happy pride month especially to them
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
Mike Driver

Janaina Medeiros
trying on a metaphor
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

@theartofmadeline
NASA

blake kathryn
DEAR READER

titsay
dirt enthusiast
noise dept.
Three Goblin Art
No title available
Today's Document

JBB: An Artblog!
Cosmic Funnies

izzy's playlists!
YOU ARE THE REASON

if i look back, i am lost
seen from Indonesia
seen from Serbia

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from Malaysia

seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Russia

seen from Spain

seen from Germany
seen from Serbia
seen from Belarus

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from Italy

seen from Indonesia
@pdivaricata
happy pride month especially to them
So! This is a perfect case study in situations where you should be wary of misinformation.
Take a moment and ask yourself, a project like this requires a lot of time, money and dedication of resources, why would scientists dedicate that time to something that could just be done by a tree?
The answer is they wouldn't. So that means this claim requires further investigation!
This project is called LIQUID 3, and it's not meant for cities with wide open spaces, it's meant for cities like Belgrade in Serbia. These cities are densely populated and heavily polluted, to the point where pollution actually chokes out current trees and makes creating green spaces difficult.
Liquid 3 was a PhD scientists answer to these problems. The microalgae tank is intended for spaces where you either:
Don't have enough space to plant full trees, or
Don't have enough time to plant trees and wait for them to grow up.
The tank is extremely efficient when you consider the amount of space needed compared to the amount of CO2 turned into oxygen. The tank can operate throughout the winter. And most importantly, it can be quickly set up in areas that desperately need relief from air pollution NOW not in 10 years when trees are done growing. Children currently suffocating on polluted air can't wait for trees to grow, they need to be taken care of now, and Liquid 3 is one of the ways to take care of them. Depending on the species of microalgea used, a number have shown a pretty amazing capacity to pull heavy metals out of the air which is something trees can get choked up by.
The tanks aren't just tanks either! Liquid 3 have solar panels placed on top, they have lighting and mobile phone charging, and they work as public benches. The designers of it want to encourage green spaces where there's room, but where there isn't room or time, Liquid 3 can step in. Realistically, this isn't a replacement for trees. It's replacing boring metal city benches with new, cooler benches that also clean the air (and have at least some heating during the winter).
Not only that, but the microalgea that grows is native to Serbia and all that microalgea has a ton of great uses! It makes for great fertilizer, compost, wastewater treatment, cleaner biofuels and even for helping create new tanks for further air purification. They only require a quick algae divide once a month, and the produced algae can be carted off to where ever it's needed. This makes them effective solutions for areas that can't sustain complex installations.
So yeah, there's actually quite a lot of places that would like these. Lots of people currently breathing in terrible quality air would much rather have their boring city benches replaced with really fucking cool algae tanks that clean the air and can be used to help create + sustain future green spaces in cities. I dunno about you, but I'd take that over a dumb metal bench any day. Put these at every bus stop and I'd be delighted.
can ppl pls reblog this version
Well damn. I was also like wtf is this stupid slime tank and then I read the rest and my mind got blown
feels like a real step back that with all the sexual freedom available to us we moved to Hookup Culture instead of Having Sex With Friends Culture
Kiss the homies. Hold the homies. Make love to the homies. Then play smash.
*nods sagely* smash bros and then Smash Bros
#hell yeah #I’ll show you a good time and then kick your ass with Luigi #come at/on me bro
Important rules for the "age verification" era of the internet that we're living in:
1. Do not do age verification.
2. If you have to do age verification, cheat. Do not under any circumstances give them your real ID.
The tool presents users with a 3D model they can then manipulate to, the creator says, bypass Discord's age verification system.
Oh no I dropped my link, what a horrible thing! Sure hope this doesn't get reblogged until it reaches users from the UK and Brazil!
And remember to not make a second account just to test out what works best when verifying your identity
A reminder that we still dont support Age Verification bullshit.
Paywall removed here
Aaand here's the link to the project's Github.
A verified tool that works on any potato computer that will let you bypass discord verification - promptpirate-x/discord-id-bypass-tool
Sometimes I really want to take everyone under the age of 24 (as of 2026) by the shoulders and say:
