Iām not tech savvy enough to know how to turn things into a gif, but Alda sees his muffin top in the mirror, squishes it and then decides to cover it up with his boxers. Very funny scene, sorry I canāt post the gif.Ā
Claire Keane

No title available

Andulka
Keni

No title available
Cosimo Galluzzi

titsay
No title available

Product Placement
ojovivo

ellievsbear
No title available
I'd rather be in outer space šø
official daine visual archive

romaā
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

gracie abrams
No title available
The Stonewall Inn
todays bird
seen from Russia
seen from Iraq

seen from Slovenia
seen from Germany
seen from Russia

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Germany
seen from Kazakhstan

seen from Türkiye

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from India
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States
@tuttle-did-it
Iām not tech savvy enough to know how to turn things into a gif, but Alda sees his muffin top in the mirror, squishes it and then decides to cover it up with his boxers. Very funny scene, sorry I canāt post the gif.Ā
Every time Sean Astin makes a statement on whether or not Sam and Frodo were indeed gay for each other in lord of the rings heās always like āwell we have to acknowledge that attitudes around sexuality have changed dramatically over the past several decades and since authorial intent is only up to speculation, the story is open to multiple readings, some of which might have different significances for different groups of people also they kiss on the lips because I said soā
at the rose city comic con panel this month a fan asked them (sean and elijah) if sam and frodo were in love and they said
Sean: .....yes. absolutely
Elijah: 100 percent.
Sean: dont tell rosie
Rosie: "This is my husband Sam, and that's his husband, Frodo. Frodo is my husband-in-law. I'm not into him, he's he's a bit too 'elfy' for my taste, but Sam likes him, and that's fine with me. As far as I know, Frodo can't give Sam children, but Frodo looks after ours all the same, so I don't mind sharing Sam if it means another pair of eyes on the wee ones. In all honesty, our family tree is right simple compared to some hobbits. Yes, I'm referrin' to you Lobelia, over there pretendin' you ain't eavesdroppin'. Still bitter you ain't got either of my boys or their house, eh?"
Tbh it's canon that Frodo invited Sam and Rosie to move in to Bag End after their wedding and they all lived there for a couple of years until Frodo went to Valinor, so yeah. Running with it.
And once Rosie dies, Sam says his goodbyes and disappears after him.
whatās funny is people assuming that rosie would somehow be too dim or naive to KNOW that sam loved frodo, instead of looking at a guy who would loyally follow a beloved friend to hell and then help carry him home again, and not be like āoh i canāt not fuck that.ā
Polyamory, specifically polyandry, would be an interesting solution to the oddball population of the Shire.
The Shire is excellent farming country, with consistently good weather, and only one tough winter in living memory; hobbits like to produce large families; theyāre resistant to disease, rarely violent, and encounter few dangers. It is usual for hobbits to produce many children, so that (for example) Bilbo and Frodo are unusual in both being only children, with no siblings, and not having children of their own. All of this should point to a population that increases every generation if not doubling outright. Young people (and their ideologies!) should rapidly outnumber the old with an ever-increasing effect and impact on society. However, the Shire has a surprisingly stable history; it never seems to increase or decrease greatly in population, and the bell curve of age seems⦠demographically balanced? There certainly isnāt a conflict from rising young bloods challenging the middle-aged reactionaries; thereās no unemployment; there are no housing crises or waves of emigration, or even a tendency for young people leaving home to marry. Meanwhile, not only does the Shire not suffer from internal pressures, but it remains obscure and hardly noticed in global politics.
What makes sense here is that adult hobbits form a loose group. Four parents in a polycule, between them all, may produce four children. All four parents claim to have four children. An outsider would assume this meant the adults had eight children.
Hobbits therefore are not especially fertile or fecund. They simply have large families. Much of their interest in genealogy is due to the complex relationships of blood-kin, hearth-kin, love-kin and pledge-kin, who must all be carefully tracked and measured - not just because you need to make sure that you donāt climb into bed with an un-permitted degree of blood-kin, but to track family alliances and carefully quantify the precise level of thoughtfulness to put into the proper present to gift your fatherās loverās lover (too much implies a degree of intimacy that might upset the polycule.)
