Doug Jones
occasionally subtle
h
gracie abrams
bliss lane
Aqua Utopia｜海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
YOU ARE THE REASON
Mike Driver
Love Begins
Andulka
𓃗
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
tannertan36
almost home
Not today Justin
No title available
The Bowery Presents
Cosmic Funnies
Product Placement
noise dept.
seen from United States
seen from Japan
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from France
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Türkiye
seen from Iceland
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Indonesia
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from Vietnam
@ycungconservatixe
Life imitates art in the shittiest ways.
Wow people in suits sitting in a semicui really says alot about our society :/
Have you fucks never seen a table
They sure are sitting next to each other
Wow they’re sitting at a table how sexist
More like art imitates life. You know how long that set up has been that way... right? They definitely didn't just build that place and base the architectural design off the show.
Also....
Men sitting in a semi-circle!
Is this what Hillary meant when she said that the left shouldn't be civil with the right?
Believe Girls Believe Women. 20x28 watercolor
Let’s get used to the idea that some discomfort is a good thing when trying to improve yourself and your habits. Dieting is uncomfortable. Quitting a bad habit is uncomfortable. Working on yourself is uncomfortable. Stop conflating self care with only comfort. Sometimes the best self care is uncomfortable.
Okay but diets don’t work and are actually damaging. I think what you mean is a permanent lifestyle change for eating and exercise is uncomfortable. Which is true, it is!
But it’s good for you
You need to diet to some extent if you want to lose weight. Diet isn’t a dirty word.
Not really, dude: 1 & 2
Diets don’t do shit. You need to permanently change your eating habits to have results that actually last
Changing your eating habits IS the diet.
Yeah and if you want actual results that LAST, you need to PERMANENTLY change it. To which it’s no longer a diet, it’s a lifestyle change.
When people say “Go on a diet”, 9 times outta 10, they mean “dramatically decrease the amount of food you eat and completely cut this particular food/ingredient out of your life for a week to a month and bam! Results!”
Which yes, you WILL get results.But the second you go back to eating what you were before and no longer on said diet, you’ll gain back all the weight you just lost and in many cases, more weight than you had before. Because you starved your body and it doesn’t know when it’s next good meal will come, so it holds onto EVERYTHING you eat and stores it as fat.
Something you go on for a week to a few months is a diet. And they’re dangerous, and do nothing. Permanently changing your eating habits is not a diet, it is a lifestyle change. Diets are meant to be temporary, and that’s why they don’t work.
Well, if you overeat, you SHOULD eat less. You can exercise til you’re blue in the face but if you’re still consuming more calories than you’re burning, you need to not eat so much. A lot of obesity would be solved with eating healthier and eating less. Which makes dieting necessary for a huge portion of the USA and other countries with obesity epidemics.
Okay clearly you’re not understanding the most basic crap.
There’s a big fuckin’ difference between eating LESS, and eating practically NOTHING. Having a protein shake, an apple, and a glass of water, and having that be your meal all day EVERYDAY, is not fucking healthy. Did you know that’s a real diet that celebrity UI did in South Korea?
What you’re not getting is that DIETS. ARE. TEMPORARY. The point of a diet, is for it to be a temporary thing. It’s marketed as a quick way to lose a lot of weight.
And they are. But the way you go about them is not healthy. 90% of diets tell you to be eating an average of 1000 calories a day. Did you know the average adult female needs 2000 calories a day?And that the average male needs 2,500? So what happens when you’re taking in literally HALF the calories your body needs to stay functioning? It starts to starve and get sick. And then when you try to go BACK to eating what you were before, or even TRY to be slightly healthier with your old eating habits, you’ve STARVED YOUR BODY to the point that it doesn’t know what proper food is and will either throw it all back up, or store it all as fat.
Diets don’t do shit except make you fatter once you’re done said diet. If you want to lose weight and keep it off and be healthier, you need to figure out how many calories you should be having each day with a physician, based on your current weight and body mass, metabolism, etc. and try to stick to that many calories, and you exercise. And you permanently make that your new life, your new routine.
That’s not a diet, hun. That’s a fucking lifestyle change.
