h
đȘŒ
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
d e v o n
KIROKAZE
The Stonewall Inn
if i look back, i am lost
Cosimo Galluzzi
đ©” avery cochrane đ©”
Game Changer & Make Some Noise
One Nice Bug Per Day
Product Placement
cherry valley forever
Keni
macklin celebrini has autism
tumblr dot com
noise dept.
shark vs the universe
Sweet Seals For You, Always
art blog(derogatory)
seen from Switzerland
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from Syria
seen from Argentina
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Singapore
seen from Argentina
seen from Guatemala
seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Singapore
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Mexico
seen from Bangladesh
@scoliosiswizard
I feel like I should make a pinned post for tags I use kinda often and my other stuff
I have a soundcloud I haven't updated forever and a youtube channel I haven't really started. Currently only one mashup posted but I'm proud of it lmao
Tagging this with everything I regularly use to access them easier lmao
MOODBOARD FOR WHEN SHIT IS FUCK
Gold earring with glass head pendant, Phoenician/Carthaginian, 3rd-1st century BC
from The Metropolitan Museum of Art
This ancient Rockabilly pendant holds tremendous power
oh no theyâre going to start calling democrats the same thing theyâve been calling democrats for 20 years now
"Hereâs a trick I learned during the Obama presidency for handling certain types of political labels. Take, as an example, the Tea Party claim that Obama is a Communist. Donât take the word of the person making the claim (Tea Partiers). Donât rely on the rebuttal of the target (Obama), because that will just be dismissed. Go to the group itself (Communists) and ask them. Ask an actual Communist if Obama is a comrade and see how they answer. Watch as they laugh at you, then explain in great detail how they wish there was a Communist in the White House, but hereâs a long and exhaustive list of why that just isnât so. Now apply this logic to the claim that Hillary is pretty much the same as a Republican. Ask an actual Republican if they think Hillary Clinton is one of them. Watch them laugh, and then explain in the same exhausting detail why that just isnât so. Some of them might concede that sheâs better than Trump, but thatâs not the same thing. Finally, go ask a White Supremacist if Trump is one of them. As they excitedly explain how Trump is the guy theyâve been waiting for all these years, and how heâs really empowered their movement, use this to guide how you will be voting in November."
Source: a 2016 facebook posts by Craig Enan, since then deleted (OG link here)
oh no theyâre going to start calling democrats the same thing theyâve been calling democrats for 20 years now
"Hereâs a trick I learned during the Obama presidency for handling certain types of political labels. Take, as an example, the Tea Party claim that Obama is a Communist. Donât take the word of the person making the claim (Tea Partiers). Donât rely on the rebuttal of the target (Obama), because that will just be dismissed. Go to the group itself (Communists) and ask them. Ask an actual Communist if Obama is a comrade and see how they answer. Watch as they laugh at you, then explain in great detail how they wish there was a Communist in the White House, but hereâs a long and exhaustive list of why that just isnât so. Now apply this logic to the claim that Hillary is pretty much the same as a Republican. Ask an actual Republican if they think Hillary Clinton is one of them. Watch them laugh, and then explain in the same exhausting detail why that just isnât so. Some of them might concede that sheâs better than Trump, but thatâs not the same thing. Finally, go ask a White Supremacist if Trump is one of them. As they excitedly explain how Trump is the guy theyâve been waiting for all these years, and how heâs really empowered their movement, use this to guide how you will be voting in November."
Source: a 2016 facebook posts by Craig Enan, since then deleted (OG link here)
who up hitting the rick and morty genderbent incest meth bong
hey does anyone know a free replacemt ad blocker fur blokada, on android mobile? it wants me to pay now and im not doing that ~nya
i wanna put more eyes on this youtuber i just found out about. theres like some overlap in our creative interests i think, really love her work
the way she just like blows past the premise stated in the title of the video, just like, watch it, you'll get it
Be able to say "Wicker Penis" with your full chest. Don't censor yourself.
LOL whos tye saultry little binch on the bottom lsft????
this post is less than 1% away from being completely incomprehensible
I saw this tweet:
and thought âah okay, so like probably just some normal guy with a slight-to-moderate looking eccentricity about himâ brother i
How did Joe Rogan get Baron Ashura on his cast
wait a second that's the fucker from decrease the increase
Correcting the Historical Bias Against Domestic Materials
Archaeology has traditionally had a fundamental bias against fabric. Fabrics are after all highly perishable, withering away within months or years, and only rarely leaving traces behind for those coming millennia later to find. Archaeologistsâpredominantly maleâgave ancient ages names like âIronâ and âBronze,â rather than âPotteryâ or âFlax.â This implies that metal objects were the principal features of these times, when they are simply often the most visible and long-lasting remnants. Technologies using perishable materials, such as wood and textiles, may well have been more pivotal in the daily lives of the people who lived through them, but evidence of their existence has, for the most part, been absorbed back into the earth.
There are exceptions, of course, and traces can and do survive, usually thanks to an unusual climate: freezing, damp anaerobic conditions or extremely dry ones. The climate in Egypt, for example, is ideal for preserving all manner of usually perishable things and we subsequently know far more about ancient Egyptian textiles than those from most other regions. As archaeology has matured and diversified, scholars have increasingly looked forâand foundâevidence of fine, complex textiles stretching farther back than anyone would have guessed. Their beauty and the skill needed to make them suggest a very different image of our earliest forebears than the club-wielding, simpleminded thugs of popular imagination.
