If your feminism cannot GRASP that some women want to cover up for reasons other than men sexualizing them. Then I fear your feminism is weak sauce.
Same goes for if you can’t grasp that a woman can wear ‘immodest’ clothes for anything other than men’s desire.
Actually I’m going to say something even more controversial. People with weak sauce feminism hold onto your socks.
You can in fact choose whatever you wear because of men and still be feminist. One of the most badass people I know wears a full khimar and specifically does it 1. Cause she is religious, but 2. Because she says that she feels empowered because men are not owed the right to look at her body.
And you know what… she is right. Yes her choice in outfit is based on men but when you live in a patriarchal society NEWS FLASH your decision will have to consider the patriarchy in some way. Because at the end of the day misogynistic men in power will view women as less than whether they cover up or not. So the real choice is wearing whatever you think will make these men most uncomfortable and give you the best ability to fight against the patriarchy. HOWEVER that looks like to you.
one of my closest friends and mentors is my art teacher from highschool, and she talked to me a lot about how the older she gets the more shes drawn to shapeless clothes. She wore lots of loose fitting fabrics and even modified her clothes to be that way. she said she was tired of men looking at her and she wanted then to be completely unable to see her body at all. i dont see that as anything but powerful personally
























