[nickfuckface]

i’m loving all this violent response to nazis stuff that’s going around but i also want to say like be careful out there because not all nazis are fucking clowns like richard spencer. most of em carry weapons and will not hesitate to cut your ass up and leave you dying in a dumpster. if you don’t know how to fight, don’t take one on without backup. and even if you do know how to fight, watch yourself. i don’t want to see any of you getting killed

[prettykikimora-deactivated20250]

Irl these are the same ‘people’ who put up their shitty swastika stickers around towns and hide poisoned razor blades behind them so people cut themselves and get sick if they try to peel it off with their hands so don’t like underestimate what those animals are capable and what they’d be willing to do to you.

[hollowedskin]

yo that reminds me to remind you never to peel off facist propaganda with your hands, that’s what your pocket knife/boxcutter/antifascism stickers are for. don’t trust facists please be safe.

[cornerof5thandvermouth]

if you see a fascist sticker, just put your own sticker over it, don’t bother removing it because you could absolutely get fucked up

[archduke-marmalade]

Please! don’t try to fight Nazis! Hurting them will never convince them that they are wrong- argue, debate, engage in constructive conversations, (if you feel safe doing so!) Resorting to violence is what They do, don’t stoop to that. We’re better.

[leftaf]

Found a collaborator ^

[factfiend]

Fun fact: Michelle Rodriguez has admitted that the reason she’s typecast in action roles is because she refused on principle to ever play a female character she didn’t respect, so turned down every role asking her to play a victim or underdeveloped girlfriend character.

She has also made it clear that she doesn’t give a shit about what people say about her roles, as she’s happy to only be associated with characters who stomp colossal amounts of dickhole. 

[leftaf]

Fun Fact: Michelle Rodriguez is a huge a huge transphobe and an all around horrible person.

[anti-kf-network]

Kiwi Farms, the Web’s Biggest Community of Stalkers

The prototypical virtual pillory.

key points:

Kiwifarms was created exclusively to facilitate the gang stalking of and harassment of an autistic trans lesbian, although at this point KF individually targets hundreds of people (mostly trans, mostly women, mostly neurodivergent, mostly people of color).

They hack online accounts, gaining sympathy by posing as friends, exclusively to gain enough access to humiliate targets. 

They call targets families and workplaces posing as journalists, classmates, psychiatrists, potential business partners and a whole range of other ruse identities to gain access to slander targets.

They have publicly spread targets home and workplace addresses and gone personally to their residences, taking pictures and breaking in. 

they have been known to individually follow users, taking pictures and harassing them personally in public. 

Packages and letters are routinely sent to targets residences, almost all of which contain obscene materials designed to threaten the recipients. 

they have also sent sex workers to people’s houses, then called their families to taunt them.

the members of the forum also openly support kinksters and predators, many being members of the dd/lg or “incel” communities. 

The owner and head admin of kiwifarms, null, is a self-confessed pedophile.

despite warnings to “hide your powerlevel”, most users don’t really conceal their identity, many using accounts a quick google search will prove are associated with their real name. lol

[lainathewitch]

They also pushed a girl to suicide already 

[no-corners-deactivated20160918]

^^^^^

[no-corners-deactivated20160918]

oh and also they use geotag snooping  to find and publicly post people’s actual addresses. 

location information is included in the exif metadata of basically any picture or selfie anyone might post on tumblr

They have literally broken into homes and apartments

[no-corners-deactivated20160918]

please boost?

[titleknown]

Holy shit I’d heard of this people but I didn’t know they were this bad. Like, how the fuck haven’t they been shut down by somebody already?!

[no-corners-deactivated20160918]

They’ve already been DDOSed a couple times lol.

[liberaleffects]

[left-reminders]

It’s not just the educational system. It’s that the Left hasn’t been able to provide a viable outlet for the working class people who put their faith in Trump – that’s our fight, to help organize the Left so that it becomes possible. “Fix education” is the liberal answer to pretty much everything, but it won’t remedy the wealth inequality and it won’t remedy the alienation. There needs to be a coherent anti-capitalist movement that focuses on putting power and influence into the hands of the working class beyond the vague promises about education that have been touted for decades, and that means full worker control.

[leftistnaija]

The liberal insistence that the only thing stopping people from being more liberal is a supposed lack of education is sickening in of itself.

