I want to go back to the āabusive relationshipā parallel because it might also be useful to reverse this: to think, rather, of what we call cults" as āabusive/toxic/coercive group relationships.ā
I think sometimes words can actually obscure rather than clarify, if weāre not careful, and I think this case is important because the problem weāre talking about here is not āa group of people have a joint belief in a kooky thing or even behave in ways that are different from other groups of peopleā.
Itās the BITE Model stuff. Itās control and coercion backed up with threats of social isolation and other consequences. Itās group-based abuse and yes, it can end up with a weird fucked up lateral mutual abuse where everyone is reinforcing this dynamic on everyone else, but the important part is itās that stuff thatās evil, bad, poison.
And I think pulling this out is useful because if youāre in a group of humans where this is happening, it literally doesnāt matter how mainstream/normal the bases of your beliefs or group-ness are. This is how social justice social-circles get ācultyā and what we mean by that is this stuff; this is what we mean when wellness stuff gets ācultyā, and what we mean is this.
What makes Scientology a dangerous cult is not that they believe weāre all trapped and anguished souls of long dead aliens. Thatās not that much weirder to believe than that an omnipotent cosmic being made us out of dust; just because the one has been around for several thousand years and the other comes from a few decades back doesnāt actually change the character of the story except to make one more or less respectable.
The dangerous cultyiness is the control and coercion and isolation and, more than anything else, the punishment and retaliation for leaving the fold. Itās because this is a toxic, abusive group relationship.
And yes, this means youāre going to abruptly discover many groups of Respectable Religions are culty as hell, and thatās gonna feel all kinds of uncomfortable. (It also means youāre gonna find groups of other belief-based things - philosophy, politics, nationalistic stuff, whatever - that is likewise, and is likewise gonna be uncomfortable, and some of them are going to be on āyourā side).
It means you might even find yourself perpetuating some culty behaviours, because this shit actually doesnāt arise necessarily out of Nefarious Purpose but a lot of the time just from the fact that human social behaviour REALLY inclines us to want everyone to Act Right and Understand Right otherwise itās Dangerous, and our monkey brains arenāt helpful.
At which point one has to go ooookay self are we being a shitty control freak about this? Are we narrowing what people are āallowedā to do and feel into a rigid norm weāre comfortable with? Is that reasonable in this situation? And so on.
Because toxic groups come from humans, too, not just from ideologies, and weāre all human.
Itās just ⦠really worth drilling down to: yes, these are parallel to the signs of abusive relationships. Because they ARE a kind of abusive relationship. Because abusive behaviours and toxic interpersonal systems arise out of human tendencies, not out of specific definitions either of the ideologies followed, or the makeup of the relationship.