[crescencestudio]

winner of the bunny poll. i'm going to start leaving this bitch off the polls | pose credit: @pu_huk.

WE REACHED 60 REVIEWS ON STEAM!!!! Technically, 50 reviews is the big milestone since that's when you get the Very Positive rating instead of just Positive. but still YAAAAYYY

Reaching this does good for the game on the steam algorithm (so i hear), so it's really exciting to have reached it so soon after release! if you haven't gotten the chance to leave a review yet, please consider doing so to help the game reach more people <3 even if it's short, each one counts and goes a long way!!!

thank you so much to everyone who has been playing and enjoying so far---it's meant the world to see people play it and fall in love with the same (or new) characters!!!

[actorsallusionpresents]

Test

Test post

[another-exclus]

Everything is like “QUEER history” and “List of QUEER young adult books” or “Top 10 QUEER movies” and queer this and queer that and for the love of god please just say LGBT.

But queer is more inclusive

[a-tired-humanist]

And faster to pronounce if you are talking instead of writing.

[another-exclus]

It’s not more inclusive, and if your excuse of using a slur as a blanket term is “it’s faster to say”, GENUINELY what is wrong with you

[a-tired-humanist]

It’s called economía del lenguaje.

It’s also the respected academic term?? The acronym isn’t static and it’s usage is varied by things like generational difference, location, and knowledge of the community. Even just in the U.S. in the last few decades the common usage gone from GLBT to LGBT to LGBTQ, to LGBTQA/LGBTQIA/LGBTQIAP/etc (Which, let me tell you as someone who has given presentations in the past using these updated acronyms, are all real mouthfulls), to LGBT+.

Also yes, queer is more inclusive! Especially coming at it from an academic standpoint, people didn’t always use or identify with the terms we use now and you can’t always try to cram them into our modern perceptions of sexuality. We can argue for years about whether a famous historical figure was gay or bisexual or straight and trans or whatever, but if we can all agree that they were somehow queer then using that term allows us to move past the debate and into productive discussion. And not everybody everywhere shares the same terms for sexual and gender identity, or even the same concepts of those things, so queer really is a more inclusive term in a lot of cases.

Like yeah if you’re talking specifically about gay or trans people you can just say gay or transgender, but if you’re talking about more than one identity or someone who doesn’t conform to our perceptions of ‘LGBT,’ or a person or people whose identity you don’t know, queer is just the better word.

[jabberwockypie]

“That’s SO gay”, “Oh my god, you’re not a LESBIAN, are you?”

Your words are slurs, too. Why do you get your words, but I don’t get mine? What makes you so special?

I’m here, I’m queer, go fuck yourself.

[levynite]

queer is not a slur, stop drinking the TERF koolaid

[darthsuki]

[matronofthevoid]

every time one of you fools spout about ‘queer is a slur’ a terf laughs because their fucking plan to make that word ‘taboo’ is fucking working you dipshit.

[letmetellyouaboutmyfeels]

I did not get my degree in queer literature for you all to keep pulling this bullshit.

[moki-dokie]

baby gays,,,, i beg of you to learn your queer history and stop listening to terf bullshit

every single one of our labels has been used as a slur against us.

terfs and -phobes are always going to try and hurt us with what we identify as. but the fact remains these are OUR labels and always have been.

we’re here, we’re queer, get used to it.

[hyperactivehedgehog]

I don’t know if this is just because I’m not American but I’ve never heard queer used as a slur. Ever. Meanwhile gay was the insult in the 2000s here. Everything you didn’t like was ‘soo gay’. Queer wasn’t even a word most of us knew back then.

It just baffled me that people would think an identifier is automatically a slur just because someone uses it to mock someone. If we did that gay would be a slur. Stupid would be a slur. Autistic would be a slur.

