Carlos was taken from his mom, Encarnacion Bail Romero after she was arrested during a work raid. Her words, “Nobody could help me because I don’t speak English,” are still resonating deeply within me. This child was kidnapped from a loving mother, and she went to hell and backwards trying to get him back, and a judge literally told her she had no rights to her own child.
Completely unfit parents can get their children back like it’s nothing and this poor woman who loves her child and just wants him with her again cannot? How is this not human trafficking/kidnapping?
Also:
The judge said the biological mother had no rights to even see her child, according to the mother’s lawyer.
Asked if the Mosers would allow Bail Romero to see the child, the Mosers’ attorney, Joseph Hensley, said the couple was “not willing to comment on that at this time.” source
reminder that many children are funneled specifically to Christian families and communities for the same reasons they always have: destroy culture, stack votes, add bodies to communities that otherwise wouldn’t hold majorities. it is literal, actual trafficking.
This is a part of genocide. Removing the children from their parents, who generally desperately love and want to raise them, and placing them with white American families is a way to erase their culture from existence without the ugliness of directly killing children. But it’s still ugly, and it cares nothing for the actual welfare of the child.
Background voice: So you are a transgender boy, do you know what that means?
Male: So you were born a girl, but you feel like a boy right? That means–that kinda means you're transgender. Okay? And that's okay, but that's [..] just the term for it.
Male: Do you like doing quiet, girly activities or do you like being... do you like jumping around and being crazy and tackling everybody?
“Do you hate girl activities (that are boring and worse sometime) ??? Hum do you hate them ???? Do you hate being a girl (which mean doing girl activities ??”
But noooooooo being trans have nothing to do with stereotypes !!!
So trans identity is based on what type of activities you like, and these have to be gendered? Seriously? "Quiet girly activities"? "Boy activities" being the ones that involve being active? This is just conservative bullshit at this point; saying that girls do quiet, docile things while boys do loud and active things.
If schools in the UK are punishing girls who protest unisex restrooms how are they responding to the boy that ASSAULTED a girl in order to get a picture of her on the toilet? Perverted freak.
A mother has spoken out and alleged that her 13-year-old daughter was physically assaulted in the unisex washrooms at her secondary school i
A mother has spoken out and alleged that her 13-year-old daughter was physically assaulted in the unisex washrooms at her secondary school in Coventry.
The girls mother, Gemma Brennan, told CoventryLivethat her daughter had been injured in an incident at Caludon Castle School in Wyken on Tuesday, February 28. She reported that her daughter had to be taken to hospital after the alleged assault happened.
Brennan explained that a teenage boy had kicked the toilet cubicle door open to take photographs of her daughter while she was using the facilities. He kicked the door so hard that it hit the teen in the face, leaving her with marks on her arm and a large cut on her forehead.
“She went into the cubicles and one boy kept donkey kicking the door. It hit her on the arm and then he did it again and it smashed her right in the face,” Brennan said.
The incident is said to have occurred after parents had raised concerns about the schools’ new unisex toilets. However, Brennan explained that these concerns had “fallen on deaf ears” and not been taken into consideration by the administration.
“It is an ongoing problem at that school, there are unisex toilets so girls and boys have to share and the boys go in and take photos of the girls, kick the doors down and there are no locks on the doors so they are going over to the cubicles to take photos and videos which is a massive concern,” Brennan explained.
The school Brennan’s daughter attends is not the only facility to implement unisex or gender neutral bathroom facilities.
Schools across the United Kingdom are opting to replace single sex toilets with unisex toilets, despite ongoing protests from parents and students alike.
Schoolgirls in particular have organized protests and in some cases even vandalized school property to make clear their opposition to the new mixed-sex facilities. Many of these acts of protest have been documented and uploaded onto the social media app TikTok by the students themselves. Students often use TikTok to help coordinate their activism. The videos of these protests, which often rack up hundreds of thousands of views, have inspired students at other schools to do the same.
Most recently, one school suspended 34 students after they protested unisex toilets and posted videos of the debacle to TikTok. Students at Mountain Ash Comprehensive in Wales skipped classes and triggered fire alarms as they joined in the protests being co-ordinated on social media around England and Wales.
Students at Mountain Ash Comprehensive also reported that the toilets were being locked during class time. The school has denied this claim, but many parents have supported the students efforts despite condemnation from school officials.