There are diets that are extremely healthy, however. For instance, The diabetic diet, which doesn’t necessarily decrease caloric intake! :D
But if you’re PERMANENTLY incorporating that routine of eating into your life, which I’m assuming a good diabetic WOULD
THEN IT IS. NOT. A FUCKING. DIET.
DIETS. ARE. TEMPORARY.
AND THEREFORE, ONLY A BAND-AID TO YOUR HEALTH AND WEIGHT ISSUES
Sometimes diets are meant to be permanent. It’s about upkeep. Certain diets are temporary, others aren’t. Veganism is a diet. For a lot of people, it’s permanent. A lot of people have to abide by diets for the rest of their life due to health problems or because their metabolism is so slow.
James Smith on dieting corridors.
Words of wisdom!!!!
On this blog, we stand with Kavanaugh.
lmao yo
OMG SO RELEVENT
Reblogging AGAIN. 😩
You know having unseasoned food is an actual thing in japan. “Simple flavors” is part of Japanese food culture. No seasoning or just salt.
I think we should mock japanese people too. Generalize them as having no taste or ability to cook. And laugh at them if they say it’s racism or childish.
The difference is white people colonized—raped, stole and destroyed—other cultures for these seasonings…that they don’t even use ☺️therein lies the irony. Also…not the point of the post…the point is, making fun of white people’s weird shit does not equal racism.
I said what I said ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
So staaahp trolling and go read a book maybe.
Lady, i have 2 degrees on this. I literally have walls of books on the history of food. White people didnt rape, colonize, steal, or destroy anymore than the Chinese did. And i doubt you would be okay saying this about Asians.
People tended to use less seasoning back ghen because food was bred and grown differently. Things like chicken and beef had way more natural flavor, so additional seasonings werent really needed. In fact, for some places, seasonings were typically used by the poor, who were left with bad tasting scraps. Other places had them solely for the rich, since non native spices were incredibly expensive.
Just like with Japanese culture, food culture in European cultures are often rely on tradition. Traditional methods are used, even if obsolete from newly available ingredients. It’s why old traditional methods of wine and cheese making are still used today. In fact, simple flavors and limited seasonings are available in a large amount of African dishes. The whole “white people dont season their food” stereotype originated in the US, and is clearly wrong, since European immigrants brought over tons of well seasoned and loved food like pizza, sausages, gyros, literally a ton of well known french dishes. I mean most southern cuisine came from French immigrants, and African slaves and paid servants (who at the time didnt even have access to most spices) simply copied those. The only real nuance is the addition of peppers and things like nutmeg and corn (originating in the americas) which European immigrants had already been using in their recipes. ( Actual soul food that can be entirely credited to African Americans is limited).
The point is that the caricature of white people’s cooking being unseasoned is a very real part of reality for other cultures. Japan prides its traditional food with simplistic flavors. As in minimal or no seasoning. So any mocking you have for white people, equally (if not moreso) applies to the Japanese. You clearly don’t think it’s okay to say these same things to Asians, so it is clear that it isnt the action itself that you have a problem with, but the race doing it.
Youre a racist. You think just because you mr opinions are popular and other bad activists are on your side, that you are in the right. I think we know from history that a popular opinion isnt always the right one.
I’ve seen how you reply to other people who disagree with you and it is so childish. You just tell them to read a book or go to a library without considering their knowledge on the subject. I am here to tell you that i am much more knowledgable than you are on this subject. You are just making up stuff to excuse the fact that you dont like white people.
https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2015/03/26/394339284/how-snobbery-helped-take-the-spice-out-of-european-cooking
I literally cannot make this shit up lol. 😂 your degrees are obviously for naught. Also..the British and Europe DID colonize these areas…which included the aforementioned atrocities.
Not racist. Just have a grasp on history. Get one.
How Snobbery Helped Take The Spice Out Of European Cooking
I dont think you even read this.
It clearly states that while Indians (and it only relies on indians, not the mentioned Japanese or really any other Asian country) focus on curry, while Europeans often focused on gravies and sauces.
