Mark Krzepis (Canadian, 2001) - Toronto Love Line 1/2/3 (2025-2026)
d e v o n
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

Love Begins
art blog(derogatory)

Kiana Khansmith
official daine visual archive
h
RMH
🪼
Interview Vampire Daily
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
todays bird

shark vs the universe
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Fai_Ryy
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
The Stonewall Inn
tumblr dot com
taylor price

seen from France
seen from Mexico

seen from United States
seen from Indonesia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Philippines
seen from United States

seen from Austria

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Costa Rica
@zontloomnoka
Mark Krzepis (Canadian, 2001) - Toronto Love Line 1/2/3 (2025-2026)
Nobody except Americans give a flying fuck about American "queer history". Why do you think anyone in the rest of the world would care about Stonewall? Shut up.
This is an interesting ask to get as a Canadian. Let's unpack this.
Making Queer History has spent a lot of time sharing global queer history, so this message feels out of the blue. It takes only a couple of clicks to find how many countries we have been able to find stories from. That being said, there is no denying Stonewalls historical significance. The Pride Parade itself is rooted in the Stonewall riots.
So if a country has a Pride Parade, it has the Stonewall riots to thank for that tradition.
But if what you learned from the stories of Stonewall was "America is the most important country", then you missed the point. Stonewall is remembered because it was a galvanizing moment for the queer community that people weren't able to bury afterwards. We are lucky enough that we live in the wake of that bravery, and telling someone to "shut up" about it is directly disrespectful to that legacy.
There were rebellions before, and after Stonewall, important ones! They deserve to be discussed, but the cost of that discussion cannot be disregarding the importance of Stonewall.
In the telling of the riots, many people will complain about how many conflicting stories there are of that night, which makes sense because it makes things difficult to pin down. What some fail to realize is how LUCKY we are that we have multiple widely spread versions of events. So many queer stories have been disappeared. So I am deeply grateful for the stories that were able to be preserved, even when it is hard.
We can both do the work of uncovering the stories that have been erased, and protecting the stories that we have access to. In fact, the false choice of only doing one or the other is what leads to American history being held as the most important.
I don't think you came here for nuance, but I have some to give regardless. I believe that you sent this because you are feeling the lack that all queer people are faced with, but I promise you this lack cannot be solved by cutting away at what little we already have. We need more stories, not less.
primordial soup
Puerto Rican velvet worm, Peripatus juanensis, Peripatidae
Photographed in Puerto Rico by wesgapp
Now available in Blue Raspberry!
Indigo Velvet Worm aka Ngaokeoke (Peripatus indigo)
Standing outside the club w no ID dressed as benoit blanc and asking women if they could help me solve the mystery of where my hug is at
It's the Royal Academy of Art Young Artist's Summer Show. One of my favourite exhibitions of the year. Like. Not only are the older kids insanely talented, the younger ones' artist statements will just punch you right in the face.
Jeffrey is my cat and he feels like my heart
Click [here] for the full online exhibition
straight white people making a romance movie: haha what if it was illegal to have sex? wait what's lawrence v texas. wait what's mclaughlin v florida. wait what's loving v virginia
As preposterous and stupid as this fucking movie's premise sounded (for a light-hearted rom-com, and not The Handmaid's Tale) I didn't want to think about it too much until the movie actually came out, and then I could see if it was somehow more intelligent and subversive than the trailer let on, but guess what, it's even worse!
If this is what it takes to get a rom-com greenlit these days, maybe we should just let them die.
Sex workers are thrown under the bus, shown only as thieves who fleece men in the woods at night, while queer sexuality is relegated to a few scenes with Allie’s roommate (a woefully underused Quintessa Swindell) and a handful of pans past blurry same-sex extras making out in the background. “This night is for the straights,” Swindell’s character says to Allie, before saying that queer people have worked around straight laws for centuries. This is supposed to be a nod to queer resilience, but largely comes off as straightwashing the history of anti-LGBTQ legislation in this country that led towards raids of queer clubs and incarceration of queer people in the not-too-distant past (let alone the current barrage of anti-Trans and LGBTQ legislation currently in the works and on the books). It’s also ignorant of the long and fraught fight for the normalization of age-of-consent laws, which, by the way, did not happen in all states in this very country until 2003. Yes, that’s not even thirty years ago. By the end, our intrepid protagonists have not had sex with anyone, because this is a film about Romance with a Capital R (and I guess sex is not part of romance!) and for that very same reason they ultimately embrace the fascist state of things. They aren’t the only ones who refuse to fight back. No one in this cursed film is protesting this mandate beyond “repeal” signs in various windows and some creative graffiti (...) (...) If we are supposed to believe that the film is making some subversive statement about the state of sex and bodily autonomy in this country, it cannot end with its leads embracing their chains. That’s just warmed-over conservatism running around in sheep’s clothing.
