Take a gun, point it at your temple, and pull the fucking trigger, moid
So I was curious on what other videos this scote has done and imagine my unsurprise on that most of his videos are making fun of women and how we ruined media lmfao
One Nice Bug Per Day
Stranger Things

gracie abrams
RMH
Cosmic Funnies
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
𓃗
No title available

ellievsbear

#extradirty
Mike Driver
taylor price
trying on a metaphor

titsay

tannertan36

No title available
macklin celebrini has autism

No title available
art blog(derogatory)

JVL

seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Netherlands

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Philippines
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Ecuador

seen from Germany
seen from Indonesia

seen from Canada

seen from Australia
seen from Italy
seen from United States
@cabinpassage
Take a gun, point it at your temple, and pull the fucking trigger, moid
So I was curious on what other videos this scote has done and imagine my unsurprise on that most of his videos are making fun of women and how we ruined media lmfao
he should be in prison for life wtaf
this man is unspeakably vile, but I feel like what is being slept on is the other men who showed up to a stranger’s house ready to (supposedly fake) fucking rape her without ever having interacted in any real or meaningful capacity. like i find cnc disgusting and amoral but fundamentally there are couples in the world who do it and there isn’t really much i can do about that, but these are people who have met and interacted in real life and agreed to do this. these men showed up to that woman’s HOUSE never having seen her or heard her voice, going off of fucking tinder messages, which any child can tell you can be easily faked. like they knew that there was a significant chance this was dodgy, they just didn’t care, they wanted plausible deniability to do what they wanted to do anyway.
When we say girls and women should be afforded the protection of sex exclusive sporting events, it's not entirely because of biological differences between males and us. Clearly these differences are less present in certain age groups.
These girls are absolutely destroying the other team, but look at how the boys are already putting their hands on them and shoving them to the ground in retaliation. They cannot handle losing to an all girls' team, so they're forgoing sportsmanship and honor. Yes, the boys may learn that a win isn't assured to them just because they're male, but the girls will learn to expect male violence if they succeed. Good on the ref for calling it out.
Well well well
Like ngl when zombie jesus followed me back I was lowkey like I’m a huge fan of your work. He knows everything esp around historical revision & he has documents & videos to back it all up. So it’s nearly useful against transactivists fanfiction. Because they could hear Johnson say he was a gay man consistently throughout his life & then impose what they think he’d identify as on a dead man.
Like imagine just being bastardised for a movement decades after your death of which hasn’t even been confirmed the manner of which it occurred. & you’re constantly being used as a gotcha argument by 20 year old heterosexuals using a slur for your sexuality as their movement name.
My what? Also throwing in racism right after saying a man suffered from misogynoir- literally the term for misogyny specifically targeting black women is crazy work.
Iranian women started an AMAZING trend on tik tok, proving that no matter how hard men try to control women and take away their autonomy, women WILL ALWAYS fight back and tear their freedom from the hands of their oppressors
WOMAN LIFE FREEDOM
“Nonbinary” woman makes this video
And somehow the comments are actually supportive of lesbians!
All the top comments are like this. And it gives me hope! You may be wondering, did the creator acknowledge this criticism that the overwhelming majority of commenters had? Did she apologise for spreading homophobic conversion rhetoric?
Nope, she made a pinned comment to appeal to the penis havers and their worshippers. That’s her main concern. Not that she’s saying lesbians can be attracted to men, but that she didn’t police how she talked about dicks at the expense of lesbians enough.
But once again, the commenters are not having it
It’s really interesting to me that somebody not only thinks this is an okay video to publish…but then completely refuses to acknowledge the criticism rightfully calling her homophobic for it. Why make a video about lesbians if you clearly don’t give a shit about us?
Soo.. She deleted the video, because of "woke". Lmao.
Lmao
It’s funny that she only took it down because people were negative towards her. “Waaaah people didn’t use they/them pronouns for me and said I’m not a lesbian if I’m attracted to men waaahhh I’m not in the space to read this”
The negativity that she spread by posting an incredibly homophobic video that perpetuates harmful myths about lesbians? Doesn’t matter to her. She doesn’t care. She thinks that making a video about how lesbians are attracted to men is just being “silly”.
Then to say that her video “made some people uncomfortable” as if the issue is mere discomfort and not homophobia.