Thus, while a hobbit matron may tell a startled dwarf that she has seven sons, she might only have borne five of them herself, and have one hearth-son by her wife, and a pledge-son of her first husbandās. There are between three and four fathers involved at various stages of production, from conception to pledge-duty, but there is debate about the precise number of fathers, as one child was festival-conceived and therefore provisionally pledged to the Brandybucks until more distinctive paternal traits should materialise. Itās expected that four of the sons will be uninterested in women, and their contribution to family life will be in raising hearth-children and pledge-duty. However, this level of detail is normally negotiated later in conversation, as a mutual overture of friendship. So sheās just clear and simple: yes, certainly, she has seven sons. Yes, theyāre all hers. Yes, thatās fairly normal - yes, hobbits like big families. How big? Thatās really hard to say! Well, about thirteen hobbits live in her house⦠er, she has forty-three nieces and nephews. Yes! She has nine siblings, thatās correct, but some of them are still babies themselves..
In this way, a bewildered dwarf might assume that hobbits are absurdly fertile, producing an average of seven children per couple, at an absurd pace.
When in fact, with about half of hobbits never bearing biological children, the population of hobbits is pretty much always the same.
Tl:dr, hobbit population works perfectly well, both internally and in the perceptions of outsiders, if the majority of the Shire is gay, theyāre all polyamorous, and they all firmly claim to be parents of high numbers of children. Of course Frodo fathered Samās kids - he named them! They were pledge-kin but not hearth-kin, as Frodo needed a lot of quiet and stability in the home.
No outsider ever parses hobbit genealogy well enough to understand this except for Gandalf, who never explains anything either.
Okay, reblogged this too quickly out of enthusiasm.
This makes so much sense in the worldbuilding, actually???
Like, consider: Elves don't understand hobbit families, but hobbits are also baffled by elf families. You have exactly one partner ever? And it's considered wildly inappropriate to take another even if that partner straight up dies? And they only raise their own children, usually three maximum? Most hobbits would be convinced that elves were cold, unfeeling and anti-social.
Bilbo is percieved as oddly elf-ish when he comes back from his adventure at least in part because he only takes on one hearth-child, and even then quite late in his life. Like sure dude, you don't have to have romantic or sexual partners but no children????? Very strange. Here. Take a Frodo. Maybe he'll fix whatever is wrong with your brain.
And this also explains why hobbits get on better with Elrond than most other elves. Because Elrond has a weird af family by elf standards and takes in foster children all the time. He seems much warmer by comparison. Basically, when Bilbo comes to stay at the Last Homely House and he's doing his writing Elrond would be thrown by how comfortable Bilbo is with his family.
Elrond: My apologies, I know this must be quite confusing for you.
Bilbo: No no I understand perfectly. You have two blood-parents (Elwing and Earendil), two hearth-parents (Maglor and Maedhros), one blood-brother (Elros), and one pledge-brother (Gil-galad). Certainly a bit unconventional due to the kinslaying and all, and a bit on the small side, but other than that...
Elrond, who has never in his life had his family called 'small': ...
You get it
I need detailed breakdowns on the differences between blood-, hearth-, love-, and pledge-kin STAT
Blood - biologically related
Hearth - lives in your home, presently
Pledge - legal documentation on some sort of āvow,ā of familial connection, like a legal marriage or adoption or birth certificate, and maybe also something like a fealty/apprenticeship in some cultures?
Love - you love them so they are kin on an emotional level, regardless of biology, where they live, or legal documentation.
I really like this a lot & it makes a lot of sense. I wonder how the whole ācabbage patch hobbitsā reproduction would affect this! Like, that way, you canāt even rely on matrilineal genealogy, because biological parentage is nonbinary & sexless - any two, or maybe even fewer or greater numbers of bio parents could be involved in procreation.
Yeah you got it!
I think any cabbage-patch shenanigans would come under āblood.ā Thus leading dismayed outsiders to ask: why do plants count as blood????? Why are plants blood!!!!!!!
