hello vonnie
Not today Justin
Today's Document
YOU ARE THE REASON
tumblr dot com
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Stranger Things

PR's Tumblrdome
cherry valley forever

No title available
we're not kids anymore.
dirt enthusiast
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

Product Placement

if i look back, i am lost
Cosimo Galluzzi

Kiana Khansmith
KIROKAZE

shark vs the universe

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from France

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Romania
seen from United States

seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Poland

seen from Türkiye
@bigbad1880
Petroglyphs of Sikachi-Alyan, Nanaian village
Deer friends thousands of years apart
Elk-figure from Åskollen, Drammen, Norway.
Petroglyph of Sikachi-Alyan under the snow
i dont read comics but i think dc should create a new role called the Crazyperson Advisor and hire one for every writer. the crazyperson advisor has read and memorized every comic ever and can tell the writer when something contradicts established canon and how. obviously comics canon is at this point so convoluted and contradictory that it would be impossible to never write something that doesnt follow it but i think it would be good if it only happened on purpose. also i think it would make my mutuals make posts like “did timothy jones fucking kill his crazyperson advisor is that how this happened” and “i am going to kiss the green lantern 2030 crazyperson advisor on the mouth for this reference to the 1954 martian manhunter” and i think that would be fun. i would like to see them.
At Marvel his name was Mark Gruenwald, an Executive Editor (eventually) whose knowledge of Marvel continuity was so vast and wide ranging that there used to be a communal trivia challenge at annual comic-cons, where he would personally take on all comers who would try to stump him. I think he was stumped something like once or twice in MANY yeras of these events.
Marvel still refers to him as the "Patron Saint of Marveldom"
Some poor brave fool: No one knows more about Marvel trivia than me
Mark Gruenwald: (ง •̀_•́)ง
The BEST thing about this is the fact he was so good at his job, HIS FACE is the inspiration for Mobius of the Time Variance Authority, whose job it is to police continuity.
He was literally the lore-cop in and out of universe. Legend.
Oh my god I was just looking to see how much a copy of Hamlet would be through Barnes and Noble and PEOPLE ARE ROLEPLAYING WARRIOR CATS IN THE REVIEWS??????
@vriska
ok i was VERY involved in the. b&n reviews warrior cats roleplay scene when i was like 10-12. the first two books of the series were general hubs where ppl would post ads for their clans and other groups. there was a huge percy jackson community i remember participating in too. it worked through search results, eg. riverclan might be under the search result “rivers”. book 1 was rules and a “map”, book 2 might be the main area, book 3 the medicine cats tent, etc. there was also usually a book where ppl would post lengthy descriptions of their character(s). it was a rlly bizarre little corner of the internet jdksj also it was impossible to find any real reviews of any of the warrior cats books bc of it
this is unironically kind of cool
I rbed this silently but I think I've gotta answer some questions now. I was a big part of this whole thing and the reason we didn't use forums was because 90% of us didn't have normal internet access. Barnes and Noble had an e-reader that could connect to the internet and reach their digital store, which was great for those of us with controlling parents who only let us read books.
I want to go back in time and write my doctoral dissertation on this
Can you tell us a little bit about weird elephant relatives?
I can tell you a lot about weird elephant relatives.
(Image by Yathin S. Krishnappa)
The two extant genera of elephants - Elephas (the Asian elephants) and Loxodonta (the African elephants) - are the only living representatives of the order Proboscidea. Their closest living relatives are the members of the order Sirenia - manatees and dugongs - and the two groups are believed to have shared a common ancestor.
Keep reading
Talk about Parasaurolophus!
(Parasaurolophus, by Steveoc 86.)
Parasaurolophus was a hadrosaur from the Late Cretaceous of the western United States and Alberta, Canada. Its most distinctive feature is its tubular head crest, which was formed from the bones of its skull. Charonosaurus, another hadrosaur that lived slightly later in China, had a very similar crest, and was very closely related to Parasaurolophus.
