This tiny octopus, whose body measured about five centimeters across, was spotted swimming along at a depth of 825 meters as we explored Whiting Seamount, off Puerto Rico.
No title available
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
macklin celebrini has autism
đ
noise dept.

pixel skylines
Game of Thrones Daily
taylor price
Doug Jones
RMH
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
YOU ARE THE REASON
Fai_Ryy
Color Me Curious
No title available

@theartofmadeline

Discoholic đȘ©
Monterey Bay Aquarium
KIROKAZE

bliss lane
seen from Egypt
seen from Russia
seen from Philippines
seen from France
seen from Trinidad & Tobago
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
seen from Myanmar (Burma)

seen from Armenia
seen from Philippines
seen from Congo - Brazzaville
seen from Brazil

seen from Germany
seen from Brazil
seen from France
seen from Germany
seen from Pakistan
seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from France
@fleetinglypassed
This tiny octopus, whose body measured about five centimeters across, was spotted swimming along at a depth of 825 meters as we explored Whiting Seamount, off Puerto Rico.
do you know how many bones the human body has? its 206. we start with 369 when weâre babies but they fuse. wouldnât you want to go back? have as many bones as a baby? what if i could help you
hi yeah what the actual, literal, GENUINE fuck does this mean
mcelroy dialect ive picked up
âbuckwildâ âthey horny for this oneâ âgot it in oneâ âshits popping offâ ârobustâ âdiscreteâ âgood good/sweet sweetâ âyyeeUPâ âgashaponâ âin a major wayâ âam i good?â âits very sickâ âUH OH, OH NO, WHOOPS, OH NOâ âbangerâ âwhipâ âstraight ____, dogâ âaw beansâ âjust that random irreverant south park humorâ âzag on emâ âhachi machiâ âvis-a-visâ âits real ____, innit?â âboyâ and also griffins musical way of speaking and putting random emphasis on things
âSCUSI?!â has legitimately became a staple of my vocabulary.
thereâs just so much about the stress of living as a woman thats hard to explain to men beyond just like, the most explicit and overt sexism/misogyny. its like this tightly wound ball of all these behaviors and expectations and mannerisms that even most women are not consciously aware of half of them. you just get the feeling that something is not right, like itâs unfair. but you canât explain why because itâs never simply just one thing or action done by another person- itâs that your whole life has always felt this way because the systematic dehumanization of women is so deeply insidious and invisible.
At Target this lady told her son he couldnât have a Wonder Woman doll because âthatâs for girlsâ and then bought her daughter the same one. It got me thinking about how often I see people bar young boys from appreciating girls/women as protagonists and heroes, and my own experience with it as a kid.
Why don't I feel like I'm a good person?
because youâve got the inside view.Â
see, you see all your nasty thoughts as they pass by. you feel all those mean impulses; you catch every terrible thing you think about a friend, you have to watch yourself procrastinate on important stuff and be lazy when you feel like you should be working. you get front-row seats to all the awfulness that comes with being a person. and you only get that view of yourself, not of anyone else. so naturally, since you canât see all the internal flaws in everyone else, it seems like they donât have themâbut you do.Â
the secret is that everyone has those flaws.Â
if being a good person is something you strive forâif you keep those nasty thoughts inside your head instead of directing them at other people, if you support your friends instead of pushing them down, if you try your best at what you doâthen i promise you, youâre a good person. and even if you fail at that stuff sometimes, all it takes to be a good person is to keep trying.Â
thereâs nothing any more bad about you than there is about loads of other people.Â
ask your friends if youâre a good personâwhen it comes to things like this, they probably see you more clearly than you do yourself. trust them. if they say âyes, of courseâ then youâll know you donât have to worry. if they say no, you can ask them why, and then strive to change those things about yourself.
just remember that if it seems like everyone else is a better person than you, itâs only because you canât see whatâs happening inside them. trust meâeveryone struggles to do the right thing sometimes. even steve. Â
youâre a good person. even if you donât feel like it.Â
From the beginning, I was told I was a best case scenario.
