The Lost (II) (2006) Review
Xuebing Du
Misplaced Lens Cap

izzy's playlists!
noise dept.
I'd rather be in outer space đž

blake kathryn
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

Product Placement
Show & Tell
No title available
Three Goblin Art
đȘŒ
Aqua Utopiaïœæ”·ăźćșă§èšæ¶ă玥ă
Claire Keane

tannertan36

JVL
Today's Document
styofa doing anything
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
dirt enthusiast

seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Poland

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Portugal
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Ireland

seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia
@hammerreviews
The Lost (II) (2006) Review
Grace (III) (2009) A FIlm So Bad It Has Eli Roth's ApprovialÂ
Jack Brooks: Monster Slayer (2007) Review/A Thank You To Scott Sanderson/Introduction
Welcoming the newest member of HAMMER Reviews
Hey all! It's been a while... A long while. It's time to remedy this! Aussie and I have been pretty busy. We have a whole lot of reviews and stuff on the way, but for various reasons I won't go into, we are currently unable to post all that regularly. Christian A. too has a new webcomic coming up and so hasn't had too much time to make us some graphical delisiousness.
That's okay! We have a new member joining the crew! Presenting thefuckerfromhell aka BrandonLee1795/1895!
We discovered him on the Deadpit forums. If you go there, you'll know that I'm a fairly regular poster. Anyway, Brandon was a pretty cool guy, but due to his grammar (or lack there of) and sometimes random posts, he ended up getting banned.
He was a great guy though and he made videos... Lot's of videos. Seriously, he makes like 100 a day! Anyway, we offered him a position as our resident video guy, seeing as we pretty much never have time to make videos anymore and he happily agreed!
Be prepared for some video carnage, only here on THE HAMMER!
(for all of the latest videos, check them out on our official channel here: http://youtube.com/user/hammerreviews)
Quick Movie Quips #7 - Life of Pi
Sooo! Life of Pi! What to say, what to say? Well, I guess I could begin with stating that this was one of the best theatrical movies that I've seen in a long time - it was really good.
I've also read the book by Yann Martel that the film was based on and was pleasantly surprised that the book is kept pretty much intact. Everything of importance is present and it's a great adaption.
The movie looks great, especially during the scenes when the ship that Pi (and his family) are on suddenly begins to sink in a ferocious storm. I saw the film in 3D and while I can't say that the 3D was super great, I think it was pretty good and definitely more immersive than most films that make use of 3D nowadays. If you're willing to spend the little extra money, and wear glasses throughout, then it's well worth it!
The acting was also a highlight with everyone doing a great job and really making the story come to life. Now enough of those clichéd phrases, you can hear that from the promotionals... just go see the movie - K?
-Scott Sanderson
The Santa Clause Review by Scott Sanderson
 Iâll go right ahead and admit it. I like Christmas movies and family movies. Christmas has always been my favourite time of year and so itâs fairly natural that Iâd like films trying to encompass this festive season. Thereâs just something about these often childish movies that I really like, even if I wouldnât necessarily watch them at any other time of year. I guess itâs just a tribute to my own childhood and watching Christmas movies, with my family, during the time is something Iâve always done and loved doing.
 Anyway, I digress. The topic at hand is the 1994 film âThe Santa Clauseâ starring Tim Allen. When it comes down to it, The Santa Clause achieves what it was trying to do. Itâs a fun movie, appropriate for all ages and keeps the Christmas feeling going strong right to the end. Itâs a good movie for kids, but teenagers and adults alike can enjoy what this movie has to offer. Tim Allen plays the part pretty well and when he does, in fact become Santa Claus, he both sounds and looks the part.
