Since people keep spreading false accusations (misogyny/fatphobia claims, the “rape apologist” accusation, Harassing minors, AI, etc) about me, let me make this very clear.
Obviously, I’ve already debunked this nonsense on my other platforms, but I’ll address it here as well.
For those who don’t know, I’ve been dealing with people on TikTok who seem obsessed with following my every move just to find some kind of "gotcha" moment. They’ve made 30+ slideshow TikToks about me (seriously, get a job) and have even sent them to people on Tumblr to encourage harassment.
The asoiaf.facts user and her little cult are apparently using private or anonymous accounts to stalk and harass me.
The alt accounts they used to harass me:
And honestly… why they need private accounts in the first place. Normal people don’t obsessively monitor someone else’s every post while hiding behind anonymous alts. If you need multiple private accounts just to keep tabs on someone, screenshot everything they do, send it around to other platforms, and constantly jump into their mentions looking for a "gotcha," that’s again harassment.
Posting a bunch of bs about me and calling it “holding me accountable” just to block me right after… but then harassing me while using alt accounts. How exactly does that work? Since when is accountability making accusations, talking behind someone’s back, then cutting off any possibility of response? Define accountability, PLEASE. Imagine taking someone accountable by blocking them.
If someone blocks the person they’re supposedly "holding accountable," what they actually wanted wasn’t accountability it was control over the narrative they’re using by harassing people. They wanted to say whatever they wanted, avoid pushback, collect validation, and dip.
Accountability requires discussion and standing on what was said. Not posting nonsense, hiding behind a block button like a coward bully. So again… define accountability, because "talking shit then blocking" isn’t accountability. It’s harassment.
NOTE: I never engaged with them under their posts, DM’d them, stalked their accounts, or followed them into other people’s comment sections to argue with them. Everything I’ve posted has stayed on my own account. Meanwhile, they’re the ones repeatedly coming onto my page, harassing my posts.
A)
They are targeting me because I used Sense & Sensibility to critique the whole “evil stepmother” trope projected onto Alicent and Catelyn which was @autistic-pea-princess idea. That’s what started all of this. Not because I bullied anyone.
From the beginning, the harassment started because I was using literature, historical parallels, and canon text to defend a character they already hated and now they want me to stop posting altogether, so instead of arguing the actual points, they’re digging through old posts, stalking, nitpicking, and pulling things out of context to paint a narrative.
The funniest part is that asoiaf.facts can’t seem to make a post without mentioning me under every single of her own posts. I’m apparently so "irrelevant" that I somehow end up living rent-free in their content.
Sorry for doing basic text-to-text analysis and noticing how people hating on historically grounded feminine women who works within patriarchal systems instead of acting like Marvel girlbosses 24/7.
Apparently literary analysis is a war crime now. Is reading comprehension lacking in American schools or something? Acting as if fiction exists in a vacuum and doesn’t influence other fiction. Intertextuality, text-to-text influence, historical parallels, literary references this is basic media analysis, not made-up fandom thing. Stories are constantly borrowing from, responding to, deconstructing, or remixing older stories. That’s how literature, film, mythology, and genre fiction have always worked.
ASOIAF itself is built on historical chronicles, Arthurian myth, Shakespeare, medieval romance, fantasy tropes, and earlier speculative fiction. George writes in conversation with other texts all the time. They act like making connections between characters, themes or archetypes, is “reaching,” I mean… congrat on discovering media literacy IG.
A huge part of analysis is understanding how stories echo each other and how audiences interpret those echoes. Especially with adaptation discourse, because adaptations are also texts responding to earlier texts. Everything is part of an ongoing cultural conversation. Pretending fiction has no influence on other fiction is not the intellectual gotcha you think it is. It’s just ignoring how storytelling has functioned for centuries. That’s not “making things up,” that’s just… how literature works.
I also don’t think they’d be putting this much time and energy into me if my posts weren’t reaching people. I’ve seen people tell me they’ve changed their minds or started looking at the text differently after reading my analyses. That’s why it feels like the focus has shifted away from debating my arguments and toward discrediting me personally. There are plenty of accounts that post obvious ragebait or genuinely problematic takes, and most people just ignore them. That’s why it’s strange that so much time and energy is being spent on me instead. If my posts were truly irrelevant or had no impact, they could simply scroll past them like they do with everyone else.
