People can have whatever headcanons they want. and I can whinge about them.
ojovivo
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

@theartofmadeline
taylor price
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
The Stonewall Inn

Product Placement
Not today Justin

shark vs the universe

pixel skylines

tannertan36

PR's Tumblrdome
No title available
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
EXPECTATIONS
wallacepolsom
No title available
Today's Document
will byers stan first human second

Discoholic 🪩

seen from Russia
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from New Zealand
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States
@mapswithoutwyoming
People can have whatever headcanons they want. and I can whinge about them.
Ok but when you say "restorative justice" do you mean "hegemonic power structures need to provide ways for people who've done bad things to reintegrate into society" or do you mean "you, personally, someone with no hegemonic power whatsoever, need to keep forgiving people who've hurt you forever" because those are like. Pretty different.
#yeah ive been reading transformative/restorative justice stuff lately and some ppl Do Not Understand the difference#asking ppl to forgive their abusers is not restorative justice and anyone who thinks it is needs to shut up forever thanks
There's a Norwegian documentary, Norges Farligste, which goes through (nowhere near perfect, not above criticism) attempts at restorative/reformative justice in the country's prison system.
It provides some interesting insights into what attempts at restorative justice can even look like when, for example, you've got a guy who tried to murder his dad with a hammer to the back of the head, but has now been in years of therapy during his sentence and is going to meet his dad for an attempt at reconciliation. Because the victim asked to do so. Because stuff like this is complicated in real life.
Starting to think all the backlash to the idea of the trolley problem is just people trying to hide the fact that, deep down, they know they would be too scared to pull the lever.
I suppose one of the advantages I've gained from having been in the military is that I went from a suspicion I would have the conviction to make those kinds of calls, an absolute certainty that I do have it. I've held lives in my hands, but thankfully I rose to my training and my convictions. I chose the best of the options I had available to me at the time.
There is nothing shameful about being too afraid of making the decision, in my view. But yeah, it's cowardice to project your anxiety by claiming the philosophical quandary itself is meaningless.
No reason to wonder. A ton of people openly bragged about how morally pure they were for not pulling the lever in 2024. They just hate it when you contextualize it like that and insist they were taking a third option to sound less terrible when their actions are 1:1 compared to the thought experiment.
If anything, the reason I reject it is because I consider the thought experiment ITSELF to be cowardly.
All human lives are worth the same amount, and any LOSS of human life is as large a tragedy as any other amount of lost human life. You aren't doing a GOOD thing by condemning one person to die to save four more, you're not even doing a BETTER thing. It might be the more valuable thing in a coldly utilitarian point of view, but from my moral stance death is death. You don't get to compare and contrast your way out of that.
You’d be too scared to pull the lever huh?
People hate the trolley problem because it is inherent to the problem that choosing not to act is an active choice. That's why they reject the problem itself rather than making an argument for choosing to not pull the lever. They aren't afraid to pull the lever- they're afraid to admit that their priority is keeping their own hands clean.
I mean, my objection to the trolley problem is its applicability. In the real world you don't know who is on what track, and everyone is lying to you all the time about the subject.
One of the inherent issues with the Trolly Problem is framing. (there are others, like people acting smug over choosing the 'right' answer, which is also what people are doing when saying 'you'd be scared to pull the lever' but that's not what I wanna go in depth on)
If you asked someone 'would you be willing to kill one person to save five others' they would have to parse out the moral complexity. Who's being saved? who's going to die? The Trolly problem sets you in a minor situation where you have little if any time to make that decision and no way to gain any other information. It's a fast moving vehicle on a track and if you had the time to make a choice and think about it you'd have the time to swap the track and then rescue the one person who's at risk!
So the real answer is that most people would be stuck going 'Wait what are you talking about?' miss the window to pull the lever and five people would die! Because time sensitive question!
There's more. There's a LOT more, but again. Just wanted to focus on one point.
