read thru diary of an innocent last week, most surprising effect was that it slightly permanently decreased my genital dysphoria to read this bit

Janaina Medeiros
Xuebing Du
cherry valley forever

★

#extradirty
Sade Olutola
Cosmic Funnies
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
AnasAbdin

⁂
YOU ARE THE REASON
Sweet Seals For You, Always
NASA
Today's Document

Origami Around
Show & Tell

PR's Tumblrdome
Stranger Things

Kaledo Art

blake kathryn

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from Taiwan
seen from Bulgaria

seen from Romania
seen from South Africa

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
@lizardgirlfrills
read thru diary of an innocent last week, most surprising effect was that it slightly permanently decreased my genital dysphoria to read this bit
so is there like some trick to getting tumblr to actually let you download a backup of your blog or am i just gonna have to lose out on that once againrr
Had a weird moment today you might relate to.
Skinny guy with hair he bleached over a month ago, smoking habit, mtg player whobis VERY attached to the game's faction of nonconsensual body modifiers, a little nervous, not the most sensible person, wears a hat indoors.
And after talking to them for a while for the 2nd time in a few months, remembering their name is going to be complicated because all that I have for them now...
is EGG
very cute i hope she realizes she's a girl soon <3
Did you have a term of art for someone who conflates women with nonbinary people?
i don't think there's yet a term for someone who is not themselves nonbinary who does this but there really should be an insulting term for this. "theyfab" has gotten a lot of good use for afab nbs who fundamentally view themselves as a weird type of woman (and thus ontologically incapable of harming others)
why do you think it's acceptable to base your worldview on falsehoods? what's your justification for being religious?
Why do you think you're doing anything else but basing your worldview on falsehoods?
And this has nothing to do with if a giant beard in the sky exists or not, because that's irrelevant to this conversation.
The idea that I have a religion or don't is something you have no information on. It is a theoretical concept, to you unverifyable because you have done pretty much nothing to discern if it's true or not, or even to change your world view based on the evidence or lack thereof you've discovered.
Instead, you took it on faith that I must be, because to your personal dogma, only someone who believes in a god would disagree with how you behave.
I MUST believe in a divine being, or beings, or falafels controlling humanity from a secret moon base. Because otherwise, YOU'RE the asshole here.
To those who don't get the joke: The issue isn't if god(s) are real or not, but the patterns of behavior that lead to being unwilling to question or grow because that would challenge the preconceived world view. It's what we call 'Religious Thinking', and deciding you're immune to a kind of mental trap because you don't believe in the existence of Yokai is itself the same kind of mental trap.
That you believe in fewer gods than other people does not make you immune to that kind of flawed pattern of thought that's common in people who believe in 1+ more deities than you.
"have you ever considered that atheism is the REAL religion? checkmate atheists"
basing your worldview on whatever group of random superstitions you grew up with is infinitely dumber than realize that supernatural things aren't real and living your life around that obvious assumption. are YOU willing to ask yourself "if atheists are right, am i okay with the way i'm acting?" bc right now you've got posts on your blog trying to justify the murder of thousands of innocent people on religious grounds
the implication here is that some people dying justifies military actions to kill more than an order of magnitude more people, most of whom were unrelated to the initial killings. this is a great example of how religious thinking clouds people's judgement and makes them unable to think or act in even the most basic moral ways, despite their claims. god isn't real, and you will cease to exist when you die.
you know why this is funny? And seriously it is really kinda funny here...
It's that you refuse to admit that the war going on is based on religious beliefs on BOTH Sides.
But to be fair, when you start from the position of 'oh some people died' as the description of 'massive terrorist attack filmed and streamed live on the internet' I'm not exactly going to state your morality is the guideline I'm going to look to... just in general?
That you fundamentally do not understand... a lot of things? Does not surprise me. Nor the whole 'Oh I am more morally superior to you' position you're holding cause you still are very much and very obviously hideously ignorant on what I think and believe after spending hours trying to find something to attack me with.
AND YOU STILL WERE NOT ABLE TO FIGURE OUT HOW I THINK.
Just fucking comedy.
But also fuck off. You're an embarrassment.
1000 people dying does not give anyone the right to kill >10000 mostly unrelated people in response. hence the "order of magnitude" comment. i am morally superior to you because i don't decide it's okay to kill people because i'm more sympathetic to one side's supernatural beliefs. i don't like islam either, doesn't mean random innocents should be bombed to death. keep being a religious idiot as much as you want, everyone with sense can see it makes you a more callous and evil person when you believe lies on purpose.
okay go follow lizardgirlclaws
okay go follow lizardgirlclaws
okay go follow lizardgirlclaws
okay go follow lizardgirlclaws
okay go follow lizardgirlclaws
okay go follow lizardgirlclaws
why do men shave their whole bodies they don’t even have years of commercials to tell them to be hairless to blame. everyone stop being hairless it’s scaring me i have sensory issues and your razor bumps are ableist
yes this was triggered by that resident evil guy w the animal ears and metal outfit what’s going on with that i thought that was a horror game what’s happening that he’s hanging shaved dong
Women hate to see a smooth king thriving
bumpy and prickly, gonna give someone rug burn
male pattern body hair looks like mold. do you want men to be like mossy logs
yes
yes
BDSM gets a bad rep as like a violent (male) dom pushing the boundaries of a reluctant (female) sub but in my experience it's a lot of subs with wildly elaborate fantasies screaming shit like "PUT MY ASS IN THE CHILI" while a new dom is like "Okay I think, we are reaching yellow for me,"
Never give this site money
Tumblr staff doesn’t care about you and will never solve the TERF/nazi problem. If they wanted to, they would’ve a long time ago. Remember that next time they roll out quirky checkmarks or do a promotion with one of your favorite multimedia franchises
not to detract from the overall point (don't give tumblr money when their priorities don't line up with yours)
but
moderation at scale is actually hard and i've yet to see anyone with over 100M MAUs do it well. i mean maybe they could "solve" the TERF/nazi problem but that's not the solution you want because it can and will (and has) leak into banning inoffensive queer content long before a human reviewer touches it. and obviously the human reviewers are also at issue. checkmarks are trivial to roll out in comparison.
in the course of our clowning let us not pretend anyone has achieved the gold standard, much less that it's easy
i think they could just blanket ban everyone who's ever used the "radfem safe" tag (and a few others that have no overlap with good content (or at the very least they could stop them from being searchable, like they've done with many other terms)) and that would make this site massively better. sure the radfems would make new accounts and come back but it would have a chilling effect on them.
there's also the obvious "stop banning trans women just because a few dozen terfs decided to report them"
just saw someone suggest that HP Lovecraft might have been a transfem repper and now i'm budgeting to buy all the biographies and primary texts I can find to put them under the microscope
like at least Darger exclusively wrote about dickgirls so art historians would have to mutter excuses about queer liminality when discussing her work. if I have to spend six months looking for citations only to uncover a single anecdote that Lovecraft once expressed vague trans feelings and no-one thought this line of investigation was relevant to interpreting the body horror in his work then I'm going to become the fucking Joker
AAAAAUUUAUAUAUAUGGGGHHHHHHHH
cistorians when Lovecraft was a sickly waifish wordcel: yeah he was a weird effete guy with issues and subscriptions
cistorians when Lovecraft called himself a girl and had to be told to man up: Lovecraft was a BOY with a BOY'S NORMAL INTERESTS!!!