I had forensic evidence, sober unÂbiased witnesses, a slurred voice mail, police at the scene. I had everything, and I was still told it was not a slam dunk. I thought, if this is what having it good looks like, what other hells are survivors living? Iâm barely getting through this but I am being told Iâm the lucky one, some sort of VIP. It was like being checked into a hotel room for a year with stained sheets, rancid water, and a bucket with an attendant saying, No this is great! Most rooms donât even have a bucket.
After the trial I was relieved thinking the hardest part was over, and all that was left was the sentencing. I was excited to finally be given a chance to read my statement and declare, I am here. I am not that floppy thing you found behind the garbage, speaking melted words. I am here, I can stand upright, I can speak clearly, Iâve been listening and am painfully aware of all the hurt youâve been trying to justify.
I yelled half of my statement. So when it was quickly announced that heâd be receiving six months, I was struck silent. Immediately I felt embarrassed for trying, for being led to believe I had any influence. The violation of my body and my being added up to a few months out of his summer. The judge would release him back to his life, back to the 40 people who had written him letters from Ohio. I began to panic; I thought, this canât be the best case Âscenario. If this case was meant to set the bar, the bar had been set on the floor.
The morning after the sentencing, my phone screen was stacked with texts and I turned it over saying, not today, on this day I deserve to sleep. My phone kept ringing and I learned that BuzzFeed was waiting for my permission to publish my court statement in full. As soon as it was posted, I remember thinking, what have I done, making myself exposed and vulnerable again. I texted my sister when it hit 20,000 views, thinking that was it, the comments were actually quite nice, and I closed my computer.
I started getting e-mails forwarded to me from Botswana to Ireland to India. I received watercolor paintings of lighthouses and bicycle earrings. A woman who plucked a picture of her young daughter from the inside of her cubicle wrote, This is who youâre saving.
When I received an e-mail that Joe Biden had written me a letter I was sitting in my pajamas eating some cantaloupe. You are a warrior. I looked around my room, who is he talking to. You have a steel spine, I touched my spine. I printed his letter out and ran around the house flapping it in the air.
There was, of course, the wee sprinkle of trolls. Some photos of me leaked and someone said, âSheâs not pretty enough to have been raped.â In response I say, damn I wish the world could see me. I wish you could see my big, beautiful head and huge eyes. Perhaps now you are at home imagining me looking like some sort of bloated owl. Thatâs all right.
When Ashleigh Banfield read my letter on the news I sat stunned watching her speak my words, imagining them being spoken on every television set in the nation. Watching women and men at Gracie Mansion, on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives, girls in their rooms, gathered together to read each segment, holding my words in their voices. My body seemed too small to hold what I felt.
In the very beginning of it all in 2015, one comment managed to lodge harmfully inside me: Sad. I hope my daughter never ends up like her.
I absorbed that statement. Ends up. As if we end somewhere, as if what was done to me marked the completion of my story. Instead of being a role model to be looked up to, I was a sad example to learn from, a story that caused you to shield your daughterâs eyes and shake your heads with pity. But when my letter was published, no one turned away. No one said Iâd rather not look, itâs too much, or too sad. Everyone pushed through the hard parts, saw me fully to the end, and embraced every feeling.
If you think the answer is that women need to be more sober, more civil, more upright, that girls must be better at exercising fear, must wear more layers with eyes open wider, we will go nowhere. When Judge Aaron Persky mutes the word justice, when Brock Turner serves one month for every felony, we go nowhere. When we all make it a priority to avoid harming or violating another human being, and when we hold accountable those who do, when the campaign to recall this judge declares that survivors deserve better, then we are going somewhere.
So now to the one who said, I hope my daughter never ends up like her, I am learning to say, I hope you end up like me, meaning, I hope you end up like me strong. I hope you end up like me proud of who Iâm becoming. I hope you donât âend up,â I hope you keep going. And I hope you grow up knowing that the world will no longer stand for this. Victims are not victims, not some fragile, sorrowful aftermath. Victims are survivors, and survivors are going to be doing a hell of a lot more than surviving.
