Ok so I’m not being critical of Crowley’s decision here— I’m discussing the way it was presented to the audience.
Right so in this interview (<https://michaelmarshallsmith.substack.com/p/in-conversation-with-lisa-morton>) with Michael Marshall Smith. This paragraph is immediately after he discusses GO3 — i believe he’s still essentially talking about go3 here:
In my personal opinion fandom wars sometimes happen in part because something was left ambiguous.
In certain cases possibly something that maybe should have been less ambiguous?
I know the trend against subtext and towards wanting everything to be super duper spelled out is bad; and I don’t think there’s anything wrong with leaving some things up to interpretation.
That said, i personally think caution needs to be taken that — while one can justifiably use these arguments in cases where people are overreacting to a reasonable level of ambiguity — it can also be used to explain away ambiguity or plotholes where they maybe shouldn’t be.
God said “What do you want? Do you want me to put everything back the way it was?”
Now canon does explicitly tell us that the old universe as is does not have true free will—the game is rigged etc.
From what I have seen one major contribution to the divide we are currently seeing is the fact that many fans do not feel satisfactorily convinced of the following:
“Can the old universe be brought back — and can we find a way where humanity is free/has free will moving forward in that original universe (everyone lives, memories intact)?”
Now i understand that for many who like the finale the answer to this question is intuitively obvious, which is totally cool!
I would gently submit however that if a strong enough percentage of the fandom do not feel that canon sufficiently answers this question — that that may in fact mean that canon did not sufficiently answer it.
This is an extremely important question for many who did not like the ending because we are talking about billions of souls
While we understand that in the bookshop scene those souls (that were erased by Michael) do not presently exist.
Many of us also feel God saying: “What do you want? Do you want me to put everything back the way it was?” arguably at least raises the question of whether those millions of erased souls can/should be restored
This is not explicitly addressed in canon:
Whether the universe and souls can actually be restored.
Whether there is a way to satisfactorily solve the free will problem within the old universe.
And that i think more than anything is one of the single biggest causes of this particular divide we find ourselves in.
(I will remind here that from “what do you want?” To the end of the scene (into the Big Bang) Aziracrow do not explicitly mention anything at all about saving the old souls. God might have saved them through reincarnation but that was not explicitly negotiated by Aziracrow)
Is it possible that “can free will be fixed in the old universe” didn’t occur to anyone involved in the production? Maybe. I certainly know that many who love the ending were surprised the very first time they heard this question.
That said I was already asking this exact question on May13th before the credits even started rolling. I mean to say, I did not fully process my first viewing of Asanthony’s meet-cute because my brain was still too busy puzzling about “why didn’t they ask to bring back the old universe but just like abolish the afterlife and turn everyone human?” And just 5 days later Sendarya posted a video with the exact same line of thought:
<https://youtu.be/rC0BlZSw7T4?is=gy3RONq7xN7HQXJ0>
So I personally find it hard to believe that no one involved in the production at any point had the thought (even in passing) of whether some fans might wonder why not “restore the old universe in a way that fixes the free will problem”
I understand and respect leaving things ambiguous and up to interpretation. It can be a great narrative device that can be very effective.
Where I feel there is a misstep is that this question specifically maybe shouldn’t be left ambiguous?
And the reason why is that if there was a way to restore billions of erased souls — I’m not going to say that you have to save them — but I think it at least warrants having an explicit conversation thats acknowledging the question
And if the answer is “it is not possible to have God restore the billions of erased souls for xyz reason” then I think that is really worth making it into the explicit text.
I think that’s the biggest writing mistake in the finale and honestly one of the biggest causes of this divide. I personally think some things do really actually need to be explicit text.
Now if canon had explicitly answered that question would it completely solve the divide? Honestly probably not. But i can tell you as someone who didn’t like the ending — I personally think the overall temperature might have been at least a few degrees less hot.






















