If the Abrahamic God exists, then He needs to be told a few things. The things He needs to be told, in turn tells us volumes about His true nature: that God’...
hello vonnie
untitled

izzy's playlists!

roma★

oozey mess
noise dept.
No title available
Noah Kahan
art blog(derogatory)

pixel skylines

@theartofmadeline
official daine visual archive
No title available
h

ellievsbear
ojovivo

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Game of Thrones Daily
Doug Jones
d e v o n

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Japan

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Jamaica
seen from United States
seen from Thailand

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from France
seen from Oman
seen from Italy

seen from Germany

seen from Türkiye

seen from Australia

seen from Türkiye
@objectiveoctopus-blog
If the Abrahamic God exists, then He needs to be told a few things. The things He needs to be told, in turn tells us volumes about His true nature: that God’...
Seems legit
Please consider supporting my work through Patreon here: http://www.patreon.com/DarkMatter2525 This video contains some insane things I've heard. You can see...
The Bible’s teachings on when sexual relations may occur between a man and a woman are in direct conflict with the American Sexual Consent ideology that sadly even many Christians believe in.…
“But from a Biblical perspective, it is absolutely impossible for a man to rape his wife because a man can only rape a woman he is not married to.” - Yet another reason we shouldn’t live by this book. A woman's consent ALWAYS matters.
-Sam Harris, The God Debate II, vs. William Lane Craig.
Watch the full debate here
Logical Fallacy - Appeal to Tradition
This is a fallacy by which people assert that something is correct or “better” just because it is part of some tradition, has been around for a long time, or “it has always been this way!” People are generally more comfortable sticking with the thing they are familiar with, or the thing they hear has “always been done”. The belief here is that if said thing has stood the test of time, it must be good, strong, and factual. It was held for a long time that the earth was flat, but this was proven to be false, despite people still choosing to believe it. The logic is faulty. e.g. “I was raised Christian and my ancestors were Christians. We have always been Christian, so I must marry a Christian and raise my children Christian.”
“Witches” Aren’t Real; Wicca and its Origins, Lack of Evidence, and Irony.
“Wicca” is a form of neopaganism associated with witchcraft. Believers variously claim it was handed down, usually through an “ancient lineage”, to Gerald Gardner, an amateur anthropologist, who claimed to have encountered a group of witches calling themselves the “New Forest Coven” in 1936. No evidence exists for the existence of the New Forest Coven outside of Gardner’s own claims, and modern researchers such as Leo Ruickbie and Ronald Hutton, doubt the coven ever existed. Gardner claims that, during the Second World War, hundreds of witches gathered together, naked no less, in the forest to participate in an event known as “Operation Cone of Power”, with the aim of sending Hitler and his generals' telepathic thoughts to stay out of England... yeah. Again, no historical evidence for this event exists in any form, other than in Gardners own accounts. A possible influence on Gardner is the works of Margaret Murray, a British Egyptologist, and conspiracy theorist. She is mostly remembered for her “Witch-Cult Hypothesis”, a conspiracy theory stating that many of the people killed during the witch hunts of the early modern period were, in fact, the members of a highly secretive, surviving pagan religion. Her influence, beginning with her book “The Witch-Cult in Western Europe”, has had a huge impact on Wicca, Witchcraft, and fantasy fiction right up to the present day. Once again, no evidence actually exists to support the Witch-Cult Hypothesis, but as it is not entirely impossible and cannot be disproven, believers continue to assert that this pseudohistory is “truth”. In reality, the Wiccan practice began with the “Bricket Wood Coven”, founded by Gardner himself around 1946. The rituals involved nudity, bondage, and scourging, essentially making it a BDSM club, with magical quackery thrown in the mix. When the Witchcraft Act of 1736 was repealed, Gardner made his coven public, and it grew from there. When it was suggested the coven have rules to abide by, Gardner, essentially from nowhere, produced the Wiccan Laws, 30 laws by which to live. These rules are full of irony, not only threatening believers with the CHRISTIAN hell for breaking the rules, they were also sexist, “a man loveth a woman by mastering her”. Ironic, as Wiccan asserts that it supports gender equality. Rightly so, most of Gardner’s coven walked out on him, but he still had enough support and fame by this point to survive the ordeal and grow his coven. Over time, people began to add their own interpretations and form their own offshoots of Wicca, resulting in Alexandrian, Dianic, "Church and School of", Georgian and "Fluffbunny" Wicca. Many identify as "Solitary Wiccans", who have found their way through studying without joining a coven. Similarly, there are many people identifying as “Witches” without associating with Wicca at all, though they also usually claim to be descended from some ancient sect, witchy ancestor, or arcane lineage, none of which can be backed by evidence and require taking the said person at their word. These groups may appear less harmful than other religious groups, as they are not generally interested in mass conversion or preaching their doctrine, but by continuing to hold beliefs that are not grounded in reality, involving an abundance of magical thinking, and living according to an incoherent tradition invented by early 20th century fantasists, they are in essence still the enemies of anyone seriously interested in advocating truth and reason.
Young children who are exposed to religion have a hard time differentiating between fact and fiction, according to a new study published in the July issue of Cognitive Science. Researchers presented 5...
Setting them up for a lifetime of gullibility and issues when dealing with reality.
Five More Logical Fallacies
“Bandwagon”: Appealing to the fact that many people do it as an attempt to validate it. e.g. “Why won’t you believe the world is flat? Everyone else knows it is...” Personal Incredulity: Claiming that because you find something difficult to understand, it cannot be true. e.g. “I have no understanding of the fossil record whatsoever, so you must be making it up!” “Tu Quoque”: Answering criticism with criticism. Avoiding criticism by turning it back on the accuser. e.g. “You can’t tell me not smoke, I see you smoking all the time!” Appeal to Authority: Using the opinion of an authority figure in place of an actual argument. e.g. “Buy this toothpaste, because nine out of ten dentists prefer it” Special Pleading: Making up exceptions when a claim is shown to be false. Moving the goalposts. e.g. “I couldn’t read your mind because you simply didn’t believe enough!”
BTW, I also happen to accept the overwhelming scientific evidence in support of gravitational theory.
Goodbye, supernatural magical sky monsters. You were barely passable campfire ghost-story placeholders filling the gap between our curiosity and our understanding of the world around us, right up until the point where we realized we’re more moral, more reasonable and know more than you, than we endowed you with, thereby holding us back in a prison of our own creation when we invented you. So, it’s time to say goodbye, and fondly remember the good times… uh… the time when… uh… oh, when… wait… I guess that full five minutes before you started that eternal vendetta against us for eating your lunch. Yeah, not gonna miss that…
Argument From Fine Tuning
This is a variant on arguments for the existence of God, where information is cherry-picked from physics, biology, and mathematics. It asserts that the odds of the conditions for life coming to be on their own are so remote that they are therefore impossible without the guidance of a creator. It is, however, wise to remember that improbable things do happen. Given the size of the universe and the number of stars in it, the possibility of other planets being in the “Goldilocks Zone” and already supporting life is not that insignificant. With one-hundred billion stars in the galaxy and as many galaxies in the universe, this makes even the smallest chance of life arising mean that it is extremely likely to have arisen somewhere else as well. The universe appears to be fine-tuned for life because life evolved through natural selection to survive in the conditions present in the universe. If the conditions in the universe had been different, then life would have evolved completely differently, to fit those conditions instead. But if the Universe was “created” specifically for life, why does the universe appear to be so completely devoid of, and hostile towards it?
Two churches located across the street from each other.
blua: