Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
No title available
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
will byers stan first human second

No title available

titsay
Three Goblin Art
Peter Solarz

izzy's playlists!
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Jules of Nature
we're not kids anymore.
Cosimo Galluzzi
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

Kiana Khansmith
🪼
Mike Driver

No title available
seen from Ukraine
seen from Albania

seen from Singapore

seen from United States
seen from Jamaica
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Singapore
@biologyspotter
saw a post urging people to cull any invasive house sparrows they come across and like if its a male maybe sure but the amount of even experienced birders who have difficulty with sparrow ID do you REALLY think average joe will be able to tell the difference??
one of these sparrows are invasive, the other five are protected native species.
[id: photo showing six images of small brown sparrows that look very similar.]
Seriously!!! Leave the culling to the professionals please and thank you. The average citizen will not know how to identify which sparrow is invasive and which sparrow is a protected native species, and if you accidentally cull a bunch of native protected females, that’s a huge blow to the population. Additionally, even invasive species that need to be culled deserve humane euthanasia, and I don’t trust the average joe to know how to humanely cull a bird or how to properly dispose of it, because hey there’s epidemics of avian diseases all the fucking time that effect songbirds, and you’re not helping anyone if you unknowingly increase the risk of epidemic among native songbirds.
This is a female House Sparrow:
And this is the highly endangered Florida Grasshopper Sparrow:
One is invasive, the other is critically endangered at only 120 individuals.
Are you a qualified ornithologist? No? Then don’t try to lead your own culling project.
Sparrows aren’t an easily identifiable species like the invasive Spotted Lanternfly insect, you can’t just go around thinking you can identify every sparrow and play an amateur ecologist.
Anyway you know what you as an average Joe citizen can do to help native birds that isn’t recklessly culling birds you aren’t even sure are your target species?
-Clean your bird feeders/baths regularly. Every year it seems we get seasonal epidemics of avian diseases that affect native songbirds, that are spread through contaminated bird feeders/baths.
-Reduce light pollution. If you live/work in a tall building, make sure the lights are out at night or you cover the windows with blackout curtains. It’s migration season, and every migratory season thousands of birds die from building collisions at night because the lights from your windows confuse them.
-Put decals on your windows to prevent collisions. Birds can’t tell your window is solid, help them out.
-Plant native plants. Native birds rely on certain invertebrates and seeds and berries associated with native plants. When native plants are destroyed, it affects the whole ecosystem.
-KEEP. YOUR. CATS. INDOORS. Cats are an invasive species and decimate local bird populations when you let them free roam. Keep them indoors.
-Leave fledglings alone. They don’t need your help, they need you to leave them alone and let them learn to fly naturally.
did that thing go see-through? where is it’s blood?
Cephalopods and other invertebrates don’t have blood in the same sense that vertebrates do - they evolved their own circulatory system completely independently. The invertebrate analog to blood is called haemolymph, and it contains the copper-based protein haemocyanin for oxygen transport, rather than the iron-based haemoglobin that vertebrates possess. This means the haemolymph is a blue-green colour when oxygenated, and colourless when deoxygenated.
And they hope to create a new vaccine with it.
COVID-19 vaccines have been effective at keeping people from getting severely ill and dying from the virus, but they’ve required different boosters to try to keep on top of all of the coronavirus variants that have popped up. Now, researchers have discovered an antibody that neutralizes all known COVID-19 variants.
The antibody, called SP1-77, is the result of a collaborative effort from researchers at Boston Children’s Hospital and Duke University. Results from mouse studies they’ve conducted were recently published in the journal Science Immunology, and they look promising.
But what does it mean, exactly, to have an antibody that can neutralize all variants of COVID-19, and what kind of impact will this have on vaccines in the future? Here’s what you need to know.
What is SP1-77?
SP1-77 is an antibody developed by researchers that so far can neutralize all forms of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. It was created after researchers modified a mouse model that was originally made to search for broadly neutralizing antibodies to HIV, which also mutates.
The mice used in the study have built-in human immune systems that mimic the way our immune systems develop better antibodies when we’re exposed to a pathogen. The researchers inserted two human gene segments into the mice, which then created a range of antibodies that humans might make. The mice were then exposed to SARS-CoV-2’s spike protein (which is what the virus uses to latch onto your cells) and produced nine different families of antibodies that bound to the spike protein to try to neutralize it.