Following the rash of protests, the school issued a letter condemning parents and carers who “glorified and praised … appalling behavior.” They were also instructed to “warn their children against being manipulated by TikTok trends, which are an increasing problem for schools across the UK at present.”
But parents were not the only ones to show support to the protesting students, members of the public — particular women — have praised the youth’s efforts to reject the implementation of unisex toilets. Many female social media users responded to Mountain Ash Comprehensive’s tweet about the incident by citing their own experiences as young women dealing with female-specific issues.
“I’m furious that you made this decision. Did you engage with the pupils how they felt about unisex toilets. I fully support the students actions. As a young girl going through periods … changing pads this is embarrassing,” one woman tweeted in response to the school. “I used to be crippled over in the toilets with what I later found out was endometriosis at school I assumed it was just cramping but I could barely stand my friends would sometimes gather me and hold me up can you imagine the mortification as a girl having that with boys around? Have you put yourself in that position?”
“I menstruated on my clothes in school. I used the female-only bathroom to wash the blood from my clothes so I didn’t have to walk around in a bloodied skirt. Are you going to force girls to walk around in bloody clothes or to undress in front of boys to wash the blood out,” another woman tweeted.
Many pro-woman campaigners are pushing back against the switch to gender neutral toilets and changing facilities in schools, businesses, and gyms.
One such business that came under fire was the fashion retailer Primark, after a video went viral of a young woman tearfully explaining how she was deliberately intruded upon by two men while using their unisex changing room.
“I was trying on some clothes, and it was a unisex changing room — which, I am for because it makes every feel really included… But, twice, two men walked in on me. Opened the curtain and walked in on me … It was two different men but they were with the same group,” the woman explained, clearly emotionally distressed while recording the video in her vehicle.
After the video began to circulate, women on Twitter started a #BoycottPrimark campaign, with the hashtag briefly trending on social media. But this was hardly the first incident to occur in a Primark unisex changing room. In another horrific case, a 4-year-old girl was sexually abused while her mother was shopping for clothes at the Watford Primark.
Last year, a London Metropolitan police officer avoided jail time after he secretly filmed a woman in a unisex Primark fitting room. He was also caught in possession of hundreds of “disgusting and extremely distressing” pornographic images and videos of children and animals.
By Shay Woulahan
Shay is a writer and social media content creator for Reduxx. She is a proud lesbian activist and feminist who lives in Northern Ireland with her partner and their four-legged, fluffy friends.
School officials adults are influenced by the gender cult by installing gender neutral restrooms in the first yet girls are being “manipulated by TikTok trends” when they protest.
Why couldn’t schools just add a gender neutral restroom and keep single sex restrooms?
we actually entered hell when liberal men started acting like watching or buying porn and paying for sex was actually activism because it helped “support less fortunate women”
i was in this facebook group and witnessed this first hand. most comments were positive and people were also saying that he was wrongly accused and that his victim deserved it for being a terf. Literally. i’m going to try and find screenshots.
And if it’s because having them is a reminder that they’re biologically female, then why don’t male nonbinary people get breast implants to distance themselves from the body the had by birth too?
A French radfem is being sued for correctly recognising biological reality
Dora Moutot, one of the most famous French gender critical radical feminists, is being sued by two LGBTQ+ organisations because she called a TIM a "transfeminine man" and a TIF a "transmasculine woman". This, according to these organizations, constitutes "insults and a call for transphobic hate". This will be the first judicial case of "misgendering" in France.
The organisations represent the two individuals who Dora Moutot referred to, "Marie" Cau (the TIM) and Hanneli Escurier (the TIF). For context, this is what they take issue with:
When invited to speak and debate on the TV show Quelle Epoque, she said: "To me, Marie Cau is a man. A transfeminine man." She went on to explain how trans ideology presents risks for women's rights, citing as an example male inmates in female prisons and the ensuing rapes. These are facts. And despite her explaining these facts in a very diplomatic way ("I'm of course not saying every trans person do such things, far from it, but as women we have to be distrustful of people with penises"), she is accused of "public provocation of transphobic hate"
Hanneli Escurier, the TIF, has expressed threats of violence towards Dora Moutot. She put on a show where she was boxing, and next to her were a series of signs with the people she herself declared were "to be killed". One of these signs read "Dora Moutot and the other TERFs". Hanneli Escurier has also posted a story where she called for violence towards "the TERFs", saying that whoever beats them up should have their legal expenses crowdfunded and their acts publicly supported. Dora Moutit has denounced these actions, and it is in these contexts that she referred to Escurier as a "transmasculine woman".
