Would you consider fostering a child in the future?
I have already fostered one or more children
Yes, I would consider fostering one or more children
No, but I would consider adopting a child
No, I wouldn't consider fostering or adopting a child
seen from Belgium
seen from Russia
seen from Kazakhstan

seen from United States
seen from Russia

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States

seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Colombia

seen from United States
seen from Russia

seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from China
Would you consider fostering a child in the future?
I have already fostered one or more children
Yes, I would consider fostering one or more children
No, but I would consider adopting a child
No, I wouldn't consider fostering or adopting a child
Romani children are disproportionately represented within the UK care system (x).
It is the exact same thing all over Europe (x).
Romani children who are put in the care system are less likely to be adopted than non-Romani children, they are more likely to spend their entire childhood in an institutional setting and to face poverty and exclusion once they turn 18 and leave the system (x).
It's not because their parents are abusive - it's often because the State and local authorities blame us for the poverty they are putting us in, holding us responsible for it and making us pay for it by taking kids away
A couple of days ago, the police barged into a Romani household and ripped five children away from their parents and manhandled them in broad daylight. They did this because one of the children had to go to the hospital and they simply assumed their parents must beat them (without opening any investigation whatsoever).
A 15 year old died trying to escape.
Romani people rioted a couple of days ago and British media has been twisting this and complaining about "a criminal minority" that has been "causing unrest" (x). Leftists and non-Romani antiracist activists have been silent because it's always fancy to oppose police brutality and racism unless it's for the Roma
Councils are sending vulnerable kids to homes ran by money-grabbing cowboys and private-equity vultures, says Guardian columnist George Monb
There is no place for a “market” here. Children are not a commodity to be bought and sold. Private profit and public service are always oil and water. But if there is one service above all others that capital should never be allowed to get its filthy hands on, it is children in care.
This is a horrifying but necessary read. CW for mention of csa, child abuse and trauma.
What has happened since Tuesday
Since Tuesday a lot of stuff happened. As I already posted my mom told me on Tuesday that I will move into another care home than the one that was planned at first and I will move in there on 4th April.
➡️♿️🏡🆕️
I didn't react with a meltdown or crying at first but I had a lot of meltdowns in the last days and I even destroyed my phone in a meltdown on Wednesday. Luckily I had enough money in my room so the boss of the care home drove Wednesday in the afternoon to the electronics store in the next city and bought the one I wanted. Since today I also have a out door phone case the protect my phone from meltdowns.
😭🤜📱🆕️📱
On Thursday I and the boss of the care home tried to talk with the boss of the new care home on the telephone but I had a meltdown. Than he talked with her alone and he was good in advocating for my needs and that are important for me. Then my accommodations were sure (It's logical a home for disableds but disabled people have different needs so they need to be treated differently in some things.) But I still was scared because I didn't know exactly how moving will look like and how the measurements of my room will be so I couldn't plan furniture. Now I know all these stuff.
📞😭🧔🏻♂️💬♿️👍😨
I think the new care home will be better than my current one or at least as good as my current one.
But I'm also scared. I want to share some facts about my new care home.
- The organisation is specialised on intellectual and psychiatric disabilities (Autism is a psychiatric condition according to the Austrian system of disability categorisation.)
- The care home is in a single family house and only 5 residents live in it
- While day 3 caretakers are at the care home and 1 while night. In the night the caretaker sleeps but the residents of the care home are allowed to wake them up if they need help. That are much more caretakers than in my current one and in my current one live much more residents.
🆕️♿️🏡👍
- The care home is specialised on people with severe emotional regulation or behaviour disorders.
- I don't need to go to a special workplace / day centre at the new care home and if I want I can go but the special workplace / day centre of the organisation has only open from Monday to Thursday and only from 8 a.m to 12 p.m which is much less than my current one. (I will not go to the special workplace/ day centre at first but when I'm at the care home for a while I will talk about it with the caretakers or boss of the care home.)
- It's unfortunately much more further away of my family than my current one but I hope it will be better although these fact because the new care home is especially for people like me.
🆕️♿️🏡👍
starting of with archiving a great sunday picnic with my lovely friends. it was a sunny day, not too scorching hot but the sky was clear. we went on a picnic at a local urban park. we brought fruits, cake, and sweet beverages. we talked about life, tech industry, ex lovers, family, and we even got a quick tarot reading.
this is the kind of day that has been my "reset sunday". it never felt right for me to just stay inside at home (i couldn't process my feelings and couldn't fully rest at a place where i had to constantly in a fight or flight situation). so going out, laying on a grass and taking a power nap under the sun never fail to uplift my spirit.
i wish to talk about "taking a rest" from the hectic routine that i sometimes called life. throughout my life, i have always been in a surviving mode. things are keep happening and sometimes i dont have the control to stop them from keep happening. and yet, with so little time to process—i still have to put my mind to find a way to survive. to pay the bills, to provide food on my plate, to overthrow the government.
this body has so little time and limited space to actually rest. to actually heal. but i am heavenly blessed with people who always have time to take care of me. i am blessed to say that i am properly being taken care of by my loved ones.
i hope while you're reading this, you also in a place where you are being properly taken care of. where people notice things about you. where you're not being neglected.