B)
Now I get it… You’re offended by my masterposts because you’re emotionally attached to the character while clinging to them like lifelines and projecting your own neuroses onto them.
Notice how all the slides she made are just reactions to my posts defending Alicent and criticizing her fav white lizards tyrants.
Where’s the evidence I bullied anyone…
There’s barely any engagement with the actual arguments. The amount of obsession, nitpicking, and hostility makes a lot more sense. You couldn’t refute the arguments, the sources, or the analysis, so instead you resorted to taking digs, twisting things out of context, and acting bothered every time I post. If my masterposts were so irrelevant or wrong, you wouldn’t be this pressed over them. But clearly they struck a nerve.
And don’t even get me started on the parasocial attachment you have to these fictional characters. You’d think they were actual people in your life rather than characters from a fantasy series.
What she said:
[Sansa-stark-is-me] willgo out of her way to normalize Alicent's crimes as having nuance that isn't present in the text, is quick to call out any misogyny towards Alicent, etc.
She’s not a real politician. She’s not a real criminal. She’s a fictional character in a fictional medieval fantasy world. You’re a sick, mentally ill person who got this hurt over someone defending a fictional character. To me, that makes it pretty clear this isn’t about me supposedly “bullying” anyone. It’s about the fact that I like and defend Alicent. If I held the exact same opinions about a different character, I doubt any of this would be happening. I wouldn’t even be surprised that you are the one who bullied Olivia too, considering the deep hatred you have for a fictional character.
Are you suggesting it’s pointless to call out misogynistic behavior when it appears, even when it’s happening in real time online? Or that criticism is only valid when directed at one side instead of addressing harmful behavior wherever it appears? Because if we’re talking about real-world consequences, your toxicity doesn’t stop at fictional characters. Your cult in these spaces have sent harassment and rape threats to actual human beings over disagreements about fictional characters.
She twists herself into a pretzel for an interpretation of Alicent that, while not entirely invalid or without merit, doesn't exist in canon whatsoever. And then she gets upset and elitist when other people cannot see at all this sanitized vision of Alicent she's invented within her mind. She's besties with conservatives, she lets her mask slip all the time, etc. She is not this beacon of feminism that she pretends to be. It's a facade and an act. It's a way to bash the characters everyone likes and defend the characters everyone hates without stepping her toes too deeply into anything that could get her cancelled. It's this liberal conservatism, so woke it goes backwards. Her behavior is identical to the people who knew they couldn't call Sabrina Carpenter a sl*t without being cancelled, so they went out of their way to uplift their faves and say that Sabrina was glorifying DV over a kinky album cover.
This is genuinely one of the most unhinged things I’ve read because almost none of it is actually responding to anything I’ve said. It’s just a string of assumptions about my motives and political beliefs.
Apparently I "invented" Alicent’s characterization, I’m secretly conservative, my feminism is fake, I’m friends with conservatives, I wear a mask, I’m strategically avoiding cancellation, and somehow this is all connected to… Sabrina Carpenter?
… what the actual fuck?
Notice how little of this is about my actual arguments. They don’t explain why my interpretation is wrong with textual evidence. Instead they psychoanalyze me, assign me motives I never expressed, and build an entire personality around someone they’ve never met. It’s easier to invent a villain than engage with someone’s reading of a fictional character.
I get that you see rhaenyra as an "extension" of your self, so criticism of them feels like criticism of you. That’s why every analysis becomes an attack. The level of emotional investment is genuinely unhealthy.
If you think my behavior is ‘identical’ to people who hid behind fake concern to attack Sabrina, then your behavior is identical to Sabrina herself the racist who you keep standing by her side despite the Zionists people she works with.
I’m not surprised you’re defending racists people, who defend Israel, or standing with Zionism in real life, because you’re doing the same thing in fiction dismissing or denying the prejudice and racism certain characters faced like denying your fav character is a racist white male-cantered character who used the black Jezebel trope against Nettles.
I’m not even surprised anymore you’re using the genocide in Palestine just to score points for fictional characters, while acting like you care about Palestinian people, but then still supporting Sabrina at the same time. What kind of denial are you trying to push here?
