⁽⁠⁽⁠ଘ⁠(⁠ ⁠ˊ⁠ᵕ⁠ˋ⁠ ⁠)⁠ଓ⁠⁾⁠

Proship | Pro-Para | Anti-Contact

[opals-shipcourse]

Hi y'all, welcome to my proship discourse blog!

Here's a little info about me:

22 y/o

Trans Man

Bisexual

He/Him

NO-ACT Paraphile

Stances:

Proship

Pro-Para

Anti-Contact

Anti-Radqueer

No DNI, anyone can interact but I do block freely, as I encourage you to do as well :)

Also, if you're a minor please don't DM me

[opals-shipcourse]

you're not a "safe space for all CDD systems!" if you only welcome those who agree with you

[joycomplexx]

a lot of people won't like to hear this, but oftentimes when someone is sexually abused as a child, that WILL fuse the concepts of "child" and "sex" in their mind, and that also does not make them a bad person.

[a-crook-and-his-wealth-journey]

I was asked to post this.

[anti-willo-pdude]

Hey, im Dude! This is a discourse and system blog.

Not going to really say anything about me aside from bodily im an adult and im a complex dissociative identity disorder system. I'm not the host but I am a host.

Feel free to just send me whatever, I like to chat, too! It doesn't have to be syscourse. I'm always open to new friends!

Minors above the age of 13 (to comply with Tumblr ToS and for my own comfort) are allowed on this blog but i ask you do not participate in any paraphilia or sex-related discourse on my blog barring topics of pedophilia (when the op is NOT a pedophile themself, if they are the tag #unsafe op will be used) as I think minors should have voices in conversations about their safety, as a victim myself who never had any voice.

If you interact with me and are under 13 I will report your blog. Tumblr is already unsafe enough for anyone 13 and older, if you are under 13 as someone who was on tumblr below that age in the past, I seriously recommend you leave.

Please do not interact with me if you are a dd/lg/lb blog, diaperplay, or post irl gore/sh/ed related material. I check the blogs that interact with me because I like to follow new people, it saves us both trouble.

Endos can interact but you will be treated as you treat me. If you come in insulting me, dont expect any respect.

Tag guide:

#dude says! - non syscourse or discourse related post

#syscourse

#discourse - a broader tag for anything from para discourse to trans discourse. Containment tag.

#unsafe op - a tag to warn especially minors that an op is potentially dangerous and to not interact (adults interact at their own discretion)

#shit endos say - tag for complaining about endos (not engaging in discourse)

Blog stances:

Obviously anti-endogenic and that comes with also being anti any other "identity" that comes with attempting to invade dissociative disorder spaces and demedicalize these disorders through attempting to state that you can naturally fail to integrate ego states.

When it comes to religious practices and using things such as internal family systems to view yourself in multiple facets, I have no issue!

I am anti radqueer, anti NLM and anti para.

When it comes to paraphilias, specifically the big (3, 4, whatever. The harmful ones.), I do not think anyone is a bad person for a disorder, however, I draw the line at people attempting to say you can engage with these desires harmlessly even in fiction, because there are numerous studies showing that leads not only to resistance to real urges breaking down, but to internal justification. As a paraphile (non big 3 but a harmful one) myself, i stand firmly by avoidance and other methods of coping that do not at all involve indulgence.

I would be willing to believe in a form of natural plurality if there were proof, however I still firmly believe that endogenics enroach on traumagenic spaces and that endos and traumagenic systems have vastly different experiences and that trauma survivors deserve their own separate spaces and exclusive language. Its not that trauma makes you superior as I see many people try to say we argue, its simply accomodating the disabled. DID and similar dissociative disorders are disabilities. Natural plurality is by definition not a disability, rather a different manner of being.

I do not hate endogenics. I would have no issue with them if they did not constantly try to enmesh these communities, even if endogenics were simply just people who chose for some reason or another to be more than one. The difference is that I am less than one masquerading as many, as a survival mechanism. We will never be the same.

Plurality is also incomparable to being transgender, and I find this sentiment immensely harmful. Endogenic or not, but especially if you attempt to argue being trans is in any manner similar to having a CDD. You are parroting transmedicalist rhetoric and being transgender is not inheriently a medical condition in need of treatment.

I will always support victims of trafficking and abuse. My status of victimhood of anything should not need to be disclosed for me to say i stand by ramcoa victims and programmed systems, and that their language and existence is not automatically antisemetic for the creator of certain terms being a peice of shit and because christians, who are often the perpetrators of violence such as cult torture, decided to perpetrate antisemetic violence and scapegoat victims of torture.

I will not engage with anyone arguing about ramcoa or programming.