‘The fact this has become commonplace is deeply worrying,’ expert warns
One in six mothers involved in care proceedings over the last year were given just a day’s notice of a court hearing to decide whether their newborn child would be taken into care, according to research.
The vast majority of such women in England and Wales receive less than one week’s notice, new analysis shows.
Work by the Nuffield Family Justice Observatory work also found the number of newborns being taken into care had risen dramatically in recent years. “Newborn” in this case refers to babies under two weeks old.
In England the number of newborns involved in care proceedings annually surged by 20 per cent between 2012-13 and 2019-20 – increasing from 2,425 to 2,914, the Nuffield researchers found. In Wales, the numbers shot up by 40 per cent, from 145 to 203.
Lisa Harker, director of the group, told The Independent it was hard to pinpoint a specific reason for the rise. Ms Harker, whose organisation looks at the experiences of children in the family justice system, said it was partly linked to rising poverty levels across the UK.
She added: “We certainly see a pattern of higher babies being taken into care in areas with higher rates of deprivation.
“We also know many of the mums whose babies are taken into care have serious mental health problems such as anxiety and depression which are treatable mental health conditions. Part of the explanation is the serious unmet need for mother’s mental health support and the lack of available services.”
Ms Harker warned separating a mother and her baby was “deeply traumatic for all involved” and had repercussions that lasted a lifetime.
While urgent action after a baby is born can be needed in cases where there is an “immediate safeguarding need”, there is nevertheless “widespread concern” that the volume of cases is rising, Ms Harker added.
She said: “Not only does it seem that chances are being missed to work with vulnerable mothers much earlier to give them the best chance of staying together as a family, but when that is not possible, the process is often not being managed in a sensitive or humane way.”
The study found the majority of mothers involved were left with a very short amount of formal notice. Researchers discovered more than four out of every five cases in England in the last year and three-quarters of cases in Wales were heard with less than a weeks’ notice.
Ms Harker said: “The fact this has become commonplace is deeply worrying. The legal process is very short notice. We hear directly from mums that the process is overwhelming and emotionally traumatic. It can be difficult to fully participate and understand what is going on.
“As you can imagine it is very likely to be close to the birth, so they may well be in hospital or have recently returned home, and then they have to prepare and get proper legal representation in place.”
There is “clearly a need for a national conversation” about how vulnerable families can be given greater support, Ms Harker added.
The report warned urgent hearings can make it very tricky for parents to have time to “effectively instruct a solicitor”, while the social worker who represents the child does not have a great deal of time to look into the case before making a recommendation to the court. Researchers used eight years of court data covering more than 21,000 babies in England and Wales.
Mothers living in the northeast of England and Yorkshire were substantially more likely to have a care application made for their child just after she gave birth than in London, the study found. Researchers raised fears problems with the current system could infringe the human rights of parents.
Professor Karen Broadhurst, a lead author on the report, said: “Deprivation twinned with a lack of services is a perfect storm when it comes to keeping families together.
“Earlier research has suggested that the greater availability of preventative services in London, such as mother and baby placements and the quality of legal advocacy, had resulted in fewer infant cases being issued at birth, than in the North of England or Wales.
“The greater use of short-notice hearings in England and Wales requires further analysis – I see the statistics as a first step in working collaboratively with professionals and family members alike to understand this trend and to consider whether there are alternatives to issuing care proceedings so soon after birth.”
A spokesperson for the UK judiciary said it welcomed the research, adding that it “provides a helpful statistical perspective on an area of great importance in the family courts and will be the basis of further in-depth analysis, qualitative research and review”.
The spokesperson added: “The fact that hearings take place within a short time of a child’s birth tells us nothing of what occurs at those hearings; it should not be assumed that urgent court hearings and legal orders necessarily mean separation of mother and child.
“Judges are mindful at all times of the best interests of the child and a decision to separate mother and child is taken only after examining the available evidence and considering all other options.”
—
Bolding for emphasis my own.
Jade’s SSO Rambles - 8 Updated Care/Bonding System
(Please keep in mind that these are my thoughts and opinions at the time of writing these rambles. I may change my mind in the future.)
Some time after I sorted out my thoughts on the current care system I took a step back and finally fit the pieces together regarding how I think a new “care” system could be implemented into SSO. Some of this is pulling from ideas for my own personal horse game concept but I don’t think that’ll be an issue. My game is intended to be a single player experience with a very different horse system to SSO’s collect ‘em all style of horse models.
We are very long overdue for a better care system and I certainly don’t blame the team for taking their time on it. I would prefer to wait over having something so integral to the game’s core be rushed and sloppy. I just hope that I can toss my own two cents in and propose some decent ideas that might help facilitate a better experience.
A final additional note before I begin, I do have ideas for how to expand on the care skill I will be lightly brushing over but I plan on doing a separate ramble on it. Primarily it involves some suggestions for improving the skill and making it more useful and interesting than its current implementation and expanding on ideas for the Rescue Ranch and Jorvik Rangers.
So to all you pro-life/anti abortion/every life matters people out there; how many young vunerable people have you taken out of your local care system and welcomed into your home?