 You donât look to a movie like this for depth or complexity. At its heart, the Santa Clause is a simple, yet endearing little escapade into what itâs like to become the jolly fat man himself and what the idea of Santa really means. It isnât revolutionary or ground breaking by any means, but itâs a good movie for the holidays. I also liked the fact that this movie, obviously made kids, is actually about Santa and the Elves, the North Pole, Reindeer, etc. Unlike most Christmas comedies around the time or later, that seem to be about some family trying to get into the Christmas spirit, or having competitions for the best decorated house, this does things differently and some may beg to differ, but Iâd say better. Those other movies have a time and a place and Iâm not saying theyâre bad, but when I think of Christmas, I donât think of troubled families or competitions. I think of snowy days (despite the fact that I live in Australia and it never snows where I live. In fact itâs the middle of summer â 40  heat!), Christmas trees, presents and of course Santa. This is the type of movie that I want to watch during the holiday season. This is the sort of Christmas I want to remember.
Now, as the ever faithful HAMMER readers will notice, this is not the traditional type of Scott review. Iâve barely talked about the film at all. I havenât really spoken much about its flaws, the story or anything. I think, in this case, it doesnât need any of that. If youâre a kid, or remain a kid at heart, with a strong love of Christmas, youâll like this movie. It doesnât matter that the film has flaw. Of course, like most movie, it isnât without its problems, but if you are like the person I just described, youâll easily look past them. This is not a movie to be analysed, it is a movie to watch and enjoy. Just do it.
If, on the other hand, you donât like Christmas movies for whatever reason, you probably wonât like this one. Itâs as simple as that.
 4.5/5 stars
The Santa Clause is a âmodern classicâ in the Christmas genre (if it exists). While not flawless, itâs fun, inviting and perfectly captures the Christmas spirit.
- Scott Sanderson
The Scott Files: episode 3 - Squeeze
 Ahh, Finally, the first really good episode. I know that the 'monster-of-the-week' style episodes were always quite popular, and now I can see why. I much preferred this to the regular 'conspiracy theory' based episodes that started the series.
Eugene Tooms was pretty cool and looked pretty spooky in his transformed state, which is always a good thing for this sort of show. And finally, the somewhat open-ending was actually pretty decent, and seems to imply a future appearance of Tooms? (Oh what's this? episode 21 - 'Tooms')
I guess it could be said that this episode lacked the 'depth' and real story that the others had, but hey, I'm not really complaining. At least not at the moment. If the series continues on like this, we're onto a winner!
The Scott Files: episode 2 - Deep Throat
So, episode 2 of the X-files... what to say? If I'm completely honest, I don't think I liked this episode as much as the first. Not to say that it's bad, but I just didn't think that it was as interesting. Duchovny as Mulder is still as good... Anderson is still meh as Scully. The introduction of the character 'Deep Throat' was good, however. I, like other X-files fans enjoyed his character, despite him only appearing for a short period of time.
The main thing that I didn't like about this, is that i felt it didn't really 'go anywhere'. I mean, I realise that stuff did in fact happen, but it just seemed like nothing had any real consequence. The episode ended in a rather unressolved and 'open-ended' way. I know that this was done intentially, and I also know that a lot of people seem to like this, but I can't say that I really did.
The show ultimately still holds a lot of promise, and I'm going to credit this weaker episode to the fact that it's still early days as far as the show is concerned. I look forward to future episodes, in the continual hope that it'll become really good!
The Scott Files: episode 1 - Pilot
So! The first episode of the long running, much beloved show, the X-files. What is there to say? The first episode was... decent. It was compelling, it caught my interest and made me want to continue on this venture into the unknown. BUT, ultimately, at least as far as individual episodes go, it wasn't anything super special. The plot was okay, the characters were okay and the effects, while maybe a little dated now, are still... okay. I guess, these will be things that'll grow on me with time and what I think is just 'okay' now may end up being a significant aspect which I greatly like in the future.
The reason that I say everything was okay, is because nothing seemed to stand out. I guess at the time, there probably weren 't many shows like this and so it was very original back then, but now, with the abundance of sci-fi shows available, it didn't seem like anything too different. I realise that i can't hold that against it, but I'm looking at these episodes from a... 'modern' point of view. I've been exposed to all of these other sci-fi doohickey's and so I can't help but make some comparisons.