C)
The rape threats I received (the same day where they harassed me) I hope that y’all take a long, hard look at your willingness to justify causing unnecessary harm to someone over online:
There’s more hateful asks here. There’s even more that I didn’t post them yet.
If you can look at that and still think it’s normal or acceptable, that says more about the situation than it does about me. I know many of team black stans justify, excuse, or downplay rape threats online where harm against women is treated as acceptable, funny, or deserved depending on context. So again who’s bullying and harassing right now?
Besides, this has stopped being “just fandom drama” for me. I have an eating disorder, and this situation has already had real consequences for my physical health.
D)
Me calling Daemon “Epstein” as obvious hyperbole under one of your friend’s posts where they were calling everyone “Epstein,” including calling Alicent “Maxwell” is somehow enough for you to accuse me of supporting sex trafficking and other insane things? Meanwhile, you’re perfectly comfortable dragging a real, ongoing genocide into fictional fandom? I never made posts about the files like your friends I was responding in the same exaggerated tone your friends had already established about fictional characters. So me clapping back at your friends in the exact same tone they were using is somehow unacceptable, but what they said is perfectly fine?
If they’re free to throw around exaggerated comparisons about fictional characters, why am I suddenly the villain for responding with the same energy? Either the jokes are acceptable, or they aren’t. You don’t get to invent one standard for your friends and another for me.
I know you weren’t interested in context you were looking for a “gotcha.” That’s why you ignored the fact that I was replying under your friend’s post that you defended, where everyone was already making the same type of hyperbolic jokes. The irony is that you’ll bend over backwards to interpret the worst possible meaning from my comments while excusing your own side’s behavior, even when they escalate things by dragging real-world tragedies into fandom arguments. If your goal was honesty, you’d apply the same standards to everyone. Including yourself.
ACCUSED OF BEING FATPHOBIC:
Me getting accused of misogynist and fatphobic ia for pointing out that aging, weight gain, or losing conventional attractiveness is a recurring GRRM trope applied to both male and female characters will never stop being ridiculous to me. Getting older, gaining weight, becoming physically worn down, or losing traits characters were once proud of is literally everywhere in ASOIAF. Robert Baratheon, Lysa Tully, Illyrio Mopatis, Theon Greyjoy, Jaime Lannister, jeyne Poole and plenty of others go through physical decline or bodily transformation tied to stress, trauma, excess, illness, war, aging, or power.
Your fave is not the first or last character GRRM has written this way. But somehow when it comes to certain characters, they scream “propaganda,” “fatphobia,” or “misogynistic lies” as if the text invented physical decline exclusively to target them personally. Meanwhile the exact same narrative device gets accepted without issue for male characters all the time. And no, acknowledging that this trope exists across the series is not the same thing as mocking characters for their appearance. It’s just recognizing a consistent pattern in GRRM’s writing where bodies physically reflect age, trauma, excess, grief, imprisonment, injury, stress, or changing social circumstances.
MY ORIGINAL POST:
…Where did I ever made fun of them? My fav characters are in the post too.
Where did I ever say that skinny characters are “hotter” than characters who gain weight? Again, they’re arguing against something I never said. None of my comments were about attractiveness, and nobody in my replies was saying, “Alicent is prettier because she’s skinny” or comparing women that way. They don’t even have any SS because those comments don’t exist.
Throughout the books, characters comment on one another’s appearance whether someone is too fat, too thin, too old, too young, too beautiful, too plain. I even used examples like Viserys and Cersei mocking people for being skinny how is that fatphobic…
I’m still trying to understand how me describing Rhaenyra as “big” is supposedly fatphobic, while Rhaenyra stans (lady celtigar same person who joke about Cersei’s rape) call their own fav "big" without anyone caring:
A lot of fat people prefer the terms big over fat. Of course, different people have different preferences, but “big” is generally considered a more polite/respectful and neutral way to describe someone’s size than “fat.” Rhaenyra is big, and that’s relevant because GRRM himself explicitly notes that Sunfyre, being badly injured, couldn’t swallow her whole. So why is it only offensive when I say it? If calling Rhaenyra “big” is fatphobic, then that standard should apply to everyone not just when it’s convenient to create a gotcha.
Ironically the only “fatphobia” come from people who simply can’t accept that Rhaenyra is described as fat or big in the source material. Instead of engaging with what the text actually says, they treat even a neutral description of her size as an attack.
