JULIEN DE SAINT-JEAN as ANDRÉ DE VILLEFORT in Le Comte de Monte-Cristo (2024)
seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from Russia
seen from Chile

seen from France

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Venezuela
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Japan
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from T1

seen from United States
seen from South Africa

seen from United States
JULIEN DE SAINT-JEAN as ANDRÉ DE VILLEFORT in Le Comte de Monte-Cristo (2024)
Forgot that I could post memes here lmao
i've noticed there's a debate on if villefort knew benedetto was alive when he buried him or not. i think he did, because that's the big thing about the trial on chapter 110; benedetto accuses him of trying to murder him and villefort admits his guilt. but i raise you a secret third option: he did know his son was alive but the guilt was so much he tried to convince himself he was dead or was going to die anyway, whether that was in the moment of the burial or years after, by trying to change, in his mind, his own past actions.
i have so many thoughts, i'm thinking of writing an essay about all we learn of the 'burial' throughout the book, because until chapter 110 i did think villefort was unaware that the baby was still alive, and the many interpretations of that entire situation are kind of fascinating. tbh i have ideas for a lot of different tcomc posts but i'm so insecure about my writing and opinions i feel shy posting them lmao but i think they could possibly be interesting (once i wrote a whole essay about villefort's relationship with macbeth, and how that connects with héloïse and his relationship with women in his life and when i was about to save it in my drafts tumblr deleted all of it in a second ☠️ i want to rewrite that one. also, i have an essay i want to finish about hermine, and another simple one about edmond's connection to othello).
anyway, this song ("i am the one (reprise)" from next to normal) reminded me of them so much!!! a father who tries to deny the memory of his haunting son and comes to terms with the tragedy of their relationship. and the son who seeks for his father to finally see and accept him. it's also VERY interesting because i can definitely see similarities between the diana/gabe/natalie & hermine/benedetto/eugénie relationships!!! a mother who lost her first child (a son, specifically) when she was young and he was a baby, and who ended up living an 'artificial' life, never being truthfully happy or free, ignoring and not loving nor caring enough for her daughter as a result. we do not know if eugénie ever found out benedetto was her brother but imagine "superboy and the invisible girl" with them!!! it makes so much sense even though i'd say, at the end of the day, eugénie was relieved by the carelessness of her mother because it meant she could flee, but i think she was still very hurt by it. what an interesting relationship, i should write an essay about that too!!! they're actually sooo similar and do not realize it, or at least not hermine.
+ i actually don't know if the term 'burial' is correct, as benedetto was alive but it sounds cool and, i mean, he was buried. also, if anyone who speaks french sees this pls know i struggled choosing how to translate that bit at the end of the video!!! i searched for like 5 different translations to be as precise as possible and ended up choosing "i admit my guilt" which was featured in what is considered the best tcomc english translation (robin buss'). i take my little silly edits very seriously!!
The Count of Monte Cristo: look at the little Edouard de Villefort, screaming and trashing on the floor while his mother soothes him! He is such a terrible and self-absorbed brat, just as a child of Villefort should be! This confirms that my quest for revenge is completely justified!
Me: or, and I am spitballing here, he could be such a brat because he has been spoiled since birth by virtue of being The-Oh-So-Desired Male Heir.
The Count of Monte Cristo: nonsense, he is evil!
Me: he is a child.
The Count of Monte Cristo: he is Villefort’s son! Have you seen his half-brother Benedetto? He is a self-serving, self-absorbed, amoral and violent young man!
Me: yeah? Guess who also passed his entire childhood spoiled and never reprimanded? And he didn’t exactly had the best examples to follow either-
The Count of Monte Cristo: nature will always prevail on nurture! Villefort’s blood speaks for them!
Me: does Villefort’s blood speak for Valentine too, then?
The Count of Monte Cristo: who?
ROUND 1 — Match 45 of 138
Benedetto/Andrea Cavalcanti (The Count of Monte Cristo)
Problematic because: "this but with crimes" Propaganda: "imagine you're on trial and the prosecutor asked you why you killed a guy, and you turn to the prosecutor and say "I dunno, why did YOU kill a guy??" and then you pull out evidence that he did in fact try to kill a guy. same evidence proves that he's your dad. and that he was having an affair. and you do all that in a public court room."
vs. Dog (Dogbird)
Problematic because: "too christian to properly date her girlfriend :(" Propaganda: "I relate to her :(( not christian but you can understand Dog through the context of any strict religion. rip Dog and Bird's relationship, I wish they could run away together and be happy forever but alas and alack that's not how things work"
Who should advance?
Benedetto
Dog
(Disclaimer: All text above was sent in by submitters and not written by OP.)
Spoilers for The Count of Monte Cristo below cut
It really is a good thing that Benedetto didn't strongly resemble either Villefort or Madame Danglars because this whole long game revenge arc with a satisfying twist for Edmond wouldn't have worked out. Like imagine if he was a spitting image of Villefort. I mean Villefort knows someone unburied his son because he specifically mentioned to Madame Danglars that he tracked the baby to the orphanage and learned someone claimed the baby. He knows that baby is out there somewhere and he has probably done that math to learn the age that child is now.
