And may your pets always stay healthy âĄ

ellievsbear
Phantogram Three
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Sade Olutola
The Bowery Presents
Fai_Ryy

izzy's playlists!
One Nice Bug Per Day
Cosmic Funnies
$LAYYYTER
macklin celebrini has autism
Interview Vampire Daily
No title available
ojovivo

@theartofmadeline
đŞź
Cosimo Galluzzi

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club

#extradirty
seen from United States
seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from Latvia

seen from Israel
seen from Brazil
seen from Indonesia

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Russia

seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Malaysia

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Oman

seen from United Kingdom

seen from China

seen from Malaysia

seen from TĂźrkiye
@bullyshark
And may your pets always stay healthy âĄ
I thought you might like these moss-filled pawprints in concrete which I saw earlier. :-)
Left by the Creature of Gentle Moss
Lili Chin- The Play Way
In January 2020, I attended Dr. Amy Cook's PLAY WAY seminar at Pasadena Humane Society. The seminar was about "social play" as a tool for rehabilitating reactive/stressed/fearful dogs.
"Social Play" has been defined as something different from playing with toys (tug, fetch, etc.) It is literally "goofing around" with your dog in a way that they like, that makes them happy. Body language responsiveness, movement and timing is everything.
Not only did we get to see some inspiring and entertaining video footage of Amy Cook playing with her dogs, some attendees had also brought their own dogs to play with, while Amy offered coaching.
We saw the Play Way live!
It was an amazing and delightful experience and I couldn't wait to get home to play with my 15 year old Boogie (now passed on) who hadn't been interested in Tug or Fetch in over a year due to his vision loss. The Play Way class was like learning a new language, a new vocabulary to play with my dog.
This infographic cannot possibly do justice to all the material covered in the Play Way seminar, which also focused on play as "therapy". For now, I hope this is enough to pique everyone's interest in the subject and how to be mindful and respectful of our dog's body language and of our own body language in conversations with our dog.
Also read: Whole Dog Journal article on The Play Way
Image description and text under readmore.
Oh the dorgs! All the beautiful dorgs! At last I have satisfied myself that there are 11 or 9 different kinds of dorgs.
link to bluesky post
In addition to how to turn various things, it includes:
Other useful AI Removal/Detection links
How to spot AI Hallucinations like a Reference Librarian (originally on Substack)
Library Freedom Project has a lot of handouts about AI on their Resources page
Shark says support your local library!!
Hi. So whats the general vibe nowadays with social media choices? For less intrusive ads, for better privacy, for ideally zero AI. Everything wants access to who I am and my contacts list and my Google profile (which I hate even having that and never connect it to things).
Where are my art and dog friends at? Bluesky, Mastodon, Pixelfed?
I find myself wanting to post some things again but hating the platforms and the culture. Tumblr seems like the only place I can trust to have the feeling I want but posting on mobile often causes it to eat my post if it's too long or has too many pictures.
my bad I guess
We did a thing today, I can't wait to see the results!
Thank Dog, it's spring again
Just a girl and her dog
Shark is and will always be a fashion icon
You know, I donât really get a lot of clinical exposure to pepper spray in Australia, only encountered it on a dog once, but it is handy to know how our human counterparts recommend decontaminating it.
We went through a big life change at the end of November, but Shark maintains her whimsy as always. Truly an inspiration and always making me laugh.
Hey the US government is proposing to get rid of the Endangered Species Act. Please go comment.
(yes this entirely for corporate profit)
Cut and paste the docket number to put in your response if you remember. You can comment anonymously if you want.
The Oregon Zoo has some sample arguments you can make.
We have until December 22nd!
I don't usually add on to stuff like this, but this is really really important to me.
Since OP didn't explain what's actually changing (lots of things) here's a simple explanation of one of the Big Ones.
One of the biggest changes is a proposal to remove the ESAâs Threatened Species Blanket Rule (FWS-HQ-ES-2025-0029). The Blanket Rule is extremely important because it automatically extends the same protections given to endangered species to all newly listed threatened species, quickly providing prohibitions on harming, killing or trading the species. If the Blanket Rule is rescinded, species-specific rules would have to be enacted, imposing additional procedural delays and uncertainty at the most critical time for the species' survival. And with more and more species in danger each year, thatâs a risk that we as a country cannot afford to take.Â
Also, @why-animals-do-the-thing / @animalphotorefs this seems like something that your reach might help with, and that's relevant to your blog(s).
If you run into issues, try turning off your VPN if you have one, in case it's getting annoyed that you're not "in the U.S.".
If you need a template, I'm putting one I got sent at work under the cut. (But check out the Oregon Zoo link, too! Or better yet, write your own! Unique and individual comments catch more attention than copy-pasted ones!)