Reblogging because it got even better!
I don't even care about LOTR, but I am a fan of positive polyamory.
no worse feeling than going on some subculture fashion clothing website and seeing the size chart runs from extra small to petite to pequeƱo to microscopique. yeah here at DeathKillFuckShadow Fantastique Cloth Imaginations i think youāll find that we see the world a bit difference⦠we have bleak brutal imaginations⦠what if blood and fangs were COOL⦠but we cannot in our most tortured imaginations picture a woman who has a stouter frame than the fucking Insulindian Phasmid
im going to fix my entire life
When?
Like Um. later
preview of my artwork for the vampire zine š¦
give it up for girls with vaginas and boys with penises
pause i forgot cis people exist this was intended as a celebration of bottom surgery
You've heard about the Madonna/Whore complex, now I propose Mary/Medea: a fictional mother must be an absolute perfect selfless saint whose identity revolves solely around her children, or else be a selfish abusive demon with no redeeming qualities whatsoever
Bugs Bunny accidentally transformed the word nimrod into a synonym for idiot because nobody got a joke where he sarcastically compared Elmer Fudd to the Biblical figure Nimrod, a mighty hunter.
Etymology is ridiculous and terrifying sometimes
Bugs Bunny is more powerful than God
He also solidified the idea of rabbits loving carrots when carrots actually carry very little nutritional value for rabbits. The funniest part of that is that the original joke was a reference to a Clark Gable film where Gable munches on a carrot, it was never meant to imply that rabbits love carrots. The Clark Gable reference wouldāve been obvious to audiences in the 40s but it has been pretty much lost to time.
Bugs Bunny has too much power and should be feared.
stop exposing these Bugs Bunny secrets heās taking out the whistleblowers one at a time in reverse order
āPeople should pass a test before being allowed to have kids.ā āIsnāt it scary how white people have this inborn capacity for evil?ā āIāll never pass because males and females have different skull shapes.ā āAutistic people have a stronger sense of justice than anyone else.ā āI donāt want AMABs in my space because theyāre dangerous.ā āYou shouldnāt have access to hormones if you dress like THAT.ā āAnyone who does something that awful isnāt human.ā āSome people really shouldnāt be allowed to vote.ā
This is eugenics. This is phrenology. THIS IS NAZI SHIT, YOU ARE A LEFTIST BUYING INTO NAZI SHIT. YOU ARE NOT IMMUNE TO NAZI SHIT.
A vocal amount of "liberals" on tumblr are actually just facists who's version of "correct" is liberal coded.
So for the people in the back. Facism is bad. Not just because of who it hates (which is also bad don't piss on the poor here) it's just bad.
Biological determinism is bad. Literally no matter what its a form of racsism and misogyny.
Dictating what anyone must do or not do to their body is bad! No matter what! Infriging on bodily automy is evil!
Don't be Nazis.
I was rewatching Shaun's video on a certain Series Not To Be Named. One of the things he points out is that the main character doesnt really have a moral core. There are no such things as good and bad actions in that story, only good and bad teams. You can make fun of fat people if youre a good guy but it's reprehensible if one of the bad guys teases your guy for being fat. You can segregate peoples if youre the good authoritarian ministry, but not the bad one.
I say that to illustrate: some of you have never examined your biases, never really thought about the implications and ramifications of some of your ideas, and how those things could be abused in the wrong hands. Not that they would be any more correct in the so-called "right" hands, because there is often no such thing as the "right" hands. Everyone is capable of being corrupted. Given the right propaganda, the right fuel, the right match, everyone can be turned against vulnerable people.
Everyone is equally capable of evil. (Theyre all equally capable of redemption but my point is about immorality.)
You can be a far leftist and still have a fascist mindset about certain things.
Just because you're a transgender person doesn't mean you don't have biases against transgender people. Just because you're a woman doesn't mean you might not have an implicit bias against women.
Just because you are a person of colour doesn't mean you might not have implicit biases against people of colour.
We all have biases-- pretending we don't honestly just makes things so much worse. It's just a fact of living in a society, we ALL have biases.