"I'm really sorry that lockdown and the ongoing pandemic interrupted pivotal educational and social/emotional development moments for you. You have an uphill battle towards adjusting to a lot of community based efforts because you experienced a mass trauma during an incredibly important time in your life where you should have physically been around your peers learning to engage in shared community. There is no "but" here, I'm genuinely really sorry. Something many of us consider key points in our interpersonal growth as youths was taken from you, not without reason but without care for its impact on you. I hope you know we are eternally allies in our struggles and if that is something you struggle to know I hope you can learn it someday."
Because so many of the angriest, most disenfranchised people I see on this website are under 24 and I often try to put younger people's behavior in the context of where they might have been 2020. I've seen the impact on my siblings and their peers+friends first hand, all ages 18-24. We've talked about how its impacted them, the isolation, the attachment to the internet, the anxieties and phobias and fears it developed in them due to the pandemic, the political unrest, and the responses to both that we've seen since. I know they're not the only ones and I know how much being marginalized also influences that impact too.
It's terrifying. I know it must be terrifying for a lot of the young people on Tumblr too. I hope one day we're able to bridge all of those complex feelings into something collective and positive so we can do our best to prevent similar traumas from happening to future generations.
My kid is 15 and just finished 10th grade, he was in 4th grade during lockdown. He's in orchestra, and at a parent meeting we were asking her why she thought every incoming class (of orchestra students) is bigger than the last right now. And she said without hesitation that basically, Covid wiped out the orchestra for a few years and it's just now recovering to its previous size.
In our district you start orchestra/band in 5th grade. So basically any kids who were in 5th or 6th grade, and to some extent 7th and 8th, weren't very committed to it yet when suddenly they were all at home and orchestra was basically canceled for a few months, and a lot of them just dropped it.
And I wonder how many extracurriculars had the same problem, and how many kids basically just stopped doing any of that for a few years. Extracurriculars were central to my social life in high school, I have no idea how else I would've met people (especially bc I moved in 9th grade). Add to that helicopter parenting that probably only got worse with parents feeling paranoid about their kids' safety and you've absolutely got a cohort of kids who are massively undersocialized.
yeah yeah rainbow capitalism is bad and whatever but like. when I was a child, being pro gay was not the popular or lucrative choice. I'm happy that times have changed.
I miss rainbow capitalism. I do. I miss when it felt like public opinion was still pro gay. I understand it was always an empty gesture, but it mattered in a sense of knowing how socially acceptable being queer is. If that makes sense.
tl;dr guide to Appalachian history and prejudice
Where: region defined by the national government covering 13 states, defined by the geologic Appalachian mountains & areas of high poverty
Who: a sprinkling of local gentry, with a mixture of white trash (akin to a racial slur denoting Southern whites at the bottom of the social hierarchy, particularly Ulster Scots), runaway slaves (Melungeons), Native Americans (particularly Cherokee, Shawnee, and Creek), and others
When:
1780 - Battle of Kings Mountain - refused to disarm during Revolutionary War
1791 - Whiskey Rebellion - forced assimilation into the cash-based economy to fund national bank; resulted in widespread resentment against law enforcement
1830 - Trail of Tears - forced relocation of most of the Cherokee tribe, in part to seize newly discovered gold
1860s - Civil War - central Appalachia was pro-abolitionist including desegregated education (c.f. Berea College); resulted in splitting of Appalachian Virginia from wealthy lowland planter elite Virginia and post-Reconstruction enforcement of Jim Crow laws
1870s- 1880s - enclosure movement resulted in splitting of mineral rights from surface rights; wide-spread clearcutting of old growth forests resulted in wildfires that forced local families into wage work in flood zones and their land sold to large timber companies; whiskey tax enforcement created widespread resentment between whiskey makers and federal tax agents; desperate local gentry fought each other on behalf of external power brokers
1900s - new railroads made central Appalachia's coalfields accessible; when locals revolted against working conditions, mine owners created debt bondage system of Blacks, southern mountaineers, and eastern European immigrants in company towns
1920s - armed revolt by miners led to the Mine Wars (miners lost; coal companies bombed women and children); eugenics movement portrayed mountain peoples as subhuman and inbred and began forced sterilization
1930s - Weeks Act created national parks in Appalachia and forcibly removed locals; Tennessee Valley Authority forcibly displaced tens of thousands of people and flooded their homes for hydroelectric dams
1940s to 2000s - only ~25% population remaining by the end; federal policy encouraged locals to relocate outside of Appalachia; coal industry shrinks