Italian sauces for instance relied on fresh herbs (not spices), while French sauces relied more on stocks. Once dried peppers came over, many countries used paprika to season their stews, and others regularly used rosemary, bayleaf, thyme, and pepper.
It’s really odd that you would compare any country’s use of spice to India’s. Essentially anyone’s would use less spice in comparison. In fact, as shown in the link, India is known for contrasting flavors using odd spice combinations that most countries (including non european) would never use. It doesnt really prove your point. It just shows that you really dont understand how these things work.
Your grasp of history is poor, because according to your other posts, you actually think white people invented racism. You keep mentioning atrocities Europeans committed and act like they are the only ones who did them, which gives you permission to be racist.
You are the one who doesnt understand history. And you do not understand food culture among European countries. You are just driven by stereotypes and opinion peices.
Hungarian paprika chicken
Beef bourguignon
Roasted gyro meat
Just because they dont have spice blends with 30 components like many indian masalas, doesnt mean they arent seasoned.
As someone who has made these dishes (and many others from various countries), and as someone with more education on the subject, I am here to tell you that you are wrong, misonformed, and racist.
“the difference between white people and japanese people is that white people colonized, raped stole and destroyed, japanese people didn’t”
sometimes i don’t even know what to say to shit like that. i… i can’t
“HAHA WYPIPO TAKE JOKES SO SURIUS!”
*later*
“"the difference between white people and japanese people is that white people colonized, raped stole and destroyed, japanese people didn’t"““
> the difference between white people and japanese people is that white people colonized, raped stole and destroyed, japanese people didn’t
Yes. Hello. Korea and China both wanna have a word with you.
Lmaoooo imagine denying Japanese colonialism. Like holy shit some of that happened in living memory.
People like that deserve to get dragged tbh.
A raccoon, a tree and a disney princess
How it feels to be a Trump supporter everyday.
Very interesting theory on Trump's Success
The mayor of Livermore California explains Trump’s popularity and success. This is perhaps the best explanation for Trump’s popularity.
Marshall Kamena is a registered Democrat and was elected mayor of Livermore, CA.. He ran on the democratic ticket as he knew a Bay Area city would never vote for a Republican. He is as conservative as they come. He wrote the following:
Trump’s ‘lack of decorum, dignity, and statesmanship’ By Marshall Kamena, Mayor of Livermore, CA.
My Leftist friends (as well as many ardent #NeverTrumpers) constantly ask me if I’m not bothered by Donald Trump’s lack of decorum. They ask if I don’t think his tweets are “beneath the dignity of the office.”
Here’s my answer: We Right-thinking people have tried dignity. There could not have been a man of more quiet dignity than George W. Bush as he suffered the outrageous lies and politically motivated hatreds that undermined his presidency. We tried statesmanship.
Could there be another human being on this earth who so desperately prized “collegiality” as John McCain? We tried propriety – has there been a nicer human being ever than Mitt Romney?
And the results were always the same. This is because, while we were playing by the rules of dignity, collegiality and propriety, the Left has been, for the past 60 years, engaged in a knife fight where the only rules are those of Saul Alinsky and the Chicago mob.
I don’t find anything “dignified,” “collegial” or “proper” about Barack Obama’s lying about what went down on the streets of Ferguson in order to ramp up racial hatreds because racial hatreds serve the Democratic Party.
I don’t see anything “dignified” in lying about the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi and imprisoning an innocent filmmaker to cover your tracks.
I don’t see anything “statesman-like” in weaponizing the IRS to be used to destroy your political opponents and any dissent.
Yes, Obama was “articulate” and “polished” but in no way was he in the least bit “dignified,” “collegial” or “proper.”
The Left has been engaged in a war against America since the rise of the Children of the ‘60s. To them, it has been an all-out war where nothing is held sacred and nothing is seen as beyond the pale.. It has been a war they’ve fought with violence, the threat of violence, demagoguery and lies from day one – the violent take-over of the universities – till today.
The problem is that, through these years, the Left has been the only side fighting this war. While the Left has been taking a knife to anyone who stands in their way, the Right has continued to act with dignity, collegiality and propriety. With Donald Trump, this all has come to an end. Donald Trump is America ’s first wartime president in the Culture War.
