Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
occasionally subtle
taylor price
Xuebing Du
ojovivo
Sweet Seals For You, Always
cherry valley forever
★
almost home
Misplaced Lens Cap
Sade Olutola
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

No title available

No title available

tannertan36
untitled

titsay
Claire Keane
Game of Thrones Daily
The Bowery Presents
seen from United States
seen from India
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Venezuela
seen from Iraq

seen from Panama
seen from Peru
seen from Russia

seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from United States

seen from Brazil

seen from Singapore

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Slovakia

seen from South Africa

seen from Norway
seen from Netherlands

seen from United States
seen from Argentina
@sleeplesslyembraceyouu
WHO’S THE COOL GIRL JOSH IS DATING? 2.07 | Crazy Ex-Girlfriend
there should be a special place in hell for those who renovate victorian houses to have modern interior like what the hell is wrong with you. i hope the ghosts kill you fr.
There was no comment from Kensington Palace, but the Princess of Wales upstaged her husband by attending the Serpentine Gallery’s annual summer party this evening, putting on a defiant display in what many are already calling her “Revenge Dress”.
THE CROWN 5x05: The Way Ahead 2016 - | dir. May el-Toukhy
make me choose: @tiffanymaxwels asked - gilbert blythe or cole mackenzie
Need anything else? Any dragons around here need slaying?
I don’t want sunbursts or marble halls, I just want you.
L.M. Montgomery, Anne of the Island
PRIDE AND PREJUDICE (1995) PRIDE AND PREJUDICE AND ZOMBIES (2016) BRIDGERTON (2020-)
in light of the current "THINK OF THE CHILDREN" moral panic re unsuitable literature, i'd like to share an anecdote.
my thirteen-year-old cousin came to visit a few months back. he saw my copy of american psycho and asked if he could borrow it, because his friend had seen the movie and said it was really good. i said okay, sure, but just so you know, it's a lot more graphic than the movie and there's some stuff in there that you might find really upsetting. he asked what kind of stuff. i gave him a bare-bones outline of the contents (gore, sexual violence, cannibalism, etc). he said he would think about it.
a few days later, he came back to me and said, "it doesn't sound like my kind of thing. i think i might wait until i'm a bit older to read it." alright, i said, good call, and that was the end of it. i am 99% sure that if i'd just said "no, you can't have it, you're not old enough," he would have felt patronised and found a way to read it anyway, just to prove a point.
you can draw whatever conclusions you want from that, but i feel it's a pretty good indicator that giving kids the information they need to curate their own experience is way more effective than telling them what they are and aren't allowed to read. that's just my two cents, though.
My mom did the same thing with me and it was much more beneficial to my mental development than censorship would have been.
I read the Earth’s Children books at a relatively young age — for those that aren’t familiar, the books contain a lot of sexual content, mostly positive and consensual, but also rape and violence — my aunt saw me reading one and, since she had read the books herself, gave my mom a heads-up on the content.
My mom gave me a serious but not punitary talk about how she was aware the book had those themes, and if I was made uncomfortable or confused I could talk to her about it, and it wouldn’t result in the books being taken away.
Meanwhile, I was mostly skipping the pages of sexy stuff to get to the parts about the dog and the horse and the mammoths, so this was pretty sufficient for me. I learned a lot about sex from the positive, consensual content that I did read, but the majority of what I remember about the books are the plot and the animals. (Although there is a scene where the mammoths have sex, too, which I will never forget.)
6 hour long fight at this year’s Tolkien Historical Society Conference about whether Middle Earth has bees, before I reminded everyone that the Rohirrim had mead halls, which means they had honey, which means there’s bees. Everyone sighed and the conference continued. This is the life of a Tolkien scholar.
It’s what he would have wanted
op why did you wait six hours
a wizard arrives precisely when he means to
Am I the only person who thought this was really fucking funny