Some of them, we're aware of. For example, I can tell you right now I have a MASSIVE bias against donald trump and I get angry every time I see his face. I even get irritated when people use the word 'trump,' like 'Ace trumps King'. His face and his name make me angry, and anyone who even tries to convince me he's a decent person? I have a bias against them, too. I KNOW this is a bias. It's not an implicit bias, it is one I am very, very well aware of.
Other biases, we might not actually be aware of (implicit biases). There's a good list here about different types of biases we all have. It's not extensive, but it can give you an idea of some of the biases people might have.
Many of us have grown up in societies that prioritise certain demographics. I've grown up in a society that prioritises wealthy, thin, conventionally 'attractive' able-bodied cis-het white men. And a lot of you have, too. So naturally, we can develop implicit biases against the people who are not in these demographics-- even when we ourselves are not in these demographics.
When you are aware of your biases, it's a lot easier to catch yourself when you're saying or thinking or doing something led by these biases.
How do you figure out what some of these biases are? I'm sure there are a lot of things out there like this, but one thing I know about is a bias checker from Harvard university.
For adults 18+ you can learn more about your biases with regards to age, skin tone, weight, race, Native American cultures, gender and career (for example, how most people will assume a nurse is a woman and a doctor is a man), transgender people, Muslim people, Asians, Disability, gender with regards to science and liberal arts, Jewish people, sexuality, weapons, Arab people, Hispanic people and they've also added one on presidents. I'm sure you can guess how I scored on that one.
There is also a Project Implicit Youth for those under 18 that look at more general concepts like dogs vs cat.
(obviously, the unspoken implicit bias of a Harvard University bias test is that it is highly Americanised, but it's still a good way to learn more about yourself regardless).
The more you know about your own implicit biases, and how you view the world, the easier it is to face those biases and start trying to work through them. To control your biases instead of being controlled by them.
āPeople should pass a test before being allowed to have kids.ā āIsnāt it scary how white people have this inborn capacity for evil?ā āIāll never pass because males and females have different skull shapes.ā āAutistic people have a stronger sense of justice than anyone else.ā āI donāt want AMABs in my space because theyāre dangerous.ā āYou shouldnāt have access to hormones if you dress like THAT.ā āAnyone who does something that awful isnāt human.ā āSome people really shouldnāt be allowed to vote.ā
This is eugenics. This is phrenology. THIS IS NAZI SHIT, YOU ARE A LEFTIST BUYING INTO NAZI SHIT. YOU ARE NOT IMMUNE TO NAZI SHIT.
A vocal amount of "liberals" on tumblr are actually just facists who's version of "correct" is liberal coded.
So for the people in the back. Facism is bad. Not just because of who it hates (which is also bad don't piss on the poor here) it's just bad.
Biological determinism is bad. Literally no matter what its a form of racsism and misogyny.
Dictating what anyone must do or not do to their body is bad! No matter what! Infriging on bodily automy is evil!
Don't be Nazis.
I was rewatching Shaun's video on a certain Series Not To Be Named. One of the things he points out is that the main character doesnt really have a moral core. There are no such things as good and bad actions in that story, only good and bad teams. You can make fun of fat people if youre a good guy but it's reprehensible if one of the bad guys teases your guy for being fat. You can segregate peoples if youre the good authoritarian ministry, but not the bad one.
I say that to illustrate: some of you have never examined your biases, never really thought about the implications and ramifications of some of your ideas, and how those things could be abused in the wrong hands. Not that they would be any more correct in the so-called "right" hands, because there is often no such thing as the "right" hands. Everyone is capable of being corrupted. Given the right propaganda, the right fuel, the right match, everyone can be turned against vulnerable people.
Everyone is equally capable of evil. (Theyre all equally capable of redemption but my point is about immorality.)
M*A*S*H | 3.07 - "Check-up"
Hawkeye my bisexual icon i miss you
(screenshot redraw from 5x11 - Hawkeye Get Your Gun)
Malcolm in the Middle ā 2.11: Old Mrs. Old
I saw this video about a doctor who performed an MRI on a 5 year old and discovered she essentially had ābrain damageā from excessive iPad use, as the white matter in her brain couldnāt form properly due to an understimulated environment.
