Man sees crab for the first time.
does he...
Live in the
Sea?!
Some fucking
mollusk
pulls up

No title available
Sweet Seals For You, Always

Product Placement

PR's Tumblrdome
No title available
Keni

Kaledo Art
NASA

pixel skylines

roma★
trying on a metaphor
will byers stan first human second
DEAR READER
Game of Thrones Daily

No title available
dirt enthusiast

titsay

if i look back, i am lost

ellievsbear

izzy's playlists!

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Australia

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from Malaysia

seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye
@obnoxiouscanary
Man sees crab for the first time.
does he...
Live in the
Sea?!
Some fucking
mollusk
pulls up
i dont miss overwatch but i miss the psychosexual dynamics of playing mercy or whatever like. getting to briefly exist in the body of The blender porn girl you know
playing mercy and just thinking wow everybody in this match wants to fuck me
Playing pyro in tf2 is still like this
A trainer and their affectionate Arbok
I was bored so I took a mental age test, twice
Taking an avg., I’m 11
Accurate
drop the link bestie i need to get angry at whatever it thinks i am
Of course✨✨✨
https://mymentalage.com/
Look I’m ancient!!
@todaysbird
Rent is due and I am an artist. I do it to survive, but I do it with love.
well.
[Transcript: Tiktoker: How has the CW not made any money since 2006?
Adam Conover: Okay, this is gonna be super fun to explain. It’s likely because of something called “Hollywood Accounting”. See, the CW network doesn’t actually make the shows it airs. Instead, they’re made by a studio that’s part of the same parent company, and the CW network pays that studio to air the shows. In that way, they’re able to show a loss even though the entire company is making money off of all those sweet superheroes in love.
Now why would they go to all that trouble? Huh. You think it could be because it allows them to reduce the amount they pay in taxes, royalties, and other profit-sharing agreements? Actors, writers, directors, and producers are often entitled to a backend - a percentage of the profits that a show or movie makes. But if the show or movie lost money, then the company doesn’t need to pay those people. That’s why, according to Lucasfilm, Return of the Jedi, one of the most popular films of all time, has supposedly never gone into profit. And why stars like Harry Shearer and Peter Jackson have had to sue movie studios just to get paid.
So short answer, these companies are cooking the books in order to cheat on their taxes and cheat their own talent out of money.
End transcript]
It makes me so, so angry when I see those posts that are like "HORRIFYING EARLY PLASTIC SURGERY RESULTS FROM WW2," because all of those lists are full of images that aren't the final result and are used for pure shock value. Harold Gillies, who performed most of those surgeries, was an incredibly talented surgeon. Here are some images of the full results of his surgeries.
I need to emphasize that I can't post the "before" pictures that go with these because the men did not have faces. The injuries were so extensive that these men were missing nearly all of their facial features, and through cutting-edge techniques that "looked scary" at the time (e.g. extensive skin grafts), Gillies saved these men from a medical nightmare.
Gillies performed the world's first ftm bottom surgery for trans man Michael Dillon and pioneered mtf bottom surgery! Respect his legacy.
It’s not “encouraging” that “people with 4+ comorbidities” are most of the people who die with Covid.
People saying it’s “encouraging” that most deaths are people with 4 or more comorbidities are trying to imply that only disabled people are going to die.
And I’m glad a lot of you are on board with the fact that it’s fucking evil to cheer for the idea that vulnerable people will be most affected.
It’s also just not true.
You as a healthy abled person can easily have 4+ of these comorbidities.
The CDC’s list of “comorbidities” (not to be confused with “underlying conditions”, they’re different) is 152 pages long and includes things like:
lactose intolerance
marijuana use
mild depressive episode
pollen allergy
“obesity”
vaginal/vulval yeast infection
autism/”childhood autism”/Asperger’s
“short stature not otherwise classified”
migraines, also, headache (they’re 2 different ones)
insomnia
tinnitis
gerd (a common type of acid reflux)
constipation
acne
“pain in joint”
“pain in limb”
“low back pain”
UTI
heavy periods
cough
hiccough
sneezing
urinary incontinence or retention
eating “too much” or too little
broken bones
medication overdoses
drug “of addictive potential” in bloodstream
traffic accident
fall
“contact with hot tap water”
and just… basically anything medical or medicalized that a person can have.
Ever told a doctor literally anything about your body? You probably have four or more of these.
Anything in your chart is a comorbidity, even your lactose intolerance or your acne.
While some conditions on the list might mean you’re more likely to get severely ill, many of them really don’t. They aren’t meant to - that’s not what the list IS.
It’s just a list of conditions that were in a patient’s chart when they died.
The idea that “people with 4+ comorbidities are 75% of deaths” means “most people are safe” is complete and utter nonsense.