(Charonosaurus, by Kana-hebi.)
The purpose of this crest was once a subject of great debate. It was theorized to have been a snorkel used for breathing underwater, but it lacked the proper nostril placements. It was also thought to have been connected to the neck with a flap of skin or mass of muscle, used to display to mates or support the neck. However, this would have greatly impeded its neck mobility.
The crest is believed to have served a function of recognition, with subtle differences between individuals serving to distinguish sexes and species. It also may have been used for thermoregulation, helping to cool the brain. However, it had another function that may have been even more surprising.
Tubular passages traveled from Parasaurolophus’s nostrils, up the interior of the crest, and down into the skull. It’s believed that these tubes were used for vocal amplification, increasing the volume of its calls.
By creating a 3D model of the interior of a Parasaurolophus skull, scientists have managed to replicate what the animal might have sounded like. The result is a supremely haunting noise. Imagine this sound echoing across the fields and valleys of Late Cretaceous New Mexico!
(Image by James Kuether)
All the pictures, museum exhibitions, sculptures and animations of Quetzalcoatlus suggest it must be a well-understood animal, but it's actually very difficult to provide consultancy on, for several related issues. The first is that the science on the animal itself is unfinished, largely unpublished, and the existing body of work is decades old.
Quetzalcoatlus, commonly dubbed as “the largest flying animal ever,” is not exactly what the media think it is. Despite its celebrity status, the scientific understanding of this pterosaur is far from complete.
Crocodylo-Month Bonus: Modern Crocodilians
(Image from Wikimedia Commons)
The crocodilians have taken a long, strange journey from the Permian period to today. They began as a massively diverse group of reptiles that inhabited every ecological niche imaginable; now they only occupy semi-aquatic ambush predator niches, but are so effective at what they do that it seems unlikely that they will be dethroned anytime soon. Hundreds of different groups of crocodylomorphs once existed, but today there are only three families: Crocodylidae, Alligatoridae, and Gavialidae.
Keep reading
Prehistoric Pokemon: Omanyte and Omastar/Ammonites
If you’re not familiar with how the Pokemon games operate: Pokemon are usually found and caught in the wild, by wandering around in environments where they’d appear. This is not always the case, however, and one exception is the fossil Pokemon. These Pokemon actually originate as fossilized specimens, which can be brought back to life through science-fiction technology.
The first generation of Pokemon games - Red, Blue, and Yellow - introduced three evolutionary lines of fossil Pokemon, none of which, surprisingly enough, were based on dinosaurs. You’d think it would be obvious, but a lot of non-fossil first-gen Pokemon were dinosaur-like to begin with.
The first-ever fossil Pokemon, Omanyte, has a pretty obvious basis - an ammonite! It’s right in the name!
(The ammonite Asteroceras, by Nobu Tamura.)
Ammonites (subclass Ammonoidea) were cephalopoid molluscs related to octopodes, squid, and cuttlefish. They are distinguished from modern cephalopods by their shells. Although the shell was likely useful for protection, this wasn’t its main purpose; it was filled with a number of empty chambers that could be filled with water and vented, allowing the ammonite to increase and decrease its weight to adjust its height in the water.
Since the soft portions of ammonites almost never fossilize, paleontologists must attempt to figure out the habits and behavior of these animals from their shells alone. However, even with such incomplete evidence, it’s apparent that the ammonites were a highly successful group of animals, and came in all shapes and sizes to fill a diverse set of niches. Some ammonites had lightweight shells that were laterally flattened like the bodies of fish, enabling rapid movement through the water; others had thicker, heavier shells suited to a more bottom-dwelling lifestyle. The shells themselves took on numerous odd shapes; while the stereotypical ammonite possesses a tight “ram’s-horn” coil, some had helix-coils like snails, and others were perfectly straight. One genus, Nipponites (pictured above - image from Palaeopedia), had a shell with a bizarre asymmetrical arrangement of U-shaped curves, the purpose of which is unknown.
