Quora Reshare: Why did Daenerys burn down King’s Landing in Game of Thrones S8E5?
Oldie but goodie. Another possibly being reshared again here. Kelsey
The key to Dany’s decision wasn’t in the scene when the bells went off and she snapped and started burning everything.
It was in the throne room when Tyrion was trying to talk her out of destroying the city.
Tyrion: “The people who live there. They’re not your enemies. They’re innocents, like the ones you liberated in Meereen.”
Dany: “In Meereen, slaves turned on the masters and liberated the city themselves the moment I arrived.”
Tyrion: “They’re afraid. Anyone who resists Cersei will see his family butchered. You can’t expect them to be heroes. They’re hostages.”
Dany: “They are. In a tyrant’s grip. Whose fault is that? Mine?”
Tyrion: “What does it matter whose fault it is? Thousands of children will die if the city burns.”
Dany: “Your sister knows how to use her enemies’ weaknesses against them. That’s what she thinks our mercy is. Weakness.”
Tyrion: “I beg you, my queen —”
Dany: “— but she’s wrong. Mercy is our strength. Our mercy toward future generations who will never again be held hostage by a tyrant.”
Tyrion then begs Dany to call off the attack if the bells ring, i.e. if the city surrenders. She nods and seemingly agrees.
Everything Dany does in King’s Landing is telegraphed here. She tells Tyrion what she’s planning to do and why.
Everyone’s made a big deal about how Dany’s never gone after innocents before, but that’s the point: To her, the people of King’s Landing aren’t innocent because they didn’t immediately and openly throw themselves at her feet when she showed up. She tries to frame it in the way of “help those who help themselves,” but the truth is that what she really wants is the same sort of crowd-surfing, slavish devotion she had in Slaver’s Bay. She wants people to want to “liberate” themselves for her. She wants their love. (And of course, she is literally unable to differentiate between a slaving society and a feudal one; Westeros isn’t perfect, but expecting it to function like Slaver’s Bay did, just goes to show how totally out of her depth she is.)
Additionally, Dany seems to view the people in King’s Landing as a sunk cost or lost cause. It’s not her fault they’re there, it’s not her fault they’re hostages. It’s worth it to her to go scorched earth on them — and surely they deserve it, right, if they can’t even be bothered to liberate themselves? — and in turn this level of brutality will ensure, in her bent perspective, that such brutality won’t be necessary in the future. Weirdly, her idea of “mercy” here reminds me of Joffrey saying he gave Ned the “mercy” of a quick death — it’s completely warped. She has more inclination to be “merciful” to future hypothetical generations (ones who will grovel and scrape and know their place, hmm?) than to a living, breathing one that’s already here but not quite grateful or devoted enough for her liking.
So now the battle is won and the bells are going off and Dany snaps and starts burning. It’s a punishment — how dare you make me actually go through the effort to capture this city instead of throwing the gates open for me? If anything the surrender itself seems to have angered her, because … if they were going to surrender so relatively easy anyway, why didn’t they do it earlier? To her, they probably wanted it both ways: Fight her (how dare they) when she attacks, but then expect mercy and the chance to surrender when the fight goes south. It’s punishment, and it’s also almost a ritual purification by fire (ice preserves, fire consumes) — she’s destroying the unworthy, impure, insufficiently grateful capital and her idea of mercy is filling it in the future with people who won’t be “held hostage by a tyrant,” with absolutely zero sense of irony on her part.
But yes: If you want to understand the root of what Dany did, it’s in this scene in the throne room. This is where she lays out her mindset and explains why she’ll do what she does. The rub is that she seemingly agrees to Tyrion’s request to stop if the bells go off, and then reneges on it.