âEmily Doeâ has chosen to remain anonymous.
Food has to be packaged well, except for flour. Apparently the worldâs messiest substance is best sold wrapped in paper and glue.
People really donât understand the difference between a character being attractive and being intended for consumption by the other gender.
Thereâs a big difference between a character looking hot and a character being intended for sexualization. There are lots of attractive characters out there that arenât intended to be consumed by other genders, objectified, and sexualized. For example:
Batman. Undeniably attractive. He is good looking.
But he was not intended for consumption by women. He getâs power poses and muscles because thatâs how men want their male heroes, the oneâs they aspire to be like and project onto, to look.
By contrast look at Black Widow. She is intended for male consumption.
She doesnât have long legs, a tiny waist, a pronounced butt, and big boobs because that is what women want their heroes to look like. She looks like that because thatâs what men want their women heroes, the oneâs they picture themselves romancing, to look like. Sheâs not just attractive, she is also sexualized and intended for a male audience.
Now look at a male character meant for women. Tuxedo Mask from Sailor Moon.
Heâs not buff and bulky, heâs long, lean, and well dressed. This is what women want their hero men, the oneâs they want to fall in love with, to look like. This isnât a male fantasy, this is a female one.Â
Now look at a women intended for women. The main characters from Totally Spies.
They have small waists and long legs yes but their boobs and butts arenât particularly noticeable. They get power poses instead of oneâs intended to sexualize. They look like this because this is what women want to project themselves on. This is a womenâs power fantasy. This is closer in comparison to Batman, good looking but powerful, than it is to Black Widow, sexualized.Â
Now are all of these characters attractive? Yes. But do you see the difference between sexy and sexualized? Sexy depends on the âtypeâ of the viewer and what they like in men and women. Sexualized has less to do with what you personally think is hot and more to do with what society as a whole thinks is hot. So when I say that Wonder Woman in the movie was not meant for male consumption I am not saying she isnât beautiful, sexy, or attractive (I left that movie gayer than I was before). What I am saying is that she was posed, treated, costumed, and written more like an attractive human than like an object for men to gawk at.
I canât do justice to one of the weirdest camp stories I know. My friend tells it so well, and I can offer only a pale shadow of his story.
Last summer, he was working with one of the younger units comprised of ten year old boys. They had spent the night camping on another beach and were just readying themselves to depart. âMake sure you have all your things!â called my friend. âDonât leave anything behind!â
One small boy came up, dragging a massive tangle of decomposing seaweed behind him. âBut⊠what about me boy?â he asked, lip trembling.
ââŠwhat is âme boyâ?â
The child held up the stinking wad of bull kelp. âThis is him. This is Me Boy.â
âMe Boy is not coming back with us,â said his counselor. âYouâre going to leave Me Boy behind on the beach where he belongs.â
The campers loudly mourned the loss of Me Boy. They insisted on giving him a Viking burial at sea, which just consisted of pushing him solemnly off the back of the rowboat into the water and watching him drift away in the surf.
That was only the beginning. Me Boy would be back.
The campers, in true camp fashion, possessed some kind of cultic hive-mind and a predisposition for bizarre memes. Me Boy would not be forgotten. They started telling each other stories about Me Boy and how he would one day rise again. There were warring factions with contradicting dogmas about Me Boy. Only when the gardener allowed them to take home a zucchini she had harvested did they find their god, born anew.
Me Boy, The Zucchini That Was A God, became the whole unitâs mascot. The kids would bicker over who got to carry him. They built nests and carriers for Me Boy and brought him to different activities, fiercely defending him from those that would do him harm. One child appointed himself the Voice of Me Boy and would translate the zucchiniâs divine wishes into human speech.
It got out of hand. Me Boy had become a distraction, a fixation, a violent controversy. Something had to be done.
