we’re so lucky that gilgamesh survived and is a banger. can you imagine if we found the oldest written human story ever recorded and it sucked balls.
RMH

if i look back, i am lost
todays bird
EXPECTATIONS

Origami Around
Cosmic Funnies
untitled

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Monterey Bay Aquarium
sheepfilms
KIROKAZE
Claire Keane

pixel skylines

No title available
YOU ARE THE REASON
The Bowery Presents

Andulka
Cosimo Galluzzi
Today's Document

No title available

seen from Italy
seen from United States

seen from Italy
seen from Hungary
seen from United States

seen from Argentina
seen from Argentina
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
@burgundystriker
we’re so lucky that gilgamesh survived and is a banger. can you imagine if we found the oldest written human story ever recorded and it sucked balls.
the nasty trick is that making friends is pretty easy but managing to keep in touch with everyone is next to impossible
genuinely me
Okay but the article is fucking sending me
I think Tumblr will love this
For the love of GOD turn the volume on
every day someone thinks of an art form no one did before
blazette 💙
↳ half body comm for blazettemidnight!
my high school english teacher would often critique our literature analysis work by pointing out: "you're treating these characters like they're real people. They're not. They're characters". And it took me a long time to understand what he meant by that. Because I always thought "isn't that the point? That writers want to write characters to be so three dimensional that they act and feel like real people?" but that's not it.
Characters are tools a writer uses in service of a story. Of course characters can be written with depth to the point they feel real to us, but they exist in service of their narrative. Something real people aren't beholden to at all. When discussing characters, I think it's easy to accidentally see these characters as "real people" and not extensions of the author's beliefs. Tools for a narrative. Means of storytelling.
a couple of people are misunderstanding me saying "extensions of the author's beliefs" by interpreting this very literally. I don't mean that a character's beliefs are always one to one with their author (and therefore the character's actions are being condoned). I mean this in a far more general sense.
A character could represent the dynamic opposite of a writer's beliefs and the writer could either make the story prove the character wrong, or make a narrative where a villainous character gets away with their crime as a tragedy. Characters can be utilized in so many ways outside of "obvious mouthpiece for the author's beliefs". That is still an extension of the author's expression and beliefs.
Rare But Not So Rare Sonic Moments
Sonic Swooning Over Amy
So, Sonic’s been kind of the driving force of Sonamy recently. Let’s analyze that.
I’ll show Sonic having feelings for Amy in almost every media aside from Fleetway and the few cartoons she isn’t in. I’ll also present the “whys” in more detail then just “Amy calmed down.” While that’s part of it, I’d like to add my own can of worms. And possible headcanons too. Bear in mind I never grew up with Sonic, so forgive my mixed opinions.
While I love Amy having a crush on Sonic like the energetic sugarplum she is, nowadays Sonic’s oddly been the drive of their dynamic. Any examples of it beforehand? Let’s look outside of the games first.
I missed most of the Iraq war due to being a baby, but every time I read about it I start wondering why we aren’t all talking about it all of the time
it feels like the sort of unforced error that should be obsessively postmortemed for the next fifty years, a catastrophe that should utterly delegitimize the society that made it happen, but instead everybody’s like “oh yeah, that. lmao, that was crazy”
I have to add to this because I was teaching a text about this topic to a bunch of post-2003 undergraduates recently and each time I do so I experience the same sense of disorientation.
This is a war about which the accepted, mainstream consensus is that no one is able to explain the U.S. decision to invade Iraq. The people involved in that decision are unable, in retrospect, to explain or justify it. In almost every postmortem of this decision, you will find some reference to the fact that Richard Haass, who advised Colin Powell at the State Department in 2001-3, has said that he “will go to [his] grave not knowing” why the U.S. invaded Iraq. George Packer, in The Assassins’ Gate, describes the invasion as “something that some people wanted to do.”
This is a war that destroyed a country. It created ISIS. It destabilized the Middle East. It killed a minimum of c. 200,000 people. It displaced millions more. It resulted in devastating losses to the cultural heritage of Iraq. And twenty years on, no one is able to explain why it happened.
It seems to me that there are several important lessons here.
This is a war about which the accepted, mainstream consensus is that no one is able to explain the U.S. decision to invade Iraq.
