Claire Keane
Sade Olutola
NASA

Kiana Khansmith
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
🪼
One Nice Bug Per Day
will byers stan first human second
KIROKAZE
No title available
Keni
styofa doing anything

pixel skylines
todays bird
wallacepolsom

oozey mess
sheepfilms
trying on a metaphor

Kaledo Art
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Australia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Hong Kong SAR China

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Singapore

seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Switzerland

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Indonesia

seen from Australia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Sweden
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Singapore
@angrycrownoises
I am not a straight people.
Reblog if you are also not a straight people.
fool me once shame on you. fool me twice shame on me. fool me three times this has gotta be a sex thing for at least one of us
under US law, it's illegal for anyone who's not a member of a recognised native tribe to own an eagle feather. the penalty is a $100,000 fine.
14 years ago when I had recently moved to Alaska, I went hiking with an Aleut friend, and she pointed to a feather lying on the ground and said "hey that's a bald eagle tail feather, you should grab it!" and I was like "uhh I'm very white and that's very illegal" and she went "they're fuckin everywhere up here man. I have 20." so she grabs it off the ground and hands it to me and says "there, now it's a ceremonial gift from an indigenous person."
and I'm like, okay, cool, I guess this is how we do things in Alaska. nice.
so I keep this bald eagle tail feather around for years. display it in my home among other cherished memorabilia from places I've lived and visited, etc.
on a whim, I have just now looked it up. there is no exemption to that law for a ceremonial gift from an indigenous person. the last 7 years I lived in the US, I was technically a bald eagle poacher.
probably a good thing I don't intend to move back there anytime soon. I wonder what the statute of limitations is on bird crimes.
@freedomisscaryshit I'm fucking dying I think you forgot the word "feathers" in your tags?? or do you just wish you could grab whole ass eagles that land in your yard??
As an Indigenous person, it continues to astound me that there are such strict laws (written by White people) in our name, laws against...picking up things just found on the ground. Like, stop pretending this is "for" us. We don't want this.
so, for clarity, that's not what this is. the law against possessing feathers is an anti-poaching measure, derived from a North American treaty protecting certain migratory bird species from hunting. that treaty has an exemption for indigenous people to allow tribes that use eagle feathers in ceremonial or religious practices to continue doing so.
i used to collect feathers (illegally) as a teenager and the thing is that it's incredibly important for feathers from wild birds to be illegal to possess because it ensures that they never become fashionable to wear. the reason we passed the migratory bird act was because the american and european fashion industry was driving species to extinction in a timespan of years. not just decades. the ecological devastation of exporting birds for hats was absolutely insane and people were watching wetlands and forests and meadows just empty out in realtime. look at the wikipedia article for the plume trade.
the law against 'picking feathers up off the ground' means that you can't go shoot an eagle then sell the feathers on etsy by saying you 'just found them'. you can't own them no matter where they came from, which makes sure that they're not going to come from any birds killed and then secretly disposed of.
these laws, as harsh and ridiculous as they seem, saved flamingos, spoonbills, egrets, and all kinds of hawks and eagles from extinction. the minute these laws weaken and people can make money off killing them again, they're fucked.
this is one of those "no actually this regulation exists for a reason" laws much like work place safety and building fire codes (that Republicans keep trying to roll back) and is written in blood just like them as well. it's just not human blood this time, and the fact that people actually cared enough about long term future over short term profit to get it put in place is nothing short of astonishing. That it didn't get put in place in time to save several species is heart breaking.
Knights in Love
I have every word ever blocked. I could be mutuals with axe murderers and I wouldn't know because I have "#axe murdering" in my blocked tags. it's so peaceful here (hears a noise behind me) (doesn't turn around)
hey just so you know, op of that post you reblogged let the dogs out :/
who?
who?
I refuse to reblog callout posts because I'm a prison abolitionist
In all my years in this website, and I've been here a long time, I can't recall a single instance of a callout post leading to actual restitution for the victims of the alleged harm the person was accused of. Even in cases where the accusations were true. Even in cases where there was legitimate harm done to another person.
Remember the sixpencee child slave thing? What happened there, exactly? Was the kid freed? No? They were just run off the website? OK so what good exactly did that do?
Remember the bone stealing witch? What exactly did that witchhunt accomplish? The person got arrested, oh that's great, the american justice system surely rectified the situation
And again, those are instances where the accusations were true and involved real substantive harm to another person. We used to joke on here how callout posts were shit like "receipts below: [several paragraphs of petty fandom drama] [three paragraphs of petty interpersonal drama involving cheating on partners or stealing food out of the fridge or something] [fabricated evidence that the person is responsible for the murder of JonBenét Ramsey]"
And that was back in the 2010s. The meta has changed. Callouts used to be a tool people used to point out actual harm a person had done, rarely, and more commonly were used as a means of bullying somebody over petty drama. Nowadays they're used to manufacture outrage and harassment against marginalized populations. They are a weapon bigots use to turn us against each other. A few manufactured accusations here, some out of context or clipped screenshots there, and people who should be standing in solidarity with each other against white supremacy, patriarchy, cisheteronormativity, are instead devouring each other.
It's sinister as shit, dude, and people will still share these accusations without a second thought. So, why? What is the point? What's the best case scenario here? Raising "awareness?" what the fuck is that supposed to accomplish? Will we get the oh-so-trustworthy authorities involved? Are we hoping for an arrest? A conviction? Throwing a queer or poc person in prison so they can be abused and assaulted and humiliated behind bars? Is that who we are?
Callouts and the like don't serve any real good in the world. At a macro scale they divide us when we should be standing together, and at a micro scale they result in deeply traumatic never-ending harassment and threats and doxxing and worse to a person who almost definitely does not deserve it. And again, for what? A sense of "justice?" this is not justice. This is retribution. It is punishment.
It's fucking cop behavior, and I'm not gonna participate in it.
Where that New England Gothic post
my personal favorite
Thank you divorce for all you've done for music
sister post to this
everything can be about yuri if you have a pure heart and an imaginative mind
Now, all previous posting aside. Bruce Wayne arguing to a jury of his peers that a villain being ready to fight Batman in costume upon Batman's arrival isn't actually particularly good evidence that he did the specific thing that Batman was after him for? On the grounds that it's entirely rational for even a totally reformed villain who's gotten advance warning of Batman Being After Him For Something Really Bad to get ready for a really horrible fight? Because there's very little reason to assume that Batman in Righteous Crusader Mode is going to open with a friendly chat? All serving as a dialogue that Batman is having with himself about the moral veracity of his SOP if you take away the genre assumptions of his innate righteousness? Is a really really good beat
This whole arc is a little bit like the setup to Superior Spider-Man where, if you take the abrupt intrusion of real-world moral logic into the comic book power fantasy super seriously, it does a lot of damage going forwards and backwards to all of the stories that it's commenting on, where the realistic consequences didn't manifest despite it still being the same continuity. That said. Batman bribing his way onto the jury in order to talk-no-jitsu everyone else out of their culturally-inculcated worship of the idea of Batman is possibly the most Batman way possible for him to address this core tension at the heart of the genre. Can Batman, with Prep time, Beat the Cultural Specter of Batman. Can God Create A Rock So Heavy Even He Could Not Lift IT
Dmitry Khramtsov (Храм), “Eyelashes,” 2026
lets out one truly pitiful little whimper & then goes back to doing fucking whatever
Old foes
Always been a sucker for whales
Kaii Higashiyama, Sound of Waves