At level 40, Omanyte evolves into Omastar. While in-game lore establishes Omanyte as a peaceful bottom-dwelling plankton-feeder, Omastar was a predator that cracked open the shells of mollusc Pokemon with its four muscular arms and sucked out their soft inner bodies with its four-part beak. A classic case of niche differentiation!
(As a side note, Omastar also bears a striking resemblance to ammonites of the genus Hypoturrilites. It’s possible that this was intentional, but there’s no real evidence either way.)
Unfortunately, Omastar’s protection became its downfall. Its heavy shell made it difficult for Omastar to catch prey, and as a result, the species died out. Actual ammonites did not die out for such clear-cut reasons; they survived for almost 350 million years before dying out during the Cretaceous mass extinction, from causes that are still not certain.
The only shelled cephalopods that survive today are the nautiloids, represented by two genera - Nautilus and Allonautilus. Despite their appearances, the nautiloids are not close relatives of the ammonites, belonging to a completely different subclass of the Cephalopoda. Nautlius (pictured above; photo by Professor Lee R. Berger of Wits University) is the better-understood of these two genera, while Allonautilus is native to much deeper water and has rarely been observed or collected alive.
Both genera of nautiloids are at risk due to overfishing and climate change. If you can, please donate to ocean conservationist causes; unlike those in the Pokemon world, we can’t bring these beautiful animals back to life when they’re gone.
Prehistoric Pokemon: Kabuto and Kabutops/Order Xiphosura
Kabuto, Omanyte’s counterpart fossil, has two different fossil bases. It’s most frequently compared to a trilobite, and its body shape certainly does suggest one. However, it also takes some inspiration from the Xiphosura.
(The xiphosuran Mesolimulus. Image from Wikimedia Commons.)
Xiphosura is an order within the subphylum Chelicerata, which also includes arachnids and sea spiders. They are distinguished by their solid, smooth, dome-like carapaces, which bore a secondary pair of primitive eyes capable of detecting changes in light. This is reflected on Kabuto, which appears to have a different face depending on whether you look at it from the front or above!
Unlike Ammonoidea, Xiphosura is not completely extinct. It is represented today by horseshoe crabs (above - image from the Tybee Island Marine Science Center), which inhabit coastal waters in Southeast Asia and the American Atlantic coast. Modern horseshoe crabs are essentially unchanged from the oldest members of Xiphosura, which originated at some point during the Silurian period, some 450 million years ago.
Despite their unassuming appearance, horseshoe crabs are invaluable to the medical industry; their unique blood is used to synthesize a substance called Limulus amebocyte lysate, which is used to detect gram-negative bacteria.
Just as Omastar evolves into Omanyte, Kabuto eventually evolves into Kabutops. However, while Omastar remains fairly accurate to the realities of ammonite biology (discounting its ability to launch its spikes and attack with jets of water), Kabutops takes a xiphosuran and gives it the rangy, bipedal body of a land-dwelling predator, complete with massive scythe-like claws for killing its prey. While I’m not opposed to Pokemon diverging from biological reality (and while I actually like Kabutops more than Omanyte, from a pure character-design perspective), it’s a bit strange in comparison to Omanyte’s more naturalistic transition.
Also, Kabutops has an internal skeleton? I’m not even going to touch that one.
Kabutops’ segmented anatomy seems more trilobite-like than Kabuto’s, and its head even bears the distinctive shape of the trilobite head segment. However, there’s another extinct animal I find that it resembles…
The eurypterids - such as Eurypterus, pictured above; image by Obsidian Soul - were relatives of the xiphosurans that lived from the Ordovician to the Permian periods. (They’re also known as “sea scorpions”, despite not being true scorpions.) Their ranks included the largest arthropods in Earth’s history, many of which were powerful predators. To me, Kabutops resembles what would happen if a eurypterid grew legs and became a running land predator. It’s even got the spike-shaped eurypterid tail!
The fossil of a petite pterosaur discovered in British Columbia is the first find of its kind, scientists say, and it promises to change the way we think about the flying reptiles.
Read on to see how the new pterosaur sizes up, and what it tells us about pterosaurs’ flying rivals: the birds!