The worst thing they’re holding against me is a comment I don’t even remember making… from THREE years ago. How is digging up a three-year-old comment and using it to build an entire narrative about me “accountability”? That’s not accountability that’s just looking for excuses to harass someone and then blocking them. Fix your mental illness instead of spending your time digging through years.
Why don’t you keep that same energy for your friend, who said Aegon being fat makes him ugly? That’s just another fatphobic post. Or does “accountability” only apply when it’s someone you don’t like? I’ve never reposted or made fatphobic content. If anything, that comment before three years ago was me clapping back at people who were already making fatphobic jokes by throwing the same energy back at them. Digging up one out-of-context comment from three years ago to paint me as a horrible person while ignoring actual fatphobic posts from your own friends is just hypocrisy.
E)
Me accused of being a Zionist.
Me being accused of being a Zionist because I reposted two ASOIAF fan arts (HERE and HERE) is genuinely ridiculous. Since when am I expected to investigate every single artist’s personal politics before sharing fan art? Do you seriously expect people to background-check every artist they come across before hitting repost?
What’s even more ironic is that you’re policing me over reposting art while using artwork from a controversial artist as your own pfp someone you’ve acknowledged has expressed pro-Zionist views.
If you’re going to make accusations that serious, at least apply the same standard to yourself instead of selectively enforcing it depending on who you’re trying to call out. The hypocrisy is astounding.
Also harassing the artist and accusing them of insane crimes when the artist herself already said the ship wasn't age-explicit.
F)
Accused of being racist STILL zero proof of me being racist.
She's again accusing artists of being racist by attaching this onto me. Being accused of racism is honestly absurd to me when I’ve consistently been one of the few people in this fandom who actually talks about racism in ASOIAF. If you look through my account, you’ll find post after post discussing racism, xenophobia, colonialism, blood purity, and how race shapes the world George wrote. It’s a recurring topic on my platform.
What I find ironic is that many team black stans (including them) accusing me of racism are also the ones dismissing any discussions of racism in the series. They’ll insist their fav characters can’t be racist, argue that race “doesn’t exist” in ASOIAF. Whether it’s the treatment of Nettles, the blood purity ideology surrounding Valyrians, or the prejudice directed toward different peoples across the world, those conversations are shut down instead of engaged with.
So it’s strange to be painted as racist by people who frequently push back against discussions of racism in the text itself…If you’re going to accuse someone of something that serious, you should have actual evidence not just yapping.
G)
I never accused her or her friends of using AI. If anything, it’s been the complete opposite they’re the ones who harassed me and accused me of using AI.
It’s also funny how she’s calling me weird for using AI viggle… twice. I only did it for fun because one of my friends asked me to. Meanwhile, AI viggle are everywhere on TikTok. Half the app uses them. It’s funny that she called me weird for using AI visuals twice, yet when I checked, the post she wrote about me is AI-generated:
I never held anyone to some impossible moral standard. You’re the one doing that. Just look at your own behavior before trying to lecture everyone else.
H)
Accused of being rape apologist for saying that ceryse didn't SA'd Maegor. It’s crazy how Asoiaf.Facts can victimize Maegor but completely deny Alicent’s victimhood, make a bunch of posts defending Daemon as a morally grey character despite being a rapist like Maegor with his abusive actions, then turn around and act like Alicent is just pure evil. The double standard is actually insane. But also accusing Ceryse of raping Maegor and ignoring what happened to Ceryse.
Ceryse was publicly humiliated, repeatedly disrespected, and reduced to accusations about her infertility. She likely would’ve preferred almost any other marriage if she’d actually had a choice, but instead she was pushed into one and had to survive an incredibly abusive situation. And let’s not forget you also accused Jeyne Westerling of raping Robb. You only extend empathy to women you already like. If they aren’t Rhaenyra, suddenly their suffering doesn’t count.
If your logic is that Ceryse SA’d 13-year-old Maegor, then how does that same logic work when you also claim 14-year-old Aegon II SA’d Helaena? You’re literally ending up blaming a child victim of COCSA with that argument. And the inconsistency doesn’t stop there. You’re also fine with your friend shipping 14-year-old Jace with 21-year-old Cregan while claiming to be against pedophilia.