With that being said, however The pilot episode is still very solid and still makes we want to continue. I'm sure the episodes will get better as time goes on.
As far as the characters are concerned... well I like David Duchovny as Agent Fox Mulder... Gillian Anderson as Scully... not as much. As I previously stated, I'm sure these things will grow on me, but currently, I'm not too much of a fan of Scully.
Both Mulder and Scully have somewhat deadpan characters, expressions, etc. etc. It works for this show. They both do a competant job at that. BUT, Anderson's Scully to me seems deadpan to the point of having no emotion... no real substance. Mulder on the other hand, is deadpan, but cracks jokes every now and then, he smiles, looks saddened at times. To me, Duchovny comes across as (at least from this episode) being a good actor who's playing the role of a deadpan-dryhumour-cynical kinda guy. Anderson, just comes across as not a great actress.
All in all it was not a bad episode, it still interested me enough to make me continue on in watching. It just has a few minor problems which prevents it from being great. But hey, it's the first episode, what can I expect? First episodes are pretty much always a little shakey, until they hit their stride later on.
I look forward to watching the next episode soon.
- Scott Sanderson
The Scott Files: episode 0 - the intro
OKAY kids! So... I have decided to do an X-files retrospective of sorts for the humble Hammer. An x-files diary, if you will. Prior to this, I have not fully watched a whole episode of the ground-breaking, history-making show before. Sure, when I was younger, too young to really be watching, I would see bits and pieces of episodes when my parents would watch, but I havent watched an episode properly myself.
Every time I watch an episode, I'll post up a 'Scott-Files' - a short, basic review of that episode, mainly just expressing my thoughts, without going into too much depth. I plan to do this for every single episode of the show made, as I watch them, as well as the two movies... and maybe even the few games released.
So sit tight and join me on my adventure into the depths of the unknown. Maybe it's your first time with the show as well. Maybe you've been a long time fan. Either way, I hope that you enjoy this series and don't forget to leave a comment, with your opinions on the episode, reactions, etc.
See you then!
-Scott Sanderson
Prometheus Review by Scott Sanderson
I'm not going to lie, I initially had high expectations for this movie. I am a pretty big fan of Ridley Scott, so far there have only been a few of his movies that I've disliked and none have been terrible. Anyway, Alien was, no... IS still one of the greatest scifi movies of all time, so naturally, when I heard that Scott was returning to the director's chair for this... 'spiritual prequel' of sorts, I, like many others , became very excited. Once the film was released to mixed reviews (and often negative ) I became skeptical, however. Okay... So Prometheus wasn't going to be the great super movie that I had hoped for. At least I know that it'll still be good. Boy, how I wish that I could retract those words now. Upon seeing the film, I can safely say that it was a complete disappointment. I didn't expect it to be f as good as Alien and definitely not Bladerunner, but I did expect it to be decent on some level! But alas, it was not to be.
When it comes down to it, the special effects and visuals were very good, some of the best I've seen and they could be considered 'fully immersing'. The acting too was very strong, especially from lead Noomi Rapace who did a phenomenal job and really kept this movie standing. Michael Fassbender has generally been complimented for his role and while I thought he did a competent job, I didn't think the character really allowed for too much scope... Another actor could probably have played it just as well. Guy Pierce was good, although the stupid rubber latex mask that he wore is the stock standard deal for old people in scifi movies nowadays and it was a little annoying to see it used again here. Charlize Theron seemed a little wooden at times, but seemed to suit the role . The rest of the cast, while not great did a decent job, and I can hardly complain too much.
The big problems with Prometheus emerge with the story. The plot. The dialog and every little part in between. Off hand it doesn't seem so bad, and itâs hard to do the movieâs âutter woefulnessâ justice here, in writing. It's really something you have to see. And that's not necessarily something that I recommend you do. The story is just a huge mishmash - a cluster fuck of various pointless ideas and attempts at storytelling which just fail miserably. Just for the record, Bladerunner is one of my favourite movies of all time. In the past, I've had heated arguments with people over aspects of that movie. One such discussion which I've had was relating to the fact that the movie poses important, and some may say complex, questions but never gives any answers. Personally, I don't have a problem with this and I think that if done correctly, can aid a movie and add a whole new thought provoking depth that it may not have had, had it simply given us all of the answers.