Probably because everyone involved in producing and disseminating that "mainstream consensus" was involved and culpable in that crime, and instead of opening themselves up to criticism or their careers to repercussions for their monstrous behavior it's easier to just pretend that it just happened, somehow.
George Packer, in The Assassins’ Gate, describes the invasion as “something that some people wanted to do.”
"Some people." We know who these people are.
Established in the spring of 1997, the Project for the New American Century is a non¬ profit, educational organization whose goal is to promote American global leadership. The Project is an initiative of the New Citizenship Project. William Kristol is chairman of the Project, and Robert Kagan, Devon Gaffney Cross, Bruce P. Jackson and John R. Bolton serve as directors. Gary Schmitt is executive director of the Project
Some of these names might be familiar, like John Bolton, some less so, like Robert Kagan, even though this piece of shit, his brother, and his wife are still at it, having a direct hand in the current war with Ukraine.
In essence, The Project for a New American Century is a policy document laying out the intention and rationale for expanding America's hegemony as sole global superpower into the 21st century. It lays out in no uncertain terms why the US went to Iraq: [emphasis added]
In the Persian Gulf region, the presence of American forces, along with British and French units, has become a semi¬ permanent fact of life. Though the immediate mission of those forces is to enforce the no-fly zones over northern and southern Iraq, they represent the long-term commitment of the United States and its major allies to a region of vital importance. Indeed, the United States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein.
Iraq and Iran both are identified explicitly as obstacles to US domination in the region.
Over the long term, Iran may well prove as large a threat to U.S. interests in the Gulf as Iraq has. And even should U.S.-Iranian relations improve, retaining forward-based forces in the region would still be an essential element in U.S. security strategy given the longstanding American interests in the region.
And repeatedly the authors express anxiety over the fact that their plans for domination are on a time table as the regional powers they're looking to dominate are trying to develop deterrents, especially nuclear.
Potential rivals such as China are anxious to exploit these transformational technologies broadly, while adversaries like Iran, Iraq and North Korea are rushing to develop ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons as a deterrent to American intervention in regions they seek to dominate.
Iran, Iraq, Syria, Libya, and North Korea are all set up on the chopping block because they represent threats to American/NATO interests. Elsewhere in the document they point out that such a transformation in American power and posture as they're prescribing might not be possible absent a "Pearl Harbor" like event, which they got in the form of 9-11.
And twenty years on, no one is able to explain why it happened.
No, they're just not willing to say the quiet part out loud. All these bastards know full well why it happened and who was responsible, but saying so not only implicates themselves, but the entire US government.
May they all hang.
This was intentionally manufactured by Facebook. Facebook implemented it’s “accountability culture” starting with its rule about only using your real name and photo on its service and encouraging you to disclose other information in your profile, and from there it just got normalized. It was entirely to gather data for advertising purposes, but now we associate that level of openness with “accountability”. Entire generations are now being raised with this as the norm. Privacy is no longer a priority, or even really seen as an option.
This is to your detriment. Your privacy protects you from predators of all kinds. You really should be guarding it carefully. Disclose what you feel is important on a case by case basis, but even your mental health status and beliefs are exploitable by big business and small-time bullies and abusers alike.
Even if you’re not overly fussed about what people know about you, just understand that not everyone has the luxury of feeling the same. Some people have stalkers and abusers they’re trying to evade, or don’t want to attract new abusers into their lives by being that vulnerable and open again. Some people have extreme social anxiety. Some people are protecting other people in their lives. Some people just don’t want their grandmothers to find their smutfics. Some people are Internet privacy advocates who keep their details private as a political statement and as a matter of principle.
You are not entitled to anyone’s information, and you do not owe anyone yours. You are allowed to just be an anonymous username until you feel safe to disclose more.
You are not entitled to anyone’s information, and you do not owe anyone yours.
This! Bring back handles! Let me decide when im ready to tell you my IRL name.
