Monterey Bay Aquarium

tannertan36

oozey mess
art blog(derogatory)
🪼

Kiana Khansmith

#extradirty
todays bird
h
hello vonnie
Not today Justin
𓃗
taylor price
Phantogram Three
occasionally subtle

izzy's playlists!
Noah Kahan

Love Begins

roma★
d e v o n
seen from United States

seen from Bangladesh

seen from Malaysia

seen from India

seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Kazakhstan
seen from Kazakhstan

seen from Malaysia

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia
seen from Netherlands
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Indonesia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
@insomniaticdreams13
#let me be for real for a moment some of the reasons kanji have so many readings are #they entered the Japanese language as loanwords multiple times at different times of history #so different Chinese pronunciations = different kanji reading #as Chinese pronunciation changed plus a lot of loanwoards entered Japanese as specialised language #some of the readings are kind of euphonic changes depending on what the kanji is attached to (sh sounds vs j sounds vs z sounds a big one) #and some are the old Japanese word that was attached to a kanji with the same meaning = nama #which is also why there are so many homophones since Chinese is a tonal language and Japanese isn't @pudentilla
OHHHH IT'S ONYOMI VS KUNYOMI TIME!! Okay sorry for the caps but this is a subject I actually think is really cool.
So the official term for this, when a kanji is read one way in some contexts and a different way in others, is usually a case of onyomi vs kunyomi. -yomi, "reading" (from yomu "to read") basically categorizes words into whether you read them with the chinese pronunciation or the japanese pronunciation.
There are a lot of complicated factors that go into this but the easiest way for english speakers to wrap their heads around it is that the Japanese language ended up with multiple sets of vocabulary in the same way that the English language did with the Germanic language/Romance language split; you have one set of vocabulary for common, everyday use that derives from germanic vocab, and then another set of vocabulary for fancy, formal use that derives from Latinate vocab. The classic example is using swine to describe the animal, which the Germanic-speaking Anglo-Saxon farmers and handlers would tend to, and porc to describe the meat, which the French-speaking Normans would eat. But pretty much every word in the English language has some degree of casual-formal duplication of this kind.
Much like European scholars did with Latin, a bunch of vocabulary got imported by the literati of Japan starting around about the 5th century in order to have a different and more formal register to talk about certain topics. This was imported alongside the Chinese writing system at the same time, which then over the next few centuries was shifted into a simpler, non-logographic, syllabic script that became hiragana (the wavy one.)
But that means that a bunch of imported Chinese vocabulary was conventionally written in their original-or-close-to-it hanzi form, and spoken with their original-or-close-to-it Chinese pronunciation. Words of this type have a much higher incidence of long vowels, left over from the Chinese where each character would represent a single complex syllable varied by vowel intonation, compared to native Japanese words which are polysyllabic and hit more consonants.
So, the system has evolved in various directions over time, and now there are a lot of ways that a single character can be read depending on positioning and context, but the broad strokes are: if the kanji is mostly on its own, surrounded by hiragana, it will take the Japanese reading (kunyomi) and if it's part of a compound word, paired with other kanji, it will take the Chinese reading (onyomi.) The more formal the text -- especially notable with medical, scientific, or governmental texts -- the more dense and compacted it will get, with a much higher ratio of kanji compounds to hiragana, and a correspondingly higher dose of onyomi readings.
To leave off with one example: the video above highlights (手), which is 'hand.' When it appears by itself surrounded by simple words like participles, it takes the kunyomi te, like in the sentence 'take my hand' (手を握って, te o nigitte.) But if you are using it as part of a more abstraction concept, like in 手動 -- done by hand, or manual, see how the english term underwent the exact same shift into latinate when it gains a level of abstraction? -- then it becomes part of a compound word with another kanji. Now it takes the onyomi shu, to become part of the compound word shudou. Catch that long vowel! If it weren't part of a compound word, that 動 by itself would take the kunyomi hataraki, for motion or action.
Anyway, onyomi and kunyomi, fun!
Some more examples in English:
'Troupe', 'troop', and 'thorp'. Loaned from French twice, as well as the homegrown term for a small village/group of houses.
'Pack', and 'bailey'. Native word and French loan.
"Sir', 'sire', 'seigneur' and 'Monsieur'. All from French at slightly different times and in different contexts.
Same with 'dame', 'dam', 'madam', and 'ma'am'.
'Mister', 'master', 'magister' and 'maître d'. All from Latin and French.
To 'spout' and 'spit'. First is from Dutch, second is native English.
To 'wake', 'watch' and 'wait'. First two are native English, third is from French.
To 'ward' versus 'guard'. Same word, but the second one was borrowed into Latin and then back into English from French.
In English the connections are disguised by using different characters for each word, but it's the same process!
gender essentialism is soooo funny bc it's like "this is what women are like" and you're like "I've met women and many of them, if not the majority, have not been like that" and it's like "well women SHOULD be like that" and you're like "why should women be like that" and its like "because that's what women are like"