2000s - present - poor environmental laws encourages ecologically damaging industries to provide electricity to Eastern Seaboard, particularly for data centers; most land (about 75%) owned by outside corporations that pay little or no taxes; highest rates of deaths of despair in the country
Why: One theoretical framework is that Appalachia functions as an internal colony from which resources can be extracted to benefit other parts of the country. Research shows that Southern and mountain accents are seen as belonging to less intelligent people. Stereotypes of "witchy" and "feral" Appalachians contribute to othering and continue racism against local Black and Native populations.
For the first time, Space Telescope Science Institute scientists observed a brightness gap in the population of red dwarf stars in an ancient, crowded globular star cluster. A similar gap was first identified in data from relatively nearby stars by the Gaia space observatory. However, it had never before been seen in a globular cluster. This gap provides clues to what’s happening deep within the stars’ interiors.
This finding would not have been possible without the software and techniques originally developed at STScI for the Hubble Space Telescope: https://news.stsci.edu/49x77d1
I know this is a silly question but I literally don't know anything about describing environments in writing as in weather or surroundings etc. When do you think it is most relevant to mention them?
I'm asking this as someone who has HARDLY EVER written anything before
HELLOOO!!! THIS ISNT A SILLY QUESTION AT ALL this actually one of the first things my lecturer taught us when i started my uni course!
Describing environments, weather and outfits is one of the trickiest things in a novel/fic because if done at the wrong moment it can take the reader out of the story and break the flow that a paragraph has, SO HERE ARE MY TIPS FOR WRITING SCENERY:
One of the most important things to think about when writing is that a reader is going to be entering a story with pre-conceived ideas and images of everything that will be mentioned inside it. E.g., if the author writes about a 'house' and its innards, the reader will often put in its place an image of a house from their own memories, because of this when an author goes out of their way to describe anything inside that house it will break the flow and immersion that the reader had.
To stop this, you want to describe as little as possible while retaining as much of your concept as you can. What this means, is you need to describe the "vibe" of a room and any important objects inside it.
Examples of this: "The room was cold, damp where rotten wallpaper sagged astray from each wall." Here, we know that the room has been abandoned/is in a state of disrepair, but the readers imagination is not hindered - they are still able to insert their own furniture and layout. The exception to this rule is as I mentioned previously, when an important object lies within the room.
Let's say that a messy room is important to a characters personality, or, that a character needs to pick up an item from a table, or interact with any kind of furniture (as most characters do.) Continue to use this rule, but add to it.
Example: "The room was cold, damp where rotten wallpaper sagged astray from each wall. It's contents, a sofa and a small coffee table, lay rotten with disuse; littered with scraps of old trash and food wrappings. 'Character-A' took a small, cautionary step forward and grabbed at a half melted piece of chocolate from atop of a couch cushion, a grimace settling across her face." Instead of bombarding the reader with a full paragraph description of the room at once, you are slowly feeding objects to them and telling them how they are supposed to feel about the environment. Without hindering the readers imagination too much, you guide them into seeing the version of the room that you want them to.
A key thing to note is that you should always mention how light or dark a room is, as it sets the tone for an entire scene.
When it comes to outdoor environments, there is a lot more freedom to describe and explore your surroundings. Since being outdoors means a character is going to be in a much larger space with less semantic connotations, a reader is going to have a harder time inserting their own images into this environment.
There are two approaches you can take to describing an outdoor environment: The worldbuilding approach or the pathetic fallacy approach:
Example of worldbuilding: "I took a sharp breath, a cloud of condensation forming before my face. A crisp chill filled the air, carried along by dry, orange leaves that rattled across the pavement and stuck to the wet concrete." This scene suggests the story takes place in late autumn/fall or perhaps early winter, it has no relation to the main characters emotion and merely serves as an environmental tool to help the reader understand the time and place in which the story takes place.
Example of pathetic fallacy: "My nostrils flared as I let out a sharp breath, the air before my face fanning out into a sodden cloud. A crisp chill filled the air and sunk itself deep into my bones, it bit at the swollen skin beneath my eyes; delicate from tears freshly shed, and carried along with it dry, brown leaves that rattled across the pavement and stuck to the wet concrete." By connecting the weather to the main character, there is an inherent connection between it and their emotions. Pathetic fallacy uses the weather as a tool to set the mood for the main character. E.g., if it is storming then the reader will understand the main character is upset, if it is sunny the reader will understand that the main character is happy.