Reunion.
A word on Benedetto’s father figures
Because I’ve been thinking about it all week. Have some parallels and contrasts, my friends:
Villefort:
Starts off Benedetto’s story extremely strongly by literally burying him alive within minutes of his birth. No one has ever failed their son harder.
Might have been onto something when he said crime spread around him and from him like a disease. Seriously, look at this family! It’s so dysfunctional in so many ways!!! If you’re a nature-over-nurture person, it’s not that far-fetched to suppose Benedetto got the Criminal Gene™ from him.
Literally changed his name to hide his compromising origins (as much as humanly possible in the spheres he frequents).
Burnt Edmond’s denunciation letter. Guess who else likes to burn things?
Is brought down by the literal unearthing of his biggest secret, which in turn concludes Benedetto’s arc.
Bertuccio:
Is, literally, the one who gave Benedetto life, and the emissary of Providence™ who shows up to bestow blessings upon him at semi-regular intervals.
Unfortunately, those gifts are always cursed. Surprise salvation from the grave in the garden? Only happens because Bertuccio tried to murder the kid’s father first, and results in what is functionally a kidnapping. Surprise adoption? Results in Benedetto being raised by a literal criminal, who is #shocked when his protege starts hanging out with ill-intentioned older boys and disciplines him with what we can reasonably assume from the unreliable narration is the good old belt. Surprise life-changing information about his origins that Bertuccio held onto all these years? Only revealed to cement Benedetto’s status as Monte-Cristo’s puppet.
Crumbled the second Benedetto questioned his ascendance, therefore drawing a clear link between authority and paternity and reinforcing the kid’s desire to defy both.
“Major Cavalcanti”:
Is just Some Guy™.
And yet, they have so much in common: both are impostors trapped in Monte-Cristo’s web, both are passionate about scamming rich people. There’s a quasi-instantaneous recognition between the two and, because they share the same goal, they develop a strangely wholesome understanding…? It’s forced coexistence as much as it is respect, but it’s not deprived of a weird sort of warmth, and Monte-Cristo himself comments on how much it looks like actual familial love. The contrast with Caderousse could not be harsher.
In virtue of his fake wealth and fake fatherhood, the Major becomes the Ultimate Authority™ ‘Andrea’ name-drops every time he wants to advance in society.
Caderousse:
Outwardly, he adopts all the attributes of a good father. He taught Benedetto most of his tricks! He feeds him! He talks of all the hardships they’ve been through together, like a family would!
But, of course, what he’s really doing is blackmailing Benedetto. Caderousse wants money, and it’s taken him a while to actually get his hands dirty, but he’s finally graduating to murder! And his silly young friend should help him if he doesn’t want his blood spilled on Place de Grève.
Anyway Benedetto stabs that guy real bad. I thought it was hilarious of him.
Danglars:
As Andrea’s future father-in-law, Danglars is his ticket towards the life of luxury without effort he has always wanted.
Of course, Danglars is using Andrea for the same reason Caderousse uses Benedetto: for money. Both of them lie about what they own, ergo about who they are, to get their hands on what they think the other has. This is especially interesting when put in perspective with the brutal honesty Danglars employs when talking to Eugénie, who he treats like a son and almost business partner rather than like a daughter (Transmasc Eugénie Truthers, rise up!).
… But of course, he still wants people to think of he and Andrea as family to strengthen his own nobility: if his son (in-law) is a prince, a title Danglars repeats ad nauseam, doesn’t that make him a king?
All things considered, despite losing their freedom (temporarily in Danglars’ case), money and status, both of them get a relatively happy ending compared to most of the cast.
Monte-Cristo:
BUCKLE UP THIS IS THE MOST INTERESTING.
Twice Benedetto raises the possibility of Monte-Cristo being his biological father, a perfectly logical conclusion in light of what he has done for him; in turn, Monte-Cristo recognises Benedetto as one of God’s punishers, a title he otherwise only attributes to himself.
Both of them went through a symbolic rebirth after being buried alive.
Both of them were wrongly accused of being evil incarnate, but eventually graduated to Full-On Criminals. Talk about self-fulfilling prophecies.
Escape Artists™
Both had to completely reinvent themselves, down to their names and origins, to achieve their ambitions.
Ruined engagement ceremony!!! This also draws parallels to Villefort and, interestingly, to Valentine and Franz.
THIS:
🇫🇷 « Ce calme, cette parfaite aisance firent comprendre à Andrea qu’il était pour le moment étreint par une main plus musculeuse que la sienne, et que l’étreinte n’en pouvait être facilement brisée. »
🇬🇧 « This calm, this perfect poise told Andrea that he was presently held by a hand far stronger than his, whose grip could not be escaped easily. »
Both Edmond and Benedetto know they are prisoners of people more powerful than they are, of the narrative, of a superior power that wields them like knives; both Monte-Cristo and Andrea accept their role as knives in the hope of eventually slicing through their ties. Whether or not they succeeded in the end is up to the reader’s interpretation.