hi, i'm berry/k-angel, the co-host of the sadissystem ! i'll likely be the only alter posting here, so keep in mind the rest of my system has separate accounts
i wish to be a source of love, comfort, and happiness to every being ! everyone deserves to be loved and safe, and it pains my heart that there are so many people suffering . i am always open to making friends or just being a person to talk to !
tag guide below
#โ. ๐ หmeow meowโน เฃช ห - random posts
#โ. ๐ หfruit splatterโน เฃช ห - art
#โ. ๐ หsad strawberryโน เฃช ห - venting
#โ. ๐ หcutie marksโน เฃช ห - self-harm
#โ. ๐ หlets justr say my peanitsโน เฃช ห - horny-posting
What's your opinion on someone being pro - contact/leaning towards being pro-c?
I have a somewhat complicated opinion on being pro contact.
First I would like to say, I think that pro-c folks are 100% a part of the radqueer community, and if you participate in harassing pro-c radqueers, you are not radqueer.
I think contact stances are inherently flawed. I label myself complex contact, because my opinions are complex. And stances like anti, neutral, and pro contact do not describe my opinions.
The idea that someone could possibly fit into the categories of strictly anti or strictly pro contact is insane. For example, most people who say they are anti-c are only talking specifically about paraphilias that cannot be consensual, not paraphilias like objectum or other "non harmful" paraphilias. And people who are pro-c, usually are also explicitly pro-consent, so therefore are most likely anti-c for a specific set of paraphilias that cannot be consensual.
I will state now, that I do not in any way support xenosatanism. But being pro-c is not the same as being a XS (I have seen people get them confused...)
I also do not like the term "harmful paraphilia" because no paraphilia is inherently harmful, most people who use that term mean harmful contact (aka: paraphilias that cannot be acted upon in a non-harmful way.)
TL;DR I support all contact stances, as long as you are anti abuse, and strictly pro consent.
im unsure about this. is just ramblings and unformed opinions, but here
due to the legally and societally created power disparities between the classes of child and adult, children can't consent. it shall be considered false/invalid consent due to reasonable assumption of implicit coersion
this is not an inherent quality of children, but a product of the conditions they exist under
this also seems adjacent to theory about power disparities with proletariat/bourgeoisie probably
whtv seems reasonable. gon think about it more. im such a smart puppy
I like to view myself as someone who a strong sense of morality. Someone who is repulsed by anything slightly abnormal. Naturally, this would lead me to hate you, as you're a messed up person.
But I can't deny that I find the ideas your posts bring to mind is appealing. To be entirely reliant on someone who has full control over me, to be harmed over and over, I find it... oddly comforting in a way too.
You give me a lot to think about -๐ฟ
i always have the urge to tease the hell out of those who are disgusted by me yet still find some sort of sick pleasure in my content , but this is incredibly genuine , so i will hold back for just a bit. iโll get you next ask , ๐ฟ anon . . <3
let me offer another perspective ; taking time to understand these abnormal sides of humanity instead of instantly hating them will give you a stronger sense of morality . a person acting on their first instinct of repulsion will never be as morally correct as a person who is acting on logic , even if they both come to the same conclusion . the first person will often end up being morally inconsistent , as theyโll be morally against the things theyโre repulsed by and morally accepting of the things that donโt personally bother them , even if both things are on the same level of harmless or harmful .
this is especially problematic when you imagine the other side . iโm the opposite of repulsed by many harmful paraphilias , would it be morally acceptable for me to ignore consent and do whatever i want regarding them ? of course not . as a hardcore clinical sadist it scares ME when peopleโs reason for not doing something is that itโs โ disgusting โ . . because ironically , thatโs an admission that , if you were me , you would be an offender .
i consider myself a person with a strong sense of morality because i consider morals before my initial reaction , and morals before my own pleasure . i only pursue my harmful paraphilias within fiction , role - play , or consensual contact , if applicable . i donโt harass people for their thoughts , urges , desires , and identities , even if they personally make me uncomfortable ; i judge purely based on their actions and the harm they cause . i judge how important they view consent when pursuing their pleasures . at the very least , iโm morally consistent .
anyways , i promise youโre not a bad person for finding pleasure and even comfort in that fantasy . conabuse fantasies and relationships can be especially comforting to those who are used to non - consensual abusive relationships . our brains are complicated , liking something in certain contexts doesnโt mean condoning it in general .
ok i have never talked about discourse on this account back to my normal self uhm . antis are soooo hot they turn me on . ooo donโt you want to stick around my blog and let me corrupt you into the perfect victim for my sick fantasies ooo ( teasing )
( seriously , send another ask if you want less serious and more sadism . just wanted to be real for a second )
If so how do you feel about like. Contact stances n such
My beliefs align best with the redefined terms of xenosatanism updated in 2024 (linked here.)
Iโm complex-c in the way that I would be pro-c in an ideal worldโ I do not support abusing children or animals in this worldwide society where children are unaware and uninformed; and where people are against and uninformed about animal liberation. I will not touch, and therefore harm, any child or an animal because of this.
So yesโ I lean mostly towards pro-c; but Iโm comp-c. I think all contact stances are valid and I follow the core belief of being radqueerโ anti-harassment.
I have a post defining my stance a little further from a while ago. I wonโt fuck you up unless and until you unconsentualy abuse me, or mineโ thatโs my harassment stance. If you DO: I will kill you. And thatโs not just an empty threat.
Everyone keeps insisting I'm a predator, ignoring the huge letters reading CONABUSE on most of my blogs, because they see "comp-contact" and black out.
I'm literally not allowed to date people less than two years the system's chronoage. And also I thought I was supposedly the one being groomed??? Why're we changing the narrative now?
Anyway, for the nosy fuckers who want an indepth report on What I Actually Think About Pedophiles And The Like: I don't really care. I *do* think contact between chrono adults and chrono minors isn't necessarily "good" but my entire shtick is being evil. Also, I'm an attention seeker and it just so happens that pro-c MAPs are easy engagement bait. I could literally be the world's most anti-contact activist and if a pro-c MAP gave me a ounce I'd pounce on it like a lion.
That, plus the fact that how I view contact towards animals vs things like objects is why I'm comp-contact. Do I have views and opinions? Yes. Do I follow those views to any meaningful degree? No. So comp-contact it is.
And obviously all that is about me personally, because I don't care about other people. Except therians. Everyone else can go die.
Anyway I'm going back to canni-necroposting about imaginary creeps on my sideblogs :3 baiiiii
