kill yourself
Sade Olutola

ellievsbear
official daine visual archive
No title available
RMH
No title available
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
No title available
𩵠avery cochrane đŠľ
tumblr dot com
No title available

No title available

@theartofmadeline
Xuebing Du

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
we're not kids anymore.
YOU ARE THE REASON
Misplaced Lens Cap

romaâ

bliss lane
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Colombia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Colombia
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Latvia

seen from United States
seen from Vietnam

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Sweden
seen from Brazil
seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Switzerland
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Belgium

seen from Saudi Arabia
@womynsreality
kill yourself
Man, it's really embarrassing to be anti JKR in 2026... because that means that every single time a wave of hate for her went around, over and over and over again, you never got curious enough to fact check. You never went to the source, you blindly swallowed every lie, and years later you're still parroting laughably false ideas like that she "funds a trans genocide." OR, even worse, you did read her measured and thoughtful essay, then saw the vile misogyny she received in response, and said "Ah, yes. I will side with the misogynists."
JKR is a feminist, a philanthropist, and very arguably the most accomplished author of our time. We have a whole subculture of iconoclasts who want nothing more than to erase this woman and her accomplishments, but all their years of effort has led to exactly nothing. Hogwarts Legacy was hugely successful. The Strike books are hugely successful. The Harry Potter HBO trailer is already their number one trailer. JKR just keeps on winning, and honestly? No one deserves it more. Good for her.
all this "TME/TMA" discourse and the transmascvoicesproject drama is just proof of how full of shit the trans community is when they say they pride themselves on being above the gender binary and bioessentialism and all that... like holy shit. they arguably participate in that crap just as hard as conservative christian evangelicals it's W-I-L-D! what do women always get told when they accuse a man of DV or rape? "liar." "oh please, you had it coming" "you know you're ruining a man's life talking like this right?"
and how are the lovely trans "women" on this hellsite responding when this account comes up for trans men to anonymously share their stories about about their experiences with abuse from them? SAME. BULLSHIT. "you're hurting us!" "they're LIARS!" "WE'RE the victims here!" right. but male and female socialization definitely isn't a thing, trans women are totally real women, and this community 100% isn't horribly bigoted to everyone who is biologically female regardless of whether or not they identify with their birth sex. uh-huh. oh, and the earth is flat too.
Why is porn the only media category that's allowed to be as offensive as possible?
The level of racism and ableism in a lot of mainstream porn would (rightfully) upset most libfems if it was in any other category of media, but it's somehow okay just because it's porn? Why is porn immune to any criticisms of it's racist / homophobic / misogynistic / ableist content the way no other media category is?
There's a slave category of porn where black women are abused like slaves by white men, or black women are portrayed like savage beasts with no self control, or Asian women are portrayed as docile and submissive to the extreme and fetishized for it, or there's hijab porn specifically fetishizing women who wear a hijab, or or
This would (rightfully) cause a major outcry in any other category of media. "But its just a fantasy!" So is any other category of media that would (rightfully) be criticized for portraying such offensive and bigoted content. Why is porn above such criticism?
Because porn itself is built on an inherently offensive system that dehumanizes women. And on some level, I think libfems and other faux progressives know this. Thatâs why they can excuse all the other bad stuff because porn itself is offensive already. There are no expectations of anything better.
TRAs love saying âbelieve people are who they say they areâ except when it comes to lesbians saying they donât like dick and not even if itâs attached to someone whoâs altered themselves to look like a woman.
Well as a bi woman, I trust lesbians to know who they are. They say theyâre female people only capable of being attracted to other female people.
So, I believe it. I donât have to know what itâs like to only be attracted to one sex. I just believe women are what they say they are.
I think I get what you're trying to say now.
you're lying about healthcare and disfiguring children because you desperately want people to notice you're lying about "not liking" cock. you need to be dicked down really good but you just can't admit it, so this is your way of trying to get it.
