Ryan Gosling as Ryland Grace PROJECT HAIL MARY 2026 — dir. Phil Lord and Christopher Miller
Game of Thrones Daily

if i look back, i am lost
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
official daine visual archive
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Show & Tell

shark vs the universe
NASA

ellievsbear
hello vonnie
Mike Driver
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

JVL
Misplaced Lens Cap

pixel skylines
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

#extradirty
d e v o n

Origami Around

No title available
seen from South Africa
seen from Russia
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Türkiye

seen from Sweden

seen from Italy

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Australia
seen from Israel
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from Armenia
seen from Hong Kong SAR China

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from China

seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
@wonderofthenight
Ryan Gosling as Ryland Grace PROJECT HAIL MARY 2026 — dir. Phil Lord and Christopher Miller
everybody: hello ryland you are now the Main Character ryland: Yikes!! No Thanks!
*presses a button and everything stays the same except now stranger things ended after one season in 2016 and is remembered fondly as a great miniseries and nothing more*
Viggo Mortensen as Aragorn LOTR: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001), dir. Peter Jackson
Steve Harrington + Weapons
“I am,” he whispers, “the monster I warned you against. “You are,” I say hoarsely, “the monster I claim.” —s. jae-jones.
happy holidays, @keikuns! from your @animangasecretsanta.
Judy:*exists
Nick: 🥰
I love their friendship!
i always click the "track package" button as soon as i get the email. "oh boy i wonder where my package is!" warehouse.
wheres seasons greasons
its that time of year again
It doesn’t have to be
its not optional
Goncharov (1973)
This was such a great fucking movie.
We really don't talk enough about Goncharov on this site.
happy Halloweeeen
My babies
gun to my head, had you asked me who i thought sevro would grow up to be while i was still reading the first red rising book, not in a million years would i have guessed girl dad married to an amazonian queen.
Diomedes and and Sevro my favourite war criminals
saja boys
I think the Hunger Games series sits in a similar literary position to The Lord of the Rings, as a piece of literature (by a Catholic author) that sparked a whole new subgenre and then gets blamed for flaws that exist in the copycat books and aren’t actually part of the original.
Like, despite what parodies might say, Katniss is nowhere near the stereotypical “unqualified teenager chosen to lead a rebellion for no good reason”. The entire point is that she’s not leading the rebellion. She’s a traumatized teenager who has emotional reactions to the horrors in her society, and is constantly being reined in by more experienced adults who have to tell her, “No, this is not how you fight the government, you are going to get people killed.” She’s not the upstart teenager showing the brainless adults what to do–she’s a teenager being manipulated by smarter and more experienced adults. She has no power in the rebellion except as a useful piece of propaganda, and the entire trilogy is her straining against that role. It’s much more realistic and far more nuanced than anyone who dismisses it as “stereotypical YA dystopian” gives it credit for.
And the misconceptions don’t end there. The Hunger Games has no “stereotypical YA love triangle”–yes, there are two potential love interests, but the romance is so not the point. There’s a war going on! Katniss has more important things to worry about than boys! The romance was never about her choosing between two hot boys–it’s about choosing between two diametrically opposed worldviews. Will she choose anger and war, or compassion and peace? Of course a trilogy filled with the horrors of war ends with her marriage to the peace-loving Peeta. Unlike some of the YA dystopian copycats, the romance here is part of the message, not just something to pacify readers who expect “hot love triangles” in their YA.
The worldbuilding in the Hunger Games trilogy is simplistic and not realistic, but unlike some of her imitators, Collins does this because she has something to say, not because she’s cobbling together a grim and gritty dystopia that’s “similar to the Hunger Games”. The worldbuilding has an allegorical function, kept simple so we can see beyond it to what Collins is really saying–and it’s nothing so comforting as “we need to fight the evil people who are ruining society”. The Capitol’s not just the powerful, greedy bad guys–the Capitol is us, First World America, living in luxury while we ignore the problems of the rest of the world, and thinking of other nations largely in terms of what resources we can get from them. This simplistic world is a sparsely set stage that lets us explore the larger themes about exploitation and war and the horrors people will commit for the sake of their bread and circuses, meant to make us think deeper about what separates a hero from a villain.
There’s a reason these books became a literary phenomenon. There’s a reason that dozens upon dozens of authors attempted to imitate them. But these imitators can’t capture that same genius, largely because they’re trying to imitate the trappings of another book, and failing to capture the larger and more meaningful message underneath. Make a copy of a copy of a copy, and you’ll wind up with something far removed from the original masterpiece. But we shouldn’t make the mistake of blaming those flaws on the original work.