[left-reminders]

[gayasscommie-deactivated2017090]

See if only the working class wasn’t so STUPID they’d know that they should only be politely racist

[leviathan-supersystem]

also the idea that poor people are overwhelmingly right-wing is a classist liberal myth- trump supporters are less wealthy than the supporters of the other republican nominees are (were? i’m not sure how to tense this) but still have more money on average than democrats do [link] and even the claim that the white rural southern poor are right-wing doesn’t quite hold up to scrutiny [link]

also, whether or not a group votes for democrats is not a good indicator of whether or not they’re left-wing.

[brucebocchi]

“people should be better informed,” says man whose entire living is earned by clickbaiting gullible people

[youeitherskateoryoudie-deactiva]

It's just one of the guys from Hamilton, and what that person was referring to on how it's racist is how once the director of Hamilton used the n-word when he was reading out loud what one of his behind-the-scenes scripts were, and since it was censored on the paper, people say he's racist for it.

ahhhi mean ive seen things about how hamilton is unhelpful bc its still telling white history and stuff like that altho i generally think that the issues involving hamilton r not my place to really talk about 

i didnt know who the guy was i just liked the sentiment of the post esp for not specifically calling people who menstruate women

however i can delete the post if it is an issue? 

[leftaf]

Hamilton is about white slave owners being played by black people, with rap songs. It’s an inherently racist concept designed by white supremacists to normalize their views and endear the founding fathers so people forget that they were slave owners. Racist propaganda sold to white kids in a black person’s voice, using black culture as a funny prop against itself. The director using the N word is just a predictable footnote in all this.

[tiffupig-deactivated20201209]

Oh my god, this is so stupid. Hamilton is /not/ racist, the person who wrote it isn’t white! Why are you just erasing the writer’s Latin identity and pretending like all the actors involved are just puppets to some crazy white man’s scheme like holy shit. This is so annoying, people of color can’t do anything fun without someone trying to ruin it. The entire point, which Lin-Manuel Miranda made clear of choosing the founding fathers and thus casting it with minorities shows how radically different of a country America is today. He picked Alexander Hamilton because he was grew up severely in poverty and wrote himself out of it to success.

[leftaf]

A latin person used black culture to absolve white slave owners. Non-white people are capable of anti-blackness. Alexander Hamilton “broke out of poverty” by being a slave owner. Are they praising him for being a self-made slave owner? And yes, it shows that America is such a different place, because a black man playing a slave owner wouldn't have been widely accepted back in the day, America’s racism has become so much more relatable and discreet. Alexander Hamilton was a monster, a despicable human being along with the rest of the founding fathers. Endearing him to a young audience by using black culture as the brunt of the joke only serves to normalize and absolve who the founding fathers were, slave owners. If you have anything but contempt for slave owners and those who idolize them, then Imma have to ask you to step back from your lil uwu liberalism culture and maybe do some critical thinking as to why an idea like human slavery could be normalized in the first place.

[youeitherskateoryoudie-deactiva]

It's just one of the guys from Hamilton, and what that person was referring to on how it's racist is how once the director of Hamilton used the n-word when he was reading out loud what one of his behind-the-scenes scripts were, and since it was censored on the paper, people say he's racist for it.

ahhhi mean ive seen things about how hamilton is unhelpful bc its still telling white history and stuff like that altho i generally think that the issues involving hamilton r not my place to really talk about 

i didnt know who the guy was i just liked the sentiment of the post esp for not specifically calling people who menstruate women

however i can delete the post if it is an issue? 

[leftaf]

Hamilton is about white slave owners being played by black people, with rap songs. It’s an inherently racist concept designed by white supremacists to normalize their views and endear the founding fathers so people forget that they were slave owners. Racist propaganda sold to white kids in a black person’s voice, using black culture as a funny prop against itself. The director using the N word is just a predictable footnote in all this.

[leftaf]

Yo I just wanted to shit on Hamilton. That play irritates the hell out of me and I truly despise the fandom. You’re great skateordie, I’m a fan of your blog, you did nothing wrong and if anything I let my anger drive when I should’ve saved it for people that are actually out here defending Hamilton.

[youeitherskateoryoudie-deactiva]

It's just one of the guys from Hamilton, and what that person was referring to on how it's racist is how once the director of Hamilton used the n-word when he was reading out loud what one of his behind-the-scenes scripts were, and since it was censored on the paper, people say he's racist for it.

ahhhi mean ive seen things about how hamilton is unhelpful bc its still telling white history and stuff like that altho i generally think that the issues involving hamilton r not my place to really talk about 

i didnt know who the guy was i just liked the sentiment of the post esp for not specifically calling people who menstruate women

however i can delete the post if it is an issue? 