Those antibodies were then tested and one—SP1-77—was able to neutralize Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and all Omicron strains (including the current circulating ones) of COVID-19.
The antibody works in a slightly different way than many of the antibodies people make to vaccines. To infect you, SARS-CoV-2 has to first attach to ACE2 receptors in your cells. The current COVID-19 vaccines block this binding from happening by attaching to the spike protein’s receptor-binding domain (RBD) at certain spots, a press release from Boston Children’s Hospital explains.
The SP1-77 antibody also binds to the RBD, but doesn’t prevent the virus from binding to ACE2 receptors. What it does do is block the virus from fusing its outer membrane with the membrane of your cells, which is what needs to happen to make you sick.
“SP1-77 binds the spike protein at a site that so far has not been mutated in any variant, and it neutralizes these variants by a novel mechanism,” study co-author Tomas Kirchhausen, Ph.D., said in a statement. “These properties may contribute to its broad and potent activity.”
Read More
Do you think those cat/dogs learning to talk with buttons thing is actually accurate? I know even primates apparently dont know how to parse human words (with regards to sign language) so i struggle to understand why dogs or cats suddenly understand complex english
They don’t actually understand what the buttons mean. These animals aren’t capable of processing language like we humans do and they tend to react more to your tone and visual cues then the actual words you’re saying.
The buttons are just very basic operant conditioning. I very basic form of cognition in animals. They press the buttons because they are rewarded for doing so, not because they actually understand the meaning behind the buttons.
You can see in those videos (they do usually edit it out, but sometimes the creator of these videos just outright admits it) that it can take their pet something like 15 - 20 minutes to respond via the buttons.
Claims that the pets are asking questions ect. feel very staged / trained (like the below for example). Remember these videos are all coming from people on tiktok and people will do anything for a bit of internet fame. Scientific research has shown that dogs do not pass the “mirror test” but the mirror test is a very outdated way to show self-recognition in animals.
You compare this to the language studies done by Pepperberg with African Grey Parrots like Alex; in which they were able to ask questions they weren’t already trained to ask, form sentences they weren’t previously trained to do, display self-recognition (via asking what colour they were), could understand syntax and form their own words eg. Alex called apples “banerries”, a combination of "banana" and "cherry", two fruits he was more familiar with.
I prefer not to touch on koko the gorilla because that research is already pretty widely criticised with a lack of actual data, and there was evidence of the Clever Hans effect (her trainers' unconscious cues were prompting her to display specific signs).
They can understand the buttons on some level at least, my brothers dog is trained in like 5 buttons for when he wants to go outside, is hungry, wants to play, and wants pets. He's trying to get the dog trained on "no" so the dog can say he's not in the mood for something but that's a more complex topic 😅
That’s operant conditioning. That’s just operant conditioning not evidence of language use.
The difference is between "understanding", and "understanding language". I mean in layman's terms we can argue that a lot of things are language, but a cell randomly tumbling toward food and away from harmful chemicals looks like understanding to us because we see the patternsof movement. Ants can theoretically count steps, and bees can sense time, which are like mathematical languages, but it's not what the post is about. I don't understand it myself but it sounds like a high level study between philosophical understanding of sentience, linguistics, social biology, and neuroscience.
what arid desert adaptation are YOU
personally I’m partial to both “manic cartwheel locomotion” and “developing efficient extra-potent venom to conserve moisture” but god there are so many good ones
wait actually fuck both those things I can’t believe I forgot literally one of my favorite creatures on the planet
I’m “live underground with my huge family and be covered in miraculous prismatic silver bristles that perfectly reflect the sun’s rays and only come out during the most unbearably hot 10 minutes of the day when my predators are taking shelter and scavenge for corpses of creatures that perished in the heat, navigating not by pheromone trail but by memorizing the relative position of the sun to my home and running at insane breakneck speed to avoid getting cooked”
I would say “nasal passages that strip the moisture from my breath so it is not lost upon exhalation” is an underrated contender BUT it also seems like a really efficient way to aerosolize a deadly coronavirus and give people MERS so maybe not
actually let’s be real, I’m probably “dig a hole in the ground and meditate in a cocoon formed of my own skin and mucus and holding my pee for a few years and hope no one digs me up to squeeze my urine out for a quick drink”
YES I love solfugae. To them, we are just huge, uncooperative parasols.
do you get big thin ears and spindly legs to stay cool OR do you get fat and form a waxy coating and maybe some spikes to discourage people from slurping your precious bodily fluids
I want to know which animal it is that gets dug out and squeezed for a quick drink. Do humans squeeze out and drink its urine or is it other animals?
