You x Your F/O's is Canon @apathetic-altruistic - Tumblr Blog

Posts

F/O List

Platonic F/O’s

Overwatch: Hanzo, Genji, and Tracer

BNHA: Kendou, Hawks, Dabi, Toga, Ojiro, Jirou, and Hagakure

Homestuck: Dirk Strider, Aradia, Rose Lalonde

Dragon Age: Solas, Varric, Sten, Iron Bull, and Krem

Obey Me: Diavolo

Star wars: Finn

Familial F/O’s

Overwatch: Moira (mom), Doomfist (Dad), Soldier 76 (Dad), Widowmaker (Aunt), Symmetra (sister), and Bastion (brother) Reaper (Dad)

BNHA: Present Mic (dad), Aizawa (dad), Eri (Sister), and Kurogiri (dad), Midnight (mom) Shigaraki (brother) Toga (sister)

Dragon Age: Vivienne (mom), Cassandra (mom), Sera (sister), Cole (brother), Morrigan (sister), Kieran (nephew) Marrin (daughter)

Star Wars: Luke Skywalker (brother), Plo Koon (dad), Boba Fett (dad), Mace Windu (dad)

Star Wars Republic Commando: Kal Skirata aka Kal’Buir (dad)

Death Note: Light Yagami (brother)

Obey Me: Luke (Brother)

League of Legends: Camille

Romantic F/O’s

American Mcgee’s Alice: Alice Liddell!!

Overwatch: D.Va, Lynx 17, and Ashe

BNHA: Monoma, Snipe, Iida, and Shinsou + Kaminari (poly)

Dragon Age: Anders, Anna (ship name Aposdate), Carver Hawke, and Marian/Garrett Hawke.

Homestuck: Jane Crocker and Nepeta Leijon

Star Wars: Ahsoka Tano, Rey, Obi-wan Kenobi, Dogma

Homestuck: Jane Crocker and Nepeta Leijon

Death Note: Touta Matsuda

Until Dawn: Hannah Washington, and Emily Davis!

Persona 5: Ryuji Sakamoto, and Akira Kurusu

The Hobbit: Fili

Lord of the rings: Gimli

Others Oc’s: Jasper @yanderemommabean

DC: Tim Drake

Obey Me: (all in different aus) Leviathan, Belphegor, Beelzubub, Simeon

anistarrose

if you are a parent, or may become one, or you are otherwise likely to arrive in the situation of caring for a child while they eat, promise me this: if a child doesn't like a certain food or food group, you will ask them WHY. and specifically, you will pay attention to either confirming or ruling out "it makes my mouth itch" or "it makes my stomach hurt," both of which are medically important info that children may not provide unprompted. which i know because this PSA has been brought to you by "i spent my entire childhood and much of my early teens eating peas and lentils while wondering why everyone else liked the Violently Itchy Mouth Sensation so much, like were they a bunch of legume masochists or something, before i finally realized that Violently Itchy Mouth Sensation was in fact a sinister demon appearing only to me, and her true demonic name was: Legume Allergy"

brainrockets

Do not let your child suffer from spicy bananas!

puddleorganism

Why does “falling in love” have pretty much exclusively romantic connotations it’s such a good phrase. I’ve fallen in love with every single one of my friends

puddleorganism

This was such a smart post to make because every day I get to see people declaring their love for their friends in the tags. Such a simple but sweet “restoring faith in humanity” kind of thing. We’re all just little creatures who love our buddies <3

puddleorganism

Alright so this post has gotten over 5,000 notes in a month and I think that means the consensus is that everyone loves their friends and you should tell them

manuciruja

awww the like button turns into a rainbow when you press it! that's so cute...hey staff what's with all the trans women you keep nuking?

manuciruja

i think we should be ridiculing them more for this. you don't get to try and go all "queer website" when your staff likes to go on nuking sprees targeting the trans fem users

smadsel

would be remiss not to mention that the rainbow notably straight up just removed the trans flag colors from it. like they’re gone. it’s the progress flag minus the trans flag colors.

smadsel

that’s not the whole flag, now is it

manuciruja

hey staff what the fuck

villainessbian

hey staff don't you think you're being too on-the-nose

shrodingers-catgirl

HEY STAFF DONT YOU THINK YOU'RE BEING TOO ON-THE-NOSE

aropride

please god let chatgpt die out like nfts did. With a fast and graceless fall into irrelevancy

bladespark

Like to charge, reblog to cast.

atwotonedbird

This spell has a very low hit ratio, so we need a lot of us to do it.

holy0ak6-deactivated20240421

squeeblr

via bree newsome bass on twitter:

“The widely circulated timeline created by @Zerflin does a great job in showing how recently slavery & segregation occurred & that they lasted longer than the modern era.

