SCP author"local lesbian commie" mother is suffering from cancer and there strugglign to buy meds,please donate to them
Support Gaby
@yourlocalgnarpgnarp pls reblog this and donate if you can,sorry if im spamming tags
Sade Olutola
cherry valley forever
Mike Driver
$LAYYYTER
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
trying on a metaphor

Origami Around
Show & Tell

izzy's playlists!

Janaina Medeiros

No title available
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Stranger Things
noise dept.
Cosimo Galluzzi
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Misplaced Lens Cap

Product Placement

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Malaysia
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
@dummi-irl-fr
SCP author"local lesbian commie" mother is suffering from cancer and there strugglign to buy meds,please donate to them
Support Gaby
@yourlocalgnarpgnarp pls reblog this and donate if you can,sorry if im spamming tags
I would like to propose a corollary/spin-off of the Komaeda Archetype called the Vriska Archetype
a Vriska is:
a female character (especially a teenage girl)
who acts as an anti-hero or does a lot of morally dubious things
has a justification for these things that lead a lot of people to argue that she "did nothing wrong"
expresses romantic or sexual interest in another female character (either in canon or fanon)
and is extremely divisive within the fandom
handy checklist
star butterfly fits all the check marks except the 2nd one, but tbf its one VERY dubius thing, mostly cuz its introduced at the END of the show so theres not much context
the character
I agree, THE character
why is this post completely broken in every way imaginable
Broken notes… deactivated account… removed image….
Finally, we have them all.
In addition: OP’s name is just… gone. No “[insert username]-deactivated[insert a bunch of numbers]” as is the standard for deactivated blogs.
Just the world “deactivated.” Look upon their post, ye mighty, and despair.
It’ll be almost impossible to find this post unless it wanders across your dash.
You have a bigger fish to fry, man.
What do you think of the RPC Authority?
trans girls are allowed to be annoying and stereotypical and socially inept and hyperactive and hypersexual and various types of animalgirl and there's nothing you can do about it. in fact if you're mean to that skirt go spinny reddit trans girl i'm stealing your entire house
It appears that all parties with the exception of Restore are not going to entertain Farage’s media circus.
Count Binface - it is your time. People of Clacton, please do the funniest fucking thing that’s happened in UK politics for a while.
Shitposting at its finest.
Hi there! Do you care about artists having a right to their work? Do you care about people being fairly credited and compensated? Then LISTEN UP.
I do not want to see ONE. SINGLE. fan of SCP going to see the V/H/S SCP film. I do not want to see any horror fan going to see it. I do not want anyone who claims they care about artistic integrity to go see this film.
Spooky Pictures and Image Nation Studios are producing “V/H/S: SCP,” a full-length feature based on the online SCP Foundation project.
If you're unfamiliar with SCP, it's an online horror fiction collective. The beauty of it is that it's all CC-by-SA-3.0 licensed, so no one person can lay claim to it. A key part of that license is:
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Guess what's fucking that over?
The Wiki's Licensing team was not contacted about this project. I repeat: the Wiki's Licensing team was not contacted about this project.
"But what about Backrooms?" The content for Backrooms was based around Parsons' own series and interpretation aside from the original anonymous post. The Wiki is a collective of hundreds of authors producing original content. It VERY MUCH SEEMS like the people behind this project are about to profit off of basically stealing site members' work. I cannot confirm if authors have been contacted or not, but staff have been totally blindsided. If this film doesn't comply with the SCP Wiki's CC license, there is basically nothing they can do about it. A small horror writing website cannot win a legal battle against these studios.
PLEASE spread the word. I am beyond angry about this.
I'm also tagging @deadmeatjames here real quick because I know you've spoken about this franchise in the past and I am a whole random person online with zero reach.
EDIT: To be crystal clear, this post is not a statement on behalf of Wiki staff or the site as an entity.
EDIT 2: Please do not attempt to contact the film studio on behalf of the Wiki.
i hate that 1. i have to reblog this and
2. ill likely wont matter
also @relicanthfan6113 @pixie-stikk @andromeda3125alpheratz
Hi there! Do you care about artists having a right to their work? Do you care about people being fairly credited and compensated? Then LISTEN UP.
I do not want to see ONE. SINGLE. fan of SCP going to see the V/H/S SCP film. I do not want to see any horror fan going to see it. I do not want anyone who claims they care about artistic integrity to go see this film.
Spooky Pictures and Image Nation Studios are producing “V/H/S: SCP,” a full-length feature based on the online SCP Foundation project.
If you're unfamiliar with SCP, it's an online horror fiction collective. The beauty of it is that it's all CC-by-SA-3.0 licensed, so no one person can lay claim to it. A key part of that license is:
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Guess what's fucking that over?
The Wiki's Licensing team was not contacted about this project. I repeat: the Wiki's Licensing team was not contacted about this project.
"But what about Backrooms?" The content for Backrooms was based around Parsons' own series and interpretation aside from the original anonymous post. The Wiki is a collective of hundreds of authors producing original content. It VERY MUCH SEEMS like the people behind this project are about to profit off of basically stealing site members' work. I cannot confirm if authors have been contacted or not, but staff have been totally blindsided. If this film doesn't comply with the SCP Wiki's CC license, there is basically nothing they can do about it. A small horror writing website cannot win a legal battle against these studios.
PLEASE spread the word. I am beyond angry about this.
I'm also tagging @deadmeatjames here real quick because I know you've spoken about this franchise in the past and I am a whole random person online with zero reach.
EDIT: To be crystal clear, this post is not a statement on behalf of Wiki staff or the site as an entity.
EDIT 2: Please do not attempt to contact the film studio on behalf of the Wiki.
i hate that 1. i have to reblog this and
2. ill likely wont matter
harryblank made CLIO and Alexandra limited memory style sprites everyone look at them RIGHT NOW i'm gonna cry
harryblank made CLIO and Alexandra limited memory style sprites everyone look at them RIGHT NOW i'm gonna cry
harryblank made CLIO and Alexandra limited memory style sprites everyone look at them RIGHT NOW i'm gonna cry
harryblank made CLIO and Alexandra limited memory style sprites everyone look at them RIGHT NOW i'm gonna cry
harryblank made CLIO and Alexandra limited memory style sprites everyone look at them RIGHT NOW i'm gonna cry
harryblank made CLIO and Alexandra limited memory style sprites everyone look at them RIGHT NOW i'm gonna cry
harryblank made CLIO and Alexandra limited memory style sprites everyone look at them RIGHT NOW i'm gonna cry