This is the first time in France that a person is sued for describing reality. But it's not the first time TRAs have taken up pitchforks against Dora Moutot. They have already destroyed her commercial partners, lobbied to have her books removed from libraries, and ostracised her from feminist rallies.
What you can do:
Spread the word, especially if you're French. This is an issue of misogyny and freedom of speech - Dora Moutot has not insulted these trans people, she simply addressed their biology and described reality. People like Laetitia Ky are already speaking up in support
If you have a radfem social media page, please consider sharing this issue with your followers
If you have money to spare, please consider donating to the fund for her legal expenses. The French justice system is not cheap
Support her on Instagram @doramoutot, fight the trolls in her comments if you have the mental capacity for the vitriol, or just send her a nice message
I'm also going to buy her books, they are available online. Im going to keep updating this post with more info over the coming days.
This is infuriating. Hanneli should be facing the justice system for her threats of violence, but she is not. Dora is, for sexing someone correctly. It's sick.
Rebecca Whitehurst never wants to set foot in a school again.She also wants all teachers, especially female ones, to wear bodycams, to have
Rebecca Whitehurst never wants to set foot in a school again.
She also wants all teachers, especially female ones, to wear bodycams, to have CCTV in every classroom and for teachers to operate in pairs. “I think teachers should never be alone with children, there should always be someone else there. I know it is dramatic but I don’t want what happened to me to ever happen to anyone else,” she said.
The views of Whitehurst, who is married with two children and has been a modern languages teacher for more than ten years, have been shaped by what she describes as a “modern horror story”.
Last week the 46-year-old wept as a jury at Manchester’s Minshull Street crown court cleared her of two charges of sexual activity with a child and one of sexual communications. She had been accused of a sexual act with a 15-year-old pupil in the back of her Volvo and of sending him explicit texts, including a photograph of her breasts.
The court heard that the teenager, who had declared he was in love with Whitehurst, became obsessed with her and lied about or faked the messages. The boy, who watched pornography involving older women, assaulted her in her classroom and sent an abusive message to her daughter, the court was told.
The family spent £43,000 fighting the case, which dragged on for three years. If convicted she would have faced up to 14 years’ in jail.
Speaking from her home in Cheshire where her husband, Billy, an accountant, has “been unbelievably supportive”, she said her experience at times felt like a television drama.
It unfolded against the backdrop of a rising number of schoolboys watching online pornography, and pupils’ mental health becoming a frontline problem for many schools.
Last year, an Ofsted report found 90 per cent of girls and 50 per cent of boys polled by the schools inspectorate said they had been sent explicit pictures and messages they did not wish to see. A survey for the British Board of Film Classification last year found that almost half of 16 and 17-year-olds had recently seen pornography. Figures from NHS Digital found that one in six children in England had a probable mental health disorder last year, up from one in nine in 2017.
Whitehurst’s ordeal started in April 2019. The boys’ school where she taught French, German and Spanish had paid for her to attend a three-day course on mindfulness. She was asked to teach the subject — not to lower the stress of high-achieving children in the run-up to exams, which she had suggested, but to children on the inclusion register, who have special educational needs and disabilities. “I said yes because I am that sort of person,” the Sheffield University graduate said, but admitted to being nervous about teaching a “wishy washy” subject to children who may have experienced significant trauma.
In an early session with the group of ten boys the 15-year-old who would go on to accuse her said he was hearing voices in his head telling him to kill someone. “I thought OMG,” she said. “As soon as I could I reported it on our safeguarding system . . . I reported it on there and thought someone would talk to me about it, but no one did.”
As the sessions continued the teenager “latched” onto Whitehurst, who tried to give him “sensible advice” via the school’s email system.
He talked about being in a gang and, in an area of the city linked to the Manchester bomber, Whitehurst also feared he was at risk of getting involved in terrorism. When he started to talk about how he had “this big secret” and she was the only person he could tell it to, she made, she admits, a critical mistake.
“He had said he wants to kill people and is in a gang,” she said. “He was talking about going to the mosque. All these things were adding up in my head. I thought there was a bigger picture and I would find out about it and report it.
“I tried to get him to talk to staff who were better trained in such matters but he said no. He said he did not trust the school email which we were already communicating on. In one email thread he emailed me a ghost emoji and I realised he meant he wanted to tell me the secret on Snapchat. I downloaded Snapchat on purpose because I thought he was going to give me this big secret.”
