radfems go kill yourselves challenge
h
YOU ARE THE REASON

if i look back, i am lost

pixel skylines
d e v o n
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Mike Driver

Origami Around
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
No title available

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
will byers stan first human second
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

★

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club

bliss lane

gracie abrams
NASA
Today's Document
we're not kids anymore.
seen from Spain
seen from Belgium

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Myanmar (Burma)

seen from United States
seen from France

seen from Indonesia
seen from Mexico

seen from T1

seen from T1
seen from Colombia
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from United States

seen from Argentina

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
@ratsetflummi
radfems go kill yourselves challenge
life is so awesome if we ignore all that
Das Leben ist so geil, wenn man die Gesamtsituation ignoriert
My brain: You have so many tight deadlines. So many things on your weekly schedule. So many important jobs. You have to get important work done!!!
My hands:
It's a
Canada Griffin
Why can the Internet not just spontaneously create new fic for me when I run out?
Not like that! I didn’t mean it like that!
It does genuinely shit me off when folk refer to any amab nb as "transfem" just like it's a given. No, I am not trans-"fem" I am nonbinary. That is, not masc or fem. Not one of the two "binary" options. "Non"-"binary". As in not either one. You get it? Is it clicking yet?
#they just don't believe being nonbinary is its own unique identity#with unique experiences and material conditions from @queerautism
IMHO, if you are AMAB and not cis, you are transfem, because that is short for transfeminine or transfeminized.
The simple truth of patriarchy is that whatever isn't masculine is feminine. Distancing yourself from masculinity in any direction gets you subjected to misogynistic violence.
Transfem is a term that means "subjected to the societal pressures of being non-cis and AMAB."
It's like being mixed race — you're still racialized, you're still not white.
(Race, gender, borders and money are alike in that they're real, but only because we make them.)
If you are AMAB and nonbinary you will be subjected to transmisogynistic violence in some capacity.
You will be lumped in with the trans women.
This is because the patriarchy does not care about what is in your soul. It cares about punishing deviance.
You might not get hit as hard as she/her feminine gender expression F on the drivers license HRT and SRS having trans women, but you WILL take a lick or two.
Transfem does not mean "trans woman". It means "the patriarchy will try to kill you in approximately the same way as trans women."
The material conditions are not that different.
I see what you are talking about but I don't think it's fair to tell people they should define themselves by the way they are oppressed. Transfeminine means you are leaning towards a feminine presentation. You can be "AMAB", not cis, and not lean towards a feminine presentation. Let alone, gender isn't a spectrum that only has masculine and feminine, no matter what the patriarchal perception is. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought transfem and transmasc were supposed to be labels descriptive of your self perception and the way you want to be perceived, not something for other people to stamp you with. I do sincerely believe we are having a semantic disagreement in this case, but I can't find anywhere that transfeminine has anything to do with the kind of oppression one faces.
Yes, this is a clear case of disagreeing on the meaning of words, and the meaning of words and jargon is constructed and varies by domain of discourse, so I am pre-emptively just gonna say, I don't care what you think it means, and I mean that without any malice.
I'm not telling people to go and call themselves feminine in terms of presentation or identity, and I'm not claiming being nonbinary is either this or that. With all the love in the world, I don't care about what nonbinary people decide about themselves, I will cheer from the sidelines.
But what I extremely often see is that people forswear any association with transfemininty, seemingly out of a desire to distance themselves from trans women and our struggles. Even if they share those struggles.
(Note how @queerautism tagged this with "nonbinary has different material strugges".)
AMAB nonbinary people are subjected to (or at risk of suffering) the same kind of violence as transgender women. That's just a brute fact of life, as unavoidable as death and taxes.
Until such a time as queer liberation movements and mainstream feminism starts acknowledging transmisogyny (and transmisogynoir) as one of the most insidious forms of patriarcal oppression, and transfeminism (esp. black transfeminism) as the only reasonable political framework for understanding it, we will be powerless to prevent a backslide into patriarchal fascism.
(And to address your tags: #also according to your argument trans women who pass would not be transfem -- I think you pretty fundamentally misread my original point. No amount of transitioning will ever make a trans woman not be affected by transmisogyny.)