Thanks for the tag, I definitely want to jump in here because the most helpful thing any individual can do is write your own comment.
Iâm going to give you a little bit of information about the process thatâs happening here, why itâs happening, and how you can best contribute to protecting the Endangered Species Act. You can skip it by scrolling to the red text, but youâll be best set up to comment and help if you know some things about whatâs happening first, so please stick with me. I promise to be as simple and jargon free as possible.
First, and to catch people's attention as they scroll, here's two red wolf sisters: a species the ESA actively preserving. This is who we're doing this for.
To clarify one thing: theyâre not trying to totally repeal the ESA, the entire law, theyâre looking to roll back regulations implementing it/enforcing it to what was being used in 2019. This is still bad! Very bad! But a thing thatâs important when dealing with legislation/regulation is precision in the language we use.
Okay, so hereâs what you need to know. This is part of what is known as the ânotice-and-commentâ rule making process, which is federally mandated. This happens with the implementation of regulations to enact new laws, or changes to the interpretation of laws. Laws like the ESA, once passed, are delegated to various federal agencies and departments to enact and make happen, and they do that by deciding what regulations need to exist to fulfill the text and intent of the law. This change to the ESA is happening because one of the earliest executive orders from this administration âdirected all departments and agencies to immediately review agency actions to identify those actions that potentially impose an undue burden on the identification, development, or use of domestic energy resources, and, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, consider suspending, revising, or rescinding agency actions identified as unduly burdensome that conflict with this national objective.â So, as @sweetfirebird said, literally go figure out what laws and regs and protections they can interpret differently, put on hold, or trash for the energy sector. Fucking gross.
This ânotice-and-commentâ process is the process with which all these federal agencies go about exploring changing regulations. Itâs a formal process that is specifically designed to allow stakeholders to have input on what happens. Good news: in the ESA, the public is literally a stakeholder! Itâs written into the law that any âpersonâ (basically an individual or a group of individuals) can sue the government for a violation of the law. This is actually historically the prime enforcement mechanism of the ESA. Which means you, as an American on tumblr reading this, have absolutely valid standing to go tell the feds to knock this shit off. And with the way the ânotice-and-commentâ process works, they actually have to take your argument into account. (Yes, even though we know this admin is a piece of shit and dgaf). Hereâs why.
A ânotice and commentâ process has four major steps.
Agency issues a notice of proposed rulemaking. Thatâs what youâre looking at in the first link @sweetbirdfire shared. They have to describe what the rule they want to make/change is and explain the legal authority for the rule.
The public must be given an opportunity to participate in a written comment period. Thatâs what youâre being asked to do - submit a comment before the comment period is over on the 22nd.
The agency must âconsider all relevant, timely-submitted comments. If it decides to issue a final rule, the agency develops the regulatory text along with a preamble explaining the ruleâs basis and responding to all significant issues raised in the comments.â
Final rule is published.
Okay, so why did I jump to a direct quote from federal documents in the third bullet point? Because thatâs the really important shit. When federal agencies move forward with rulemaking after a public comment period, they are required to consider and response to all significant issues raised. And that is why you should write your own comment if you can.
Itâs really common for organizations encouraging people to leave public comment to ask people to send in form letters. Itâs easy, it takes no time or real work, it shows a lot of general public support on the issue, and they can quote the comment numbers when theyâre lobbying.
But! What Iâve been told by serious professional people who work with regulatory agencies is that all those form letters only have the functional weight of a single comment during the ânotice-and-commentâ process. If 100 people only bring up the same significant set of issues, that requires far less time and work for the agency to respond to than even 20 people writing in with their individual concerns. Iâve seen follow-ups on comment periods where they actually count how many people raised issues on a single topic or concern - but the form letters only counted as one âcommentâ because they were the exact same thing.
And while the political agency head probably wants to fast-track this process of changing the regs to let the feds tear up whatever the fuck they want, a ânotice-and-comment periodâ is a really good way to gum up those gears. There are still people in lower-level positions who do this daily work and I expect that theyâre opposed to this and will go through the whole process like theyâre been trained to. Under normal administrations, an overwhelming number of concerns raised during comment periods have stalled the creation/change of specific regulations for a decade. This is a process that works best when as many people as possible participate, and itâs detrimental to our interests as invested members of the public that that isnât more widely known or the process understood.