During wartime, things like “dignity” and “collegiality” simply aren’t the most essential qualities one looks for in their warriors. Ulysses Grant was a drunk whose behavior in peacetime might well have seen him drummed out of the Army for conduct unbecoming.
Had Abraham Lincoln applied the peacetime rules of propriety and booted Grant, the Democrats might well still be holding their slaves today. Lincoln rightly recognized that, “I cannot spare this man. He fights.”
General George Patton was a vulgar-talking.. In peacetime, this might have seen him stripped of rank. But, had Franklin Roosevelt applied the normal rules of decorum then, Hitler and the Socialists would barely be five decades into their thousand-year Reich.
Trump is fighting And what’s particularly delicious is that, like Patton standing over the battlefield as his tanks obliterated Rommel’s, he’s shouting, “You magnificent bastards, I read your book!”
That is just the icing on the cake, but it’s wonderful to see that not only is Trump fighting, he’s defeating the Left using their own tactics. That book is Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals – a book so essential to the Liberals’ war against America that it is and was the playbook for the entire Obama administration and the subject of Hillary Clinton’s senior thesis.
It is a book of such pure evil, that, just as the rest of us would dedicate our book to those we most love or those to whom we are most indebted, Alinsky dedicated his book to Lucifer.
Trump’s tweets may seem rash and unconsidered but, in reality, he is doing exactly what Alinsky suggested his followers do. First, instead of going after “the fake media” — and they are so fake that they have literally gotten every single significant story of the past 60 years not just wrong, but diametrically opposed to the truth, from the Tet Offensive to Benghazi, to what really happened on the streets of Ferguson, Missouri — Trump isolated CNN. He made it personal.
Then, just as Alinsky suggests, he employs ridicule which Alinsky described as “the most powerful weapon of all.”… Most importantly, Trump’s tweets have put CNN in an untenable and unwinnable position. … They need to respond.
This leaves them with only two choices. They can either “go high” (as Hillary would disingenuously declare of herself and the fake news would disingenuously report as the truth) and begin to honestly and accurately report the news or they can double-down on their usual tactics and hope to defeat Trump with twice their usual hysteria and demagoguery. The problem for CNN (et al.) with the former is that, if they were to start honestly reporting the news, that would be the end of the Democratic Party they serve. It is nothing but the incessant use of fake news (read: propaganda) that keeps the Left alive.
Imagine, for example, if CNN had honestly and accurately reported then-candidate Barack Obama’s close ties to foreign terrorists (Rashid Khalidi), domestic terrorists (William Ayers & Bernardine Dohrn), the mafia (Tony Rezko) or the true evils of his spiritual mentor, Jeremiah Wright’s church.
Imagine if they had honestly and accurately conveyed the evils of the Obama administration’s weaponizing of the IRS to be used against their political opponents or his running of guns to the Mexican cartels or the truth about the murder of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and the Obama administration’s cover-up.
So, to my friends on the Left — and the #NeverTrumpers as well — do I wish we lived in a time when our president could be “collegial” and “dignified” and “proper”? Of course I do.
These aren’t those times. This is war. And it’s a war that the Left has been fighting without opposition for the past 50 years.
So, say anything you want about this president - I get it - he can be vulgar, he can be crude, he can be undignified at times. I don’t care. I can’t spare this man. He fights for America!
Hear hear!!!
RESULT’S MATTER!
The Final Run of Ladder 118
FDNY Ladder 118 crosses the Brooklyn Bridge into lower Manhattan. This picture captures the last alarm all 6 of the members riding on that rig would ever respond to. The men from Ladder 118 responded into the chaos and emerged at the doomed Marriott World Trade Center hotel. Survivors remembered seeing men with the number 118 on their helmets running up the stairs to help the panicked guests. The next time anyone saw the firemen was when their bodies, still side by side, were dug out of the rubble.
1984 is in full effect and if something is done fast we will lose our country
This is disgraceful.
(source)
Bonus:
You save the child, because the embryos cannot survive, so they’d all die in the end anyway. That’s like asking if you’d save a healthy teen or a teen on life support, but very much alive, in body and brain, during a fire. If you pull the teen off life support, he dies. So is the healthy teen now worth more to you than the sick one?