[leftaf]

Hamilton is about white slave owners being played by black people, with rap songs. It’s an inherently racist concept designed by white supremacists to normalize their views and endear the founding fathers so people forget that they were slave owners. Racist propaganda sold to white kids in a black person’s voice, using black culture as a funny prop against itself. The director using the N word is just a predictable footnote in all this.

[folklorestv]

(x)

[leftaf]

Not only are hamilton fans racist as fuck, but they reblog boring shit like this.

[benpaddon]

People say “Big corporations don’t actually care about LGBT individuals, they’re just pandering to you because they want your money.”

But have you considered, just for a moment, how it feels to LGBT individuals to know that they are considered important enough to pander to? The notion that corporations, plural, are actively chasing gay dollars, lesbian coin, bi bucks, trans tender, is huge. It would have been almost unthinkable even as recently as a decade ago.

It’s considered more financially lucrative, more worthwhile, to pander to us than it is to pander solely to straight white cisfolk. Don’t diminish the importance of that, because that is massive. It’s a huge step forward.

[brak666]

Corporations don’t care about anyone. They only care about money. And queer people know that very well. Probably better than cishet people do. But the fact that corporations are now openly courting the queer dollar when 25 years ago it would literally have been financial suicide for them to do so is a nice sign of how far things have come.

[arallara]

Also, capitalism can be a revolutionary force.  It can catalyze enormous cultural change extremely rapidly.  And once your identity is recognized as a market demographic, there’s no going back, really.  If you’re a market, our capitalist culture will make space for you.

[gothhabiba]

OH MY FUCKING GOD ASGDWAUKHJ,M

[nightgaunts-deactivated20161212]

unbelievable

[teamnowalls-deactivated20180918]

honestly i wrote this

[tsarcasm-deactivated20180922]

they really said “trans tender”

[felrender]

it got worse

[veketa-deactivated20190129]

“capitalism can be a revolutionary force“

[bedabug]

awkwardly hedges around the darth jar jar theory because he’s still a supremely racist caricature and i’m uncomfortable

[thecrystalfems]

Ikr! It’s so offensive to see such a racist depiction of gungans in that movie real gungans are NOT that stupid!

[bedabug]

“#what is this post #jar jar doesn’t even remotely resemble a humanor any human race”

First of all wow rude, your sarcasm was not appreciated. Secondly you’re wrong. That’s okay, it’s fine to be wrong especially when, in this case, it means you haven’t seen many movies featuring blackface, nor have you seen many movies featuring characters played by Stepin Fetchit.

But just because you yourself have not seen the proof that Jar Jar Binks is a racist caricature does not mean it is not true or that others have missed it. The Boondocks did a comic strip on it. The Chicago Tribune mentioned it in an article when The Phantom Menace came out, and quoted the Wall Street Journal as calling him a “Rastafarian Stepin Fetchit.” There are dozens of other think pieces on this fact out there, including an incredibly informative one from another tumblr user.

Patricia Williams wrote that aspects of Jar Jar’s character were reminiscent of blackface minstrels. [x]

George Lucas himself was forced to put out a statement after episode 1 was released saying any racism percieved in the character of Jar Jar was unintentional and not “racially motivated” [x]

Stepin Fetchit, who was the first African American actor to ever get screen credit played a lot of characters that, as you might imagine were painfully racist considering his first movie was in 1929. His Wikipedia entry’s related entries category has links to Uncle Tom, Blackface, Pickaninny, and Jar Jar Binks. Which sums up the point quite nicely.

The mannerism, body language, and speech pattern of Jar Jar Binks is nearly identical to that of blackface minstrel characters, racist characters portrayed by Stepin Fetchit, and many other reincarnations of this particular racist caricature.

Even the way he speaks with the “mesa, yousa” is reminiscent of racist stereotypes because that was often how black characters were shown to speak as it wasn’t “sa” they were saying but “sir” with an incorrect pronunciation to highlight a lack of intelligence (because these were racist productions).

George Lucas, Lucasfilm, and Ahmed Best (the actor who played Jar Jar) all insist Jar Jar Binks is not racist. And I truly believe they did not do it intentionally. But subconsciously done or not the fact is that Jar Jar Binks is a racist caricature. It’s too identical to prominent racist stereotypes from history to argue against.