Hmm itās almost like thereās supposed to be adult figures responsible for monitoring her screen time and making sure she develops properly⦠certainly this isnāt the result of neglect at the hands of her parentsā¦
āThis 5 year old is brain damaged by excessive iPad useā
Translation: This 5 year old is developmentally impaired by neglectful parents who used an iPad as a stand-in for social and environmental stimulation / interaction for hours at a time during critical early stages of child development. The iPad is the cop-out.
āChildren donāt have the strength to hold pencils anymore because they only use screens.ā
Translation: Parents arenāt making the conscious effort to help their children develop necessary skills and letting iPads raise them.
When are people going to realize the iPads and whatnot are the instruments through which the neglect is happening through and not the cause? How the fuck do you let your child have such a severe lack of physical strength in their hands that they canāt hold a pencil properly?
People will see a study suggesting children with higher screen times have poorer or negative developmental outcomes and immediately say itās the screens causing this, and not the more likely fact that higher screen time = less engagement time with their environment, physical exercise, parents, family, and their peers, all of which are NECESSARY for a healthy upbringing as a social species.
Itās like saying a dog who was kept in a cage all its life and left with atrophied muscles was damaged by the cage, and not by the fact its owners were too lazy to play or walk their dog in order for its muscles to build properly. The cage is the instrument of neglect and the owners are the perpetrators, in the same way parents are the perpetrators and weaponizing screen time as an excuse and painting themselves as helpless bystanders.
Not like it's hard to snatch something out of a kids hands and put it on the top shelf.
When will they realise that it's simply that easy to not have kids on screens all day? Just yoink the thing out of their hands and say "no more", and the kid may throw a tantrum for 5 minutes or so, and then proceed to find something else to do.
Also, on a small tangent, kids media is becoming duller and dumber with each generation. I hate Dora the Explorer (she needs glasses), but when you compare that with today's shows, she's smart as hell.
So, pair mind numbing media with neglectful parents, and of course you're gonna have kids with developmental issues.
Back in my day, we had science shows, Bob Ross kind of DIY shows for kids, stuff that made us think.
The problem is the parents are the ones who shove the ipad in the kids' hands.
They don't have to sit and read with the kid, they don't have to talk to the kid.
Shove it in their hands and let the microphone speak (now the kids don't know how to read because they don't have to, the tech reads to them).
Hit voice transcribe (now the kids don't have to write because the tech will write it for them).
Parents can drink their wine and go on reddit or watch reality tv junk food without the kids bothering them.
The parents are the problem.
This isn't all that new. I am an Old, and my parents shoved us in front of a tv. TV raised me, not my parents. The difference is, as you say, there were things like Bob Ross teaching how to actually do things. Reading Rainbow and Sesame Street encouraging kids to learn and grow. Educational shows that encouraged kids to use our fucking brains.
Now those kids are not on public access, and the kids are just doomscrolling.
Yes! You managed to put it better!
And, especially now with so much slop going around and so easy to access, the kids don't have to learn how to do anything anymore.
I miss the shows of up to, like, 15~20 years ago (when my cousins were little) where they would see something and then we'd come back and find them putting dish soap, vinegar and bicarbonate in a bottle because "I saw them doing it and wanted to see if it's real!". It was hell to clean up, but at least they were learning something.
Long before social media, Bob Ross encouraged people to paint and send him pictures of what they were making.
Reading Rainbow ran contests in schools with businesses (I believe internationally because they had them in my schools) for kids to read a certain number of books on a list and businesses would give you discounts on things like sweets and snacks after school.
I don't have kids (thank the gods) but I've seen clips of things in passing or watching kids on the train etc. and all the shows do now are just scream and be incredibly annoying.
Read to your fucking kids.
Write with your fucking kids
Draw with your fucking kids
Do maths and science and poetry and french and politics and philosophy with your kids
Teach your kids how to deal with financial shit. Teach them how to change the oil in the car.
