fantasy is when currency is referred to as "gold" and sci fi is when currency is referred to as "credits"
pratchett is when currency is referred to as "dollars"
The Bowery Presents
we're not kids anymore.

#extradirty
almost home
Show & Tell
wallacepolsom
art blog(derogatory)
NASA
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
YOU ARE THE REASON
Fai_Ryy
The Stonewall Inn

No title available
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

Product Placement

romaâ
Keni

Discoholic đȘ©
No title available
RMH
seen from Singapore

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Italy
seen from United States

seen from Netherlands
seen from Australia

seen from Australia
seen from Vietnam
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States

seen from Venezuela

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Ecuador
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
@boycarofchilladelphia
fantasy is when currency is referred to as "gold" and sci fi is when currency is referred to as "credits"
pratchett is when currency is referred to as "dollars"
do any of you even enjoy reading or watching fiction at all? if i wanted the plot with virtually nothing else i would read the wikipedia page
meanwhile I, Redwallpilled since childhood,
âChristâs wounds were in fact not healed. Heâs got them now, in Heaven. He had them when He appeared to the disciples; theyâre part of the imitation of Christ by the stigmatic saints. God heals some wounds. Others, He glorifies. He transforms them in some way we canât necessarily imagine beforehand, just as we canât quite imagine what it will mean for our flesh to be glorified in the Resurrection.â
â Eve Tushnet. This is an astonishing insight to me.
Feeling peckish for a micro dose of Mormon Horror.
Anyone got a spooky experience in an empty chapel to share? It doesn't have to be a true story.
One time my dad was practicing organ late at night and I was finishing the bulletin when suddenly there was a huge THUD from outside, like someone had thrown a particularly dense snowball at the tiny window by the sacrament table. We both looked up, but there was zero indication of any life outside the window or inside other than us. It was also like 11:00, and we were so weirded out we went home
i can't be the only person who hates being called neurospicy. it's such a weird term. i'm neurodivergent. i'm disabled. call me that.
I totally get wanting to make something debilitating into a something joyous or trying to turn a perceived downside into an upside. However, it reminds me of when people call depression "the big sad" in the hopes of making it less ominous. Like, it's depression. It's ominous. It tried to kill me and it may try again, though we hope that won't happen. The same goes for all my disabilities; I'm engaged in mortal combat over here, don't pretend I'm playing toy soldiers when my life is on the line
I've written a poem based on my experiences as a queer mormon.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Thank you for reading. I hope this resonates with you.
sometimes people will make you feel stupid for being kind. this makes it hard to stay kind. it is important that you do anyway. if you have become unkind, it is important to remember that you can become kind again. it's a skill, not an inherent trait.
reblogs were off
you have won a lifetime supply of this
How do you feel?
good!
I CAN SELL THIS AND GET RICH
im drowning in my supply help
Eh it's okay
BAD. VERY BAD
results/other
you would receive the supply once a month
the brand/type will vary so you could
you can sell the things you get/give them away but they will keep coming until you die
if any of y'all feel so inclined to participate
Aw, I got so many celebration and/or depression meals from there!
recollections
The LDS church's reluctance to hire transgender furries is holding them back from having properly functioning app UI
Being anti-death penalty is literally the easiest stance ever. People just say "but should the state kill THIS type of person?" and you just say "no". Not killing people is so fucking easy actually
Failing at critical thinking by dint of being ignorant of the magical Kill Only The Bad People Who Deserve It And Nobody Else button that we have. Apparently
It goes like this:
Okay, let's say that these people mentioned *do* deserve to die, just for the sake of argument.
Who gets to decide that they do? Who actually genuinely has the right to make the final decision, specifically?
Is it the judge? Is it the lawmakers? It can't be you. It can't be a case by case basis where you get input, this is being carried out by the state.
Do you trust those people to never ever get it wrong? Do you trust the state?
If you do trust them, you aren't paying attention to literally anything that has ever happened in this or any country.
If you don't trust them, you must shift your stance to oppose the death penalty because a circumstance where an innocent person is killed is unacceptable.
Peeling back the curtain, yeah, my personal feelings are that there *are* people who should stop being alive. I don't think that's a good thought for me to have, but I have it.
And I don't trust the fucking state, or myself, or judge, or a panel of people, or ANYONE to be able to, with ZERO false positives, make that determination. No one, no one, NO ONE has the right to make that call because no one can always get it right.
So I oppose the death penalty even though, yeah, my gut reaction is that certain people who have severely harmed others and will do so again should be killed. But the death penalty is wrong. For even a single innocent person to die is a moral failing, an unacceptable loss. There is not and never will be a way to administer that fairly and perfectly.