My friend, their counselor, took it upon himself to kill Me Boy. The children wailed in despair as he chopped their God into refreshing slices. With this sudden turn of fortune, followers of Me Boy turned to theophagy. âWe must eat him to preserve his power!â they cried. Boys who would otherwise never have touched a vegetable ate greedily of this sacrament, eager to let Me Boy live on within them.
For a time, it seemed that peace and order had been restored, and the religion had already faded into its silver age. But only for a time.
In the last few days of camp, the religion of Me Boy splintered into several denominations. Every meal yielded new vegetable matter said to be a reincarnation of Me Boy, only for opposing groups to dismiss these as false prophets. Some believed that Me Boy was gone. Others believed his spirit lived on, intangible, omnipresent. Some believed he had found a new vessel inside a carrot, a pear, a slice of cantaloupe⊠even inside a child. There was chaos, and strife, and heartbreak without the guidance of Me Boy.
The tags on this post are very polarized. Half of them are â#Iâm glad I never went to campâ and â#reasons why I never want kidsâ, the other half are â#BOY I LOVE CHILDREN CAMP IS SO GOOD AMIRIGHT?â
GQÂ Encyclopedia of Matt Damon, his Bourne co-star Julia Stiles begins to tell the story of their encounter with Prince:
add âI live inside my own heart, Matt Damonâ to the things I will now commonly say that nobody will understand
âPedestrian small talkâ ha i love it đ
Hofburg - Museum of ancient musical instruments from Hornplayer
So somebody on my Facebook posted this. And Iâve seen sooooo many memes like it. Images of a canvas with nothing but a slash cut into it, or a giant blurry square of color, or a black circle on a white canvas. There are always hundreds of comments about how anyone could do that and it isnât really art, or stories of the time someone dropped a glove on the floor of a museum and people started discussing the meaning of the piece, assuming it was an abstract found-objects type of sculpture.
The painting on the left is a bay or lake or harbor with mountains in the background and some people going about their day in the foreground. Itâs very pretty and it is skillfully painted. Itâs a nice piece of art. Itâs also just a landscape. I donât recognize a signature style, the subject matter is far too common to narrow it down. I have no idea who painted that image.
The painting on the right I recognized immediately. When I was studying abstraction and non-representational art, I didnât study this painter in depth, but I remember the day we learned about him and specifically about this series of paintings. His name was Ad Reinhart, and this is one painting from a series he called the ultimate paintings. (Not ultimate as in the best, but ultimate as in last.)
The day that my art history teacher showed us Ad Reinhartâs paintings, one guy in the class scoffed and made a comment that it was a scam, that Reinhart had slapped some black paint on the canvas and pretentious people who wanted to look smart gave him money for it. My teacher shut him down immediately. She told him that this is not a canvas that someone just painted black. It isnât easy to tell from this photo, but there are groups of color, usually squares of very very very dark blue or red or green or brown. They are so dark that, if you saw them on their own, you would call each of them black. But when they are side by side their differences are apparent. Initially you stare at the piece thinking that THAT corner of the canvas is TRUE black. Then you begin to wonder if it is a deep green that only appears black because the area next to it is a deep, deep red. Or perhaps the âblueâ is the true black and that red is actually brown. Or perhaps the blue is violet and the color next to it is the true black. The piece challenges the viewerâs perception. By the time you move on to the next painting, youâre left to wonder if maybe there have been other instances in which you believe something to be true but your perception is warped by some outside factor. And then you wonder if ANY of the colors were truly black. How can anything be cut and dry, black and white, when even black itself isnât as absolute as you thought it was?
People need to understand that not all art is about portraying a realistic image, and that technical skills (like the ability to paint a scene that looks as though it may have been photographed) are not the only kind of artistic skills. Some art is meant to be pretty or look like something. Other art is meant to carry a message or an idea, to provoke thought.
Reinhartâs art is utterly genius.
âBut anyone could have done that! It doesnât take any special skill! I could have done that!â
Ok. Maybe you could have. But you didnât.
Give abstract art some respect. Itâs more important than you realize.