That’s a good observation and a perfectly reasonable way to look at moral quandaries. But when you get people who apply their dogma to it, or in the case of most of those above Brazen including the OP, treat a moral quandary like a damn fandom, such observations are anathema. Most of the posts in this thread are indistinguishable from a discussion on which ship from Avatar the Last Airbender is better. And that treatment of moral quandaries concerns me a lot more than someone answering differently on one that I would.
Though we also run into the inverse problem about fandom being treated like a moral choice like this hellsite has been doing for decades, but I’m starting to get off-topic.
seeing a lot of solid evidence that the concept of constructing a simplified toy problem in order to isolate one component of what would be in the real world a messy choice with hundreds of factors is breaking people's brains. when a physics word problem asks you to imagine a spherical cow it's not because they're trying to teach you how to do math on ball-shaped bovines, it's because they don't want to complicate a question designed to explore mass and momentum with the aerodynamics of ungulates. when the trolley problem gives you a clear-cut scenario with no time to think of a clever solution it's because the problem is meant to explore the ethics of inaction and consequentialism and "but who tied the people to the tracks" or "I would simply stop the trolley" or "in the real world you don't know how many people are tied to the tracks" are all deflections that don't engage with those questions.
one could argue that the trolley problem isn't a perfect way to isolate those questions but most "critiques" of the problem (and I use quotes because most of the time the dismissals aren't really meant as critiques, in the sense that the goal isn't to help someone construct a better version of the problem but to stop them from talking about it) take issue with the aspects of the problem that serve to isolate them, so I can only interpret them as implicitly assuming those are not worthwhile questions to ask in isolation. which is also fine, but I do wonder why one would think that, and can think of a very simple explanation, is my point.
Un-Rules Question: the printing of Entirely Normal Armchair from Unstable mentions "only if he or she", so would my friend using "They/Them" and/or "It/Its" and/or any other neo-pronouns be unable to activate it?
(The updated printing from Unsanctioned replaces "he or she" with the gender-neutral "they" to fix this)
(Asked by my friend Garrett who doesn't have a Tumblr)
No, all cards have the Oracle version of the rules text.
Ah, but what if R&D's Secret Lair is in play?
Talking to friends with inept parents is crazy. No wonder they’re like this if their parents kept fumbling
“I’m having trouble adapting to my adult responsibilities” well no wonder, nobody raised you 😭😭😭
Hot tip for future parents: you actually have to guide your kid to adulthood. Feeding them and waiting for them to grow up is not enough since they are not house plants. A little more thought and care is required.
for those lacking certain "adulting" skills, especially things around the house, check out:
mom, how do i...?
and dad, how do i...?
^ there are tons of other resources but these two will teach you some personal hygiene, home or apartment repairs, easy recipes and basic cleaning techniques, even how to schedule doctor's appointments
if youre a renter i cannot recommend the trans handyma'am enough, mercury is a lifesaver, and her channel and accounts are always accepting new questions
there are so many resources, a lot that you dont have to even ask for, just know how to look 🩷 much love
Jumping in here to also suggest "see Jane drill" on YouTube. She's great for bigger projects... stuff like installing appliances or doing major renovation or repair. My husband replaced all the toilets in our house in a weekend using her tutorials. It would have cost $500 per toilet to have a plumber do it but we did it for just cost of materials which was around $200 each.
seeing weird responses to chuck tingle talking about his gender has reminded me how the concept of "my gender is being gay" or "i'm not a woman i'm a lesbian" etc. feels like basic kindergarten shit from my perspective but actually this kind of thing makes a lot of peoples heads explode
i think there's also a tendency to interpret gay men having any sort of complicated feelings about their gender as being automatically trans women (some of them are!! but yknow) or that they must present in a feminine way to be nonbinary. idk man i've met bears who take estrogen and masc jock they/thems there are more genders in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy
Starting to think all the backlash to the idea of the trolley problem is just people trying to hide the fact that, deep down, they know they would be too scared to pull the lever.
I suppose one of the advantages I've gained from having been in the military is that I went from a suspicion I would have the conviction to make those kinds of calls, an absolute certainty that I do have it. I've held lives in my hands, but thankfully I rose to my training and my convictions. I chose the best of the options I had available to me at the time.