Again proving that so many people just love pretending nonbinary people basically experience the same thing as binary trans people, if anything "not get hit as hard" which is fucking ridiculous. Just say you don't believe being nonbinary is a real thing, it's just faster.
I didn't say different, btw, I said unique. Similar in some ways to other groups of trans people, of course, literally no one disputed that. It is not "distancing from trans women" to say nonbinary people's identities and struggles occupy a real place in our society, that should be considered to stand on its own. We live as nonbinary people, we navigate the world as nonbinary people, we are targeted as nonbinary people, even when society tries to label us as something else.
Using your definition plenty of AFAB nonbinary people would be considered transfem. How often do you have to be targeted by transmisogyny to count?
Literally no one is saying that transmisogyny isn't one of the most insidious forms of patriarchal oppression. "You either share my exact framework and let me label you against your wishes or fascism will win" is absolutely wild though.
claiming that being amab non-binary makes you immediately experience transmisogyny the same way trans women do just shows that you either don't understand or don't respect non-binary identities
how manual wheelchair users move (explainer for non-users)
frequently when i’m out and about with someone walking, they can’t anticipate what path i will take and therefore they’re in my way pretty frequently. this is fine! i can politely ask them to step to the side. but it makes me think about how little non-wheelchair users understand the way wheelchair users move. as someone who used to walk everywhere, it was an adjustment period for me to figure out how to navigate the world in a chair. here are some things that didn’t occur to me so that you don’t cut off your friend right as they’re building momentum to go up a ramp 😆
for context, i use an active manual chair. the world is very different in a power chair. even among active manual chair users, there is a huge diversity in physicality and strategies for getting around. this is a general guide that i think will apply to most manual wheelchair users. i’m starting super basic and getting more complicated as i go.
———
1. manual wheelchairs are a momentum game. it is very easy to maintain speed and direction. but speeding up, slowing down, or turning, is hard. one thing this affects is if we’re on a wavy sidewalk or other twisty-turny walkway, that is a pain in the ass and i am taking as straight a path as i can.
2. wheelchair users also have to pay attention to the slope and condition of the pavement, so our path somewhere will be different than yours, even if we’re taking the same route to the same place. for example, i usually have to go down slopes straight, not diagonally, to avoid tipping over sideways. one area this affects is crosswalks. many intersections have one curb cut for both roads you could cross, which means i will go down curb cuts to a crosswalk as if i am aiming for the middle of the intersection.
your path in orange, mine in blue. to you it seems indirect, but to me it’s the path of least resistance.
i also will be building speed in the second half of the crosswalk. this is a much easier way to tackle a ramp. if i approach with momentum, i won’t have to drag myself up the slope once i get to it.
3. building momentum and maintaining it is only half of the job. the other half is stopping. manual wheelchairs cannot stop on a dime if they’re moving with any kind of speed. if i tried to stop immediately when going downhill, i would fly out of the chair. so don’t walk right into the path of a wheelchair in motion and then stop! i will have to turn to the side very quickly and hope i don’t tip. i can’t tell you how often parents pushing strollers will stop their stroller directly in my path and then get offended when i am alarmed and turn sharply to avoid hitting their child. from their perspective, i was being careless and going “too fast.” in reality, normal walking speed takes a few feet to slow down from and stop.
4. in terms of slope. see this street in san francisco?
i can’t go down this street, it’s way too steep. i would give myself friction burns on my palms trying to control my speed. if i was in a situation where there was no avoiding this street, like in an emergency, i would be breaking my straight-slope rule and zig-zagging in the middle of the road.
this would require several zig-zags back and forth, more than the four that i drew. i also could not go up this road other than with this method. up or down, i risk tipping over sideways if i’m not careful.
4. in a similar vein, consider terrain. slopes with grass or carpet take huge amounts of energy to get up. this grassy hill isn’t insurmountable, but it would take me like thirty minutes to get up there. honestly i would probably go backwards, because it’s easier to pull yourself up a slope than push yourself.
other types of terrain can be completely immobilizing, though. this decorative gravel pathway is beautiful, and inaccessible to me. my casters (front wheels) simply will not go through that.
5. in terms of walkways and obstacles. if there’s a deep gap in the pavement lined up the way i’m going, and it’s, say, an inch wide, that is an obstacle for me. my casters are one inch wide, and my back wheels are an inch and a half. i’ll get stuck in it like a train on a track.