I find this whole situation so interesting because there are so many people like her running around. This is just the first time I’ve seen one receive ample backlash. But the core issue isn’t unique at all: there are so many straight and bi women who think that “lesbian” is a fun little label to adopt and stretch out to fit whatever they want it to fit. Whether that be a Kweer Experience or political “lesbianism”. And they’re more than happy to inflict harm on lesbians this way…but then they’ll throw a fit as soon as lesbians call them out.
Hate it when TikTok farm cosplayers and cottagecore types say stuff like "I'm not going to use modern equipment because my grandmothers could make do without it." Ma'am, your great grandma had eleven children. She would have killed for a slow cooker and a stick blender.
I’ve noticed a sort of implicit belief that people used to do things the hard way in the past because they were tougher or something. In reality, labor-saving devices have historically been adopted by the populace as soon as they were economically feasible. No one stood in front of a smoky fire or a boiling pot of lye soap for hours because they were virtuous, they did it because it was the only way to survive.
Taking these screenshots from Facebook because they make you log in and won't let you copy and paste:
what has happened on (white) trans twitter in the past couple of days is almost a mirror image of what happened to zeroambit on here, in 2014. only oldheads remember but it’s not difficult to find out what her friends did to her. same defenses of bdsm and kink, the downplaying of sexual violence, protecting the reputation of a sexual abuser based on optics, and suggesting that a social group is incapable of rape.
a couple days ago, a sexual abuse victim posted images of her injuries and directly accused a trans woman. the friend group of the accused, and even unrelated people who just share an identity with the accused, have dismissed the injuries as mere evidence of kink. this is called the “rough sex defense”—any physical evidence of intimate partner violence can be dismissed as kink, and sexual violence is permissible if it is consensual. they accused the victim of sending anonymous messages that indicate misbehavior, or not acting like a “real victim,” so she couldn’t have been victimized. since the victim is a cis woman, they have also accused her of being a terf, which is an attempt to paint her accusation as simple bigotry that should be ignored. they are posting quotes from “hot allostatic load” to bolster their attempts to DARVO the victim. it’s quite grim.
there is much more public opposition to this behavior now than when i saw it happen to zeroambit. but, honestly, it’s hard to be optimistic, because i’m seeing more support for the rapist too. trans victims of this kind of violence receive the manipulative message that exposing sexual abusers within the in-group is worse than the sexual abuse itself, and this often enforces their silence. they are the primary targets of this kind of intracommunity violence and we seldom hear about it. many of the people defending the current rapist in question are into kink, adhere to BDSM ideology, and are just plainly taking cues out of the misogynist playbook by portraying the victim as hysterical and untrustworthy because she is not being submissive and gentle like they demand. just like zeroambit’s abusers from back in the day. they accused her of being mentally unwell and “anti-bdsm” to discredit her claim of sexual abuse.
this is also the same attitude many online queers had during the first round of neil gaiman’s accusers who came forward. the victims were dismissed because they were thought to have consented to bdsm, and the victims were initially seen as suspicious because the only outlet that gave them a platform to speak against a wealthy male author was accused of being a terf website. they only changed their tune due to optics, per usual.
until misogyny and bdsm ideology are suppressed and purged from society, this form of rape culture and abuse will persist. this is also liberal identity politics and cultural relativism taken to their most sinister end point.
i’m putting screenshots under the read-more so people can witness the kind of tactics and rhetoric people use to harbor abusers. there is a LOT of appeal to the rough sex defense and identity politics in these images. don’t fall for the ideology of BDSM. sexual violence is still sexual violence even if the victim consents. take note, and be vigilant as you navigate relationships. anyone can be a rapist, and anyone can be a rape victim. all rapists must be socially isolated and detained at minimum, regardless of identity. warnings for physically abusive imagery underneath.
This is revolting in every possible way, I'm feeling nauseous just reading all that (That one guy talking about being jury in a trial? Holy shit). If all the well adjusted and reasonable transfems want their community to not have such a reputation, they should fucking DO SOMETHING. The bare minimum would be to speak up against these big, extreme cases.
👆👆 This is a great example of why we can't relinquish any language, even a little bit. I was very polite and affirming for a long time, i used to say things like "the word woman is not what makes someone a woman, i can use it for transwomen and still know they're biological males." But the truth is that it's always going to end up with shit like this. The user in these screenshots is a male defending a male rapist in the name of... feminism. This makes my blood boil.