[regularlesbian]

when a trans woman says they hate drag they’re probably not talking about the history of it as an opportunity for trans women, especially twoc, to publicly celebrate their femininity. they’re talking about white cis misogynist men wearing us like a halloween costume and spitting on our heritage and getting praised by cis liberals for being “progressive”

[regularlesbian]

tbh i didnt expect this to blow up so much, but let me clarify: i am not saying that drag is inherently bad, im saying that when trans women complain about drag, they’re doing it out of frustration with cis man drag queens and the fact that they’re more respected than literal trans women.

it’s similar to when non-men say something like “i hate all men”. it’s not because the speaker every single man is evil (although maleness is itself is harmful, but that’s not relevant). it’s not a party line, it’s a cry of frustration. although with the way social media works the difference can be hazy sometimes.

but that’s just my onion, feel free to give your point of view

[oh-glasgow]

Top image, Nazi propaganda in the 1930s.

Second image, UKIP and Vote Leave’s advert today. In 2016.

Beyond parody. Beyond comprehension.

[leszula]

saying that within lgbt+ spaces, white cis gay men are the first ones to be heard and the first ones to have their struggles acknowledged, and saying that therefore within lgbt+ spaces, white cis gay men need to sit down sometimes and listen to women, People of Colour and trans folks, is not at all the same as saying that white cis gay men “aren’t oppressed anymore”, nor is it the same as straight cis people telling gay men to sit down and shut up.

[bogleech]

...To put this another way:

Angry edgelords think “SJW’s” (anyone they disagree with) are enforcing some sort of groupthink conformist echo chamber where discourse is silenced and yet what those same edgelords are so mad about is that the insensitive shit they say, which once went over fine on their 2004 forum communities, is suddenly subject to backlash and criticism when viewed by 500-10,000 people.

They are literally angry because they want their echo chambers back.

[bogleech]

Wow looks like I made some people SUPER mad with this one.

It’s as if they’ve all got amnesia about the internet from 10+ years ago…or  maybe they’re too young to even remember it correctly.

Before the widespread use of twitter, tumblr and facebook, all people really had were webforums, Deviantart and livejournal, none of which were set up for posts to go viral and spread that far outside a small social circle with any ease.

It took something more extreme and special to be shared by thousands or erupt into a cross-website backlash.

On a forum in particular, even today, what you say isn’t often unlikely to be seen by more than that forum’s little clique, and every forum establishes its own totally unique status quo and social environment with its own approach to acceptability.

On social media as wide open as today’s big names, however, the things you say can be quickly exposed to basically the full spectrum of modern attitudes.

People upset that they now have to “watch what they say” like to think it’s because the culture is growing “hyper sensitive” and “coddled,” but sensitivity has not increased at all. If anything, it’s gone far down, since celebrities and politicians are getting more attention and more open support than ever for even their most despicable statements. If you can’t get away with a “joke” on the internet today that you could a few years ago it is only because it’s being seen easily enough by a large enough number of people that it is subject to inevitable, natural and expected criticisms.

[gayasscommie-deactivated2017090]

Yeah it’s like, weird, going back to forums now, they all have these cultural status quos that act more like a family than a system of friends.  Like there’s always this one asshole but everyone’s accepted them and treat them congenially, like oh there’s the guy, he’s the neighborhood neonazi, what a weirdo.

In these very small organizations holding people accountable for their horrid actions was actually the biggest faux pas you could commit, bigger than like, being a white supremacist or a violent homophobe or a misogynyst.  

I don’t have much more to add but I do think that the shift from the forum method of organization to the social network method massively changed the way that thought on the internet was organized.

[evilrashida]

I think about this a lot

[bigeisamazing]

I knew dude looked familiar.

[fatbruja-deactivated20171101]

communismkills lives in sac?????

[theechrysalisamidst]

of course these nerds do

[steeleman]

OMG… that’s the same dude that formed a “White Student Union” at Towson University, near Baltimore.

https://www.vice.com/video/white-student-union

[the-sarkai]

Matt Heimbach, who was one of the racists who assaulted a Black Woman at a Trump rally.

[fomysquad]

BREAKING: Sacramento Nazi 

  #MatthewHeimbach #Sacramento #NoNazisInSac

[faenicoleamor]

Are they facing charges?

[hechodeoro-deactivated20180924]

lmao probably not people are actually defending neo nazis

[whitegirlsaintshit]

Okay Heimbach went to my school and is a real life terrorist. He started the White Student Union, he got a speaker who was talking about the eradication of nonwhites to come to our campus, and he threatened to start armed patrols on campus, which obviously means he would start attacking people of color. This was four years ago. He is still alive and kicking, organizing more shit like this and now he’s got Neo Nazis on his side. If anyone tells you that race relations are better now, they’re fucking lying or in denial.

[leftaf]

@communismkills come get your bf

[ta7yafilisteen-deactivated20170]

Word.

[swiftlythebestoftimes-deactivat]

Y'all better be seeing this.

[mangopapi-deactivated20210928]

Look at it !