You must oppose the death penalty. It is your moral duty.
I become very uncomfortable with "Just kill anyone who's a pedophile" when there are ongoing efforts to have the act of me (a man) kissing my husband where children can see get labeled as pedophilia.
It's not that these people want to make public displays of non-straightcis romantic feelings punishable by death. They just want them labeled as being this other thing that's (under 'kill all pedos' laws) already punishable by death. Completely different.
Hey guess what!
Lethal injection protocols with three drugs (which is most of them) are designed to give the appearance of a clean medical death without suffering. The truth is:
Many states use midazolam as their first drug to âinduce sedation.â Midazolam is not physically capable of maintaining unconscious deep enough to overcome agonizing pain! It also has a âceiling effectâ meaning that it literally cannot do any more after a certain point, as it bonds to GABA receptors(?) and you only have so many! Despite many doctors testifying, briefing, and submitting affidavits to this effect, the Supreme Court ruled it was okay.
Why was it okay? Well, the inmates had to demonstrate that they would definitely be tortured to death and then they have to propose in detail an alternative method of execution (what???). But they donât have that evidence because the second drug is a paralytic that acts to ensure that the body cannot move no matter what pain itâs in. It literally only gives the appearance of a peaceful sleep without really doing anything to help the execution.
Both the second and third drug are horrendously painful.
The huge overdose of drugs introduces chemicals of the wrong pH into the bloodstream. This balances quickly but not before an extremely acidic or caustic fluid goes through the lungs. Most inmates lungs in autopsies after executions are filled with fluid and froth and show signs of struggles to breathe. Literally the drugs dissolve their lung tissue and drown them while they are conscious (because midazolam does not keep them unconscious) and paralyzed.
Placing IVs frequently goes wrong because medical professionals rarely participate, this being wildly against the Hippocratic oath. This results in drug delivery constantly going wrong, creating huge blister-like bubbles full of drugs in peopleâs joints or muscles.
Drug companies refuse to supply medications, meaning prisons use huge cash transactions with dubious compounding pharmacies whose names are kept secret by special state laws or just on the black market. Or they lie when they buy the drugs.
Independent reviews are nonexistent. Reviews are often prohibited by those same secrecy laws, which many states have specifically to protect the fiascos that are state executions.
Thereâs a reason inmates literally beg for the electric chair. At least then it only takes five minutes to die, not twenty. Not forty. Not three hours.
If I were ever sentenced to death, I would opt for firing squad. Fastest. Probably least painful. And itâs a horrible look for the correctional center. Let them live with the guilt personally.
Iâm a pacifist but I am not necessarily what you would call âchill about it.â
Time to share Justice Blackmun's dissent from Callins v. Collins (1994) again:
"From this day forward, I no longer shall tinker with the machinery of death. For more than 20 years I have endeavoredâindeed, I have struggledâalong with a majority of this Court, to develop procedural and substantive rules that would lend more than the mere appearance of fairness to the death penalty endeavor.
Rather than continue to coddle the Courtâs delusion that the desired level of fairness has been achieved and the need for regulation eviscerated, I feel morally and intellectually obligated simply to concede that the death penalty experiment has failed.
It is virtually self-evident to me now that no combination of procedural rules or substantive regulations ever can save the death penalty from its inherent constitutional deficiencies. The basic questionâdoes the system accurately and consistently determine which defendants "deserve" to die?âcannot be answered in the affirmative.
It is not simply that this Court has allowed vague aggravating circumstances to be employed, see, for example, Arave v. Creech (1993), relevant mitigating evidence to be disregarded, see, for example, Johnson v. Texas, (1993), and vital judicial review to be blocked, see, for example, Coleman v. Thompson, (1991).
The problem is that the inevitability of factual, legal, and moral error gives us a system that we know must wrongly kill some defendants, a system that fails to deliver the fair, consistent, and reliable sentences of death required by the Constitution."
i dont WANT pride months to be over,
on the other hand...
june is over... goodbye pride month, hello disability pride month!!
let's all be disabled this month... together đ€
if you're not disabled yet: no need to worry! i can help. come closer.
cannibal chappell roan: you can put a hundred boys in jars
vehicular manslaughter chappell roan: you can hit a hundred boys with cars
medieval torturer chappell roan: you can coat a hundred boys in tar
god I'm such a slut for Chinese eggplant in garlic sauce *decides itâs inaccurate to refer to myself as a slut in light of my minimal sexual activity* if The Enemy discovered my ardor for Chinese eggplant in garlic sauce, they would gain a significant strategic advantage