The reason people are upset about the word queer is that it’s a unifying term. You can say you’re queer and all people will know is that you’re part of the community. But you can’t say you’re LGBT, you have to say you’re gay or trans or ace. They don’t want you to be ambiguously queer. They want you to say which kind of queer you are so they can decide whether you’re undesirable.

[tapacamino]

yeah in the 90s and early 2000s kids would call each other “gay” as an insult. But no one ties themselves in knots over whether “gay” is a slur. So yeah, please ffs learn your history.

[anarchistmemedistro]

[rabidchild67]

They want you to say which kind of queer you are so they can decide whether you’re undesirable.

[actorsallusionpresents]

Man, people really getting tied up in knots about something that hasn't really been properly used as a slur since before the 1990's.

[velinxi]

One cheese omelet, a blueberry waffle, and all your hashbrowns, please

[featherfangart]

The Morning After

A doodle for the soul...

[featherfangart]

The Haircut

Remember the reading short comic? Fenris receiving the letter? He sure didn't take that one well and he's on a mission now...

[featherfangart]

'It's not too late to learn, Fenris'

[ikimaru]

getting a bit handsyy

[ikimaru]

oh, to be a cat

[elibvn]

[aedensolus]

Nothing to see here, just a routine hard reset.

Pasqal is very meticulous about the care and keeping of anything in his domain, including skitarii, and Scaeralvi is a unique specimen with particular needs.

Scaeralvi belongs to @aethersflames

[grapebats]

been overdosing on that medieval yaoi cocaine lately ⚔️

[aedensolus]

Two more ArtFights, for @bearlyfunctioning and Lappazol!

[actorsallusionpresents]

So like, Fantasian Neo Dimension is a really weird game, because the main playable cast is really really well cast and performed in terms of their voice actors, but both of the main villains are kind of rough in terms of their performances? I'm wondering if part of it is that they had less lines, so I wonder if they had a shorter session and it was just very "get 'em in and out". It also really doesn't help that their performances keep switching between "okay they're supposed to be mannered and stoic" and "Oh, they're in grandiose JRPG villain mode".

[listen-to-the-inner-walrus]

Love it when Rolling Stone puts out an article about the 25 most influential internet creators and I've only heard of 7 of them

[dandelioncasey]

Well I've only heard of two so you're doing better than I am!

[listen-to-the-inner-walrus]

I'm curious now since tumblr.com is home to such a specific audience and the list seems to be full of TikTokers and Instagramers. Is Instagramers the word?

Out of Rolling Stone's 25 Most Influential Creators of 2024,

how many names do you recognise?

0

1-5

6-10

11-15

16-20

20-24

All 25

Voting ended onSep 4, 2024

reblog for a bigger sample size and also please tell me who, if any, you recognise?

[itsapmseymour]

Everyone is out here asking for hongabadoinkers, but where’s the

MEN

The big muscly

MEN

[afraidofamericans]

The absolute upper limit of what can be considered affordable for a home is 4x your income. Ideally it should be 3x, but 4x is the limit for reasonably stretching your budget.

Using Sacramento as an example, median home price is about $510k, and median household income is about $85,000

That number for Sacramento is 6x, and that's for a middling city with middling employment prospects. So the entire city for almost everyone living there is by definition unaffordable. And that's not as bad as it gets

Let's look at Toronto. Median income is around $91,000, median home price is just over $1,100,000. That's a ratio of 12:1. You would need to be making a quarter of a million dollars just to be able to qualify for a mortgage.

For a home to be affordable, one of two things need to happen: 1) incomes need to rise astronomically overnight or 2) home prices need to crash astronomically overnight

In Sacramento, that means the median income needs to double (to $170k per year), or home prices need to crash by 50%

In Toronto, that means incomes need to quadruple (to $370k per year) or home prices need to crash about 75%

This is how bad the housing crisis is. I don't think people truly understand the gravity of how bad it is. Home prices should not be this high. Incomes should not be this low. Look back 100 years and you won't find a time when affordability was this bad for everyone everywhere. Things must change