I think it's very telling that when we discuss threats to transmasc lives- like forced pregnancy- it is seen as a refutation if someone can counter by pointing out the non-life-threatening issues the same would create for trans women. And yet the lack of life-threatening consequences is NEVER seen as proof of trans men being oppressed, let alone as badly as trans women.
For example: if a trans woman says that the alt-right wants trans women dead, and a trans man pipes up that the alt-right wants trans men detransitioned, the trans man is inevitably told that he is still privileged, because merely being detransitioned is better than being dead. The fact that he could live at all in this scenario is a privilege trans men have over trans women.
And yet, when trans men point out that abortion bans could kill them, as pregnancy is quite literally a life-threatening event, trans women can say "this affects us too- someone could babytrap us!" and that is seen as enough to prove that trans men aren't actually the ones suffering from abortion bans more. The fact that trans women do not face any threat to life after being babytrapped is NOT seen as a privilege. And if you do succeed in making them drop the babytrapping issue, they'll instead say that they could be forced to detransition on the grounds that a child, quote, "needs a mother and a father." And here, detransitioning while staying alive is suddenly, magically, not a form of privilege held over someone who could die.
Transandrophobes are playing a never-ending game of Calvinball.