[opals-shipcourse]

could you share your sources on the idea that engaging with fiction is likely to lead to decreased urge resistance?

because all I'm finding is that we really don't have any evidence to suggest there's any correlation to fantasy sexual material and sexual violence and that sexual satisfaction was associated with lower levels of self-reported willingness to offend

[thecutegirlkisser]

if you honestly think that sex is morally neutral, you have to accept that kinks and fetishes are also morally neutral. yes, even that "gross" one you're thinking of. yes, even that weird fanfiction you stumbled across. yes, even that deviantart piece you wish you could wipe from your memory. it's all completely neutral.

[nyaneru--neru]

fyi im pro recovery even for the "big 3" paras.

fyi im pro recovery even if you think youre "too far gone".

fyi im pro recovery even if youre not ready yet.

fyi im pro recovery even if it my recovery looks different than yours.

fyi youre valid in your recovery.

i believe you can recover from wanting to hurt people.

i believe you can apologize to the people you've hurt.

i believe you deserve a happy life and a second chance.

[miadollparts]

i understand why some people are uncomfortable with cnc and other hard kinks. i understand why they don’t want to engage with it or see it. all of those are completely valid feelings. what i don't understand is why some people think their discomfort gives them the authority to dictate what other consenting adults are allowed to fantasise about. if you’re concerned about safety you should focus on making sure the people involved are consenting and their boundaries are being respected, not on deciding whether you personally approve of the content of their fantasies. understanding consent and unlearning purity culture is going to help and protect more people than shaming and reporting a queer sex worker for discussing consensual fantasies that you personally find uncomfortable

[wincist]

If you are in any online spaces that discuss the morality of fiction or its censorship, please keep the following in mind:

CSAM refers to Child Sexual Abuse Material. This is a term that was created for use by US federal law enforcement. As such, it is important to remember that this is a term used specifically to describe illegal sexual content that is produced involving real children. the term CSAM was specifically constructed to highlight the trauma these victims experience because of this abuse, and therefore their humanity.

if you come across CSAM online, you should immediately report it to a tip line. Some websites that host their servers in the US are subject to US federal law even if the person who posted it does not currently reside in the US, so keep that in mind when reporting. again, this is involving CSAM - it is illegal sexual content involving real children.

CSEM refers to Child Sexual Exploitation Material. This is material that involves a real child in a sexualized situation, but either 1- the material itself is not illegal to possess, or 2- the material is not sexualized, but is included in a series or other content that does contain CSAM. Think along the lines or a parent with a few too many photos of their child in the bath. These images are not explicitly sexual, and are not illegal in and of themselves, but they can be used exploitatively.

If you come across CSEM online, it's still a good idea to send in a tip as well as alerting the website it was posted on. Even if the content itself isn't technically illegal, some websites do have strict rules regarding nudity and the sexualization of minors, which can help stop the spread of such materials and reduce the impact on the affected child.

CSAM and CSEM are words used to describe the assault, abuse, sexualization, and exploitation of real children. CSAM, specifically, is used as a way to identify and remove these materials.

CSAM and CSEM do not apply to fiction. They don't apply to any fictionalized or simulated child abuse or sexualized children. They only refer to real children.

Do not send in tips about fictionalized child abuse or sexualized children to tip lines meant to be used for CSAM.

Do not use the words CSAM and CSEM when discussing fictionalized child abuse or sexualized children. In a worst case scenario, it leads to people misusing tip lines due to a conflation of CSAM with fictionalized depictions.

In a more likely scenario, using CSAM to refer to fiction minimizes what CSAM was created to do - which was highlight the trauma experienced by survivors, and therefore draw attention to their humanity. By continuing to use these terms in situations that do not involve real people, it reduces that impact.

[kiyos-den]

happy pride to paraphiles !!

happy pride to queer paraphiles ♡

happy pride to trans paraphiles ♡

happy pride to nonbinary paraphiles ♡

happy pride to intersex paraphiles ♡

happy pride to stigmatised paraphiles ♡

happy pride to MAPs ♡

happy pride to zoophiles ♡

happy pride to necrophiles ♡

happy pride to anti abuse paraphiles ♡

happy pride to NO-ACT paraphiles ♡

happy pride to disordered paraphiles ♡

happy pride to non-disordered paraphiles ♡

happy pride to out + proud paraphiles ♡

happy pride to closeted paraphiles ♡

happy pride to paraphiles (੭ु ›ω‹ )੭ु⁾⁾♡ !!

[canislupuslatrans]

I'm gonna be so real here.

Just because a kink/fetish makes you uncomfortable doesn't mean its bad.

Whatever happens between consenting adults behind closed doors is none of our damn business, as long as it doesn't involve kids or animals then who cares.

It could be the most offensive shit ever but as long as it's between consenting adults in a safe environment behind closed doors then I don't fucking care.

I have bigger issues than kink.

The whole point of kink roleplay is that it's not real and it stops whenever either party wants it to stop, it's safe, it's consensual and most importantly: it's none of your damn business.

[opals-shipcourse]

ppl calling proshippers a CULT??? HUH???