So Iâm not even a lesbian and have never lied about not liking cock. In fact, as a bisexual, I would like a good dicking. I guess my âcisâ pussy just wants to envelope a dick so bad that itâs making me defend lesbians from weirdos and predatory online behavior
i'm tired of this weird dichotomy in people's worldview - you're either an absolutely inclusive individual, uncritically absorbing every rule and information that's currently *in*, or you're a seething conservative, unable to think and feel, basically a second mengele in modern clothes, if you voice even the slightest concern with what's happening culturally and socially
it's like there's no in-between, any kind of discussion is pointless when you get blind aggression and slurs in response. this cultish hivemind-esque model of receiving and instantly rejecting information can't be healthy or even natural for us - thinking, curious and info-processing creatures
People treat TIMs fears and womenâs fears vastly different.
A TIM scared to go outside and scared to interact with people, including other men, is considered by progressives and leftists not paranoid, but reasonably fearful. Itâs such a scary time to be trans, they say. Thereâs a genocide going on, they claim. Itâs perfectly understandable that a trans woman is scared and wants his transfem spaces, his communities, his transfem specific resources.
A woman is scared to be around men, wants her own spaces of just women, or goes out of her way to avoid men, sheâs being paranoid. Sheâs just been watching too much true crime. Not every man is out to get her, sheâs so emotionally swayed by online stories that arenât even true. She needs to go to therapy, itâs not other peopleâs responsibility to deal with her trauma, she just shouldnât go outside if sheâs so scared. Sheâll be lectured about how sheâs promoting racism even if she isnât even white. Her wanting female only spaces is her being hateful and paranoid. A leftist man will go on about how trans women are being murdered and thereâs a genocide and they can never ever go to Texas or Florida, if they live there they need to leave or they will die, and then in the next breath say women are crazy and paranoid for being scared of men sometimes.
So, last night at philosophy club, we finally got into the trans/gender ideology debate. On one hand, i was excited because for the first time i said what i needed to say in a semi-public venue; it felt good to get a lot of it off my chest and let people know where i stand. On the other, i was left incredibly disheartened by the fact that in a group of 5 women and 1 man, the only one who backed me up was the man. One of the women did have things to say about transitioning children that I appreciated, but for the most part, the other women were glad to throw their fellow females under the bus to uphold this ideology.
my sister is a case manager and has trans clients, so i can extend some respect there, that it's literally her job to get resources for these people. i tried to make it clear that i don't wish harm on trans people and i do believe they are marginalized as well and are deserving of legal and physical protections; it's bizarre to have people who KNOW ME, my own sister and friends, assuming that i think any GNC people should be thrown out into the cold with nothing. it just shows how deep this shit the brainwashing runs, that they can't separate me as a person from ideology. but why, i ask over and over again, WHY must this be at the expense of women's safety? why is it ALWAYS at the expense of women?
i don't even want to say "natal women" or "biological women" anymore because all that does is reinforce their claims. i'm also not going to use to the term 'trans women' anymore but will stick with 'trans identifying males.'
one of the girls there ended with "well for my part i just want to say that i'm personally comfortable welcoming all different types of people into the bubble fo womanhood" ok that's great for you, but what about women who have suffered at the hands of males? women with trauma? little girls who aren't ready to see a naked male body? it really illuminated to me how complicit women are in their own oppression and i'm feeling really fucking down about it today. the hatred for women just runs so deep, i feel like i can't even wrap my mind around it.
if you believe male-bodied people belong in women's spaces you're just a fucking freak. i'm so done. you don't care about women. you ARE comfortable with women being SA'd and raped if you think TIMs belong in female spaces. i'm so done... i'm more done than i've ever been.
I donât even know what an âenbyâ is anymore. Let alone how it differs from nonbinary.
And Iâm glad for it.
TRAs love saying âbelieve people are who they say they areâ except when it comes to lesbians saying they donât like dick and not even if itâs attached to someone whoâs altered themselves to look like a woman.