Or don't fucking have them. If you cannot do this much, don't have them. It's cruel to bring them into this world and absolutely ruin them.
Chrissake.
Things are bad now? My brother's children are almost old enough to go to university and they literally cannot read or write. They've had iphones and ipads their whole lives to read to them and to write what they say. They literally cannot tell you the difference between the letters in the alphabet. One of them is 17. He's never poured a bowl of cereal for himself.
Things are going to get so, so much worse. People need to go into HYPER over correction right now.
Oh, definitely!
We're gonna have a whole generation of people who can't make a microwave dinner.
We really need more parents that can say "let me show you how to do it, then next time you'll be able to do it by yourself", and less "I'll do it for you" too!
I know there's a lot of discourse about "asking people to have a license to have kids/therapy/psychological evaluations is infringing on their reproductive rights!" but then... We see stuff like this, and I say that at least some basic "how to deal with kids at each developmental stage that doesn't include shoving an iPad on its hands and calling it a day" classes that are heavily recommended by their doctors...
I think the whole 'people should have a license to have kids' thing cos that very quickly devolves into eugenics, white supremacy and madness. So I have a really big problem with it.
But I do think better education and accessibility for everyone at all levels and all ages, and safe spaces for kids to go and learn if their parents are shitheads.
Also, the Scandinavian countries have it right trying to push 4 day weeks and 6 hour days. There are good people out there who probably want to spend time with their kids but are so shattered by the time they get home after working three jobs, they just can't deal with it and putting the screen in the kid's hand is just easier.
So some of it is just shitheads who won't parent, and some of it is just people who are being burnt to cinders by society and cannot handle any more.
Either way, everyone deserves more support. Even the shitheads.
Yeah. Like, I see how it can easily fall into eugenics. But at least being heavily encouraged by their doctors and peers to take parenting classes should be a thing, and blocking off mommy blogs by people who say "this is how I do [extremely impractical and complex thing] at home for my 15 kids!" in a pristine dress and acting like that's normal and expected from a mother when she actually has 3 maids and 7 babysitters.
And, yes. Everyone deserves more support, even people who don't understand the "it takes a village to raise a kid". Especially those.
Sidenote, I could rant for weeks on how I feel about family vlogging, and the way children are used for monetary gain by their parents⦠I think itās one of the worst and most vicious things that have been created with social media. I really⦠I⦠I have opinions on that. And none of them are kind to the family vlogging. People who create social media for their children the moment theyāre born and then have every moment of their life uploaded on social media⦠I consider that abuse.
With regards to tech and kids, I do think the tech companies do have some culpability. They have designed this tech to be as addictive as possible. Social media works in the exact same way of gambling. The doom scrolling, and now this AI shit that is not only going to accelerate the destruction of this planet and frankly I feel ourselves. I do think these tech companies have some culpability in how fucking addictive they have made everything.
I think if thereās a future that doesnāt end with us destroying the entire fucking planet, people are going to look back at this period with astonishment at how we allowed tech to completely overtake every aspect of our lives. I think ā I hope ā that if there is some future of humanity, they are going to look back at us with horror. Horror at what weāve done to ourselves, to this planets, and what we allowed to happen ā encouraged ā pleaded to happen.
Ultimately, I do believe that it is still down to the parents to take the screens away. I donāt think that is something that governments are capable of legislating because tech giants will always bring in money and governments only care about money. Never people. Ultimately it is up to the adults to put the screens down and actually have a conversation with children and each other, and try to have time off-line that and use their brains, and teach their kids to use their brains. I think we all know thatās not going to happen.
But to play devils advocate here, if they cannot put the screens down themselves? If we cannot put the iPads down ourselves? If we cannot bother to look something up in a book rather than AI and Google, can we be that surprised that five-year-old brains are being damaged? Because our brains are being damaged as well. And no one seems to care? AI has been out there for just a few years, and every study that comes out keeps saying this shit is dangerous for us. But we keep building more and more data centres. We keep bulldozing toward our own destruction. And the planet, quite frankly.