“I'd like to offer this timeline as another way of viewing the same period of history to show the constancy of both Black resistance in US & efforts of the white power structure to maintain racial caste since 1619.”

https://twitter.com/breenewsome/status/986427881680228354

queen-mihai

This second picture is MUCH more accurate!

queen-mihai

I had the exact same experience the second time I looked at this picture as the first time. I was looking like "what is this green line? Like suddenly everything is OK? It's not. Racists are still trying to push us back to 1619. Nothing has been fixed. We still need to fight. Hard!

softwaring

herpsandbirds

"Another world is not only possible, she is on her way. Maybe many of us won't be here to greet her, but on a quiet day, if I listen very carefully, I can hear her breathing."

Arundhati Roy

tim-official

that poll going around of the guy who thought "people only eat tofu as a bit because they're deranged vegans" or whatever really crystalizes something that i have never been able to precisely say - which is "a nonzero fraction of people who start picky-eater discourse just happen to precisely hate those foods which are not from north america and refuse to introspect on this whatsoever"

tim-official

In contrast some people say "there aren't any picky eaters in Asia 🙄" but this is laughably untrue. I have a cousin in India who refused until his 20s to eat anything in a sauce. as you can imagine in India this was difficult. he basically had to pick things out of curry and wipe them dry

bobcat-pie

hollowedskin

toastyglow

I have a thing to get to but had to get this out real quick

derinthescarletpescatarian

This is what "your emotions are valid" means.

It doesn't mean that any random shit you do is fine so long as you're angry or sad. It means that the anger and sadness is fine, attacking the emotion is pointless, and it's your behaviour in response to it that can help or harm.

ruffboi-mags

As my therapist put it once, "Whatever you're feeling about something is fine. Maybe it's something to discuss with me or work on, but your feelings are valid because they exist, and you have a right to feel what you feel. It's what you do in response to those feelings that can be unhealthy or wrong."

theconcealedweapon

maarvarq

Always bear in mind that there is absolutely no legitimate evidence that Luigi was actually the one who killed the insurance company guy.

theconcealedweapon

Of course he wasn't. He was at a party with me that day.

tiny-space-whale

No but like literally, actually. All bits aside.

He didn't do it.

The cops very clearly planted evidence on him because they had to make an arrest because all eyes were on them and whoever actually did the deed was making them look stupid.

Why would the real killer hero have kept the weapon on his person and traveled two states over while carrying it and a manifesto in his bag, conveniently turning the crime into a federal matter? The same guy whose bag they found in a park, filled with monopoly money? Why did the police turn off their bodycams, take Luigi's stuff, drive a block away, turn their bodycams back on, go back into the restaurant, and then arrest him?

From the moment of his arrest, even left-of-center media has been presuming his guilt without examining anything (e.g. calling him "the killer" instead of "alleged" or "accused") and then when I say he didn't do it, the nearest person chimes in with some quip that tells me they think he did do it but should go free anyway. Don't get me wrong, I would have the same attitude if he had done it. But he didn't. It makes me feel like the only sane person in the world, even among my staunchly leftist friends.

the-zenith-calls

My favorite scenes in the LotR books are the ones where Legolas has vital information and just decides it's not important to share.

Like when Gandalf spent literal PAGES trying to figure out why the vibes were off in Moria and Legolas chimes in with just "it's a balrog :) that shit's evil :) we're so fucked :)" like what do you MEAN you knew already and just didn't tell him??

Or at the beginning of Two Towers when Aragorn thinks there's something nearby so he puts his ear to the ground to listen, and then like 10 minutes later is like "hmmm i hear horses" and Legolas is just like "mm yep. there are 105 blond bitches with spears" like you just let your friend put his face in the dirt and you can SEE them??

Legolas please gain a sense of urgency

knives-in-the-dishwater

It's because legolas hasn't spent enough time with non-elves to remember that they don't know what he knows.

gandalf is scratching his head in moria, and legolas is thinking "oh man, the wizard noticed something off *besides* the obvious balrog that we all are aware of??"

