[coffindollette]

🧿 to keep you safe from people who want to do you harm.<3 🧿

[eskildit]

like sorry its actually insane that a very mainstream us media outlet is saying shit like "Is it fair to say that third worldism is an extension of cultural Marxism? / Yes, it is. It is. It definitely is." like thats full-on far right conspiracism jacketing as common-sense centrism.

[eskildit]

sorry im posting again about the terrible washington post opinion section podcast. why are they so bad at this. how are they barely breaking triple digit views. also if you guessed they used the terms "third worldist" and "cultural marxism" fully unironically in the zohran video, you would be right.

[eskildit]

i still feel so terribly lame and old school that when i see real true left posting i go? and you're willing to put that on the record? attached to your ip?

[saejima-nyan04]

we all had a pjackk dead wife flashback today

[gaybichon]

not even funny how true this is for me

[bobdylanyaoi]

“Subverting” Catholic art? Oh, okay. I see, you think this has nothing to do with you. You log onto the internet and you post about how “Wound of Christ” from Psalter and Prayer Book of Bonne de Luxembourg, attributed to Jean le Noir, c.1349, for instance, looks like a vulva because you're trying to tell the world that you enjoy Catholic art and imagery in an alternative, queer, risqué way that challenges Christian beliefs. But what you don't know is that that stigma isn’t just a vulva. It's not just a mandorla. It's not just yonic. It's actually intentionally erotic. And you're also blithely unaware of the fact that around 1297, Saint Angela of Foligno experienced a vision of Christ himself, who called her to put her mouth to the wound in his side and lick the freshly flowing blood. And then I think it was Saint Catherine of Siena who drank blood and a clear liquid from the wound before receiving a ring made from Christ’s foreskin? And then graphically erotic encounters with the side wound of Christ quickly showed up in the writings of eight different mystics. And then the yonic interpretation of the stigmata filtered down through the illuminated manuscripts and then trickled on down into some pseudo-intellectual corner of the internet…where you, no doubt, fished it out of some Pinterest board. However, that interpretation represents hundreds of years and countless visions of religious ecstasy. And it's sort of comical how you think that you've come up with an idea that exempts you from Christian theology when, in fact…you're posting an image that was sexualized for you by the very Medieval saints you think you’re so different than…from “subverted” Catholic art.

[ishowdespair-deactivated2026012]

[estrogenesis-vaporeongelion]

it's important to yell "fuck you kill yourself" at the tv advertisements to counteract the mind control

[fatluka]

DYKE UP OR DIE. #PRIDEMONTH.

[butchsaint]

[eskildit]

rereading parts of harrow the ninth and aauuuuggghhhuuaaaa this book makes me feel shrimp emotions each time

[eskildit]

"Did I sin, Lord? Did I kill two of my fathers that day?” I'm gonna THROW UP.

[eskildit]

harrow sees John as a father but more importantly she compares him against her own father.

When the Emperor touched you, your body recalled, unbidden, each rare and terrible touch committed by your mother and father.

she compares John to the man who never loved or cared for her and who gently instructed her how to tie her own noose. John is like a father to her. But she receives no comfort from that feeling.

[proxima-bee]

can't stand when a character is a “father figure” to the protagonist. figuring out what? how to molest them?

[eskildit]

honestly i think why i dislike jod posters so much is that every time i reread parts of harrow the ninth im just thinking. hey someone should kill that guy. "breaking the cycle means forgiving john" not for me. acid jail.

[eskildit]

post prompted by rereading harrow asking "Did I sin, Lord? Did I kill two of my fathers that day?” like he cannot be allowed to live

[ot3]

anyway i think pride month is a good time to think about how lesbophobia and biphobia faced by women are not actually different types of bigotry in any concrete way, it's all just slightly different manifestations of the overlap between misogyny and homophobia that causes people to treat women like they are not a reliable authority on their own sexuality. its not that one type of queer sexuality is meaningfully more accepted its that asserting your own sexual identity as a woman is pretty much just seen as a threat to general society and will receive whatever pushback is easiest to reach for. unfortunately sometimes as a reaction to this we have a tendency to place the blame on each other for this treatment instead of realizing we're all crabs in the same bucket.

there are essentially zero experiences that a bi woman has had that a lesbian hasn't also, and vice versa. we don't gain anything from acting like we're two distinct groups with any real power imbalance or competing interests between them.

[eskildit]

really big fan of the people in the notes tryna fuck Hunter Biden. I support you all

[dogpuppy]

He is my princess diana