This is amazing news! (It also confirms something I always wanted to believe.)
Prehistoric Pokemon: Aerodactyl
The first generation of Pokemon games is currently unique in that it introduced three evolutionary lines of fossil Pokemon: two more easily obtainable fossils that can each evolve once; and a single, non-evolving fossil that’s harder to obtain, but that boasts much greater power. This non-evolver is Aerodactyl, which strangely breaks the marine invertebrate theme the Gen 1 fossils had. It’s supposedly based on a pterosaur, but it doesn’t really look like one; it’s just a big wyvern.
Later games gave Aerodactyl a Mega Evolution, which basically does nothing but stick a bunch of pointy rocks onto it. I’m as big a fan of rock monsters as anybody, but Aerodactyl has always been a little bit of a disappointment to me; I’m still holding out hope that we’ll eventually get a more pterosaur-like pterosaur Pokemon.
Perhaps it could be based on Aerodactylus, a pterosaur from Late Jurassic Germany, which was recategorized from a species of Pterodactylus in 2013. Aerodactylus was intentionally named after the Pokemon Aerodactyl, but it’s also Latin for “wind finger”. (Image by Matthew Martyniuk.)
Ey you wanna dish out some discourse on the big birds of the post K-T world? Specifically the unrelated terror birds, The Phorusrhacids and the less terrible Gastornids?
It’s generally agreed that the vast majority of dinosaurs went extinct after he Cretaceous period. With this extinction, dinosaurs were removed from a wide variety of ecological niches, one of them being “land-based macropredator”. After the Mesozoic Era ended, the time when dinosaurs reigned as land predators was over.
Or was it?
Keep reading
How feathered were Sauropods and Ornithischian dinosaurs? Are there correct or incorrect ways of drawing those dinosaur groups with feathers?
(Adding on to my previous question, if it did get sent here, how feathered were non-Coelurosaurian theropods as well?)
Sauropods. As far as anyone knows, sauropods had no feathers. Several species of sauropods have been discovered with partial fossilized skin impressions, and all were at least partially scaly. Since sauropods were so large, any kind of filamentous covering might have made them too hot, and so they were likely entirely scaly - just like how large mammals, such as elephants and whales, are hairless. While we don’t know for certain that sauropods had no feathers anywhere on their bodies, I’d say it’s a safe bet that they didn’t.
Non-coelurosaurian theropods. So far, among all theropod groups, only coelurosaurs have been discovered with feathers. No non-coelurosaur has displayed any evidence of feathers, not even trace elements like quill knobs or a pygostyle. In addition, some non-coelurosaurian theropods are known from skin impressions, revealing them to have been scaly. Again, it’s not impossible that feathers originated before the coelurosaurs, but there’s currently no evidence that they did, and I personally believe that they didn’t.
Ornithischians. Some small ornithischians had feathers or other filamentous coverings. The two currently known feathered ornithischians - Kulindadromeus and Tianyulong - were not closely related, implying that feathers may have been ancestral to Ornithischia. In addition, the primitive ceratopsian Psittacosaurus had porucpine-like spines on its tail, and so some other ornithischians may have had these as well. However, many larger ornithischians, such as larger ceratopsians and hadrosaurs, were scaly. I believe that smaller ornithischians were feathered, while larger ones became secondarily featherless for purposes of thermoregulation.
Are there “wrong” ways to depict these animals? No, not really. Adding feathers to a dinosaur with no evidence one way or the other as to its integument is purely a matter of speculation. Just make sure that your reconstruction makes sense from a biological perspective, and doesn’t totally fly in the face of current evidence.
please tell us about sharovipteryx
Sharovipteryx was a protorosaur, one of a primitive group of reptiles related to the archosaurs and the pantestudines. "Protorosaur” means “before lizard”, but the protorosaurs were not the ancestors of lizards; in fact, they have no living direct descendants today, having gone extinct during the Triassic period.
(Reconstruction by Dmitry Bogdanov.)