Ranoidea platycephala! The Australian water-holding frog. They fill themselves up before the dry season and then spend it underground, unless someone digs them up and squeezes their water out:
A lot of frogs estivate, which is the hot/dry parallel to hibernation. I don’t know if any other species have been used by people as emergency juice boxes, tough.
i am going to create an environment that is so toxic
The dumb joke is that when cyanobacteria first invented photosynthesis, the oxygen they released was extremely toxic to all the other bacteria that existed at that point. Photosynthesis was so successful and they released so much oxygen that they nearly wiped out all life on earth.
This is called the Great Oxygenation event, or the Great Oxygen Catastrophe, it is to date one of the largest mass extinction events in earth’s history, and as far as I know it’s the single most extreme event of an organism making the environment toxic for other organisms.
Which is always funny to think about from a human perspective, because pretty much all life *except* bacteria could not have evolved if this hadn’t happened.
The Archaea - the really old bacteria that existed before cyanobacteria - are still around, they just live in weird places now like hot springs and the deep ocean where the nasty oxygen can’t reach them.
Mesozoic Monthly: Aspidorhynchus
As we all seek out responsible ways to enjoy our summer months while the world continues to respond to COVID-19, many of us are embracing the therapeutic effects of the great outdoors. One popular activity, especially in and around the Three Rivers, is fishing. Some modern fishes look positively primeval, as if they were hooked straight out of the Age of Dinosaurs and reeled into the present day. For July’s edition of Mesozoic Monthly, our star is Aspidorhynchus, one of the weird and wonderful fishes that inhabited the oceans of the Mesozoic Era.
Let’s start with a quick lesson on fish, for context. There are two main groups of bony fishes. One group, the class Sarcopterygii, are called the lobe-finned fishes because they have fleshy, limb-like fins that they use to paddle through the water like oars. The first vertebrates to go on land were sarcopterygians, and the descendants of these adventurous fish eventually evolved into amphibians, reptiles, and mammals – including us! Despite their prolific limbed descendants, sarcopterygians make up only a small fraction of fishes today. The vast majority of fish belong to the other class: Actinopterygii, or the ray-finned fishes. These fishes have delicate ray-like bones supporting thinly webbed fins instead of the meaty fins of the sarcopterygians. Actinopterygians are so successful that they dominate both freshwater and saltwater ecosystems, thrive in a variety of habitats, and fill various ecological niches. Such diverse lifestyles mean that actinopterygians come in many shapes and sizes. Nemo (a clownfish) is an actinopterygian. So is the barracuda that ate his mother, the catfish in the Monongahela River, and the unfortunate goldfish you won at the carnival as a kid. Most fossil fishes, like Aspidorhynchus for example, are also actinopterygians.
Aspidorhynchus is an extinct member of the order Holostei, nested, in diagrams of relatedness, within the class Actinopterygii. The only members of the Holostei today are gars and bowfins. Superficially, Aspidorhynchus looks like a gar, but it is more closely related to bowfins. Its name means “shield snout,” in reference to its pointy, swordfish-like upper jaw. Unlike swordfish, which lack teeth as adults, this snout was filled with many sharp teeth. The limited flexibility of its skull restricted its diet to tiny fish, two inches (5 centimeters) in diameter at the largest. Aspidorhynchus was not very large itself, its slender body only growing to approximately two feet (60 centimeters) in length. It was covered with ganoid scales, which are hard, diamond-shaped scales made with a shiny compound called ganoin. Only a few types of modern fishes have ganoid scales, including gar, sturgeon, and paddlefish.
Jurassic feeding frenzy: the pterosaur (flying reptile) Rhamphorhynchus and the predatory fish Aspidorhynchus attack a school of smaller fish. Usually, the baitfish were the only casualties here, but once in a while, everybody lost (see below!). Art by RavePaleoArt on DeviantArt, reproduced with permission.