A lot of people are going to die in the next few months, and the official story is that they were going to die anyways because they were already just so sick before covid! so YOU shouldn’t try to be careful or agitate for better covid protection! because YOU aren’t at risk! (unless you’re one of those disableds we’ve already written off.)
It’s fucking bullshit, and it’s eugenicist bullshit trying to train you to see disabled lives as unworthy of protection. Don’t fall for it.
The list is here btw: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/health_policy/covid19-comorbidity-expanded-12092020-508.pdf I didn’t source it in the post because Tumblr hides posts with links from tags, but it’s also not hard to find.
im an scp but my classification is safe dw ^_^ i wont escape… hehe….
[tentatively reclassifies you as euclid and increases security on your cell]
I was high off my ass last night and had this dream where I was in this dense ass forest and sitting there was a tall woman. She was so tall I couldn’t see her face but she was wearing gold and I was like “uh…hi?” And she said “I made you, do you know that?” And I nodded and she was like “I hear your thoughts. Why do you hate my creation? Why do you try to destroy yourself? I made you perfect as you are. Please don’t break my heart”. Then she started crying and it flooded and I woke up with fucking heart palpitations like what does it Mean™️????
polar opposite of this post
inspiration struck and would not let me go until i drew this
This is really beautiful!!!
I don’t care if it’s old, this post still puts me on a laughing coma.
Lol
shapes
The CDC Director is really out here straight up promoting eugenics.
“Good news everyone! Only the disabled and chronically ill are dying so that’s REALLY ENCOURAGING. No need to change a thing. Let ‘er rip!”
CDC Diretor be like
[ID: Headline that reads “Would Anyone Notice If We Started Endorsing Eugenics?”]
For all y’all going ?!? I need you to know this is not an exaggeration.
The CDC director says fuck disabled and chronically ill lives. I’m also going to point out that you’re significantly more likely to be disabled if you are Native American or Black so this is also racist. The CDC out here officially cheering our deaths is just the perfect way to start 2022.
[ID: A series of four screen grabs of Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the CDC Director, speaking on TV. The subtitles read “The overwhelming number of deaths, over 75%, occurred in people who had at least four comorbidities. So really these are people who were unwell to begin with and yes, really encouraging news in the context of Omicrom.”]
What makes this worse is that something like half the people living in this country have some kind of comorbid or pre-existing condition. And the CDC knows that perfectly well.
So while it IS good news that Omicron is apparently less deadly than previous mutations, it is NOT in any way acceptable for the CDC or the press to throw literal millions of people under the COVID bus and just shrug it off like, "Welp, they were sick anyway."
For SHAME.
Here is a link to the full interview and the good news she is talking about is regards to the success rates of vaccinations not the death rates of individuals contracting omicron. Come on y'all.
Watched it. Still ableist.
1) This disease is still killing people, they’re not acceptable losses, and covid can also mutate further into a even more new variants so the shortened quarantine is super fucked up. Also she listed just the number of dead, there are a lot of people still getting disabled and getting long covid, including vaccinated people.
It’s 100% for economic reasons and not for public health reasons, which is why there are conflicting recommendations from other orgs. “Sick people that tested positive should quarantine long enough to be safely uninfected” should be one of the bare minimums we’re doing, even more important than vaccines or masking because they’re confirmed as infectious.
So a lot of the anger is because the policy is now writing those people off instead of still treating proper quarantine as still important. And doing it for shitty reasons.
Alongside that:
2) “Only people with complex health issues are dying, this is good news in the context of omicron” is rhetoric that’s dismissing said people as acceptable losses and saying “good news, everyone else is okay!”
People with complex health issues are still dying when they might otherwise not and plenty of the complicating health issues aren’t immediately fatal by themselves, or even in concert with each other. People can have multiple comorbidities but not necessarily terminal comorbidities. These are people that might otherwise live. “It only kills X group of disabled/ill people, not everyone else, this is promising!” is 100% ableist and dismissive of their lives in terms of how to speak about it.
Even in terms of phrasing, that information can be communicated in a less of an ableist way. “While people with four or more multiple comorbidities are still at high risk, the majority of people aren’t with omicron. [lists all the stats she listed] This is proof vaccines are offering protection for most and we should try to maintain high vaccination rates. We also need to maintain high rates of vaccination and boosters, as well as masking, to keep protecting the still-vulnerable groups.”