Whitehurst said the secret was nothing to do with terrorism: “The secret was he was in love with me. I realised I had made an idiot of myself. I told him nothing like that was ever going to happen and there had been a misunderstanding. I told him I had to tell the school. He would say ‘they are not going to believe you’ and that I had made a mistake in giving him my Snapchat username. I should have reported it but I did not and I know now that that was an error.”
A few weeks later the teenager came into Whitehurst’s classroom when she was alone. He tried to force his tongue into her mouth, touched her intimately, slapped her face and spat at her. She tried to push him away, which he told the court he thought was encouragement.
“I do not think he knew how bad it was what he did; I know porn was available to him, he sent me lots of links which I never opened but I have an idea of what he watched,” she said. “I think he thought slapping me and spitting at me was sexy in some way.” Again, she did not report the assault. Whitehurst admits she was scared and also “again I thought I would be held responsible as I am the adult and he is the child”, but from then on things got steadily worse.
Over the coming weeks he gave her a necklace and sent naked images of himself which she deleted. He “begged” her to meet him outside school. Still worried about his state of mind, she met him several times in public places, including at a charity run she was doing in a Manchester park where she thought there was no risk of him “launching himself at her”.
At school Whitehurst volunteered for extra duties to ensure she was not alone. She applied for jobs in other schools.
In September 2019 she broke down in the playground when a colleague asked her if she was OK: “I said no and blurted it all out. She said she would have to take this to the head teacher.”
Whitehurst agreed with the head teacher that the matter would be reported to the police and the local authority safeguarding officer and that she would be suspended pending an inquiry. “My logic was, they will understand,” she said. “They will know he is difficult and that I wanted to help but mismanaged things.”
Whitehurst was shocked in her first police interview, two months later, when she heard that the boy had accused her of having sexual activity with him and sending him photos of her breasts.
The pandemic meant that the investigation dragged on. She did not hear anything until last year when police said they had downloaded data from both the phones, including a screenshot of a fake text conversation in whch she appeared to be suggesting sexual acts with the teenager outdoors.
“I thought, ‘I never sent those’. They did not look right. They were obviously fake. The language did not add up. I did not need a professor of linguistics to say that was not me,” she said.
“It was extraordinary that what he said was believed and I was not. He said it was consensual. And we were in love.
“I kept thinking the police will look at all this properly, tell me this will be dropped and say, ‘You poor woman’.”
As it became clear that the case would go to court Whitehurst switched lawyers. Her new team instructed an expert witness to look at the downloaded data from both phones. His report — which cost the family £8,000 — made clear there was no evidence that a photo of her breasts or a text suggesting outdoor sex acts had been sent by her or received by the teenager. Still the case was not dropped.
A week before court, Whitehurst says “calm descended”. She decided not to wear a face mask or hide her face and be “as brave as I could be”.
By video link the teenager gave contradictory evidence and admitted the assault on Whitehurst. The jury took less than three hours to acquit her.
Whitehurst’s case may be extreme but it is not isolated. There is a website on which teachers share dozens of accounts of false allegations. Teaching unions called last year for pupils who make them to be excluded and for fully funded mental health programmes aimed at boys.
Christian Harbinson of the law firm Thompsons solicitors, which represented Whitehurst, said: “An underfunded criminal justice system is unable to cope and that stretches out the agony for innocent people like Rebecca. It’s taken almost three years, since the allegations were first made, for her to clear her name, during which time Rebecca’s life has been on hold and her family have had to deal with an unimaginable level of stress and worry.”
Asked whether the teenager, now 18, would face an inquiry for possible criminal offences, Greater Manchester police said it had no intention to investigate “the child victim in this case”.
this heavily implied that a very large amount, if not a majority, of false student sexual assault allegations against teachers are male students against female teachers, NOT female students against male teachers. i imagine most of them are male students bragging and lying that they 'slept with the hot teacher', as well as sexually harassing female teachers, and then when it gets noticed or reported, they lie and say that the teacher was mutually involved. and porn plays a massive part.
just saw a few videos of white saviors stitching the muslim creator who exposed jeffrey marsh's videos, viciously attacking her
also they apparently emailed her with her kids' information including what time she leaves to drop them both to school, so she had to make a video begging them not to hurt them and said she's deleted all her videos
