. It helped me at various points in my childhood learn to avoid religious missionaries on the street (no, I do NOT want that Watchtower, no, I do NOT want to come into your church, thanks). I was also taught not to open the door of our apartment for strangers, which is again a good way to avoid religious proselytizers and salespeople, as well as anyone who possibly might be casing your home.
The idea was to a) have a plan to ask for help, b) develop some discernment on WHO to ask for help, c) have some awareness that every single person you met might not have your best interests at heart. All of those things are still really important to know. The phrase "I don't talk to strangers" was an easy way to convey "I don't know you and I do not have enough information to decide if you are someone I should talk to right now," not "every stranger is going to kidnap me."
Kids in the 1980s and 1990s when "stranger danger" was a thing had a hell of a lot more freedom to interact with strangers than kids now - many if not most of us went places alone, took mass transit alone, carried out errands, stayed out with our friends all day, were sometimes home alone, and knew how to handle that. A fair number of the friends I had in my childhood were other kids that I randomly started talking to at the park, or wandering my neighborhood - I talked to strangers and made friends, in other words.
That also translated to being online. There were a lot of message boards, forums and websites for various interests, and people could and did just show up there and start talking to others who shared those interests. Some friendships that have endured 20 years or longer for me started when we both were in a forum talking about a band we both liked, or a movie we'd seen. We talked to strangers. We talked to a LOT of strangers. We just knew how to do it safely.
Being anonymous online
"Oh, we used to know not to give out personal information online and now every site wants it!" is not a misguided "stranger danger save the kids from mean adults!" thing.
EVERYONE was told that. ADULTS were told that.
A lot of the desire for you to use your real name and personal information online is for marketing and database creation. They want to know your interests and online activity so they can develop a better marketing profile for you. Why the hell do you THINK every company now wants you to use their app and tie it to your phone number? That's all valuable, sellable data for data brokers and marketers. YOU are the commodity. That data is also now potentially being used for things like ICE.
Using your real name online has led to people being fired, being rejected from colleges, etc. for nothing more than, say, being photographed drinking beer at a party or identifying as LGBT+. It's been used to take away people's disability benefits because they posted a photo where they smiled (yes, literally, this has been used against people) or didn't "look sick." Yes, it has also been used to identify people on the other side, but there's a cost to that. When your entire life is public and you have no privacy, there's a cost.
There actually IS a higher level of risk disclosing personal information online than there is in person. In your personal life you're unlikely to have literally a million people calling you or showing up at your door to scream homophobic insults, for example. That shit can and does happen online because more people have access to you. Internet trolls are a thing, and we can't pretend they are not. Things like swatting happen. If you're under an anonymous name on a fan site, that likely will not translate to being targeted in real life. If you're using your real name, disclosing where you live, your school or employer and your daily schedule as you live stream, it's a hell of a lot more likely that will translate to people harassing you offline, and that's happened.
At the time we were being told to guard our personal information, there were a LOT of dedicated, moderated places for children and teens to gather online and interact with others. Geocities, a website where you could create a free little website for yourself, had a children's section. There were Club Penguin, Yahooligans, and a lot of other websites specifically for kids and teens.
There was also software like Net Nanny that parents could install on their home computers that blocked access to certain sites or keywords, meaning it WAS taken as parents' responsibility to keep their kids safe. At the same time, with things like cable television, you could block certain stations to prevent your kids from watching them.
People did talk about themselves. People had websites about themselves and their likes, they wrote about their day on Livejournal or reviews movies they liked on whatever website existed for that. They interacted. The difference was that every single thing they did, every single place they went, every financial transaction, was not posted for the world.
Adults online do have a responsibility, in my opinion, to label and warn - tags and ratings on fanfiction; NSFW warnings on images; notices about flashing lights; etc. but again that is for everyone, not just kids. That 60 year old may not want to get fired because a nude image randomly popped up on an otherwise innocuous feed. That college student may not want to be triggered reading a fanfic about a topic they really need to avoid. That does not mean there is not responsibility on the parents' end about their children. Maybe, just maybe, your six year old does not fucking need a cell phone with open access to the internet and social media. Maybe we should not be encouraging young people to put their entire lives online with no privacy, no room to make mistakes, and a drive for likes and favorites instead of actual engagement with others. That shit is a hell of a lot more toxic than "stranger danger" ever could be.
FRIEDA LEPOLD 'Frosty' Cape 2026 if you want to support this blog consider donating to: ko-fi.com/fashionrunways
Blacktober day 6 !
Today I give you everyone’s favourite elf, Legolas ! Who is the one and only prince in Middle Earth and that is enough to wear a majestic crown
Details
Chinese hanfu in wuxia style