In Prometheus, we seem to be overloaded with questions, again with no answers, but here it just seems all wrong! The way these questions are presented is less thought provoking and more a tedious exercise. It comes across as TRYING to make a thought provoking, complex and important film without actually succeeding in any. A movie should not try and pose questions just for the sake of posing them or because the film makers think that it'll make the movie important. There needs to actually be a reason, a reason which is lacking here. Don't get me wrong, there are some interesting points every once in a (very long) while. I even really liked some of the religious connotations and a couple of other things here or there. What they did though was destroy any chance of developing an idea by throwing in 20 more. This movie had 'where did we come from?', 'why are we here?' 'why would one destroy their creation?' 'who am I' 'what is our meaning?' as well as a few more explicitly stated questions. While not inextricably separate, a lot of these ideas just didn't work together, especially when there were so damn many! Finally, the way they tied it into Alien was just plain terrible. If youâre going to make it an Alien prequel, fine. Do it, but make the whole movie related to it. If, on the other hand, you want to make a completely unrelated sci-fi movie, then do that. BUT WHATEVER you do, DONâT quickly add an incredibly brief, 10 second tie in that doesnt add anything to the movie anyway. I can understand the film makers maybe wanting to add a couple of references to Alien, do a little fan service, but the way they did it is just not acceptable!
Ultimately, Prometheus is not a good movie. It is somewhat enjoyable, an... Entertaining flick at best, but not anywhere near as good as it could be. It had the potential, with amazing visuals, a good cast and a good director. But, unfortunately, some really bad decisions were made. The story was ridiculous, some of the characters made, now âclichĂ©-badâ choices and overall it just didnât fit together.
2/5 stars
-Â Scott Sanderson
 When all is said and done though, the real question is not âwhy this movie was so bad?â⊠nor is it âhow could Ridley Scott have made this?â but really⊠âHOW DID ROGER EBERT GIVE THIS 4/4 STARS?â I donât understand how itâs possible for Mr. Ebert, possibly the worldâs greatest reviewer, and one of my review heroes, to have enjoyed it as much as he did. Sure there have been times when I have disagreed with his view, but even then, he usually brings up some good, justifiable points to back it up⊠here, no. Itâs all just praise. Goddammit!
 âRidley Scott's "Prometheus" is a magnificent science-fiction film, all the more intriguing because it raises questions about the origin of human life and doesn't have the answers.â â Roger Ebert
The Devil Inside â Review by Aussie
Wow, a new review on The Hammer! Yes, it's been a very long time, and as Scott has said below, there won't be too much activity round here 'till next year. I did however just have the pleasure (well, not really) of seeing this horror movie (on DVD of course) and just wanted to share my personal thoughts about it. Oh, there will be spoilers here, but I'm guessing you've already seen this. If not, then don't worry â I'll tell you all you need to know. So here you have it: 'The Devil Inside'.
As you can see from the good ol' 'Tomatometer' up top, this is viewed by most as a pretty crap movie. That's not to say it doesn't have any good points. They are just completely outweighed by a generally shocking script, retarded (at times) acting, a storyline I'm pretty sure was constructed by a 10 year old, and just being completely direction-less. Not to mention the ending. But I'll get to that later...
Okay, so a bit of background. The story is about a woman named Maria Rossi, who was sent to a psychiatric ward in Rome, after killing three people as they performed an exorcism on her. Here we encounter the first problem. In what situation would a criminal who is a citizen of the United States be sent and accepted by an institute in a foreign country? That just doesn't happen. The film-makers try to make that part of the 'mystery' of the film, when in fact it is just part of the stupidity of the film. Maria's daughter, Isabella, goes to Italy with her friend/cameraman, Michael, to shoot a documentary on what is wrong with her mum.