There is nothing shameful about being too afraid of making the decision, in my view. But yeah, it's cowardice to project your anxiety by claiming the philosophical quandary itself is meaningless.
No reason to wonder. A ton of people openly bragged about how morally pure they were for not pulling the lever in 2024. They just hate it when you contextualize it like that and insist they were taking a third option to sound less terrible when their actions are 1:1 compared to the thought experiment.
If anything, the reason I reject it is because I consider the thought experiment ITSELF to be cowardly.
All human lives are worth the same amount, and any LOSS of human life is as large a tragedy as any other amount of lost human life. You aren't doing a GOOD thing by condemning one person to die to save four more, you're not even doing a BETTER thing. It might be the more valuable thing in a coldly utilitarian point of view, but from my moral stance death is death. You don't get to compare and contrast your way out of that.
You’d be too scared to pull the lever huh?
People hate the trolley problem because it is inherent to the problem that choosing not to act is an active choice. That's why they reject the problem itself rather than making an argument for choosing to not pull the lever. They aren't afraid to pull the lever- they're afraid to admit that their priority is keeping their own hands clean.
I mean, my objection to the trolley problem is its applicability. In the real world you don't know who is on what track, and everyone is lying to you all the time about the subject.
One of the inherent issues with the Trolly Problem is framing. (there are others, like people acting smug over choosing the 'right' answer, which is also what people are doing when saying 'you'd be scared to pull the lever' but that's not what I wanna go in depth on)
If you asked someone 'would you be willing to kill one person to save five others' they would have to parse out the moral complexity. Who's being saved? who's going to die? The Trolly problem sets you in a minor situation where you have little if any time to make that decision and no way to gain any other information. It's a fast moving vehicle on a track and if you had the time to make a choice and think about it you'd have the time to swap the track and then rescue the one person who's at risk!
So the real answer is that most people would be stuck going 'Wait what are you talking about?' miss the window to pull the lever and five people would die! Because time sensitive question!
There's more. There's a LOT more, but again. Just wanted to focus on one point.
What's the original problem? "Save one person you love, or five random strangers?"
That's easy, I save my love.
I'm sure the people who loved the five people who died will take great comfort in the fact that you did "the right thing" but no, that's not the original problem anyway. I'll give you a hint: The original problem involves a trolley.
the justification when law enforcement kills someone for no particular reason always boils down to “we got really really scared, you should feel bad for us because we were sososo scared” ok. piss yourself or scream or something. why is killing someone the only option
"there's no platonic explanation for this" some of y'all need better friends
"there's no platonic explanation for this" some of y'all need to be better friends
so like basically in the REIGEN manga tome tries so desperately to throw herself into the center of this literal Superhuman world she sees and play the role of the eager young protagonist and its so endearing but in the end reigen has to come clean and she can’t keep using the spiritual premise as a crutch. not because she was wrong to have her whimsical interests, but because the fantasy of specialness can often be an escape from the isolation a person feels due to being unable to live up to societal ideals of normalcy, and yet in the end the fantasy can itself end up feeding directly into the isolation by obscuring your view of the other people in your life. you cannot prioritize the idea of being unique or special alone and that is the reason that the power structures in the story (as represented by roshuuto in REIGEN) so frequently fail short; because actually EVERYONE is a Pathetic Freak Weirdo Nerd Loser, from the handsome, popular rich boy, to the pretentious Dark!Reigen foil who takes himself too seriously, to all of the mundane teenage girls who the audience is initially tricked into dismissing as shallow, but also by the same token EVERYONE deserves to be loved and feel supported.