Homestuck in 2025?
more likely than you think!
I think they ignore that vriska tried to repair the friendship with Aradia after she killed her because you know, she killed her.
honestly i could go on a rant about what happened between the drama of Aradia, Terezi, and Vriska but that’d be super long and all im gonna say is
vriska pushed tavros off a cliff
aradia was pissed and wanted to teach vriska a lesson, even though terezi told her not to
aradia summoned the ghosts of trolls vriska had killed to haunt her
trolls vriska HAD TO KILL or else you know, spidermom would die and she’d be culled
vriska was upset by this, p much started crying
doc scratch manipulated vriska and tricked her into thinking killing aradia was the best option, and encouraged her to kill both Aradia and Terezi
Vriska listened to him, killed aradia and blinded terezi
Terezi was like “oh shit no” and tried to murder vriska
in one panel of terezi thinking about killing vriska, she thinks “Its almost sad how easy its going to be”
Terezi felt no remorse for what she was about to do to Vriska, which was murder her through Doc Scratch
Terezi informed doc scratch that Vriska had one of his Magic Cue balls, which made him LOSE HIS SHIT and he exploded the cue ball, right as vriska was looking into it, causing her to lose an eye and an arm
Then, later, they start playing SGRUB
Equius Makes Aradia a cool robot
vriska desperately wants to make it up to aradia, so she plans to deliver equius robot to aradia herself as a gift
equius sees vriskas plan and dosnt let her do this
Vriska then explains that all to aradia, who dosnt care
Aradiabot then beats the shit out of vriska in the flash “Make Her Pay”
thanks aradia
if u dont believe/remember this just read either Vriskas, Terezis, Aradias, or Doc Scratchs wiki page. i think doc scratchs page has the most info about it
k bye
While some of this is true, plenty of the rest of it is either out of order or phrased in a pretty different way from how it was portrayed in-canon!
Vriska pushing Tavros off a cliff was a legitimate attempt on his life. Yes she was manipulated into it by Scratch, yes she never really wanted to do it, and yes she regretted it later, but it was a genuine attempt to kill him that left him crippled - in a society where being crippled was a death sentence. She left him liable to be culled at any minute.
Aradia as Tavros’s friend was -quite understandably- quite upset about this. She summoned the ghosts of the other (largely innocent) troll-children Vriska had fed to her lusus to force her to literally face the consequences of her actions and those they’d hurt. NOTE: Vriska is never seen or mentioned trying to feed anything other than troll children to her lusus, and Terezi was only ok with her feeding evil ones to it. Vriska, however, sent them indiscriminately to their deaths because Alternia is a horrible society where compassion is largely considered alien and useless.
Vriska was upset about this, but she did not ‘p much start crying.’ She was frightened and angry, and because of her upbringing and lack of foresight, her immediate response (even though she claimed not to be interested in doing it) was to kill Aradia. Scratch didn’t say 'Hey, I have an idea: Kill Aradia’, he said 'Aren’t you going to kill her, that’s sort of your thing lol’ and she went with that because she feels that’s the sort of thing expected of her. It’s also notable that she used another person - one of Aradia’s friends - as a literal puppet to do this, and thought nothing of it whatsoever. It wasn’t just a case of a poor fightened babbu lashing out, it was a case of her starting something, not being able to deal with the consequences, and being unable to stop it escalating. As is an enormous theme with her fascinating and multi-faceted character.
Terezi wasn’t blinded till after Vriska had had her arm and eye blown off.
A thing you failed to go into detail about was how, in spite of everything - Terezi didn’t want to kill Vriska. Not really. She wanted Vriska to give her any sort of reason not to, and contacted her specifically asking for just that. Rather than admitting that she’d fucked up immensely and deeply regretted her actions, Vriska covered up her regret and panic with bravado and bragging about how she’d killed Aradia and crippled Tavros all by herself. At the time, she showed no regret whatsoever, and so Terezi told Scratch about the cueball, which he then blew up. This paints Terezi in a decidedly better light than if she’d simply set Scratch on Vriska without a care in the world.