Although species of Aspidorhynchus lived in the Jurassic and Cretaceous periods, we know that it encountered the same struggles as some modern fish due to several remarkable fossils. Just like swordfish, the pointy snout of Aspidorhynchus frequently got it into trouble by impaling other animals! The abundance of fossil evidence for this was provided by the unique conditions of the habitat preserved in the famous Solnhofen Limestone of Germany. In the Late Jurassic, this area was an isolated series of lagoons that accumulated a bottom layer of anoxic brine, which is extra-salty, low-oxygen water where oxygen-dependent (aerobic) life cannot survive. Despite this, the surface still teemed with life: fishes and marine reptiles dominated the water, small non-avian dinosaurs scurried along the shore, and pterosaurs (flying reptiles) and archaic birds flew overhead. The fish-eating pterosaur Rhamphorhynchus seems to have been a fairly frequent victim of the snout of Aspidorhynchus, with multiple fossils documenting unfortunate collisions in which the fish’s snout pierced and became entangled in the wing membrane of the pterosaur. (For a summary of pterosaur wings, check out the March edition of Mesozoic Monthly, on Nemicolopterus.) It’s obvious from the size of the animals that neither was trying to eat the other, but somehow, they became stuck together. As the two animals struggled to survive, they slowly drifted downward into the anoxic brine, where they suffocated and settled onto the bottom of the lagoon. If any other animals had tried to eat or otherwise disturb the corpses, they would have died in the brine as well, so the fossils of the Solnhofen Limestone are typically pristine and undisturbed by scavengers.
Three views of the most famous (and probably the most beautiful) Aspidorhynchus vs. Rhamphorhynchus fossil from the Upper Jurassic Solnhofen Limestone of southern Germany. Avid fisherman Matt Lamanna, the head of Vertebrate Paleontology at Carnegie Museum of Natural History (CMNH), jokes that the Aspidorhynchus looks angry, as if it’s mad about getting its snout stuck in the Rhamphorhynchus and dooming them both. Sorry Matt, this is just a quirk of preservation – the compression of the Aspidorhynchus skull during fossilization gave it the appearance of having grouchy eyebrows that weren’t there in life. You can learn more about this specimen in a paper by Frey and Tischlinger (2012). And if you want to see real fossils of both of these animals in person (albeit preserved separately), come visit the Solnhofen case in CMNH’s Dinosaurs in Their Time exhibition.
Because Aspidorhynchus lived only during the Mesozoic, there’s no chance that a modern-day angler will ever hook one. But should you find yourself fishing in one of Pennsylvania’s rivers or lakes this summer, and manage to land a gar or bowfin, pause for a moment and reflect on the ancient legacy of these fishes – a heritage that dates to the Age of Dinosaurs.
Lindsay Kastroll is a volunteer and paleontology student working in the Section of Vertebrate Paleontology at Carnegie Museum of Natural History. Museum staff, volunteers, and interns are encouraged to blog about their unique experiences and knowledge gained from working at the museum.
—
Photos of Yaqui catfish by Nat/geo’s Photo/Ark. Yaqui catfish distribution map by Florida Museum. Screenshots of text above, and following text, excerpted from this article:
In the spring of 2016, biologists […] came to a terrible realization: The Yaqui catfish, the only catfish species native to the Western United States, was on the cusp of disappearing. […] They estimated that, at most, just 30 fish remained. […]
For approximately two decades, the last known Yaqui catfish in the United States had been kept in artificial ponds built in and around San Bernardino National Wildlife Refuge, on the Arizona-Sonora border, and at a local zoo. Creatures of rivers and wetlands, they had not reproduced. Today, the Yaqui catfish, a whiskery-looking creature that evolved at least 2 million years ago and was once common enough for people to catch for food, is functionally extinct in the United States. There may be a few still hidden in Arizona’s ponds, but not enough to keep a population alive. […] To people for whom “Sonoran Desert” conjures up images of steadfast saguaros or sun-struck lizards, the fact that a native catfish species existed in such a dry place can be surprising. In reality, prior to European colonization, the region supported rich waterways and aquatic communities.
Biologists know surprisingly little about Yaqui catfish, dusky animals that live at the bottom of cienegas and streams, growing up to about two feet long. Only about 2% of their historic range lies within the United States; the rest is in Mexico. Living mysterious lives in gloamy places, Yaqui catfish inhabit a world rich in ways we humans can never imagine. Like many catfish, they are covered with tastebuds instead of scales. Catfish are named for the long, flexible barbels that sprout from their faces like a cat’s whiskers, helping them feel and taste their world. Yaqui catfish may communicate with each other through drummings and stridulations, and they may hunt by tracking the electric discharges from other animals’ nervous systems.