[opals-shipcourse]

"pro/darkshipping is not a healthy coping mechanism"

therapists disagree with you

[123gocat]

i could mention like a million times that i think abuse is bad, and rape is bad , and that nonconsensual acts of harm in general are wrong , and that grooming is wrong , and i'll say "chronological minors & theriform animals & the dead cannot give informed consent" and its like. given those facts am i really so deviant?

i'm no danger to anybody, i just have slightly controversial beliefs on people's taste in fiction and notably controversial beliefs regarding people's abnormal sexual interests that they have no control over , and its like,,, really people ? grow up

[dark--friction]

NO-ACT paraphile movement

What does NO-ACT mean? -NO-ACT stands for "Non-Offending, Anti-Contact, Taboo" and is a movement for paraphiles who are against sexual contact with minors, theriform animals, and non-consenting people, but pro-kink and other means of safe sexual expression. The goal of this movement is for paraphilias to be destigmatized, alongside promoting abuse awareness and prevention, sexual education, and risk-aware sexual bodily autonomy. This is also a separatist movement, as NO-ACT paraphiles must disassociate entirely from beings who hold pro/neutral/complex contact stances if we ever want true destigmatization, acceptance, and abuse prevention.

More about NO-ACT and its stances under the cut.

This movement is… -Against pederasty/youth age gap relationships, child sexual abuse material, bestiality, bestial material, rape, and all other forms of non-consensual sexual contact or creation of sexual exploitation material. -Pro-kink/RACK, pro-fiction, and encourages finding healthy ways to express taboo paraphilias. Everything like roleplay, kink, art, fiction writing, special effects in films, and other fictional outlets. -Pro bodily autonomy in all aspects. Whether it's the right to an abortion, euthanasia, rejecting treatment, or risk-aware sex. -Pro-consang, as long as it is between two consenting adults who do not have a power imbalance. -Anti-non consensual sex with the dead, and pro-consensual* sex with the dead. People deserve the right to bodily autonomy even in death, and if someone wants to write in their will that they want people to be allowed to have sex with their corpse, it should be legal to do so. -Anti-non consensual sleep sex, and pro-consensual* sleep sex. As long as someone is following RACK principles and being careful, consenting adults should be allowed to decide for themselves whether they want to have sleep sex or not. -Against pro/neutral/complex contact** stances. It is abuse apologism, full stop, and NO-ACT does not tolerate abuse apologism or abusers.

Disclaimers: -*True consent relies on the ability to revoke consent, and since dead, sleeping, and intoxicated people cannot reliably revoke consent, there will always be a risk factor to sexual contact with the dead, sleeping, or intoxicated. NO-ACT is dedicated to both advocating for the rights of the dead, sleeping, and intoxicated - and the right to bodily autonomy for people who wish to have sex while dead, sleeping, or intoxicated. Thus, NO-ACT supports those who wish to have these experiences in a risk-aware context. Consent must be obtained beforehand, written down, and preferably legally recognized. NO-ACT advises those who wish to participate in sleep sex, sex with the dead, or similar acts that involve dubious consent to be aware of the risks, consequences, and potential harm these acts can bring before engaging in them or giving consent to engage in them with another, and to exercise upmost caution. -**Anti-contact has always and will always mean being against sexual contact with minors, theriform animals, and other non-consenting beings. This is not up for debate, NO-ACT is strict on this and does not accept pro/neutral/complex stances. -NO-ACT was made partially as a way to prevent anti-contact symbols and flags being appropriated by pro/neutral/complex-contact communities. Due to this, I try to avoid using explicitly pro-contact symbols as much as possible. -NO-ACT is inherently anti-xenosatanist and radqueer-critical, as both ideologies encourage or allow pro-contact stances. This also goes for any "contact stance neutral" paraphile groups or movements, as NO-ACT is a separatist movement.

Flag symbols and color meanings:

Navy Blue: Community Teal: Anti-abuse Green: Health and Access to anti-abuse resources Sky blue: Awareness and visibility, colorpicked from the original paraphile flag. Purple: Consent, bodily autonomy, and risk-aware choices. Magenta: Joy and Pride Pink: Kink and self-expression Black: Anti-contact, and fighting stigma

Someday I hope to make a flag template and color variations with the big 5, so stay tuned!

[proship-shuujuu]

"i'm a recovering proshipper."

so you're recovering from having reasonable stances on fiction? you're recovering from minding your business? you're recovering from having a good grasp on fiction and reality? you're recovering into harassing people? you're recovering into supporting censorship? you're recovering into a puritan?

you're not "recovering" from anything, you're regressing.

[an-angelic-parasite]

꒰꒰ 🩷🩹 ⏜ "but is illegal!" Morality should not be based on laws, thinking something is bad or okay only because of legality in your country is weird, not only because you are imposing the culture of your country (since laws are based on culture) to others but because the laws do not always go with what is morally right