The species is a train wreck. I have no answers for how weāre supposed to get out of it other than just hope for a Revolution-type apocalypse where someone just pulls the plug, and we cannot turn this shit on anymore. I donāt know whether that would be a better apocalypse than the one weāre facing? I donāt know.
All I know is that we have done this to ourselves.
And on that incredibly cheerful note, please have this gif of a dog bottle feeding a lamb. Just that we donāt end up all having a horrible day.
the way that the iwtv fandom Is is really interesting to me because on my third time around i've noticed a pattern. every time a new season comes out everyone gets really mad at it, talking about how racist, sexist, homophobic, etc it is (often mixing genuine critique with blatant misrepresentations of the text) to demonize the show and the writers, while saying how well done the last season was. but then the next season comes out and everyone talks about how uniquely shitty this one is, while glamorizing the last one.
when season 2 finished airing all i saw were complaints about it; how bad the pacing was, how many flaws the writing had, how problematic certain scenes were, how horrible the finale was; and now that tvl is over and done with, i've seen so much praise for season 2. how good the pacing was, how the writing was so much better in the first 2 seasons, and how bigoted it's gotten because there were no black writers this season.
which to be clear isn't to say that the show is perfect and has no issues and that the writers are all saints without a single hint of bias (or that i don't have any of my own complaints about this season), but that the storm of controversy before the inevitable calm has been an interesting pattern to witness.
I agree. There is no conversation, no discourse-- just shredding.
I call this the Fandom Ouroboros. Where the fandoms just constantly eat themselves as they demand more of the same every time something new is given to them, get used to the new thing, eat that, and then scream because something else is new again.
The franchise I think of it most is Star Trek.
'The movies aren't REALLY Star Trek! They'll never be as good as the original show.'
'Next Generation is HORRIBLE! A bald captain?? It will never be as perfect as the original and the films.'
'Deep Space Nine is just so DARK! Why can't it be like Next Gen! And Sisko? Where's Picard!'
'Voyager can't be real Star Trek-- not if there's a vagina in that chair! Give me Sisko any day. He's a real captain.'
'Enterprise will NEVER be Trek, I won't ever accept it! It's no Voyager, that's for sure.'
Discovery? Over my dead body. I'll watch Enterprise any day.'
And so, and so, and so and so and so.
I have seen this phenomenon in a LOT of different fandoms-- especially long running ones. Some M*A*S*H fans won't watch the later years because Trapper isn't there. Obviously the Supernatural fans are in there. Marvel and DC- they all have things they won't watch because so and so is in it or not in it or directing or not or whatever. Star Wars does this and is probably even more toxic than the Trekkies.
But I have never seen this phenomenon in such a concentrated into a show that only has 3 full seasons.
I haven't seen a fandom call out for cancellation of the show and sending death threats to the writers 3 seasons in.
Wild.
Who knew that a show about toxic people who always make the wrong choices and try to shred each other would attract so many terrible people who always make the wrong choices and try to shred each other?
āPeople should pass a test before being allowed to have kids.ā āIsnāt it scary how white people have this inborn capacity for evil?ā āIāll never pass because males and females have different skull shapes.ā āAutistic people have a stronger sense of justice than anyone else.ā āI donāt want AMABs in my space because theyāre dangerous.ā āYou shouldnāt have access to hormones if you dress like THAT.ā āAnyone who does something that awful isnāt human.ā āSome people really shouldnāt be allowed to vote.ā
This is eugenics. This is phrenology. THIS IS NAZI SHIT, YOU ARE A LEFTIST BUYING INTO NAZI SHIT. YOU ARE NOT IMMUNE TO NAZI SHIT.
A vocal amount of "liberals" on tumblr are actually just facists who's version of "correct" is liberal coded.
So for the people in the back. Facism is bad. Not just because of who it hates (which is also bad don't piss on the poor here) it's just bad.
Biological determinism is bad. Literally no matter what its a form of racsism and misogyny.
Dictating what anyone must do or not do to their body is bad! No matter what! Infriging on bodily automy is evil!
Don't be Nazis.