let's be real. was i wrong about anything i said. transfems and trans women can be whatever they want just like us transmascs and trans men and other afab people want but it is literally just real life that they aren't biologically female and don't experience the same sex-based oppression that we do.
like i said. i'm not transfem so i don't want to dictate or be the ultimate voice (or any voice) what they do or do not experience. but i AM female and they are not so they don't get to dictate what we experience. there is a type of oppression that affects all people born female, just like there is a type of oppression that affects all people who are not white. it is that simple. don't try to erase or silence our experiences and nobody will have any problems with you. if you think it's bigotry to say that transfems are not biologically female and that transmascs are biologically female, you are out of touch with reality and are suppressing our only way to talk about the experiences we face at the hands of our oppressors: people born male. you are perpetuating the oppression.
i said it before but. at the end of the day, if you get mad or upset at the suggestion that there is a type of oppression that is sex-based and affects the biologically female half of the population, you are in fact a misogynist. you are a sexist. there are no ifs ands or buts about it.
Yes, you were incorrect in several points.
Sex-based oppression isn't real. That's not how oppression works. People oppress one another based on identity. The kind of oppression a trans man faces is not the same as what a cis woman faces, because the cis woman doesn't experience the transphobia the trans man experiences, and the trans man can be impacted by misogyny but isn't targeted by it the way a cis woman is.
All trans women and most transfems are women and female, so it would make sense to say that they're included in your original statement. People wanted to call that out explicitly, but you then clarified that you think trans women and most transfems don't count as women or female, which is incorrect.
AFAB does not mean biologically female. It only means one thing, that the person in question was assigned female at birth, by a doctor assuming they were female based on the shape of their genitals.
AFAB isn't a term originally created by and for the intersex community. The original term was 'coercively assigned male at birth' and it was coined by trans women. After being adopted by the rest of the trans community, it was also shared with the intersex community and is a celebrated point of commonality between all of us.
Biological sex is a social construct that doesn't describe the biological reality of humans. Being born with a penis doesn't make you biologically male and being born with a vagina doesn't make you biologically female. Those ideas are just prevalent because most people are cis men or cis women and their gender and sex traits all line up in a typical pattern. Biological sex is a social construct that isn't based on biological reality, because it doesn't account for trans people or intersex people.
You can prove the previous by looking at how people will discard anyone who doesn't fit their preconceived notion of biological sex, in order to justify their need to deny that a trans person is the gender they say they are. See: People who claim any woman who can't give birth isn't a real woman, that people only have XX or XY chromosomes, that intersex variation doesn't matter, etc.
If you're talking about actual biological fact, trans women are biologically female because our gender is female and we just happen to have other sex traits that are not typical for biologically female people. Same goes for trans men, who are biologically male, because they have a male gender with some atypical sex traits, and intersex people as well, who can be cis or trans and have atypical sex traits.
Something that's important to understand about trans people in particular is that we are the gender we say we are. The only real difference is that our bodies came out shaped a little different than what you expect. It's not a mental condition, we are just rare examples of what men, women, and non-binary people look like in the human population.
Many people who are transphobic or gender critical or whatever kind of name they're giving to their prejudice these days think that trans people merely 'think' we are the gender we say we are. These people think that we're wrong and that we're either mentally ill or are literally evil.
In reality, we are the gender we say we are, and these kinds of people just hate us because we look different from them. This is the exact same kind of attitude you find in proud racists who believe that anyone who isn't white is a lesser form of human, and in some cases, not human at all. People hating other people because of how they look, not some actual true thing.
When you argue that women are not actually women because they don't meet your definition of female, that's misogyny talking.
When the women you're talking about are intersex, that is intersexism because you're denying that they're biologically female because they may have been born with TAIS and have testes instead of ovaries.