Vriska -did- seem to want to make up with Aradia, however, the way she went about it clearly demonstrated that she’d learned very little from the whole affair. As far as she was concerned, giving Aradia the robot-body meant that they were 100% even and could go right back to being friends. She didn’t stop abusing Tavros, even though she knew it bothered Aradia even as a ghost, and she didn’t truly apologize for what she’d done to Aradia either. And when Aradia (likely under the influence of angry emotions she hadn’t felt since she died) beat her to death - Vriska held no grudge towards her whatsoever. In her eyes, this meant that they were even again, and she seemed genuinely puzzled on the meteor when Aradia (and many others) wanted little to do with her, because she seems to think that everyone thinks the same way that she does. This is also seen in how she genuinely seemed to think that blinding Terezi wouldn’t impact their friendship in the long-term - her way of 'making amends’ there was by friendly contacting her and saying 'Well we’re even’, plus saying that she’d have permanently psychically enslaved Tavros to be her 'assisted living slave’ after being blinded.
Vriska’s long line of mistakes aren’t just a case of other people doing mean things to her and her reacting - it’s showing how her very flawed view of the world poisons her relationships and her actions. Vriska Serket is a character who literally cripples, blinds and kills people and still expects them to like her because she’d still like them if they did the same to her - as seen by how she still wanted to be friends with both Terezi and Aradia after they respectively crippled and killed her.
Saying 'Well they did this so she had to do this back, can’t people just fucking forgive her already’ is the same trap that Vriska herself falls into when trying to justify her actions. It ignores that A) in every case, she was the one to start it and B) nobody owes her forgiveness or friendship.
She’s a very complicated, interesting and FLAWED character, but that all just gets thrown out the window if you try and lay the blame for all her actions on others. Hell - Vriska herself admitted to Meenah that she now understood why people would have been so exasperated, horrified and disgusted by her actions after she got a faceful of Aranea’s grandstanding egotistical crap. Without that little epiphany, she’d have continued repeating the same mistakes that she thought she’d learned from.
TL;DR, the FLARP revenge-cycle cannot honestly be summed up as a sarcastic 'thanks aradia’
Megan Thee Stallion's HISS (2024) in the style of Satoshi Kon's PERFECT BLUE (1997)
girly pop ayase!!!
AI Scraping Isn't Just Art And Fanfic
Something I haven't really seen mentioned and I think people may want to bear in mind is that while artists are the most heavily impacted by AI visual medium scraping, it's not like the machine knows or cares to differentiate between original art and a photograph of your child.
AI visual media scrapers take everything, and that includes screengrabs, photographs, and memes. Selfies, pictures of your pets and children, pictures of your home, screengrabs of images posted to other sites -- all of the comic book imagery I've posted that I screengrabbed from digital comics, images of tweets (including the icons of peoples' faces in those tweets) and instas and screengrabs from tiktoks. I've posted x-ray images of my teeth. All of that will go into the machine.
That's why, at least I think, Midjourney wants Tumblr -- after Instagram we are potentially the most image-heavy social media site, and like Instagram we tag our content, which is metadata that the scraper can use.
So even if you aren't an artist, unless you want to Glaze every image of any kind that you post, you probably want to opt out of being scraped. I'm gonna go ahead and say we've probably already been scraped anyway, so I don't think there's a ton of point in taking down your tumblr or locking down specific images, but I mean...especially if it's stuff like pictures of children or say, a fundraising photo that involves your medical data, it maybe can't hurt.
If you do want to officially opt out, which may help if there's a class-action lawsuit later, you're going to want to go to the gear in the upper-right corner on the Tumblr desktop site, select each of your blogs from the list on the right-hand side, and scroll down to "Visibility". Select "Prevent third party sharing for [username]" to flip that bad boy on.
Per notes: for the app, go to your blog (the part of the app that shows what you post) and hit the gear in the upper right, then select "visibility" and it will be the last option. If you have not updated your app, it will not appear (confirmed by me, who cannot see it on my elderly version of the app).
You don't need to do it on both desktop and mobile -- either one will opt you out -- but on the app you may need to load each of your sideblogs in turn and then go back into the gear and opt out for that blog, like how you have to go into the settings for each sideblog on desktop and do it.
now THAT’S a meme……simply exquisite!
This is an excellent vintage meme. The mixture really brings out the best of both components.
A 2007 I’d imagine. What makes this meme especially fascinating is the textwork. This was made during the short length of time between memes not yet having their defined outlined-Impact text. The Impact has obviously been included, but still uses the one-toned coloring that would be commonly seen with a variety of fonts.
I imagine this would usually be used behind the “spoiler image” feature, making the best of its abilities. Truly an intriguing meme.