because actually bonds with other people are the most important thing, and centrally this is also why REIGEN relies so heavily on bonds with others as something to create horror. the evil spirit mimics the voices of the ones you love and lures you in and when you’re at your most lost and scared and in need, that’s when you turn around and the face of the person you trust betrays you. tome only contracts the fatal curse in the first place because she cared about reigen and went back to make amends with him. because that’s the most horrifying, most terrifying thing, the thing that renders you absolutely helpless, isn’t it? it’s letting yourself rely on others and trust them to the point that it leaves you vulnerable, isn’t it? but you have to do it, if you want to achieve true connection then you can’t continue keeping up a veneer of Specialness and posturing as someone you’re not no matter how afraid you are of being seen as your true self. that’s the idea that really connects tome and reigen above all else. you have to be who you really are and you have to trust that you’ll be loved for it. and that’s horrifying! that’s an unimaginable, Forbidden terror! but it’s necessary.
and also I think it’s so clever how REIGEN conveys this by only bringing in shigeo kageyama, the protagonist and most recognizable character who the reader has so many preconceived notions of, in at the last moment as a terrifying ghost who is impersonating him. I mean also it’s partially because shigeo can easily be made to look scary lol, because let’s be real, he can be pretty goddamn scary /hj BUT MOSTLY it’s to have him in his uniform, in his most recognizable and iconic form that the reader will cling to, and then have it be blown away by the post-canon shigeo, the real shigeo, the shigeo who has grown and changed and is no longer stuck in the role he once was. because to be vulnerable with others you have to grow and change and do away with old pretenses and dynamics that you’ve become dependent on. it can be scary to stop playing roles after you’ve grown use to them for so long, but you don’t need them - your most honest self will be the most loved. and also I love how just like tome could tell that it was the real reigen bcause he immediately ran into a spiderweb and yelled, you can tell that it’s the real shigeo because he’s immediately rude as fuck and he and reigen literally instantly go into their mean pithy little affectionate banter lol ok sorry anyway.
and also because you cannot really be any more or less special than anyone else and you need bonds with others, it’s true both that you have to rely on other people, but also that you owe it to them to be kind. reigen is literally a normal person working in the spirit business, so he has to rely on other people with the necessary abilities, such as dimple the spirit and serizawa the psychic, yes, but he also does his part to take care of the people who matter to him. roshuuto is so focused on appearances and power - as shown by how he goes on and on about connections - but when it comes down to it, he was not willing to save others (leaving hoshido in Reliance), and so nobody bothered trying to save him in turn. he only abandoned, and was abandoned. this is shown most acutely in the end by how roshuuto “has no other option” but to pass his curse on to someone else to save himself, while reigen “has no other option” to take on a curse to save someone else. reigen and serizawa accepting their responsibility as adults to protect the children around them is an extension of the idea that you are equal to everyone and are obligated to be kind to your loved ones and recieve kindness in turn. anyway mutual trust and communication is all that matters and tome kurata is The protagonist of all time Sorry,
cringe fail boss
[ID: A Mob Psycho 100 comic of Tome and her high school friends. Tome says, "my boss is sooooooo funny he does anything and i laugh my ass off." She imagines a scene of Reigen saying "OK so--" and Tome cutting him off with a loud, long "ahahaha." She smirks, "he sucks so much it's awesome." One of her friends sweats and tries to smile, "well, he doesn't sound that bad--" but Tome interrupts, "no he sucks." End ID]
a lot of people think that men and women can't be friends because they must be dating which is very annoying but then over time I've been watching the "men and women CAN be friends actually" crowd turn into "men and women can't be friends because they are actually siblings" so congrats on reinventing the idea that men and women can't just have a normal platonic relationship without somebody shipping them or saying they have sibling energy when they don't
I expected my cpap machine to make a dramatic difference right away but after waking up from my first night on the machine I think the experience can be described as I woke up and thought “well I don’t think I feel dramatically different but it also definitely feels like something in there has been unclogged”
It’s like uh like when you finally remember to clean the hair out of the shower drain after a while. But with my general vibe.
According to my app which no is not called cpapp unfortunately I only stopped breathing 1.7 times per hour. Which might sound weird but during my sleep apnea test I stopped breathing 23.5 times per hour so as you can imagine breathing is generally better than not breathing
I’m not talking about my health just to overshare btw. I think there’s probably other young people out there with sleep apnea who might need to hear someone in their 20s discussing this.