âwhen she asked me how old my boys are, i panicked, and told her they were five and seven years oldâ
is it time for frank cho and milo manara to die or what
Thatâs basically a naked woman Iâm YELLING
What a pervert. What the FUCK does he not know how clothes work? What the hypothetical fuck is she wearing then if we can see all that?
Itâs like how bath towels in comics miraculously wrap completely around breasts. Or how even when injured and dead on the ground women in comics have to be twisted into âsexyâ poses. Or how women in comics walk like theyâre in high heels even barefoot.Â
Itâs the only way men know how to draw women, because to them female characters are only there to be sexy. They only think of âwomenâ as exploitative costumes and camera angles, high heels and titillation. Sex objects to ogle, plot objects to further male heroesâ narratives and drama, not heroes to cheer for.Â
Iâm sorry, I was labouring under the impression that this was the crowd that thought women should wear what they want..?
And that applies to fictional women who are depicted by men how? You canât apply agency in the plot to something metatextual when it comes to fictional characters.Â
Come on, letâs not pretend this is a male exclusive thing.
Weâre going to have this argument are we? Not to mention youâre deviating from the original point that attributing agency to fictional charactersâ clothing is asinine.Â
What you have here are images of power, and do you really believe these characters are designed with titillating heterosexual women and bisexual and homosexual men in mind? Because I donât think you do.
This is why the Hawkeye Initiative exists. Take common female poses in comics, put a man in the role, and see how âempoweringâ and âstrongâ it actually looks:Â
Also:Â
He got the painting for fighting against âcensorship.â Note that they handed him a gross design of a female being objectified, because at the end of the day, that is all they really want, to be allowed to objectify women. They donât care about censorship in general it is about their ability to sexualise and degrade women without consequence.
You can see her butthole for chrissakes
I think the best imagery Iâve seen to explain the difference between what men think male objectification is vs what women actually want to see is the Hugh Jackman magazine covers.
Hugh Jackman on a menâs magazine. Heâs shirtless and buff and angry. Heâs imposing and aggressive. This is a male power fantasy, itâs what men want to be and aspire to - intense masculinity.
Hugh Jackman on a womenâs magazine. He looks like a dad. He looks like heâs going to bake me a quiche and sit and watch Game of Thrones with me. He looks like he gives really good hugs.
Men think women want big hulking naked men in loin cloths which is why they always quote He-Man as male objectification - without realizing that He Man is naked and buff in a loin cloth because MEN WANT HIM TO BE. More women would be happy to see him in a pink apron cutting vegetables and singing off-key to 70s rock.
Men want objects. Women want PEOPLE.
This is the first time I have EVER seen this false equivalence articulated so well. Thank you.
it is tiring, being endless political just as someone existing. my teacher asks me if iâm writing more of that âfeminist poetry.â a lot of it is just talking about me, being a woman, being afraid in the city. i write about walking a line, about how i am expected to choose between home and work, how each comes with a slew of its own insults; how it feels when i am wearing shorts and there are too many men outside. these are just facts of my life. someone in the comments says, âwhere are woman even coming up with these crazy generalizations in their feminism?â
i hold hands with the prettiest girl iâve ever seen and someone sighs when they see me. âdo they have to make everything gay?â she asks her friend, loudly, âlike, do you have to force those views in my face all the time?â i canât stop blushing. my girlfriend holds my fingers tighter, tighter, tighter, until my knuckles are white, and i let her. somehow, this is us, protesting.
my fatherâs cuban blood stains my skin, i think. when i am honored with a position in the deanâs private council, a boy sneers, âyou only got in because youâre hispanic.â did i? i spend the rest of our meetings wondering if i was selected for my stellar academic record, for the multiple recommendations, for the clubs i lead - or if i was just a move the dean made, to make use of me. when we all take a picture, the dean brings me in the front. in the first three we take, i am not smiling.
it is odd. âi exist.â i say, âi deserve to exist.â
âoh my god,â he groans, âwe get it, youâre a feminist.â