Soon after arriving in Italy, she finds herself at some sort of 'exorcism class', in an attempt to work out why her mum flipped out while undergoing the exorcism. The 'exorcism class' was the first time the real 'cringe-worthy' acting came out, which was not helped by a ridiculous script which tried to make the characters sound genuine, but in reality made them sound like they were subject to some sort of heavy brain trauma, from which they never recovered. Isabella makes a couple new pals at this class, two (British?) priests named Ben and David. These characters are full of contradictions, but I won't go into detail as it's not worth the effort. But basically it's Isabella, Mike and their two new religious buddies trying to 'uncover the mystery'. Oh God...
Isabella and the gang head off to go watch the exorcism of some other crazy bitch, which is performed by Ben and David. It is successful of removing the devil inside her (see what I did there?). This gives Isabella the inspiration (?) to go perform the same procedure on her mum. Good idea Isabella! The last time she had an exorcism done to her, she brutally murdered three people! Let's see if she'll do it again, hey?! Anyway, they go perform the exorcism on the mum, she doesn't kill them (unfortunately), and we assume it all went well. Notice that I use the word 'assume'. You want to know why I chose that word? It's because they don't fucking show the mum again for the rest of the film! In fact, they don't even show her after she is cured! This is only half way through mind you. Isabella puts so much time, money and effort into curing the mum, and then never talks to her again. What the fuck?
If you were thinking the movie was substandard until this point, it now takes a turn. A bad turn. It becomes even more pointless, and basically just fucks about until it just hits the 80 minute mark, in order for it to be actually classified as a feature film. I can't be bothered describing what happens here in detail. Basically Mike starts whining about Isabella being a bitch, Isabella whines a bit about Mike for some other reason, and the priests continue to act nothing like priests. Eventually, one of the priests actually gets possessed by the devil (the twist?), though we are not properly explained how or why. He almost drowns a baby at a baptism, and eventually kills himself.
By this stage, the movie has been going for about 76 minutes, but they really want it to hit the big 80. That's why they add another twist. Isabella gets the devil inside her. No-one explains how or why. Yet again, they fuck around for a couple minutes, but once the film reaches the 80 minute goal, the film makers decided to quickly abort the film, before they opened any more holes. So how does the film actually end you ask! Well, very quickly. They all die in a car accident. Yep. That's the end. No questions are explained. All doors are left opened. The just killed them off to avoid further explanation.
Now that I have ruined the little suspense of the storyline for you, let's talk about why it was shit, but also some of it's good aspects. As I explained, it was shit because it was not thought out. The storyline was full of holes, inaccuracies, and oversights. The characters were extremely shallow, and did not appear natural in their behaviour. Questions were raised and never answered, and the second half of the movie was simply filling up time. Oh, and on another note, you remember the nun with the weird eyes you saw in the trailer (see above)? Well, she is only in the movie for a 2 second shot, and isn't even part of the movie. In fact the trailer is probably better made than the movie.
Now, as for good points, you could argue that the beginning of the film did a good job at sucking you in to the storyline, despite it's problems. I liked the fact it did take place in Italy, even though that didn't really make sense. It also had a few 'Paranormal Activity' style 'jump out of the seat' scenes, but you could always pick them coming. And it's not like that takes a lot of effort to make. This was also a handy-cam movie, which is a style I believe either totally works, or totally fails. This was on the fail side, seeing as during a few of the key scenes, Mike conveniently had to put the camera down. I'm trying to think of more positives, but I just can't.
The Devil Inside is cheap attempt of getting the same success achieved by low budget film such as 'Blair Witch Project' and 'Paranormal Activity'. It just goes to show that handy-cam low budgets still need to have a certain 'spark' to work; something 'The Devil Inside' just doesn't have. I'm done talking about this movie now. There's nothing more to say. Don't watch it unless you want to spend the time laughing at all the plot holes.