yeah i wrote this post having only seen the trailer, but jesus christ. was this movie a psyop LMAO??
also, for the unaware: mclaughlin v. florida was a 1964 supreme court case that struck down a florida anti-miscegenation law that criminalized cohabitation (and thus, as implied, sex) between white people and people of color of opposite genders. anti-miscegenation laws made marriage and sexual relationships between white people and people of color, most often specifically black people, a FELONY in several states in the united states up until the 1950s and 1960s. though it was already struck down by the supreme court, the state of alabama didn't repeal their law until 2000! there were THREE ATTEMPTS at codifying anti-miscegenation into the us constitution!
like yes, the issue here is partially straight white people's ignorance on the united states's history of homophobic policy, but it's also really important to recognize that arguably the majority of the issue here is straight white people's ignorance of the united states's history of codifying eugenics and antiblack racism.
the premise could have been interesting as a serious dystopian story, especially taking that history into account, but it wasn't written that way at all. this movie should never have been a fucking romcom making light of the violence the united states (and many other countries) has enacted on any kinds of sexual relationships it deems undesirable.
[ID: Tweet by Jack Subpar (@.SuisizeMe): “Flipping through the titles on hulu, making a point to scroll past brokeback mountain at the exact same tempo as the other films, not gayly slow or homophobicly fast”.
jåňķob (@.the_sad_donut) replies, “As an ally I hover for a few seconds and go ‘mhmm’”, to which Jack Subpar responds, “A salute or even a quick standing ovation can also be a great way to show support”. End ID.]
I CAN'T BELIEVE THIS When Maggie last visited me in Dublin I asked him to bring me my two favorite snacks I was missing from the U.S.: Goldfish crackers and Swedish fish (obviously Swedish fish are Swedish, but I couldn't find the specific type I'm used to in Ireland).
Maggie brought them both and a few days later I was in a (very casual, snacks allowed) Zoom meeting with some Phd students and our academic advisor and I was talking about my upcoming fieldwork in Irish salmon fishing communities and eating my snacks and someone else in the meeting said, "hang on. I'm SO sorry to interrupt. but are you eating exclusively fish-themed snacks on purpose?"
Helen Whitaker, England
" Sycamore Seed "
Glass , copper and brass
That's the shape of a maple seed. I wonder if the incorrect name was intentional. Sycamore seeds are a little teardrop with a fluffy end, and a hundred or so are compacted in a tight ball before they disperse.
I think it might just be an error. Here's a link:
https://www.barleystudio.co.uk/portfolio/scarborough-hospital-multi-faith-chapel/
The title is probably more properly "Prayer Tree," but in the description she does say it's "based on the form and shape of a sycamore seed, inspired by its rich symbolism and many associations."
Idk how the error came about, of course. But there it is.
It's regional - she is in the UK and "sycamore" here exclusively refers to Acer pseudoplatanus which Americans call "sycamore maple". We don't have Platanus occidentalis at all (er, that I've seen, they probably grow somewhere), which appears to be what Americans call just "sycamore".
^ When I was a very young child I knew these as helicopter seeds, but then I learnt the "proper" name as sycamore. These are everywhere. Nobody calls them maple.
^ I have neve seen these before in my life, I had no idea such a seed existed, they are utterly bizarre to me. I am delighted to find out about them!
I haven't been posting about it on here as often as on Bluesky, but every few days at least one of these very large Carolina wolf spiders voluntarily enters the house (by conspicuously walking under the front door while I am sitting in the kitchen with the lights on) and just sort of... wanders around mildly. I try to lead them safely back out, not because I don't like them, but because I honestly don't think there's enough food in here.
Today it's another female with babies. Congratulations.
10 costco secrets even your uncle with a cybernetic arm doesn't know
"(analog) parts of me" by takimunk
deriding things as performative is anti third space
im sitting on a patio at my favorite cafe rn and im hand stitching them hem of a dress im working on. and i can see why someone would say im being performative by working on something like this in a public space. but frankly theres no element of that. i just want to work somewhere that isnt my apartment. i want to be in public, i wanna chat with strangers, i wanna see the world. it’s nice to hang out somewhere that isnt my home!
what i mean is when you say people are being performative you discourage them from doing shit they love in public. and thats no way to foster the world we want to see.
this post has reblogs off but i think about it all the time. truly evergreen post
it’s quick, it’s easy and it’s free: pouring river water in your socks
why would i do that lmao
it’s quick, it’s easy and it’s free
World Heritage Post