society’s obsession with “best friends” is rooted in something insidious, but i’m not sure what exactly, probably amatonormativity tho.
i’ll explain although i’m sure i’m not the first to say this: people are always pushed to have and value one romantic partner over everyone else, but a best friend is seen as the next best thing. if you dont have a romantic partner, your best friend is expected to be the most important thing to you and if you don’t have one, you are made to feel incomplete and/or lonely because you don’t have that one person who just gets you and who you’re totally comfortable with (sound familiar?)
many people might even be forced to choose a friend to be their best over other close friends, or be made to feel guilty if they have more than one best friend because it’s expected that you have a hierarchy in your friend group which can also lead to people feeling alienated and left out being the third wheel in a group of best friends. there is also a surprising amount of jealousy that comes with best-friendshipdom which is extremely toxic although rarely discussed (i expect due in part to society’s idea that only romantic relationships can be toxic and friendships aren’t as important so you could just leave)
it’s like we as a society can’t wrap our heads around the idea that things, even as mundane as favourite films and songs and colours still have value even if there are also others you like, but anyway it’s late and i need to sleep but if anyone has any ideas i’d love to hear them this has been an incoherent rant with barely considered points held together with water vapour
Yeah! It’s interestng the way we assign ‘value’ to basically everything, using the same language to talk about a life, a person, a relationship that we would use to talk about a toy, food, art. As if there is some scale by which you can objectively measure and compare all of these very different things. Things aren’t allowed to just be different they have to be more or less. But I just don’t see the benefit thinking in terms of value? At what point do I need to care which relationship (or any type of thing) I might value higher?
We’re also encouraged to specifically value intimacies/relationships that are personal more than those that are communal/collective, which alienates people from communities and benefits capitalism. I think the ways we’re taught to see friendship as a hierarchy prepare people for prioritising romantic relationships + the family unit, in a similar way to how schools prepare you to accept hierarchies in the workplace.
I think this assignment of value is also a way to encourage people to choose only one or two things that they’re passionate about to focus on, so that they’re more easily convinced to specialize and fulfill their role in a capitalist system.
And, it’s easier to ask people to choose their work lives over their social lives if they only have bonds with one or two people.
you’re right that’s a good point, thank you! i definitely think this affects everyone, not just aros
#Also!#Kollontai wrote about this#if anyone is interested the paper is wings of eros or something?#I don’t remember#message me and I’ll actually look at my syllabus from a few years ago#it’s a good paper
@kitcatsnow link the paper pls
https://www.marxists.org/archive/kollonta/1923/winged-eros.htm
“Bourgeois society was built on the principles of individualism and competition, and has no place for friendship as a moral factor. Friendship does not help in any way, and may hinder the achievement of class aims”