Aussie
Technical difficulties... Hammer fully up in 2013
Okay... so you may have noticed that our design has been playing up... The background is white, all of the original code that I wrote for this site has suddenly stopped working... SO, now that school holidays are upon us, I will work hard (when not watching them horror movies) to bring the site back up to its original design.
Please note that Aussie and I are still busy with school, so while we'll still try to post reviews and what not, the regular, uninterrupted schedule will not be in place till 2013, when we finally finish.
I know it sounds like a while, but stick around, and by then we'll have everything working the HAMMER will continue to be the awesome site you've grown to know und love.
If you have any questions, comments, or just want to talk horror, or movies in general, you can still email me at [email protected] which i check regularily. You can leave a comment here or you can visit my facebook page at: http://www.facebook.com/anotherscott
School is a bitch!
We'll be back with the awesome updates that you know and love very shortly! Just gotta get ALL the A+s at school first! ;)
-Scott
Preview: The Prospector's curse
"There's Blood in them there Hills!"
Wowee! Toronto based film maker Josh Heise recently sent us some stuff regarding his new Western themed Horror movie - "The Prospector's Curse" set to be released in April. It's still early days, but so far it looks like it could be a really fun movie!
Anyway, without further ado, here's some info about the film from the official press release...
A western-themed horror film entitled âThe Prospectorâs Curseâ has wrapped production near the remote town of Ponty Pool, Ontario. Set during the Klondike Gold Rush of the 1890âs, the darkly comedic short is Written and Directed by Josh Heisie (âMail Order Brideâ), Produced by Bruno Marino (âAnything Goesâ) and is currently in Post Production in Toronto, Canada.
The talent lineup for âThe Prospectorâs Curseâ includes David Roberts (âCurious and Unusual Deathsâ), Johnny Quinn (âMindâs Eye: The Seriesâ), Amanda Ives (âI Hate Toronto: A Love Storyâ) and Robert Nolan (âWormâ).
Rounding out the creative team are Director of Photography Michael Jari Davidson (âSICKâ), and Special Effects Makeup Artist Carlos Henriques (âRed: Werewolf Hunterâ) of The Butcher Shop.Â
Synopsis Theodore âTubbyâ Ellsworth and Jack smith are two criminals on the run, lost in the untamed wilderness. When they stumble across a mutilated Prospector, dying on Indian ground, they promise to give him a Christian burial. The fugitives break their oath and steal the old manâs goldâŠbut that night, the Prospectorâs corpse returns to make them pay!
For more info on the movie check out the Official Facebook Fan Page: http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Prospectors-Curse/141337662650150 And Josh Heisie's official site: www.joshheisie.comÂ
Scarlett Johansson Set to Play âPsychoâ Star Janet Leigh in Upcoming Hitchcock Biopic
Well guys it's been a while, but I thought it about time that we reemerge from the dark depths of obscurity. So, here's a little news that will hopefully tide you over... until next time!
Scarlet Johansson is checking into the Bates Motel.
According to the Hollywood Reporter, the worldâs most famous shower scene is about to be re-staged, with Johansson stepping into the tub as Janet Leigh in the upcoming biopic âAlfred Hitchcock and the Making of Psycho.â
The NY Daily writes that the movie, based on a nonfiction book by Stephen Rebello, will follow Hitchcockâs struggle to produce the iconic work.
Studios showed little interest in the horror flick, largely due to its unprecedented depiction of sexuality and violence during an era accustomed to the modesty regulated by the industryâs production codes.
After studios balked, Hitchcock independently pulled together a budget of $800,000 to produce what is now one of the most influential and widely known thrillers of all time.
Besides Scar-Jo, Anthony Hopkins is attached to play Hitchcock and Helen Mirren will play the filmmakerâs wife, Alma Reville. James DâArcy will appear as Anthony Perkins, who of course played Norman Bates, whose unhealthy obsession with Leighâs character ended in a bloody mess.
Filming is expected to begin this year with Sacha Gervasi (âAnvil! The Story of Anvilâ) directing a script from John McLaughlin, who penned Natalie Portmanâs psychological thriller Black Swan.
BWAHAHAHA!