Sharovipteryx is known for its bizarre anatomy. Its hind limbs were extremely long, and were connected to the tail and torso by a gliding membrane, making it the only animal to glide with the use of its hind limbs instead of its forelimbs. Some paleontologists have noticed its similarity in shape to a delta wing aircraft, and have proposed that its forelimbs (which were not as well-preserved as the hind limbs in the single known fossil) also supported a pair of membranes, which would have given it great steering control and maneuverability in the air.
Note the similarity in shape between Sharovipteryx and the XB-70 Valkyrie bomber jet. (Image from Wikimedia Commons.)
Sharovipteryx’s only known fossil was found in the Madygen Formation of Kyrgyzstan, and dates to approximately 225 million years ago - making it a potential contemporary of Longisquama, another small reptile that was once thought to have had a strange method of flying. This has since been disproved; however, Sharovipteryx was not the only Triassic reptile capable of gliding.
The kuehneosaurids were a family of gliding reptiles that possessed long external extensions of the ribs connected by membranes. They are known from only a few species, including Kuehneosaurus from England and Icarosaurus from New Jersey (pictured above). Like Sharovipteryx, they went extinct after the Triassic period; however, unlike Sharovipteryx, they actually were close relatives of lizards (although not true lizards themselves).
Another family of Triassic gliding reptiles, the weigeltisaurids, had unique rod-like bones growing from their skin, connected by a gliding membrane to form a fin-like structure. A number of species are known, the most famous being Coelurosauravus (pictured above by Nobu Tamura). Their distribution was quite wide, encompassing Europe, Africa, and possibly North America.
I know in my heart this is probably true, but I must get an educated enthusiast's opinion: Fluffy Baby Dromaeosaurs? Like I assume that since the adults are feathered that the babies being fluffy is possible but I accept that they're perhaps like crows where they're weird and awkwardly cute babies that aren't terribly fluffy
The answer, unfortunately, is “no one knows”. No baby dromaeosaurs have been preserved with feathers, so we can’t say for certain. However, I am prepared to offer a few of my own theories.
Whether or not baby dromaeosaurs were “fluffy” could depend on whether they were precocial or altricial. Precocial animals are immediately capable of taking care of themselves after being born, while altricial animals are comparatively helpless and must remain with their parents until reaching physical independence. If dromaeosaurs were altricial, they might well have been fluffy, eventually shedding their downy baby feathers and sprouting adult plumage.
However, this presupposes that dromaeosaur adult plumage was used only for adult things - sexual display, for example, or stability while killing prey. What if these feathers had a practical purpose in babies and juveniles as well?
It’s been theorized that baby dromaeosaurs were not only precocial, but occupiers of an entirely different niche than their parents. If baby dromaeosaurs had fully formed feathers, they might have been able to glide, or even fly. This would have allowed them to occupy an entirely different niche than their parents, minimizing competition between different generations of the same species.
Proponents of this theory speculate that young dromaeosaurs were arboreal, using their sickle-claws to climb and their pennaceous arm-feathers to glide from branch to branch. As they got older, larger, and heavier, they lost the ability to glide and began to transition into ground-dwelling lifestyles, using their claws to hold down their prey and their “wings” to balance on top of it.
However, a group of Utahraptor fossils discovered in 2001 - an adult, four juveniles, and a baby - suggests that at least one species of dromaeosaur was altricial, and that young Utahraptor were raised by their parent(s) until reaching maturity. In my mind, this increases the likelihood of fluffy Utahraptor babies. Other species are less certain, but perhaps the fossil record will reveal the answer to this question in time
All images in this post by Emily Willoughby, who creates my personal favorite reconstructions of dromaeosaurs.
I should add that there is potentially one known baby dinosaur specimen that was fossilized with feathers.
Sciurumimus, a coelurosaurian theropod from Late Jurassic Germany, is known from a single specimen - a juvenile - with an extremely fluffy tail. This may show that some feathered theropods did indeed have fluffy-feathered young. However, since no one knows what adult Sciurumimus looked like, it’s entirely possible that they were equally fluffy-tailed.