You’re taking a hypothetical scenario and tacking extra shit on. That defeats the purpose.
The shit isn’t extra though, it’s the fact of the matter. Make an all encompassing scenario, then I’ll consider it.
Ok but if the embryos are somehow alive and growing even as you take them out of the fire. Then its just 1000 babies versus 1 teen. Were does the pro life thing come in?
If the babies are guaranteed to grow successfully and live, I’d probably grab those to be honest.
But no, it isn’t quite a fair conparision, at least to me, because being prolife is about protecting life that cannot protect itself, and about helping those in need, both the born and unborn.
And why can’t the teen just follow me? He’s got legs.
The teen could be unconscious.
Did you consider that?
Clap my hands real hard and yell, “wake up nigga.”
But in all seriousness, there is no way for this situation to occur in such a way the embryos would survive
That might not even work. Thry could have passed out from the flame/ smoke.
And exactly. So are you going to save a thousand cells that are most likely going to die no matter what or an actual person?
They’re all actual humans. And that’s why this argument is garbage and obviously biased, because in this situation you either let a teen die for no reason or you don’t. There isn’t anyway to save the 1000 other lives, and there is no gaurentee they’re viable or that they’ll ever develop fully
Disagree with that, i do.
And the argument isn’t garbage. This is like the entire point of pro-life vs pro-choice. People choose to place more value on a clump of cells than on living breathing HUMANS, not cells. HUMANS, that have already survived past infancy.
It’s like arguing over whether a guy with one arm or just an arm is worth anything. The arm is probably going to die. The armless guy isn’t.
You know the developing babies are human right? From conception? Human?
And no, SOME pro lifers care more about human babies than human adults. Not all. Also yikes that it seems like from that phrasing you don’t consider infants to be human? Dude.
And it’s nothing like this, because when a woman is pregnant and healthy the baby is most likely going to survive and thrive. Dying embryos with no uterus to implant into and grow with, not so much.
Cut off arm =/= embryo. Like at all. What are you on.
Developing babies are a clump of cells. They’re human cells, yes. But until they’re born, they’re not human. They’re just cells.
No. That’s not what i said. You’re putting words in my mouth. Dude.
It is like that when the only choice the woman has is to die or have the baby. In that case, the baby is very likely going to die as soon as they’re born or in infancy.
While it sucks that infants don’t always survive, that fact is there.
Cut off arm = embryo in the situation when they’re both dead. If the embryo has a chance to survive from conception to past infancy, then they become more valuable. I’m not saying infants aren’t valuable since we’ve all been infants at one point. What i’m saying is a teen or adult human is worth more than a clump of cells and i’d pick the former every time.
You’re a clump of cells right now.
You said what you said.
In which case abortion is fine in my opinion. Your point?
Neither do adults.
Teens and adults are clumps of cells. All eukaryotic life is clumps of cells. Calling a developing baby a clump of cells may help you feel better but it doesn’t change facts.
Both lives are equally important as long as both are viable and appear as though they will survive and thrive without killing the other.
“Until they’re born they’re a clump of cells” oh wow didn’t know that fully formed babies still in the womb weren’t people. honestly fuck pro choice
And just to add to the 'clump of cells' bull:
When scientists found 'clumps of cells' on other planets, we were calling it LIFE! But somehow, when it's a clump of cells inside a woman's womb, it's just... cells.... Every living thing on this planet are clumps of cells, some larger than others... it does not take away from the fact that they are living.
So this 'cells =/= life' is a load of crock.
There was just an active shooter situation 1 block from where I work. 4 confirmed dead, suspect believed to be among them. He was wearing business clothes. Speculation that he was a disgruntled ex-employee.
Stay safe and stay armed out there, people.
He was apparently not an employee. No known motive as of yet.
There was just an active shooter situation 1 block from where I work. 4 confirmed dead, suspect believed to be among them. He was wearing business clothes. Speculation that he was a disgruntled ex-employee.
Stay safe and stay armed out there, people.