So! What does that mean you should do here?
Write your own comment if you have the time/spoons.
Literally, write it in your own words, rather than using the form letters provided. If you make it a âdifferent commentâ it has to be considered separately and your concerns on the topic will be given more weight. Even if you just stick to the topics the Oregon Zoo offered: to be clear, theyâre really good ones.
But, youâll have even more impact if you can tie it to specific concerns for you. It takes a little more work so I donât expect everyone to do this, but if you have some specialized or local knowledge that can be relevant, this is a great time to drop that in. Tie the concern to endangered or threatened species in your specific community, or an ecosystem that you know companies might want to pillage.
Your comment doesnât have to be super well written or perfectly edited. It can be in language about as casual as youâd use in a tumblr post (with punctuation, though). This isnât something youâre turning in for a grade - itâs raising your hand to say hey, I object! Youâre not a major advocacy group or professional org, you donât have to be perfect, you just have to tell them how you feel. That being said. Public comments are public record. You can submit them anonymously but donât include identifying information.
Hereâs a link directly to the comment portal. While the site has a text box embedded in the page, you can also submit a document/file containing your comment.
https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/FWS-HQ-ES-2025-0039-0001
Comments close at 11:59 PM EST (4:59 GMT) on December 22nd. We have less than five days to get more comments in. Iâm really not kidding when I say every unique, individual comment makes an impact. Letâs do this.
Images from @animalphotorefs
Found a guide from protectdemocracy.org on how to write an effective public comment (these images are edited slightly for readability; go to the actual guide for more resources):
Public comments are not a voting process and simply expressing disagreement is not effective.
I personally disagree that you should write as informally you would a tumblr post. I would not trust that the regulators reading these comments have such principles about the importance of listening to people's concerns regardless of how informal or uneducated they sound.
Honestly, I would treat this as you would a graded assignment, because they are not obligation make any decisions simply because people comment that they don't want a rule made. You need to convince them that there are significant concerns, and you should be imagining the person you are convincing is an old white cis male politician who regularly complains that kids these days don't know cursive. That is the kind of person likely deciding if your comment is relevant to the regulation and brings up significant enough concerns.
But you could write out your thoughts in informal language, and then use Grammarly or something similar to help polish it into a more formal comment. Following the suggestions in that guide should help give you a basic structure for what your comment should look like.
Unique comments are most effective; copy-pasted ones are not. This is a process which requires intellectual labor and there's no getting around that, but there's nothing wrong with getting help.
Very good additions!
I framed it as âthis doesnât have to be a graded assignmentâ because I didnât want it to sound super formal and hard after going into a ton of detailed federal processes. It doesnât have to be scary was really my point. Like, Iâve read a lot of federal comments for various zoo-related laws, and Iâve seen some of the stakeholders submit pretty casual comments. Is it ideal? Not really. But I know everyone is stressed as hell all the time these days and the idea of doing a bunch of intellectual labor on a foreign topic with real world consequences can be really intimidating.
@genderkoolaid provided some great resources on writing a good comment, and I really like the idea of using online (non-genAI) services to get help with polishing. If you have the labor to put into a really polished comment, so that. But if something more informal is all you can do, do that instead of nothing.
my dog came and got me while I was getting ready for work this morning, and she was signaling that it was Very Urgent. I followed her downstairs thinking something was wrong with my senior dog or my partner but the minute my foot hit the bottom step my partner loudly asked "Did she come get you, too?"
"She did, what's wrong?"
"She wants you to look at the frog."
"...The frog?"
"Yeah. The frog."
"There's a frog?"
"on the window, yeah"
so she was standing in the corner staring at me VERY expectantly and somewhat impatiently, so I walked over and she immediately turned her attention back to the window and sure enough. very high up. and very small. there was a frog.
keep in mind that bigfoot himself could be in the yard outside and this dog Would Not Care. but god forbid a frog catches a vibe on the window I guess. anyway. glad my dog deemed this worthy of my attention
Very smart doggo knew that OP would get the word out to the public about frog. Now thousands more people know about frog. Objectively an incredibly successful Very Urgent Alert. What a good girl!!
"thousands of people you say?"