"I wonder what aragorn is listening for? must be hard to hear, what with all of the horses. How many horses are there, actually? 1... 2... 3..."

taavicleric

"What do your elvish eyes see?" is Aragorn saying, as politely as possible, "Because the REST OF US are at a significant disadvantage, Prince Dipshit."

zk-j

“Where are the trans men in history?” See. When you're born a gender that was forcefully married off, who had to live most of their life indoors, when you had to raise children, and had a lobotomy if your family thought you were a tad too odd, it's kinda hard to come out as a trans man now ain't it.

teefiesworld

forever my lineage would use his wrong pronouns but not me

runawaymarbles

Hey. Look at me. Please leave yourself a note somewhere you'll see it later that says "it is going to take years if not decades to get the United States government to the level of functionality it had in November of 2024." If we elect a democrat in 2028, we are not going to be up and running by 2032.

Please make sure you have a reminder in your phone reminding you to not look at 2028/32/36 Democratic candidates and say "why are they not promising/delivering Cool Shit?" because you are going to understand that to get Cool Shit we must have competent people running a decently funded government, and we are not going to have that.

We are not getting UBI. We are not getting single payer healthcare. We are not getting free college or free preschool. We are not redistributing wealth on a large scale. We are not getting free internet. We are not getting ranked choice voting.

If we are lucky, we are going to get an IRS that can collect taxes, qualified schoolteachers, research grants, Social Security, and a government that thinks maybe it should be a priority for people around the worlds to not have AIDS, malaria or TB.

runawaymarbles

To be clear, I don't mean we should forget or take our eyes off the ultimate long-term goals of getting Cool Shit, but to get there, we're gonna have to support things like "half-measures" and "small steps" and "not tearing down people who won't get us all the way there" and "understanding that they are starting from the basement basically because every government institution is being decimated"

sparklyeevee

If this were true, it would be the best argument I'd ever heard, and I have heard a lot, for not voting, not trying to change laws, and moving straight to a violent dismantling of the government. Because what you just said is that Democrats, who largely don't want the straightforward, societally valuable, in most cases easily implementable things you so dismissively referred to as "cool shit" here, have an incentive to let an incompetent fuckwad come in every 4 or 8 years and break enough stuff that they have an excuse to keep not doing it. And if that's true, there is no fucking point in trying to deal with them.

Listen, let's say you have a public school building, and it basically works as a building, but it's seismically unsound, there is asbestos in the walls, and lead paint that has been painted over but not removed. The building needs to be repaired, updated, renovated. But city hall is dragging their feet, because it's expensive and they'd rather put in the effort and money for other things. Now say that school building is virtually destroyed in an earthquake. That's bad, obviously. Rebuilding is gonna be even more expensive than fixing the existing building would have been, lead and asbestos were released into the air and will hurt people, and that's to say nothing of the immediate cost in human lives if there were children inside at the time. But you don't rebuild it with the asbestos, with the lead paint, with the same seismic instabilities, because that would be fucking stupid and it's gonna be almost as easy to rebuild without those issues as with. This was like, the least preferable way to get a new building without those problems, but obviously, when we rebuild, we're going to use modern, less toxic materials, and we're probably also going to build it with a modern HVAC system and wheelchair ramps, even though most people weren't even asking for the absence of those things to be addressed because they were lower priority than the immediate hazards. Do you see?

If we have to rebuild the department of education anyway, it's not gonna be that much harder to do it with free college and preschool than without, and in some ways it may be easier than adding those things to a system that wasn't built to include them. If we have to rebuild medicare and medicaid anyway, it would almost certainly be easier to go single payer than to reinstall all that eligibility and means testing crap. If we have to rebuild the IRS anyway, that could, although I'm less certain on this one, be a good time to get UBI underway, since they're the most logical agency to administer it.

Like I agree that we need keep voting for Democrats and that there are areas where we will have to tolerate slow progress, but only if you're wrong (and I both largely believe and sincerely hope you are) that the current administration has successfully put a functioning social safety net out of reach for the foreseeable future and progressives will just have to lower their standards. Again.

sparklyeevee

Reblogging my own response since apparently this post is back. Had to scroll through a fair amount of the notes, a remarkable amount of which are "No, OP is saying you should accept that you will die of bad policy and you should be grateful if that happens with a democratic in office, but not in a defeatist way!"

runawaymarbles

Literally not what I said. OP is saying people on this webbed site need to stop flinging up their hands and saying "government is doomed forever, let's stop trying" and "both sides are the same because neither will give me UBI" when the next democrat president doesn't radically change everything overnight, because they will not be able to.

saaabriel

Youu CANNOT tear down and build up the government again just like that. Also, we are NOT destroyed right now. Come on. We're still HERE.

