https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0284161

Andulka
Mike Driver
Three Goblin Art
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

shark vs the universe
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Cosimo Galluzzi
wallacepolsom
Stranger Things

No title available
ojovivo
Sade Olutola
h

PR's Tumblrdome
sheepfilms
Monterey Bay Aquarium
YOU ARE THE REASON
Game of Thrones Daily
EXPECTATIONS
Show & Tell

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Mexico
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
@dolphinbrains
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0284161
goodbye rpf 2025 welcome rpf 2026
OKAY FOR REAL NOW. HAPPY RPF 2026 EVERYONE 🎆🎇🎆🎇🎆🎇👨❤️💋👨
this post is about LONG DEAD POLAR EXPLORERS !!!! everyone in the notes talking about actors or f1 or whatever but lets not lose focus: Robert Falcon Scott (6 June 1868 - c 29 March 1912) !!!!!!!!!!
It's alive
— Ursula K. Le Guin, from “A Rant About ‘Technology’”
surprise! The meaning of words changes as society advances. Five hundred years ago, a “factory” was a warehouse where traders would store their goods in a foreign country. Two thousand years ago, a “factorium” was an oil press.
“Technology” was once a created product. Now, it’s something specifically technical, running on electricity with wires and screens and making beeps and boops. That’s the way of the world, the way language functions and has always functioned.
surprise! you have badly missed the point.
I don’t think I have, actually. I went and read the whole thing, and her main idea is people “misusing the word technology”. That’s literally what she says two paragraphs before the above excerpt -
“But [the word technology] is consistently misused to mean only the enormously complex and specialised technologies of the past few decades, supported by massive exploitation both of natural and human resources. This is not an acceptable use of the word.”
That is precisely the sentiment I was responding to - the idea that our modern use of the word “technology” is somehow wrong or misinformed. But it’s not. It has simply progressed as our society has progressed.
She goes on to write that “Its technology is how a society copes with physical reality…” and no, it isn’t. Perhaps it was, centuries ago. But within the modern societal consciousness, that is not what technology means. The meaning has changed. It’s just like how you wouldn’t describe, say, a fantasy magic system as “weird” because “weird” doesn’t have any relation to magic in the modern parlance. But it did - in Shakespeare’s day, that was the word’s primary meaning - magic, power, the occult, fate, witchcraft - though he would have spelled it “weyard”.
The most ridiculous thing is that this is all written in response a review of one of her books, in which the reviewer is very clearly using “technology” in the modern sense. But she still pedantically insists that, actually, his review is incorrect because… she’s working with a completely different definition of the word than everyone else on the planet.
And on a side note, fuck this whole… essay? I hate it. ‘Not an acceptable use of the word’ my ass. That’s the kind of linguistic arch-conservativism that creates institutions like the Académie Française.
I think, that even if you want to argue that the meaning of the word technology has changed and it now only means something running on electricity, that just isn’t correct?
Like the definition in the dictionary (here specifically taken from Collins dictionary, but it is a variation of the same in the other dictionaries) is this:
“Technology refers to methods, systems, and devices which are the result of scientific knowledge being used for practical purposes.”
I can’t help but think that you have interpreted your own bias of what technology is, to mean that the word has changed definition over time. But in many ways it hasn’t. And it is just as correct to call a computer or iphone technology as it is to call a loom or a wagon technology. Not in any of the definitions I have looked up does it say that electricity or wires or anything else has to be involved for something to be considered technology.
She specifically mentions that to only use the word to include the complex technology of the last few decades isn’t an acceptable use of the word, not that the word hasn’t adapted to also include those.
Just because something isn’t a new technology doesn’t mean it stops being technology.
I know for a fact that my stepmother loves me.
I know it for a fact because the vaccine for the sleeping sickness came out when I was ten, and she cried. When she was a kid, parents would have Sleep Overs whenever someone caught it, in the hopes of spread it around - children were statistically more likely to be woken up by "True Love's Kiss" from a parent or family member, after all, whereas if you caught it when you were older, things got more complicated and if you were old, you might be the last one in your family left.
(There’s more to it than that, I know, I've tried reading the papers, but I barely passed biocurse with a C+, and don't even get me started on organic curses. Those two classes were enough to kill any hope I had of becoming a fairy godperson.)
So, when the vaccine against the sleeping sickness came out, my stepmother cried, and my father got me on the list right away; I wasn't high priority, after all; I was young, there wasn't an active outbreak in my school district, and I was otherwise healthy. But they put me on the backup list anyway, so if there was one, just one available, I could get it.
