giving myself a merit badge that says SURVIVED MARCH
oh fuck. I’m so sorry. listening and learning
taylor price

Discoholic 🪩
Xuebing Du
Cosimo Galluzzi
★
almost home
art blog(derogatory)
Cosmic Funnies
No title available

oozey mess
Misplaced Lens Cap
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
No title available

No title available
h
Doug Jones
The Bowery Presents
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Noah Kahan

titsay
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Japan
seen from United States
seen from Ukraine
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Greece
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Italy

seen from Colombia

seen from Brazil
seen from Indonesia
@corruptedspore
giving myself a merit badge that says SURVIVED MARCH
oh fuck. I’m so sorry. listening and learning
It makes me happy when they listen
YES. YES YES YES THANK YOU
"it would be so good if it was good" will haunt you but "it's extremely good, except for the one or two parts which are so bad it's genuinely kind of insulting" will straight up drive you insane
one has you making posts like "okay but if the author UNDERSTOOD the POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS of the story they were telling, and leaned into it, it would actually be a really interesting exploration of..."
the other has you pacing your bedroom at one in the morning going "why. why would you ever in a million years do it like that. genuinely what possible thought process was involved. was the writer possessed by a fucking ghost or something."
no actually, cat of mine, I don’t like it when my toes become your mice. But if I tell you, no, then my arms become your scratching pole.
I feel like having wings violently burst out of your back would just feel really good. Like itd feel awful but also itd feel really satisfying.
The problem with being low support needs is that people mentally autocorrect that to “no support needs” and then proceed to give you absolutely nothing and then get surprised when you implode after six months.
the persecution of lefthandedness is insane to think about because it was so intense for so long, in some places still is, without any clear profit motivation. sheer love of the game. as late as the 70s at least they were smacking my stepdad's hands for it with a wooden ruler at school, to this day he's in weird ambidexterity situation where he's not great with either side and notably clumsy due to poor hand-eye coordination. just wtf
It is fascinating to me that people also think of handedness as an example of bigotry that just...went away. As you note, it...hasn't in some places. I know people who grew up in the mid-late 90s who still had this problem.
But also, and this is really important to keep in mind regarding bigotry that still causes in many ways larger problems, that the structural problems are not actually fixed.
If you go to any computer lab or public library, the mice will be on the right side of the computer. Sometimes they can be moved. Sometimes they can't. Many computer mice are curved to only fit in right hands.
It is impossible to find lefthanded scissors without going to a specialty store, because most scissor makers don't even make them. And it's not just a matter of grip; the slicing side of the blades is obscured if you use righty scissors in your left hand, so your cut is off.
All those signing pads with the little chained styluses? Almost always on the right side, often not even long enough to stretch to the left. Makes signing for lefties extremely difficult.
I caused actual muscular problems in college having to twist around in order to write at right-handed desks in college when there weren't enough lefty desks--and there never were. Some classrooms didn't even have a single one.
I could go on.
But the point is, bigotry isn't just a mindset shift. People can't just decide they're not bothered by that particular difference anymore and everything's fine, because society is still structured and designed to cause problems for marginalized people. And they're never even going to notice all the little ways their life is bent to convenience them that inconveniences others.
like yea you shouldn't expect anything out of being a nice person, you should be nice because its a good thing to do, but i can't emphasis enough just how many perks you get by not being an asshole.
Case in point: barista at the coffee shop I frequent gave me a tiny duckie
will you be running for prime minister?
if im not busy that day
dog i gotta move like yesterday
Please stay
fuck this. im gonna drive my chevy to the levee
by talos this cant be happening
well at least them good old boys are staying sober
what the fuck
some of you seem to be under the unfortunate impression that i enjoy finishing things. i enjoy making things
You know the old proverb. If you have a shirt thats good. Wear it everyday till you die
2026 nonbinary name survey: results
While the big annual survey continues (until 13th August), I'm here to give you the results of the nonbinary name survey!
This is on the blog because it's technically a side survey for fun. The survey ran from 5th July to 3rd August, and there were 11,340 usable responses. You can see the spreadsheet of results here.
The required opening checkbox was intended to make sure that everyone fit the usual criteria:
Yes, I confirm that I don't really fit into just one of the two boxes of "always, solely and completely a woman/girl" or "always, solely and completely a man/boy".
Top 20 names
Alex (1.01%, 204 people)
Jay (0.69%)
Sam (0.51%)
Charlie (0.49%)
Robin (0.48%)
Rowan (0.41%)
Ash (0.40%)
Max (0.33%)
Lee (0.31%)
Eli (0.31%)
Kai (0.31%)
Moss (0.29%)
Quinn (0.28%)
Wren (0.28%)
Aster (0.28%)
Jamie (0.28%)
Kit (0.26%)
Jack (0.25%)
Morgan (0.25%)
Ari (0.24%, 49 people)
Here's that top 20 as a graph, for the visual-brained folks:
The gender intentions of 18 of the top 20 names was "gender-neutral"; the two exceptions were Eli and Jack, where people were more likely to be aiming for something more masculine.
Here's the last name survey I ran, in 2023. The design was quite different, but the top 4 were the same names in the same order. The top 10 are the same names in a different order, but with one change: last time Kit was in the top 10 (this year it's at #17), and this time Lee is in the top 10 instead (last year it was #20).
This time I gave participants three slots to enter names. 20,118 names were entered in total, of which 2,358 (about 12%) were entered more than once. 22% of participants used all three slots, which seems like a lot to me, and maybe if I do this again I should provide more slots.
There were 8 names in the top 100 where people entering that name were more likely than not to be keeping a birth name:
Hannah (93.8% of Hannahs were keeping a birth name)
Elizabeth (93.3%)
Emily (91.3%)
Anna (86.8%)
Sarah (84.4%)
Emma (84.2%)
Laura (80.8%)
Claire (75.0%)
On the flipside, there were seven names entered over 20 times that were exclusively chosen by the participants themselves:
Aster (56 participants)
Rain (39)
Crow (29)
Niko (25)
Nyx (24)
Elias (22)
Briar (20)
Here's a graph of the gender intentions of each name:
Of the names that were not given at birth, here are the gender intention options and their top 3 names in each:
Gender-neutral:
Riley (74.2%)
Quinn (70.2%)
Sasha (68.8%)
Nonbinary:
Echo (50.0%)
Moth (35.3%)
Mars (34.1%)
Feminine:
Luna (64.5%)
Alice (34.3%)
Willow (30.3%)
Masculine:
Oliver (75.6%)
Alexander (70.6%)
James (65.9%)
Which means, this time, we have achieved our goal and discovered that:
the nonbinariest name is Echo! (24 people, 0.12% of participants.)
the most common name among nonbinary people is Alex, with an incredible ~1 in 100 nonbinary people going by this name.
And finally, despite the stereotype that nonbinary names are all three characters long, the most common number of characters in all names entered (including every name entry counted individually, and including names entered only once) is 4 or 5. Here's a graph:
As promised, the full spreadsheet of results doesn't contain individual responses, and any name entered only once is left out of the list. This is because names are identifying information and I don't want to risk anyone accidentally outing themselves due to having a very unusual or unique name.
Here's the results spreadsheet link again. Enjoy!
[ Take part in the 2026 Gender Census before 13th August 2026 ]
Changelog:
2026-08-03: Updated "Gender intentions" graph due to dramatic miscount of blank entries. I was including the blank cells from people who hadn't even been taken to that page and hadn't seen the question!
if i dont respond to a message from you i can basically guarantee its not because i dislike you. im just getting attacked by imps and shit all the time genuinely.