Well as a bi woman, I trust lesbians to know who they are. They say theyâre female people only capable of being attracted to other female people.
So, I believe it. I donât have to know what itâs like to only be attracted to one sex. I just believe women are what they say they are.
people telling radfems to focus on the actual men oppressing women, as if trans ideology isn't a more insidious branch of the same ole misogynistic, patriarchal rhetoric keeping women oppressed. wrapping this rhetoric in a progressive bow does not make it any less misogynistic and patriarchal. it does not make the tactics of these activists any less abusive or manipulative.
I truly view it as more insidious because the majority of women have developed the tools to immediately see an openly misogynistic man for what he is. Many girls and women may fall victim to abusive men in relationships for various reasons, but on a political scale, we are very much aware that far right men and MRA types are anti-women and wish to dismantle feminism. Thereâs no denying it when they say âfeminism is ruining societyâ and âwomen belong in the kitchenâ and vote against our reproductive rights. And for the most part, these men are not hiding it. They also donât pretend to be women or assume roles in our spaces. They tend to stick to other spaces and overtly take on the role of misogynistic man with contempt for women.
We know this behavior and we can dismiss him for the misogynist he is without hesitation.
But the misogynistic TIMs? Theyâre actively pretending to be women, insisting that they are women and have ALWAYS been women. They appropriate our experiences. They infiltrate historically female only spaces and communities (Iâm not even a lesbian but the amount of literal males walking around calling themselves lesbians is infuriating), and then call us bigots for protesting it. They speak over women and attempt to rewrite the history of feminism. They advocate for completely redefining the word woman.
These are men taking on the role of a woman and silencing real women but with the support of supposedly progressive movements.
We donât have to worry about leftists publicly protecting MRAs from criticism. But when it comes to trans women, leftists themselves will completely turn against women and label us bigots.
These are the only size-able group of males who get to live in progressive spaces while perpetuating misogyny and being regarded as the most vulnerable members of the group.
it feels so disingenuous whenever i see posts about how feminists are causing trans murders because they always make it seem like trans people are getting shot by lesbians who hate penises and not by violent men targeting sex workers
or they're talking about feminists driving them to suicide, which is an emotional manipulation tactic often used by abusers to maintain control of their victims.
Yeah I was recently told I have âliteral bloodâ on my hands because I argued with a trans woman that gendered socialization is a real, observable thing
"When a woman points out a man is being misogynistic I wonder if there's something wrong with her"
I love when you say something about men and they rush to tell you to pick better.
Like, I do pick better. I have never personally been assaulted, abused, or in a relationship where any mistreatment or disrespect ever took place.
But I write about such things because I care very deeply about the women who DO go through these things.
The fact that men's lives are so self-contained and myopic that all THEY have to worry about is the singular, individual girlfriend they choose is so telling. The fact that they think we're complaining about a "few bad boyfriends" is so telling. The fact that they assume we're talking about romantic relationships at all when we're in fact talking about widespread rape and discrimination from total strangers is so telling.
Imagine what a privilege it is that all you have to worry about is what girl you're dating, to the point where you assume any feminist speaking about men is speaking about HER boyfriend or ex.
While straight menâs desire for womenâs bodies is often portrayed as an incredibly powerful force, many menâs notorious confusion about what produces female orgasm, their disinterest in providing oral sex to women, and their dramatically narrow ideas about what constitutes a female body worth desiring (waxed, shaved, scented, dieted, young, etc.) suggests that heteromasculinity is characterized by a much weaker and far more conditional desire for womenâs bodies than is often claimed.
Jane Ward, The Tragedy of Heterosexuality
Tumblr in 1860 probably: Please remember that some people NEED their slaves due to disabilities that prevent them from performing labor on their own. Donât shame disabled slave owners.Â
liberal feminists on tumblr in 1860: have you ever considered that some slaves LIKE working on the plantations, and some female slaves CHOOSE to have sex with their masters?
Some slaves want freedom and some slaves want to perform unpaid labor and be property, and that is OK too. Freedom is about CHOICE đđđ đĽđ đ đ