Plus, ideally, a less stupid quarantine policy.
Part of ableism is not being aware that phrasing is dismissive of the very lives of the disabled. Speaking about this in a non-ableist way is something the leader of the CDC should be conscious of setting an example as a major leader in public health. Context doesn’t change the shitty phrasing and how someone in her position should just be more thoughtful about it than the average layman. She should be the MOST thoughtful about it. Maximum amount of thoughtfulness.
Pair that with the actual quarantine policy being economically motivated... and it’s a bad look.
And keep in mind. I say this as someone going back into healthcare myself after being out of it during covid. This is kind of shameful and embarrassing on a professional level
I also say this as someone with a few comorbidities and with a parent that’s immunocompromised and has at least 4 comorbidities. My mom’s life isn’t an acceptable loss and “good news, everyone else is okay!” would be no comfort if she died. She’s only 65 and the health issues she has aren’t easy but provided she doesn’t get some heinous life-crushing illness, even with her comorbid conditions she can expect a normal life expectancy. (And all her organs are in fairly good shape.) I’d like to have her around ten more years if possible, thanks. Could be the difference between her seeing me get married or not.
tbh the people with multiple comorbidities dying are some of the most tragic cases because they often do everything right. In many cases they would survive otherwise, and are conscientious about their other health issues. But they’re dying despite personally doing what they should be doing and getting vaccinated and boosted, all because of the carelessness and uncaring-ness of others, and shitty choices in public policy.
It’s a big problem in healthcare where issues are sometimes discussed as “It’s fortunate only the disabled/chronologically ill/etc that are affected” when that’s...not fortunate at all. They’re not castoffs where it’s fine if things are only happening to them.
I’m not saying the way she said it wasn’t ableist. She clearly wasn’t thinking through the broader implications and ableist undertones of bringing up that point. I 1000% agree that it’s a economically motivated decision on the cdc part. My problem is that this post deliberately pulls the wider context out of the interview.
I know we have all been hit with the “only disabled people are dying” bullshit for the past two years. and I’m sick af of it too. I’m not saying we should be uncritical of her phrasing or her decision to break in an explanation about comorbidity and death rates for no real contextual reason. Like that was a fucked ableist choice and we can and should demand better.
Clearly her poor phrasing was ableist. But to jump from that to it’s a deliberate form of eugenics is inflammatory af. It takes the wider context of the conversation out to increase the inflammatory nature of it. The CDC needs to do better overall all the way around. But just pretending it’s some fucking conscious bias in which everyone is actively encouraging the deaths of disabled people is actually not doing anything to improve shit. It’s just putting everyone in outrage mode.
We’re all already outraged.
I think part of the critique is motivated by exactly what you’ve just pointed out: the pandemic has brought a lot of ableism and social darwinism to the forefront. There’s been a lot of ableist rhetoric and some genuine eugenics arguments.
The “what the fuck” going on here is instead of coming from individual people it’s coming from the head of the CDC. Is she advocating open eugenics? Like...lining people up to kill them? No, but her sloppy wording is being paired with public policy that she absolutely has a hand in shaping.
Were it anyone else, even some high-ranking medical professional in a non-policymaking org, this’d be a shitty ableist faux pas they should re-think.
Pairing it with shortened quarantine time? Being a person that has a hand in actual public policy? Yeah, that does nudge it into actual eugenics, even if maybe she isn’t cackling and contextualizing it that way. The problem with eugenicists is they don’t always sit there twirling their mustaches and sometimes their actions cause death through inaction rather than action. She’s decided certain people are an acceptable loss. And CDC policy is what most other bodies are going to stick to.
When paired with the policy she absolutely has some control over, it’s not just shoddy wording. The policy itself is going to kill some people and she’s got the stats on how many.
This whole thing of her speaking here is justification for it, and a downplaying of the human cost, using ableist rhetoric to make it seem like the cost is at a minimum. I don’t think it can be ignored how bad it is when it’s 100% paired with her having actual control of public policy.
is this campaign in a fantasy setting? yes. will i give the party a homebrewed sniper rifle anyway? also yes
i gave this a misfire of 1. they immediately rolled a 1
the party wizard has died of bullet-related injuries
the rifle has been removed from the fanny pack of holding once again there is no way this ends well
the party ranger (the late wizards replacement) has died of bullet-related injuries