The Sonoran Desert’s fishes have evolved fascinating adaptations: Some give birth to live young; others snuggle down and wait out dry spells in the mud. But the past few centuries have been especially rough for them. As the Borderlands’ human communities keep growing, and climate change makes the region hotter and drier, streams stop flowing and wetlands vanish. Meanwhile, introduced species, including channel catfish originally from Central and Eastern North America, push out, or hybridize with, native species. Like most of the Southwest’s aquatic species, Yaqui catfish have struggled to survive since European colonization.
Today, a river in the Southwest often means a dried-out, sandy wash where trash and the skeletal remains of cottonwoods bleach in the sun. But before colonization, networks of riparian areas, wetlands and slow-moving rivers flowed through the region, where Indigenous peoples have lived and farmed for millennia. A combination of colonialism and human-caused climate change turned rivers and wetlands to dust. Cattle, introduced in the 1500s by the Spanish, overgrazed the land, congregating around and trampling sensitive desert river systems. Farms, mining and the extirpation of beavers all disrupted the Southwest’s rivers, which abruptly channelized in the 1800s, changing from meandering cienegas to deeply etched arroyos. In the 1900s, enormous dam projects began sending the Southwest’s water far away, irrigating California’s agriculture, even as Sunbelt cities kept growing. By 1973, when the Endangered Species Act passed, such intensive pumping meant that the region’s cienegas were almost all gone, including the tiny fragment of Yaqui catfish habitat in southeastern Arizona.
San Bernardino National Wildlife Refuge, designated in 1982, was a different approach to saving species. An archipelago of manmade pools in a sea of desert shrubland, the refuge was meant to be a place where native fish species could survive, even as their natural ecosystems drained to sand. The Yaqui catfish lived there, some for decades; what they didn’t do was reproduce. These fish, creatures of deep pools and flowing rivers, seemed to need something that the artificial ponds didn’t provide to breed. […]
To Valencia, the catfish ties Yaqui peoples to the Río Yaqui region, in part by embodying the importance of water to the tribes. As the flow of Borderlands water and species has been curtailed, so, too, has the movement of Yaqui peoples across their ancestral lands. […] Considered Mexican by the United States, the Pascua Yaqui Tribe only gained federal recognition in 1978, despite its presence on both sides of the border since long before the United States or Mexico existed.
—
Maya L. Kapoor. “The only catfish native to the Western U.S. is running out of water.” The Counter. (Originally printed in H!gh Country News.) 9 July 2020.
do I dare to tag toes and feet on tumblr dot com y/n?
More on birds since y’all seem to be really into birds. Transcript under the cut.
Keep reading
Despite reversing its position in August, the Trump administration reauthorized the use of "cyanide bombs," with some new safety regulations.
more sources here and here
here are some petitions to sign:
center for biological diversity
the animal rescue site
care2 petitions (content warning: semi-graphic photo of a dead fox)
KLEPTOGENESIS IS SO COOL
I’m so fascinated by the unisex Ambystoma and y’all should be too!!
The Unisexual Ambystoma is an all female group of salamanders native to the Great Lakes and the North Eastern United States. They are most commonly a triploid species (but they can have multiple variations of polyploidy). But what is SO COOL about them is they steal genomes from males of 5 other species (A. laterale, A. barbouri, A. tigrinum, A. texanum, A. jeffersonianum)!!
The unisexuals pick up and use genomes of sexual species every time they breed, but those genomes do not pass onto the next generation. The genes they “steal” are adapted to the conditions of the local sexual males. They’re like the ninjas of the world of herpetology!!
Imagine that! A lineage made up of only women that, generation after generation, collect genetic material from males of other species that they can distribute to their offspring in pretty much any configuration. Science still doesn’t know how the mother “chooses” the genes she gives to her daughter, and that is FASCINATING!
And this has been going on for millions of years! It is hypothesized that the Unisexual Ambystoma comes from a cross between A. laterale and A. barbouri.
But those two no longer have the same geographical range. This means that the production of new Unisexual Ambystoma populations is not ongoing. This group of female salamanders have been surviving solely by stealing genes from other species!! That’s so freaking cool!!!!!!