I)
I’m getting accused of calling GRRM a real-life criminal (wtf!) while also using his own words to support my arguments, as if that’s some kind of gotcha. First of all, there’s no comment where I called him a pedophile. I have criticized him as misogynistic, and I’ve agreed with criticism of some of the ways he writes or talks about underage female characters. I think some of his comments and creative choices are fair game for criticism. Let’s not forget he’s an older white American man who started writing this world in the ‘90s. It’s okay to acknowledge that some of his views or writing choices feel outdated or weird by today’s standards.
What I did was like a friend’s comment saying she believes he’s misogynistic and that his treatment of certain underage female characters is disturbing. Which is true. I agree that some of his comments and writing choices especially regarding Daenerys deserve criticism. For example, I strongly disagree with his view that Daenerys wasn’t raped, and I think some of his treatment of young female characters is deeply unsettling. He also said in one of his interviews that he was attracted to Daenerys, a child, and that he wanted to meet her because she looked sexy while wearing a dress that showed part of her breasts... if you don’t think this reflects a pedophilic view of a fictional child character, you need to check your fucking brain.
Liking ASOIAF doesn’t mean I have to agree with or defend everything the author has ever said or written. That also doesn’t mean I can’t use him as a source when discussing his own fictional world. Those are two completely different things. If I’m talking about the succession crisis, inheritance laws, or how Westeros functions, of course I’m going to cite the author "extra" explaining the world he created. He’s the primary source on that. But that doesn’t mean I have to treat every personal opinion he expresses as morally correct or use those opinions to justify misogynistic arguments like you do.
J)
Accusing of harassing minors. She still has zero proof that harassed anyone or that I slut-shamed anyone, sent rape threats, told people to harass others, or did half of the things she’s accusing me of. Even she has admitted that the worst thing she can point to is that I called them misogynistic and illiterate and yes, I stand by saying this - those criticisms when they’re based on the arguments being made.
Calling a take misogynistic or illiterate because someone argues “Cersei is far more sympathetic than Alicent” or “Alicent isn’t a victim” is criticism of an opinion. It isn’t the same as bullying or harassment. Meanwhile, what about the rape jokes? What about the slut-shaming? If we’re going to have a conversation about bullying, why are those behaviors constantly minimized while my literary criticism gets treated as if it’s equivalent to abuse?
And the “Helaena wife” account is an alt account that’s being used to target and harass me. The timing, the behavior, and the fixation on my posts all point in that direction.
…I’m beyond exhausted with them and their insufferable little cult. Half of them seem so emotionally invested in fictional characters that any criticism feels like a personal attack. Instead of engaging with the text, they project their own issues onto these characters and then mistake that projection for media literacy. It’s honestly so transparent. They cling to fictional characters like emotional support animals, build entire identities around defending them, and then act like anyone who reads the story differently is morally corrupt.
Slutshaming real women and girls, calling everyone "whore" "bitch" and every misogynistic slurs/insults in the dictionary, then acting confused when their comments get deleted or people block them. And spare everyone the fake intellectual act. Watching them reduce every conversation into projection, stan brainrot, and moral grandstanding while pretending they’re insightful is actually painful. They don’t analyze characters they emotionally latch onto them and treat disagreement like a personal attack.
END…
I don’t know what you’ve been through irl, and I’m not going to pretend I do. But from everything I’ve seen, you’re a hateful person and your heart seems so consumed by hatred that you’re projecting it onto a fictional world with dragons and zombies and, worse, onto real people over fiction. That’s the part I find genuinely sad. I still hope one day you’ll realize how much time and energy you’ve devoted to hating and attacking someone over a fantasy series. Imagine what you could have created or accomplished if you put that same effort into something positive instead. No one who is genuinely happy spends their time stalking, harassing, or trying to tear down strangers over fictional characters. I hope you realize how far you have evolved beyond simple hate. The constant projection, bitterness, and superiority complex aren’t fooling anyone they’re just loud symptoms of someone clearly fighting battles they keep outsourcing onto other people. And the “we’re adults actually” routine is even more sad. No functioning adult with a shred of self-awareness would willingly post half the deranged nonsense they churn out daily. At some point you need to grow up, develop critical thinking, detach from fictional characters being used as personal identity substitutes, and log off. Because the second a fictional opinion sends someone into a public meltdown.
