"Dottore with motion sickness 🙃" Thank you @tofuo0 for this. I gave him the best ride ever.
almost home
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

Discoholic 🪩
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
Fai_Ryy
macklin celebrini has autism
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

Origami Around
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
The Bright Sessions

#extradirty
Today's Document

No title available
YOU ARE THE REASON
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

@theartofmadeline
The Bowery Presents
todays bird
occasionally subtle
NASA
seen from Malaysia
seen from France
seen from Ukraine
seen from Bahrain
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Chile

seen from Colombia
seen from Ireland
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Iraq

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Slovenia

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from India
@genshinatemybrain
"Dottore with motion sickness 🙃" Thank you @tofuo0 for this. I gave him the best ride ever.
barbie movie ken redraw
unfortunately i dont think its queerbaiting if the creator is just so terminally heterosexual that they never remotely considered the same gender relationship their show is centered around could be read as romantic. it is deeply painful however.
Maybe accidental queer baiting? The way someone may not mean to say something rude, but it may come off rude, so it's rude. Frustrating either way.
Not being a dick, just a friendly clarification.
By definition you can't accidentally queerbait. Queerbaiting is specifically using a same sex pair from the show to market the show to queer audiences with no intention of ever following through on a romantic relationship.
There is officially licensed Destiel merch signed off on by Kripke. Teen Wolf had a commercial with the actors for Derek and Stiles draped over each other talking about being "on a ship." Both shows actively used scenes between them as marketing while actively mocking fans for wanting them together. Sherlock has multiple characters refer to Johnlock as a couple, including characters we're supposed to believe are never wrong about human behavior and pushed those scenes in marketing. Then they acted insulted when fans saw them as a couple.
That's queerbaiting.
Done on accident it would just be queer subtext. Done because they had no other choice due to censorship is queer coding.
The specific meaning of the word is really starting to get lost and it's a pretty important one to keep accurate. It describes a very specific phenomenon that was done repeatedly and maliciously for decades and is meant to examine that specifically.
Doing it on accident sucks, but it isn't a tactic of capitalism intentionally intended to suppress queer representation while making money from queer fans.
Reblogging to keep the accurate definition and examples of queerbaiting circulating in the world
i want to know what happened between the ages of 25 and 35 to take dottore from "sensible necktie, reasonable lab smock, glasses for character" to...well...that.
a lot of anti-historian stuff comes across like “i want history to be simple and i am suspicious of people who tell me it’s not” and this is a thing you see from people on any place on the political spectrum
do u think the dottolings were made of the otherwise unusable soul scraps that were left over after zandik split up his soul to make his segments
each one holds a tiny little shard of his soul that was too small to support a human identity, but not so small that zandik could convince himself to dispose of it entirely
"hockey is so homoerotic"
"wrestling is so homoerotic"
no
you know what's homoerotic?
replacing your husband's decaying lungs
transplanting his poisoned, dying liver
doing delicate, lifesaving surgery on him when you would never perform it on any other
if there was ever a hamilton-style musical about chopin's life, i'd want the opening number to consist of:
small groups of actors gathered together, representing various persons and professions that have shaped the persisting image of chopin as a person and musician. think people like his "biographer" franz liszt or musical historians that have documented him in the years after his death.
each group has one designated "singer". the "singer" starts to rattle off some gossipy, inaccurate misconception about chopin that they, or the general profession they represent, have introduced into his mythos. they do so to the hectic, twittery melody and tempo of the "minute waltz".
meanwhile, the actor playing chopin moves from group to group as they take turns singing their parts. he says nothing, but appears increasingly bewildered and confused. if chopin knows the singer personally, his reactions are tailored to their relationship.
the overly sweet, dulcet middle section probably ends up going to liszt so he can wax poetic about chopin being a perfect seraphic angel baby who has done nothing wrong ever. chopin is appropriately weirded out.
the last section of the waltz becomes a refrain where everyone sings all of their parts all at once while converging on chopin. he's nearly lost in the crowd, but is saved when the minute waltz descends into its close, everyone suddenly pulls away from him, and the stage is plunged into total darkness except for a single stark spotlight focused directly on him. chopin then begins his opening monologue to the audience, commenting on the conflicting narratives that have defined his memory and how he'd like to present the true story of life.
look i know that in reality, there's probably only a 3-4 inch height gap between dottore and pantalone
but i'm garbage
i want my 5'6 dottore getting towered over by a 6'4 pantalone who is usually too polite to acknowledge it, but will absolutely make an issue of it whenever dottore crosses the line between endearingly annoying and utterly obnoxious
Next up someone is going to claim that the Narnia series isn't kids books.
Kids books is probably not the best way to word it, you can enjoy them at every age, including your childhood, as you get older you may find new truths in them, but they're still good for any age.
I want you to understand this. I NEED you to understand this. My mother read me the hobbit as bedtime story, and I started pushing myself to read before pre-school so I could in fact read the hobbit for myself instead of having to wait for bedtime.
I didn't do so right away but jesus wept I PUSHED myself to learn to read SPECIFICALLY so I could read The Hobbit! It is, in fact, a children's story! And children only see page count as 'there is a lot of this fun story to read!'
I read the Count of Monte Cristo at 12. It was 1274 pages. The idea that young people can't read longer items is horrific. Tiny "not yet hit my growth spurt" me took one look at a book nearly as big as I was and got excited. Was it tough at times? Sure. I also ended up thinking hashish was opium, because I hadn't heard the term before and was working off context clues, but I was able to follow the story and enjoyed it. And I was so dang proud of myself when I finished it.
I first read Animal Farm when I was 8, and was completely fascinated by the story. At the time, the references towards actual historical events went completely over my head. But when I was told that there was more to it than just a tragic story about talking animals, it made me even more excited to read it again. Kids aren't dumb. They can read books that aren't specifically for them.
The Hobbit is legitimately a kids book, though.
i really hope genshin chooses to explore the moral conundrum of the tsaritsa presumably trying to save/avenge her child by sacrificing countless more children to her machinations.
it's either that, or she somehow wasn't aware of her own harbinger's bullshit. which just makes her incompetent.
Every time I draw Dottore there's some magical improvement in my art skills idk what's up with that
An author I follow on IG posted about her older books getting new covers and having the opportunity of going through them and edit them to make the referencers more “modern” like group chats instead of group texts and I have seen other people mention about older books getting updates like this (was it pretty little liars and the deal changing the name of tv shows to more recents ones?) and I have to say I absolutely hate this.
I hate that they are trying to modernize older books with things that are going to be outdated in a couple of years. I hate that authors can go and take out the age of their characters after a decade (looking at you six of crows). I hate that authors do this and don’t tell their fans they are doing this.
Leave the books how they were written, add disclaimers at the start if you want but don’t touch the actual text. A book is a result of the time period it was written, adding stuff like scrolling through TikTok in a book that was published way before social media existed doesn’t make sense and I hate it.
the pure of heart do not require a "car" and "driver's license" to travel
pantalone: i can still hear his voice...
blue-and-red datatorre remnants flickering in the air: gay gay homosexual gay
partnership in life and death
you know, dottore's attempt to take over irminsul probably would have worked if he hadn't been detected early
by collei
through the dead god powers
that he gave her