Every encounter leaves a mark. It’s possible that all this happened after he died, the dolphins could have been playing with his floating body and the shark might have been interested in scavenging. It’s hard for me to tell if the marks happened after death here… hopefully some experts can chime in. Other places to see my posts: INSTAGRAM / FACEBOOK / ETSY / KICKSTARTER
do fish feel pain?
Such a deceptively simple looking question has been hotly debated in science for decades now, with vocal advocates on both sides, but I’m pretty damn sure fish feel pain.
The crux of the ‘No’ argument is basically that while fish have nociceptors (neurons which detect pain) but they don’t connect to their neocortex like they do in mammals, so they conclude that while fish probably feel some kind of ‘fish pain’ it’s not equivalent to pain as we know it.
I, personally, am not terribly impressed by this argument. We used to say this about every non-human species on the planet and now we know better.
This article from the Smithsonian sums it up well. We do know quite a lot about how fish perceive their environment, including painful stimuli.
Stimuli that would cause pain in a human cause increased activity in the whole brain, not just the brain stem, which implies it is percieved consciously.
Fish behaviour changes when injected with something painful, but does not change if injected with both something painful and morphine. Morphine does not change the tissue damage, only how the conscious brain perceives pain.
Fish avoid painful stimuli.
So the evidence is mounting that yes, fish feel a type of pain and while it may not be 100% analogous to pain sensation in a mammal, that difference is likely academic. The fact that their behavior normalizes when given pain relief after a painful stimulus is pretty strong evidence in my professional opinion.
What we do know, without doubt, is that fish can suffer. The details of that pain don’t matter so much as their ability to suffer because of it. We can debate semantics and fine details all day, but if we have stewardship over these animals, it’s our duty to minimize their suffering wherever we reasonably can.
Only JUST now realized that duh, of course insects can’t see yellow, that whole part of the spectrum (red through green) is missing for them! (And then I double-checked some papers, lol whoops, I guess I do remember seeing something about that….)
So not only can’t honey bees not see the reddish hue of their honey, but they can’t see the yellow of their honey, OR the yellow of THEMSELVES!
BEES DON’T KNOW THEY’RE YELLOW
Huh. It looks like to themselves, honeybees are actually….black, with UV eyes. (I know one is a bumblebee, but the colors are similar enough.)
(yellow on the bottom image is pollen)
How ridiculously ominous.
EDIT: Of course these are photos meant to emphasize the UV aspects, but the way these work that typically means they shut out the entire part of the yellow-red spectrum, emphasizing blue through purple (pollen would have been color-corrected after the fact, I think). They might have green in them that got filtered out, of course.
https://www.beesource.com/forums/showthread.php?293586-Honey-Glows-Under-Blacklight
So apparently, like the pollen (at least this kind), honey glows green under a blacklight and I guess bees are just having one big rave in there
(Not really–the honey wouldn’t fluoresce to them. Possibly it looks like something between UV and green?? I have no idea)
Hi there, I’m a bee scientist! I’m not sure where you read that bees cannot see yellow, or if you came to the conclusion yourself but it’s not correct.
I think you’ve confused the fact bees lack the photo receptor cells (or cone) that detects red lightwaves, and therefore cannot see red with them not being able to see yellow. But they very much can see yellow. It fact we use yellow targets and “fake” flowers in my experiments and bees can very much see them.
Bees, like humans, are trichromatic, in that they have three cones (photoreceptors) that make up the colour they see. Humans have red, green and blue cones, while bees have blue, green and ultraviolet cones. This is why they cannot see reds or pinks. We actually use pink/ red targets to train bees pre-experiements to ensure no colour bias, in experiements when colour is important. This is also why bees tend not to pollinate red flowering plants, but love blues, yellows, and purple flowers.
So bees very much see each other as yellow (if the bee species in question is yellow), as well as being able to see UV markings. Hope that helps clear things up. I’d really hate for people to think this is true.
Just like to chime in as well, as a visual ecologist, that fluorescent materials are often NOT ECOLOGICALLY IMPORTANT. At All. People get really excited about exciting fluorescent proteins in things and taking a picture and going “wooooah, so cool, what is the biological importance of this??” And usually the answer is none, because there is not natural situation where you would have the right wavelengths of light to excite those proteins. So. Even though you can get these materials to fluoresce in the lab, they dont actually do that in the wild
Thank you! This too!
