adult | 🌈🍖 x ⚰️🕊 | you cannot gender me in a way that matters. | disabled | post-2025 dni banners by me, others made at my req by @/shipicons + @/ghostmoodboards + @/proselfship-banners-n-boxes
@markiplier i hope the fandom didn’t scare you with all those “Weird” posts that you might find
or we already did it. We probably did it. Hands down we’re sorry.
guy who is laying in bed doing fuck all: i have to prepare and draw new refs for artfight i have to prepare and draw new refs for artfight i have to prepare and draw new refs for artfight i have to prepare and draw new refs for artfight i have to prepare and draw new refs for artfight i have to prepare and draw new refs for artfight i have to prepare and draw new refs for artf-
im just saying the concept of being repulsed by sex and kink (valid) but somehow not pedophilia and incest is so wild to me lol
it's not wild at all. I want you to go back and read my last response over and over again until you can wrap your head around the concept. my personal stance about sex and romance and whatever the fuck REGARDING MYSELF should not bleed into what I think people should be allowed to write/draw/etc. about. my repulsion has nothing to do with taboo tropes. they are not the same.
you don't even have the guts to attach your name to this idiocy. don't come back in my inbox with this foolishness again, or you will catch yourself a block. i am not the one.
this Asian American family of 3, all grown adults, leave their corner store that they’re so concerned about being stolen from, to chase down a 14 year old Black boy for what they ASSUMED was a $1.00 bottle of water, and shot him dead when the boy brandished gun he had on him to warn them back and protect himself, and instead of letting him go and leaving well enough alone, the father came and shot that boy dead.
for a bottle of water.
the surveillance video of first, the mother following Cyrus around the store, and then all three of them running out behind him with threatening looks on their faces is insane. absolutely disgusting.
1. Eating meat is morally neutral 2. There are many ethical ways butchering has been practiced for a long time 3. factory farming is unethical due to the abuse faced in the animal's life, not bc it results in the animal's death 4. Ethically raised and sourced meat is expensive and/or hard to find in many places 5. *there are people who CANNOT subsist on a plant based diet* for varied reasons, largely disabled folks - (allergies/GI disorders that already limit what a person can eat, people in recovery from restrictive eating disorders, people with ARFID and other sensory processing disorders) and people with little money and time on their hands to cook. 6. Vegans who are adamant about animal rights often have a major blind spot as to human rights abuses; the meatpacking industry is terrible for those who work in it, yes, but people are laboring hard for your grains and produce too, often in unethical conditions and for little pay, and Vegans will treat you like you're doing some kinda "gotcha" and spit vitriol at you whenever you point this out 7. It is not Wrong to eat only plant based certainly but when people start acting like it gives them a moral highground it shows starkly how little regard for fellow humans these people have 8. Just because YOU are disabled/broke/etc and can sustain veganism does not give you permission to harass somebody who says their disability or finances prevent it 9. The most ethical way to eat, if you can achieve it, is by buying things with a short supply chain that were grown locally by properly-paid laborers
10. there is currently no way to get vitamin B12 in a vegan diet without supplementing, and vegans have increased risk of nutrient deficiencies unless they meticulously plan their diet and/or take other supplements as well. I don't love the idea of advocating for a wholesale switch to a diet reliant on vitamin/supplement companies' products
11. leather, which is a very useful material for many purposes, is a byproduct of the beef industry. all currently available leather alternatives are plastic, which causes large-scale environmental destruction including but not limited to animal habitat loss (yes, even the "pineapple" and "cactus" leathers- they're processed with so much plastic that they are essentially just plastic by the end). no beef = no leather = increasing plastic dependence. ditto wool, but this is about materials related to eating animals, so. leaving that out for now
12. Many life saving medications rely on animal byproducts and there is currently no way to entirely eliminate that without throwing entire vulnerable populations under the bus.
how are you uncomfortable with kink and sexual stuff but proship? interest in incest/pedophilia is...a kink? I dont think you can separate these things from sexual abuse, either. I'm confused. not even trying to be a dick.
if you weren't trying to be a dick then you would have the basic preliminary knowledge that proship means pro (as in for) shipping and not pro as in problematic. I am profiction/ship. I want people to have the choice to do whatever they want forever in fiction. that doesn't mean anything sexual in and of itself. if you can't separate sexual abuse from people having the freedom to write whatever fictional shit they want, that's a you issue.
also, don't question people's repulsion. do not question my repulsion. no matter if you're trying to be a dick or not, that's an acephobic as fuck move. these two topics have nothing to do with each other.
me watching so-called allies and other queer people create "inclusive" pride art/merch (they somehow all manage to not include the intersex, aro, and/or ace flag) ((if I point this out to them i'm "too sensitive" and a "killjoy"))
Please read the FULL CONTEXT under the poll block BEFORE voting.
—
Do you think it's a violation of one's autonomy when a school teacher cuts students' hair without their consent, against their will?
Yes, it is
No, it's not
Voting ended onJun 9
Full context from the submitter: when I was in high school, our school had a strict hair policy for both boys and girls. Boys have to have this specific hairstyle. Girls' hair length cannot be longer than blah blah blah. Every month on a specific date we have to let our teachers check our hair to see if it's acceptable. But sometimes teachers will just randomly check any day they want, with no heads up, during morning assembly before classes start. If they see that your hair is too long (girl) or if it's not in the correct style (boy) they will use a pair of scissors to cut it right then and there. BUT they never cut it so that it's "correct and acceptable" again. They cut it so that it's ugly — and students are humiliated because morning assembly is public, every student is there — and then we will have to have it fixed at a salon ourselves after school. If we don't fix it by the next day, there will be a punishment. I'm not U.S. based but apparently this is very common for most schools in my country, even today. Parents are okay with it because "it's always been this way since forever and they went through the same thing when they were kids / teenagers too".
This poll was submitted to us and we simply posted it so people could vote and discuss their opinions on the matter. If you’d like for us to ask the internet a question for you, feel free to drop the poll of your choice in our inbox and we’ll post them anonymously (for more info, please check our pinned post).