The US government is built on, at this point, three centuries of foundation. If the grand revolution happened, we'd have:

--Factories, but no more environmental regulation

--power plants, but no good power usage prediction (leading to blackouts and brownouts)

--cars, but no public transportation and no road maintenance

--companies, and people in need of jobs, but no minimum wage or OSHA

--agriculture, but no FDA

Let's say you have a building. Except, it's not a public school building. It's one building where everyone lives. In order to move out of the building, you need to be able to afford the move; if you can't afford that, you're out of luck.

There's asbestos in the walls, and lead in the pipes. The city government is dragging their feet on fixing all these things. It doesn't really matter. If you tear down the building right now, it will take at least a year to put back up again, and in the winter, most people will die from lack of shelter, unless they are rich enough to move away.

As OP said, we gotta understand that these things take time. They take time if you're starting from where we are now, and they take a hell of a lot more time if you start from rubble.

Also, they'll take lots more time if every time someone says "this will take a while to fix!" your response is, "then we shouldn't bother!!! Tear it all down!!!"

If you believe in the grand revolution, you don't understand the scope of government.

probablysomethingtm

Lmao we have to fucking destroy this company are you fucking kidding me with this shit

Google is transforming Search from a list of links into an AI-powered experience filled with conversational answers, autonomous agents, and

probablysomethingtm

Remember that xkcd about how Google searches are shit now? What if we made them even worse for no reason?

probablysomethingtm

I will vote for any candidate who promises to go scorched fucking earth on every tech company. Break every single one of them up into companies based around a single product and then split those in thirds. Weaponize existing antitrust laws to the hilt and pass the most draconian versions of them ever seen on this planet. Nationalize google search specifically. Pass consumer privacy protections strict enough to kill the data harvesting industry for good. Make all of these fuckers go bankrupt for this rent-seeking shit

probablysomethingtm

theoutcastrogue

The bipartisan push to remove anonymity from the internet is ushering in an era of unprecedented mass surveillance and censorship.

"The problem is that there’s no way to reliably verify someone’s age without verifying who they are. A platform cannot magically discern that a user is 16 without collecting identifying information, whether through government documents such as a passport, payment information like a credit card, or other identity-disclosing data. Whether that data is stored by the platform itself or outsourced to a vendor, the result is always the same: A user’s offline identity is forever linked with their online behavior.

Stripping anonymity from the internet would constitute one of the most sweeping rollbacks of civil rights in recent history. It would allow for unprecedented levels of mass surveillance and censorship, endangering the most marginalized members of society. Whistleblowers exposing corporate wrongdoing could be tracked and fired, government employees speaking out about illegal behavior or bad policies could face prosecution, and activists organizing protests could be identified and surveilled before ever setting foot on the street."

softness-and-shattering

And this is exactly the kind of thing US lawmakers will decide for US citizens, and it will effect everyone who uses the internet globally. Already any kind of age verification amounts to "hand over your government identification to a private US corporation".

I dont know what solutions might be on a broader scale, but its absurd for one country to have this much power and for their private corporations to be handed this amount of authority from literally world governments demanding "safety for children". This power structure is absurd.

Yall USians have got to shut down all this bullshit, youre the ones who vote these people in and out. Theyre not gonna give a shit what foreigners have to say.

cidham

amir khusrow (1253–1325 CE)

cherepashkadrabbles

This is back on my dash! And listen, I love to see Amir Khusrau getting appreciation, but this translation ignores a lot. The original rhymes! And scans! And does playful things with register! And conveys a tone of affectionate banter between the two speakers, not least because it has them both addressing each other as sakhi (translated above as “girl”) in the last two lines. I think taking some liberties with line order is worth it to preserve more of the rest—and I think there’s a better translation of sakhi. And so:

He only visits once a year, I splurge big on him when he’s here, His kisses make my tastebuds tango. Who, bitch, your man? Nah, bitch, a mango.

vacuously-true

It is extremely rare that I get unintentionally rickrolled. It is extremely common that I look at a link and think to myself, that's a rickroll, and I click on it. Then I get to enjoy the satisfaction of being correct, as well as the entirety of Never Gonna Give You Up. That shit is a banger. If someone offers me a link directly to that song you think I'm not gonna take it? No. You know the rules and so do I. It's Astley time.

Trending Blogs

Recently Viewed Blogs

You x Your F/O's is Canon