While UV is important for bees in how they see flowers as many of them have patterns that we can’t see but bees can, it’s unlikely they themselves appear fluorescent to each other. Which makes sense, as bees also use chemical / olfactory signals in communication and telling each other apart. I’ve also found no scientific papers that suggest fluorescent proteins found on bees themselves is ecologically important.
It’s also been shown that only blue fluorescence in the 430- to 480-nm was attractive for bees while they ignored other types of fluorescence outside this range. So this suggests that bees may not be able to see outside this range.
Please read this whole post if you actually believe bees can’t see yellow.
Tl;dr they can.
Huh, I didn’t know that!
Guess I should clarify, though: I know bees can see into the yellow spectrum, but previously I thought this would be processed as “yellow,” the same way people with red-green color blindness see yellow instead of green or red.
However, yellow is between red and green, not its own color. So, without red, but instead UV, we’re not getting a “yellow” at all. That part of the spectrum is being perceived as something between green and UV, not green and red.
Also, honeybees aren’t just “yellow”–specifically, they’re *reddish* yellow. Doesn’t that still fall outside their visible spectrum?
You did say in the OP that “bees don’t know they’re yellow” and “insects can’t see yellow” I was just trying to respond to that and clear up some stuff about bee vision :)
Bees see yellow similar (not quite the same if the yellow is more an orange) to how we would see yellow. Though there’s some studies that would suggest orange and yellow appear the same to them. So a more reddish-yellow or orange would just appear like a more dull yellow then just nothing.
We know this because we can measure the spectral reflectance of coloured stimuli and then put these spectra into a model (there’s a model on Rstudio that automatically does this and puts it into a hex colour graph!) that shows us where the colour loci are in a the bee colour space.
They’re able to see yellow as similar to how we would because the “green” cone can actually pick up yellow wavelengths. This graph explains it pretty well: you can see the “green” cone still picks up yellow wavelengths, even maybe a bit of orange (again its debatable at the momnent).
What is your favorite animal tidbit about the denizens of Lake Baikal?
actually my favorite thing about Baikal is the lake itself!
viewed from above, it looks like nothing particularly special. sure, it’s a big lake, but it doesn’t have the surface area of the Great Lakes or the Caspian Sea, right?
WRONG!
BOOM.
see, Lake Baikal really isn’t a lake at all, it’s a deep rent in the earth’s crust called a Rift Valley that just happened to get water in it. and the Baikal rift is one of the deepest and narrowest on earth, making this deceptively placid lake slightly over a MILE deep! that’s bonkers nutso.
like, you think the OCEAN is bad, just imagine being in a little fishing boat on this thing without realizing just how far away the bottom is....
Holy fucking shit
That bitch has a quarter of the fresh water in the entire world?!
I notice you never answered the crucial first question, OP. What lives in it? What lives down in that lake?
congrats, you lucked out this time! because it’s
THEY
that dwell in the depths
Also these! Giant Amphipods! (Acanthogammarus victorii)
Freshwater Sponges! Like Lubomirskia baikalensis
And not to mention Oilfish (Comephorus baikalensis)
Well my week has been exciting so far.
I had some other work to do this morning (Figuring out some algae stuff involving 1000 L mesocosm up a mountain) so mystery species has been sitting alone in the lab all morning…..
Made it up to the lab today to find this. It’s probably from the fridge defrosting and not the creepy “algae”.
June 13th Update.
According to a few colleagues it’s either a plant, an algae, or a fungi. So that’s been helpful.
After a day with some sunlight I think I might be seeing some chloroplasts.
It seems to like the nutrient solution I added yesterday though!
I for one welcome our new plant, algae, or fungi overlords.
I was about to say “in a sensible lab people wouldn’t waste time with this, they’d autoclave the bottles and move on” but on reflection I can’t think of a single bio lab I’ve been in that wouldn’t immediately go “ooh, mystery algae, that sounds like a fun challenge; let’s devote multiple hours to identifying it for no reason”.
I need updates tell me about the algae
The mystery algae/plant/fungi/alien is stuck in the university growth chamber. With everything going on I probably won’t get to check in on it until September, possibly not until 2021.
So by that time it will have developed what, writing?
God I hope so, then I can train it to write my thesis!
This entire post is the most on-brand biologist thing I have seen in my entire godforsaken life. The moment this pandemic is over these guys have another crisis ready for us.