âThe first cultural device was probably a recipient⊠. Many theorizers feel that the earliest cultural inventions must have been a container to hold gathered products and some kind of sling or net carrier. So says Elizabeth Fisher in Womenâs Creation (McGraw-Hill, 1975). But no, this cannot be. Where is that wonderful, big, long, hard thing, a bone, I believe, that the Ape Man first bashed somebody with in the movie and then, grunting with ecstasy at having achieved the first proper murder, flung up into the sky, and whirling there it became a space ship thrusting its way into the cosmos to fertilize it and produce at the end of the movie a lovely fetus, a boy of course, drifting around the Milky Way without (oddly enough) any womb, any matrix at all? I donât know. I don ât even care. Iâm not telling that story. Weâve heard it, weâve all heard all about all the sticks and spears and swords, the things to bash and poke and hit with, the long, hard things, but we have not heard about the thing to put things in, the container for the thing contained. That is a new story. That is news. And yet old. Beforeâonce you think about it, surely long beforeâthe weapon, a late, luxurious, superfluous tool; long before the useful knife and ax; right along with the indispensable whacker, grinder, and diggerâfor whatâs the use of digging up a lot of potatoes if you have nothing to lug the ones you canât eat home inâwith or before the tool that forces energy outward, we made the tool that brings energy home. It makes sense to me. I am an adherent of what Fisher calls the Carrier Bag Theory of human evolution. This theory not only explains large areas of theoretical obscurity and avoids large areas of theoretical nonsense (inhabited largely by tigers, foxes, and other highly territorial mammals); it also grounds me, personally, in human culture in a way I never felt grounded before. So long as culture was explained as originating from and elaborating upon the use of long, hard objects for sticking, bashing, and killing, I never thought that I had, or wanted, any particular share in it. (âWhat Freud mistook for her lack of civilization is womanâs lack of loyalty to civilization,â Lillian Smith observed.) The society, the civilization they were talking about, these theoreticians, was evidently theirs; they owned it, they liked it; they were human, fully human, bashing, sticking, thrusting, killing. Wanting to be human too, I sought for evidence that I was; but if thatâs what it took, to make a weapon and kill with it, then evidently I was either extremely defective as a human being, or not human at all⊠. If it is a human thing to do to put something you want, because itâs useful, edible, or beautiful, into a bag, or a basket, or a bit of rolled bark or leaf, or a net woven of your own hair, or what have you, and then take it home with you, home being another, larger kind of pouch or bag, a container for people, and then later on you take it out and eat it or share it or store it up for winter in a solider container or put it in the medicine bundle or the shrine or the museum, the holy place, the area that contains what is sacred, and then next day you probably do much the same againâif to do that is human, if thatâs what it takes, then I am a human being after all. Fully, freely, gladly, for the first time.â
âUrsula K. Le Guin, âThe Carrier Bag Theory of Fictionâ (1986)
Itâs crazy how there is so much bias in how we see the past and the "advancementâ of civilizations purely based on how well the remnants preserve in the climates they were in.
A civilization that built structures out of stone is assumed greater than a civilization that built structures out of wood or some biodegradable material
This makes me think of Rivercane (Arundinaria spp. our native bamboo which was almost wiped out in colonization similar to what happened to the Bison) and how it was used universally by the peoples of the Southeastern USA for every tool, structure, furniture etc imaginable: bedframes, waterproof mats for roofs, backpacks, sieves, shields, torches, sharp splits for quick-and-dirty butchering knivesâŠ
when the spanish first came here randomly roaming and murdering people all over the place they reported that the country was so populated that you could be in one town and see the smoke of the campfires of other towns on the horizons.
now bamboo by weight is stronger than steel, and Rivercane is one of the stronger species of bamboo. Bamboo-working in southeastern USA pre-colonization was crazy advanced. And you could use a split of Rivercane as a butchering knife in a pinch, and you could also use sharpened pieces as arrows without a stone projectile point at all. So there were all these useful objects and tools and constructions that were able to simply biodegrade away.
So people nowadays often assume there was hardly anybody here before white people showed up just because they donât see all the constructions and temples and stuff.
Whatâs even crazier is you DO see the constructions all around you, literally the town I live in was built on top of an Indigenous town and many roads around it and leading to it were Indigenous roads.
(And there were quite a few stone constructions, but colonizers have been running wild all over the place so long that theyâve been knocked down and you literally couldnât identify the ruins unless you thought âhey wait these stones donât belong here, they had to be quarried and brought hereâ And in a lot of cases the locations of such ruins are not popularly discussed because looting and desecration of Indigenous sites is such a huge problem if anybody knows.)
(itâs so crazy actually in the history of Kentucky specifically like historical writers in the 1800âs had this theory that indigenous people had replaced this ancient civilization of white people that built all the stone stuff and made all the pottery and things. but now that the remnants are no longer as visible, the most popular falsehood is that NO ONE lived in Kentucky and it was just âhunting grounds.â which is not true. its like people want to believe anything except that indigenous people were and are indigenous to this place)
Horn girl (rescan)
one time i was making potato soup and i needed broth for it but i was out of broth. but in my dog food cabinet there was a carton of chicken broth that i had bought for my dog. now the box did say HUMAN GRADE and the ingredients were just bog standard chicken broth. it did say something about joint health for dogs on there. but the ingredients were normal. i even compared the ingredients list to some normal person broth and they were the same. so i did put dog broth in that soup and it did taste completely normal. but i did use the dog broth.
