live, laugh, love, reload

i make silly fandom posts then people hate me for them

[weloveshortvideos]

Baby gorilla chest pounds for the first time

[railroadsoftware]

stunning

[wayneradiotv]

blown away by his own power

[qucko-deactivated20151208]

reblog this for good luck

[thesewersofparis]

btw i live on nailpolish reddit nowadays

and everyone is posting their 4th of july manis

except this year its very few american flags and red white and blue and stars.

and a LOT of pond scum inspiration

[aniseandspearmint]

This is an absolutely FASCINATING cultural snapshot.

[webheadmenace]

@justcakethanks

[loveridden1999]

[theboyfromcork]

Look who's the cover photo for Polo Ralph Lauren's post 🔥

--

Thanks @lostgirl88!

[ilovejojo]

Sometimes i think about how one of Dio's most iconic poses is based on such an erotic, fetishistic fashion illustration by gay artist Tony Viramontes and i just become completely insane, It's such a decision, to represent your villain this way, the eroticism the mystery the power play the shadow,............his face obscured..... His presence his magnetism the statuesque musculature.. so otherwordly.... No words.. araki is CRAZY

[ilovejojo]

Please do yourself the favor of checking out Tony Viramontes' work...... The gesture, sensuality, fabulosity, drag, boldness, the powerful bodies, fashion illustration is embedded into Jojo's Bizarre Aventure's DNA. The decision to make a shonen like this is what makes jojo such an unique work of art in general. It wears all of its influences on its sleeve, openly and shamelessly, Araki is a completely shameless artist.

[introsquirrel]

County roads

Full of holes

On the route

I need to go

Road construction

Lane obstruction

Let me go

County roads

[spaceshipsandpurpledrank]

[taurzza]

wips

[nikoisme]

he said he should have a cowboy hat so i gave him one

[calllynx]

The shape of love

[calllynx]

This is on paper btw

[cloudabserk]

inspired by @casgirl’s tags on this post:

[hbystuff]

Showdown

[threecatsonatrenchcoat]

Crew, stop scrolling. This is pixel art!

[beetledragon]

Holy shit. That's super impressive!!

[catneychu]

You say I’m ruining my life just because I can

maybe I am

[wuntrum]

happy sparkle on its wednesday monday

[smol-blue-bird]

I went to a library book sale this weekend and I found a very old book called “Electronic Life: How to Think About Computers,” which was published in I think 1975? I’ve been reading it kind of like how I would read a historical document, and it’s lowkey fascinating

[smol-blue-bird]

There’s a whole paragraph that’s like “okay, find the keyboard. Don’t panic if it has more keys than a typewriter, that’s normal. Really, it’s fine. The extra keys don’t make things harder. It’s FINE”

[smol-blue-bird]

Thought this section was particularly interesting:

Can the computer create something? At first glance it seems obvious that it can. Animated computer graphics, with their fluid transitions and whiplash perspectives, look strikingly new. And if one watches the machine doing animation work, there seem to be lengthy periods when the computer is acting “on its own.”

But if one observes these processes in more detail, it becomes clear that creation is not occurring within the machine. First of all, computer graphics are not unique. Computers have yet to generate anything that cannot be done by hand—and usually already has been done. Second, the apparent ability of the computer to “act on its own” is the outcome of thousands of hours of patient human effort to refine its instructions. The computer can manipulate a shape for us if we have already informed it what a shape is, what the rules for shape manipulation are, what this specific shape is, and so forth.

You can start an automobile engine and it will run by itself, too, but that doesn’t mean it’s being creative. It’s just running.

[theriu]

Somebody in 1975 had a better understanding of why artificial intelligence is not in any way “intelligence” than the majority of today’s intellectual minds.