Don’t feel ashamed to get tested if you’re tired all the time or someone has told you that you gasp for air in your sleep. Get your shower drain unclogged.
I'm 35 and I got tested for sleep apnea in the fall and I was having OVER 50 EVENTS PER HOUR.
Got my cpap and holy shit the difference. I am actually rested when I go to bed at a reasonable time. I no longer need daily 2-4 hour naps just to function.
And I also suspect that it might be helping me not get as many colds, because that nightly airflow clears things out.
I'm really glad I have my cpap now and everything is better, but also wish I had got tested earlier, because maybe if I'd caught this sooner I wouldn't have developed some of the other health issues I deal with. But I thought I was so tired all the time because I'm a parent and autistic.
So yeah, even if you think you know why you're always tired, get tested just in case.
I got a sleep test in my early 20's after a lifetime of bad sleep. It turns out I stopped breathing 35 times an hour and my blood oxygen dipped to 80 percent.
When you stop breathing due to sleep apnea your body basically wakes up for a second to take a breath so you never get restful sleep. I stopped breathing once every two minutes or less.
My CPAP was immediately life changing. Solved a lifetime of sleep issues literally overnight.
checking my notifications to see that a complex and meaningful discussion has unfolded in the replies of one of my posts like. that's not their natural habitat but I'm happy to see it
Starting to think all the backlash to the idea of the trolley problem is just people trying to hide the fact that, deep down, they know they would be too scared to pull the lever.
I suppose one of the advantages I've gained from having been in the military is that I went from a suspicion I would have the conviction to make those kinds of calls, an absolute certainty that I do have it. I've held lives in my hands, but thankfully I rose to my training and my convictions. I chose the best of the options I had available to me at the time.
There is nothing shameful about being too afraid of making the decision, in my view. But yeah, it's cowardice to project your anxiety by claiming the philosophical quandary itself is meaningless.
No reason to wonder. A ton of people openly bragged about how morally pure they were for not pulling the lever in 2024. They just hate it when you contextualize it like that and insist they were taking a third option to sound less terrible when their actions are 1:1 compared to the thought experiment.
If anything, the reason I reject it is because I consider the thought experiment ITSELF to be cowardly.
All human lives are worth the same amount, and any LOSS of human life is as large a tragedy as any other amount of lost human life. You aren't doing a GOOD thing by condemning one person to die to save four more, you're not even doing a BETTER thing. It might be the more valuable thing in a coldly utilitarian point of view, but from my moral stance death is death. You don't get to compare and contrast your way out of that.
You’d be too scared to pull the lever huh?
People hate the trolley problem because it is inherent to the problem that choosing not to act is an active choice. That's why they reject the problem itself rather than making an argument for choosing to not pull the lever. They aren't afraid to pull the lever- they're afraid to admit that their priority is keeping their own hands clean.
my grandma tailors my clothes when I need alterations which is fun because half the time it's like knock knock it's me your granddaughter can you make this dress shorter and tighter so I can slut it up better
and ykw she's happy about it. she loves that I'm enjoying being a young educated childfree single woman and get to travel and party and live life like she didn't get to. thank you nonnie I'll party for both of us
if someone is cultivating an endless publication of 'crimes' (I'll say especially sexual crimes) with the only criteria being the demographic who committed them, you need to know that is wildly fascist behavior.
people who do this never care enough to vet whether any of it is real and you should assume most or all of it is bullshit, but it is important to stress that even if someone could ensure with 100% certainty that every single instance of sexual violence listed actually occurred in exactly the way they presented it, the fact that they are choosing to present these accounts only because of what demographic committed them means that it functionally exists as propaganda against a demographic. it is incontestably a tactic for manufacturing consent for violence against a group of people.
people who give a fuck about survivors of sexual violence care about the survivors. they might (for example) make a project elevating experiences by survivors of a given demographic (which is what transfemvoicesproject did) no matter who their aggressors were.