When the fairy godperson's office called, my dad was at work, but my stepmother bundled me up and drove there so fast I thought we were going to be pulled over. (Later, I found out that she'd gotten an automated ticket from one of the red light cameras, a fact that she hid from both me and my dad.) They called my dad, of course, and he left work, but he also gave the okay for my stepmother to be my medical proxy in case he was delayed.
Vaccines don't last forever, and it was decided that I would be given it without him there. At 100 minutes, my stepmother would try kissing my forehead, and if it didn't work, the office would set me up for the 100 hours it would take before my dad could try.
Magic can't be ignored, but it can be tricked.
It didn't matter. At 100 minutes post-vaccine, my stepmother kissed my forehead and I woke up.
So. I know she loves me.
Having your main anxiety response be Avoidance is crazy cause you'll think you're chillin and then one day you're like waitttt I've been paralyzed with fear this whole time. Damn
Was anybody else playing dead the whole time they were teenagers or is that just a me problem. Like I'm 20 now and I'm like Oh shit I didn't do anything. Because I'm scared
hey dude, idk how much you remember from the party last night but- yeah, everyone saw your want. yeah no it was pretty late and winding down so it was quiet enough that every single person there saw it throbbing and twitching in your chest and so wet with hunger it was glistening under the kitchen light. they said it looked like it was reaching for something
This is awesome on so many levels.
Ladies and Gentlemen i present to you John Carpenter’s The Thing, as performed by the claymated, Antarctic cast of the hit children’s animation Pingu. Directed by Lee Hardcastle, in under 3 minutes. Noot, Noot.
Oh my fucking god.
JESUS CHRIST
I’m still amazed at how they got a “noot noot” to sound so much like a “fuck you”
I am amazed that they managed to make it somehow even more horrifying in three minutes than the original movie made it in two hours.
Nano fish 🐟 🐠
Molly Upton Watchtower (1975) Quilt
some drawings of my cat ophie as...an athlete in the olympics ✨
Pictures from the British Antarctic expedition (1910-1913) + 1993 suggestion for long-term nuclear waste warning messages
Genuinely curious because i was counting mississippi today and was like “do other countries have their own way of doing this?”
Outside of the US do you have a filler word to count seconds like “1 mississippi”?
Yes and the answer is tagged
No
No and i dont understand what this is
Im outside the US but i use mississippi anyway??
Im in the US
TAG WHERE YOU’RE FROM AND WHAT YOU USE IF ANYTHING!! Reblog so more people see this :)
For context: counting mississippi is going “1 mississippi 2 mississippi” and its supposed to be a filler word that pads time to your counting to make it more equal to a second. So the idea is saying “1 mississippi” would take approx 1 second to say, making it easier to count seconds / time things mentally/vocally. Idk if i explained that well enough but its the best i could do
murderbot + friendship
Often when I'm reading the Wikipedia article about some zoological group, there'll be a sentence near the start that says something like "[group] varies in size from [smallest species in group] to [largest species in group]". I always immediately click on the largest species. I love to see a huge version of a thing, it's usually some crazy monster that looks sick as hell, it's always worth seeing and I have a great time.
And then I say to myself, come on now, you don't want to be someone who's just interested in the big ones, see what the smallest one looks like. So with a sense of grim duty, I click. It's not even that small usually, most small things aren't like that little frog wrapped around someone's pinkie, they maybe look a bit like the juvenile version of a more median-sized species perhaps. But I nod appreciatively and I say out loud, "Gee yeah, that is a small one of those", and then go back to the main article I started at.
Now both links are purple. No one can accuse me of being narrow-minded or unjust, and I can read my article in peace.
The crew of a massive container ship that crashed into the Francis Scott Key bridge in Baltimore early Tuesday warned of power issues before the collision, which caused the bridge to collapse into the frigid Patapsco River, officials said.
Maryland Gov. Wes Moore said the warning from the ship’s crew likely saved lives.
“We’re thankful that between the mayday and the collapse, that we had officials who were able to begin to stop the flow of traffic so more cars were not on the bridge,” Moore said. He called those officials heroes.
Moore noted that the bridge was up to code at the time of the collapse. He said the collapse was a “shocking and heartbreaking” event for the people of Maryland who have used the bridge for 47 years.
(continue reading)
Good to have confirmation from someone with more knowledge on this sort of thing that no bridge would hold up to that. I had concerns if this was an engineering fail at work as well.
It actually is somewhat true that it is the fault of the bridge. Yes no bridge would be able to hold up to a cargo ship colliding with it head on, but it should also not be possible for the ship to collide with the bridge support if they had been properly secured. Many experts after the accident have been confused as to why the bridge supports have not been secured by making false islands around them under the water, so that the ship would hit the ground before it hit the bridge.