you're so right hen
Who Gets Out Of The Death Arena Alive?
Hannibal Lecter (NBC's Hannibal)
Steven Universe (Steven Universe)
get mad. get rageful. debate all you like because im sending them to the death arena and you can't stop me
I love how all the notes are like "one of these is Just A Guy and the other one is a monster-fighting superhero with alien magic powers"
I think Steven would kill him but like. on accident. He’s not very used to fighting enemies that can’t recover from almost any wound. After, he would be left with the moral dilemma of whether he should bring him back to life though.
Erika Toliusis (b.1969) - Pacific Angel. 2022. Oil with palette knife on canvas.
@teaboot
Painted with a FUCKING PALETTE KNIFE?
I also, perhaps controversially, am of the opinion that more odyssey adaptations should retain the hanging of the unfaithful maids
The only adaptation I'm aware of to engage w the hanging of the unfaithful maids is Margaret Atwood's Penelopiad and I actually really didn't like the way she handled it
@platonce would love to hear more about your thoughts on the penelopeiad/how you would want to see it done
ok brief context first for any readers not aware: in the Odyssey, the unfaithful maids are a group of enslaved women in the house of Odysseus who are hanged for 'betraying' Odysseus by having sex with Penelope's suitors. In the Penelopiad they are instead Penelope's most faithful and trusted maids who she enlisted to spy on the suitors.
my issue w the Penelopiad on this subject is just that I think making it so the maids weren't actually 'unfaithful' carries the implication that if they had done all the things the Odyssey says they did then in some sense they would have had it coming.
as to how i would want it done, i suppose the main thing i would like to see acknowledged is that given that they were enslaved women the sex they had with the suitors would have been inherently coercive. (nb i think the Penelopiad does acknowledge this but as stated above I have other problems w its handling of the subject matter)
#the problem is so many try to make Odysseus a good person by modern standards#and he's not#and he's not even that great in the original context#his crew dies because of him#so many modern adaptations strip away everything that makes him not a hero#instead of adapting the source material accurately and letting the audience decide if he's still a hero or not
yeah I haven't seen the Nolan film but i read the summary bcos i was interested to see if they kept in the Unfaithful Maids and not only are they out but the film also seems to have really played down the massacre of the suitors?
which is another thing where like, even in the original context, we are not supposed to 100% agree with that!! its followed by a sequence where the suitors' families are all like 'dude what the fuck'
part of the emotional impact, to me, of the Odyssey is that we spent the whole epic being encouraged to sympathise w Odysseus as this almost everyman-type main character who just wants to go home and then at the end of the poem he murders a bunch of people. yikes!!
also i just stumbled on this essay talking about the unfaithful maids which I would recommend
I miss when ads were a single click and then they’re gone. Now every ad has a minimum of three phases where you watch a video, exit the still frame of fake gameplay, and then exit the app download. That doesn’t even touch on the ones that forcibly take you to another app after opening a tab in safari without you ever touching the screen.
I hate advertising. I hate that you can’t do anything without companies jumping down your throat with mostly bullshit ads. I hate that billboards exist. I hate that every company unanimously decided to make their ads longer and longer. I hate that ad blockers try to charge you money and there are in app purchases to remove ads. I hate that my attention has become commodified. I hate that there’s nothing I can do about it.
Christ this is so fucking cool
I haven't been able to stop thinking about this. There's so much going on here. I genuinely love the conception of gender as mystic autodeism. Gender as divine microcosm. Gender as Great Work. It's gnostic, it's alchemical, it's got notes of bacchanalian worship of the body and the inherent magic of self-discovery. This but unironically.
So much of these people's worldview comes down to a disgust at the concept of personal autonomy. Making decisions about your body, your circumstances or your future is a demonstration of unbelievable arrogance that must be beaten out of you, either before you take the action via making it as difficult as possible or after you take the action via punishment and scorn, so that you give up this sinful concept of owning your own life. They treat the world like abusive parents who are completely shocked that their "ungrateful" twenty year old children refuse to call them any more.
me as a teenager: man it sucks to have no privacy or autonomy but i guess its for a good reason. when i turn 18 i will realise how young i was and understand why they did all that.
me as an adult: teenagers are an oppressed class, their abuse is normalised and systemic and they need to start killing people
What’s crazy is that 50 shades makes no sense as a twilight fanfic because Edward would not do any of that. But if you told me it was actually about BELLA being a dominatrix CEO who gets weird awkward virgin Edward to sign a sex contract and be her submissive… yeah I could see that.
What’s crazy is that 50 shades makes no sense as a twilight fanfic because Edward would not do any of that. But if you told me it was actually about BELLA being a dominatrix CEO who gets weird awkward virgin Edward to sign a sex contract and be her submissive… yeah I could see that.
I cannot stop laughing at the idea that socialism ignores humanity’s highest spiritual ideal: owning yachts.
Incredibly optimistic to claim that adequate food, shelter and medicine is guaranteed to prisoners and slaves also.