A lot of the really funny moments in Lord of the Rings come from Tolkien playing with language like this, where we have relatively formal, archaic, “high” language responded to with informal, modern, “low” language.
another hilarious example:
my absolute favorite example of tolkien switching registers in this way is
-Major Monogram understands hash house lingo
-Major Monogram likes to eat scrambled eggs and toast for lunch
it’s 20th century american diner lingo, i don’t think many people use it anymore, but i happen to have on-hand a guide from a book-set by julia rothman if you’d like some more examples
Idea: thieves’ cant but for chefs.
If I had a nickel for every time a cartoon Dan Povenmire worked on made a joke about somebody misunderstanding diner lingo, I’d have two nickels.
Can I be honest, I think if we went back in time and told that “MYRRH-DER” “*gasp* Judas! No!” joke to a group of medieval peasants they would completely and utterly lose their shit. They would be grabbing each other and crying with laughter. idk I just love the thought of a joke created through a modern, 21st century medium being accessible and enjoyable for devout practising Catholics hundreds of years ago
You’d be burned as a heretic, but sure, imagine they’d laugh.
No, you really wouldn’t.
When I wrote this post I specifically had in mind the liturgical plays enjoyed by medieval folks, especially from the 14th century onwards. These plays were once performed at liturgies, in Latin, under the direction of the priest or bishop, but later became plays that were enjoyed on the village green, recited in English, and performed and produced by players. Gradually, more and more comedic and farcical elements crept into the plays, because that’s what audiences loved and demanded.
They would tell the lives of saints and Bible stories such as the Fall of Man, Noah’s Ark and the Nativity. Because plays were enjoyed at carnivals and because religious spirit and merrymaking aren’t incompatible, certain characters became humorous and stereotyped. For example, Noah’s wife was a shrew who would smack her husband to get him into the ark, Herod was a ludicrous, blustering tyrant and poor old Joseph was particularly derided and used as comic relief, especially in the Nativity plays. Apparently, being cuckolded by God was not the way to appeal to a medieval man, though he would gain respect after the Reformation.
In the context that medieval peasants watched and loved ribald and slightly irreverent liturgical plays, something that would later evolve into the English stage as we know it in Shakespeare, it is entirely accurate and harmless to think that during a Nativity play the last wise man might say “I bring thee myrr…” and after Jospeh has thanked him, he would unmask to reveal his red hair (sorry guys Judas was ginger) and exclaim “MYRR-DRE!” causing Joseph to gasp and cry “JUDAS!! NAY!!” and probably trip over himself falling backwards, to the unparalleled surprise and delight of the devout medieval peasants who, guess what, still have a damn sense of humour.
i read some medieval mystery plays this semester. there’s one where mary, having pregnancy cravings, is like “oh, husband, won’t you go get me some cherries from that tree there?”
and joseph basically says “eh, that tree is really tall and I don’t want to. how about you ask the guy that got you knocked up to get you the cherries?”
and the tree ~miraculously bends down~~ so she can eat them
and joseph is like “well shit”
"how do i know a woman wants me to talk to her in the grocery store" are you an elderly woman with valuable information about cooking, cleaning, or saving money? if you answered no, then women do not want to talk to you in the grocery store.
These tags needed to be shared with the class.
obsessed w whimsigothic
you need to get it out of your mind that psychosomatic illness is just “making up symptoms” when it’s actually much more like your body is being actively poisoned by chemicals released from your brain
if you’re so stressed that you’re puking your guts up every morning, are unable to eat or keep anything down, you can’t look at light without feeling infinitely worse and feel exhausted and in pain all the time (or whatever your particular stress induced symptom set is) you’re not just feeling like that because you’ve willed it into being. your body is begging for relief from the constant barrage of stress hormones and it requires the fundamental source of stress to go away, not just distracting yourself from the symptoms
just because the root is psychological doesn’t mean the result isn’t an entirely physical process.
Relative Values (2000)
Emma (dir. Autumn de Wilde)