i have to straddle this, even if it means being too close to the middle of the sidewalk and preventing us from walking side by side.
similarly, if a crack is greater than an inch high, i’m gonna wheelie over it. at two inches, i have to. a wheelie may require a change in speed, either faster or slower depending on the person.
i have 4 inch casters, so a lip as little as 2 inches will stop me in my tracks. a lip as little as one inch, hit with any speed, can knock my casters out of square. casters can get knocked out of alignment pretty easily depending on the chair. i’d rather not have to pull out an allen wrench and a level, so i’m gonna wheelie.
this happened when i hit about a 1.5” lip on a pavement crack when i was going downhill at maybe 3mph.
6. putting it all together. see how diagonal this crack is?
this is another situation where i have to go straight relative to the slope. because that crack is wide, it will probably also require a wheelie. if i tried to approach that straight relative to the sidewalk, my left caster would get up the slope, i’d wheelie, then my right caster would land in the crack. i have to go this way.
(also lol at the trash can blocking the curb cut)
these are just a few things to keep in mind when walking about with a wheelchair user! ofc the best strategy always is just to listen when someone asks you to move out of their way 😆 but i think being able to anticipate movement a little better will help it seem less random. feel free to ask any questions!
Important question
Okay but I think these two are onto something
Test subject
(no bird was harmed)
*looks at polyamorous triad* so which of you is the soldier and which is the poet and which is the king
this is the perfect reblog post cancelled
commenting under art of a thin character "oh they look like they give the most dogshit hugs. like being embraced by a wet skeleton"
i understand all that shit about honor and knighthood and solemn vows but “kingslayer” is simply a bad insult. it sounds cool as fuck. might as well call him the landlord annihilator or the billionaire’s bane.
thank christ, all my group projects for the semester are over
which means that i can unfriend all those bastards on discord and finally stop having my status permanently set to offline
>#I love how this gag would be funny at any point since the third century BCE
if you told vin diesel fast and the furious you were gay he'd be like "Some people like driving stick…some people like driving automatic…what matters is you cross the finish line.." and then he'd rev up a dodge challenger and drive through a building and kill 16 people
he literally did in the fourth one when he's asked if he likes cars more than women
If you asked if he was cool with trans people, he'd probably say "sometimes, aftermarket parts are the only way to get the vehicle you really want. Everyone should have the right to hot rod."
My thoughts on the ‘Solarpunk is just aesthetics! Y’all can’t do anything!’ Statement
Every movement has some kind of visual identity. Every. Single. One. Now, those identities often evolve after the politics, but that’s not a rule.
Solarpunk was created as a way to directly oppose the grim, late stage capitalistic future we’ve been sold my cyberpunk for decades.
People saw this aesthetic and were able to look within it to see real change and action that could be made to get there.
Aesthetics give people something to identify with. But more importantly in this instance, they give us a collective vision to move towards.
Yes Solarpunk was an aesthetic, but no one said it ever had to stay that way. It is simultaneously our foundation and what we’re striving for.
So go take your stolen yogurt ad and fuck some shit up <3
“Science fiction is simply a way to practice the future together. i suspect that is what many of you are up to, practicing futures together, practicing justice together, living into new stories. It is our right and responsibility to create a new world.”
Everyone should read Emergent Strategy by Adrienne Maree Brown
Visualizing an end result is the first step to undertaking any project. We can’t work towards something we can’t imagine
we really should be calling it fanworks, not content
I'm here for fun and community not to rp a mega corporation's underpaid social media intern
Look, we all agree that Aragorn is hot.
Viggo Mortensen is absolutely a handsome man, but his character in Eastern Promises doesn't have most of the global population ripping their hair out foaming at the mouth screaming crying throwing up horny.
It's something about the combination of long hair, stubble, a mysterious past, quiet confidence, and looking like you've just been riding a horse for 2 weeks, that drives people crazy.
We will call this phenomenon The Aragorn Effect. My theory is that if all those same elements are combined with the correct proportions, any actor may be able to experience The Aragon Effect.
In 1989 movie Roadhouse Sam Elliot plays a veteran bouncer who is asked by Patrick Swayze to assist in a particularly difficult bar. He 1. Has Long hair 2. Has Stubble 3. Looks like he eats cigarettes. In this essay
For reference, this is Sam Elliott in every other role he's been in:
And THIS is Sam Elliott in road house, for literally no reason at all:
seal in a bubble bath
source