SOME IMPORTANT THINGS TO NOTE:
It is always relevant to describe the characters surroundings. There should be a description every time they enter a new room; how in-depth this description is should be dependent on how important the room/environment is to the story - if the room only appears once, then it isn't necessary to give it too much thought, but if it is a room that the character will enter multiple times then you want to be as descriptive as possible so that they can remember it when the character returns.
With creative writing, there are no rules; what I've said in this post isn't definitive and does not need to be followed, if you believe that your work would be best understood if you offered your audience an in-depth description of the environment (something that should most commonly be done if the surroundings are not 'common', i.e., a fantasy world or something wildly specific) then you shouldn't stop yourself from doing that! Writing is all about experimenting and figuring out what works best for you.
Environments shift dependent on the perspective in which the fic is being written in, 1st POV often creates a biased narrative that follows the strict memories of the main character which allows an author to be more creative with the psychology of an environment (an example of this would be the 'Red Room' from Jane Eyre and how Jane's memories of the room paint it differently from how the room really is), while 3rd POV allows a more realistic and direct description.
I KNOW YOU ONLY ASKED about the relevance of describing environments but i lowk went off on one... I JUST LOVE TALKING ABOUT LITERARY TECHNIQUES i get excited, i hope this helps! if you plan on writing anything, you should share it with me i would love to read 👀
After school care pulled me aside about my child dropping an f-bomb “without remorse” and I put on my concerned face and nodded a bunch.
Apparently he was building something with a younger kid “who really looks up to him and is just starting to make friends” and said “Hey, you’re really fucking good at this.” which is, in my estimation, really a parenting victory.
I absolutely failed at doing this:
F. Scott Fitzgerald, The Beautiful and Damned
You should be starting a recipe book. I don't give a shit if you're only 20-years-old. The modern web is rotting away bit by bit before our very eyes. You have no idea when that indie mom blog is going down or when Pinterest will remove that recipe. Copy it down in a notebook, physically or digitally. Save it somewhere only you can remove it. Trust me, looking for a recipe only to find out it's been wiped off the internet is so fucking sad. I've learned my lesson one too many times.
when i was a tiny baby queer (aka a 24-year-old), i went to my first pride festival probably three months after i kicked ex-gay therapy to the curb and came out to my parents. being the people they are, my parents came with me. they weren’t really sure about this whole gay thing, but they loved me and wanted me to be safe and happy and wanted to be involved in what was important to me, so they came along. (i also think my mother still might have thought i might get drugged or murdered or beaten by a protester of which there were plenty.)
anyway i wanted a memento of my first pride, you know, and this one vendor was selling keyrings, and i liked it, so i bought one. do you remember those italian charm bracelets that were all the rage like 10-15 years ago? it was a keychain like that, and it had a rainbow rooster, a rainbow cat, and then just a rainbow, and so I bought it.
i run into my mom a couple of vendors over and she goes oh you bought something? what’d you get? so i showed her, and i was like, “I’m not sure why it’s a rooster and a cat. Seems kind of random. But I liked the rainbows.”
and my mom, who was some form of minister’s wife for most of my childhood and teenagerhood, stares at me like she thinks i’m joking.
“What?” i say.
“…it’s a cock and a pussy, Jules,” she says flatly, and that is the story of how i died at the age of 24 while attending my first pride festival.
I love how every June this one gets dug up and passed around again, lmao.
oh no is this what we’re doing now
…relic…
*crumbles and blows away on the wind*
“Why don’t you use ai” idk man beyond the obvious environmental and “this machine causes psychosis and encourages people to kill themselves” thing I think asking the equivalent of a solid D student who is also a pathological liar if they can answer my question/do the work for me seems pretty fucking stupid
BBB masterlist compatibility with sports
ok i just copied and pasted this from my first run through of thinking about hockey + bbb. i think i removed a bunch of stuff that wasnt relevant that first time, and maybe actually some of those could have been useful, but they're gone i'm sorry........... past me made a choice
i have also removed / pulled out some others for commentary. but overall this list is absolutely brutally unreadable bc i guess the grid actually is important.... if i separate each prompt onto its own line that's just way too long idk im sorry!!!! anyway feel free to copy paste smash up remix put next to your favourite guy or gyal or totally rework it whatever you just have fun!!!!!
A Tale of Kindy the Penguin