When the women you're talking about are trans, that's transmisogyny because you're arguing that trans women are biologically male and thus are not Actual Real Women.
And finally, when you argue that trans men are female, you're engaging in transphobia by denying that they're Actual Real Men. You may feel a sense of solidarity with someone who the doctor also claimed was a girl at birth, but if he's not a woman you are doing him a great disservice by acting like he is one.
You should respect the reality of human biology and not try to act as the arbiter of who counts as a man or a woman, male or female.
sorry i am not reading any novel that starts with anyone telling me, someone affected by sex-based oppression (sexism, misogyny), that sex-based oppression is not real. you are a joke lol. i would have humored you had you not said something so cruel and also untrue
let me reiterate:
if you are upset or made angry by someone suggesting that sex-based oppression exists, you are a misogynist. no ifs ands or buts. you are perpetuating the sex-based oppression.
To start, people will go to any fucking length to paint transwomen as martyrs. Instead of an "everyman", identifying as a woman immediately turns them into the everywoman and they immediately have access to the female experience, right? How do you fucking figure?
@korrasera , what happens when a misogynist male sees a "transmasc" as nothing more than a woman and treats her based on this person's biological base? what is that?
Point by point:
You say transwomen are female. Call it whatever you want otherwise, but XY is male whether they like it or not. They need specific care at the doctor, they develop certain characteristics that their bodies dictate. That's why they have to take fucking hormones to grow breasts
What the fuck do you call the difference between somebody's genitals at birth, if not male or female? Go ahead and turn this into an identity thing, I can at least somewhat get on board with you, but how can you even say that our genitals Do nothing to who we are as human beings, and we can simply use language to blank them out of existence? Do you understand how hormones work? Do you realize more people would agree with you if you came even HALFWAY?
LMFAO coined by trans women. Sure. Whatever.
What does being born with a penis or vagina mean to you then. What do you call that. Biological sex can absolutely STILL account for trans people, you clown. By the way, I've seen swaglet say multiple times they are not "against" trans people. This entire premise is flawed when you reach the point where you're playing semantics to claim nothing but your own perspective is true. You are completely bypassing facts of life. Men and women are born exactly how we all live and die. Are you going to say death is a social construct?
... What is a person who can give birth? Just come up with another word for it? The word means "person who gives birth"? Sure. I can think of a word that already exists, has for centuries, but apparently excluding trans women means that word can't be true.
BIOLOGICALLY means "in an inherited or innate way". In a way that concerns living organisms. The transwoman is born male. The transwoman is born with a penis. The penis identifies their SEX. Their chromosomes identify their SEX. Their identity identifies how they feel inside. They feel like a woman, so they dress the gender and attempt to, if they feel this is their heart's desire, to dress how SOCIETY dictates women SHOULD dress. Which is a construct of society's gender roles, by the way. Even if you want to preach gender here. If a woman isn't biological and it's only an identity, then what is the transwoman even identifying WITH? Something entirely, originally made up to categorize people born with vaginas. That's your logic.
For the record, trans people I know generally don't reach these drastic conclusions. It isn't the norm to completely deny reality for the sake of your brainless belief.
And finally, sex based oppression is real. Go to countries where trans populations are lower to really see it in action without your notions clouding your view.
Reminded me of when Lara Logan was raped by a mob of men while reporting on the revolution in Egypt in 2011. She fully believed she was going to die until Egyptian women closed rank around her and protected her until soldiers were able to reach her.
Read the interview at your own discretion. It's deeply disturbing.
Link
Right wing manipulation tactics explained
by ButterFaces
Or they get the former Navy SEAL that they use whenever they need a guy to wear a mask and claim to have been part of whatever group they want to propagandize about.
Wow dang yeah that sure is him
important to know that its the guy who made this post also!
If you have the time, I would recommend watching this video. It is an example of how in practice males are leveraging politics surrounding gender identity and oppression to create a new sort of rape culture within "queer" spaces.
Jack Maibach, the man she's talking about, was also arrested for an attempted carjacking of a woman who had her toddler in the car. the woman in the OP also viewed his internet history, which was full of graphic pornography. he has also since de-identified as trans.
this video kills me they literally look like they're reading ancient scrolls