Show & Tell
No title available
Xuebing Du
$LAYYYTER
Keni
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

ellievsbear
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Cosmic Funnies
Jules of Nature
No title available
No title available
Cosimo Galluzzi

shark vs the universe

Love Begins
Monterey Bay Aquarium

tannertan36
RMH
Claire Keane
we're not kids anymore.

seen from France
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from Switzerland

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Sweden

seen from Germany

seen from Singapore

seen from Algeria

seen from Sri Lanka
@blackfeatherswan
that'z My Horse™️
ive been thinking and honest to god: i think i would actually join a girl gang if the offer came. like a legitimate, hierarchical, “let’s carry knives under our skirts and beat up men” gang. fuck college
bringing back the sukeban girl gangs from the 70’s that wore long skirts against teen sexualization and fucked things up for the patriarchy
and this was no “5 girls in a small town” who made the news—this was yakuza level shit. 20,000 girls getting into gang fights and shoplifting and getting pissed off that only men were allowed to be rough and violent and angry
and y’all wanna know the funniest part? immediately after this trend blew up, the Men decided to sexualize the hell out of these girls. this included movie adaptations and pornos where the skirts were made shorter and the tits were bigger cause apparently they had found their new fetish
but here’s how they actually looked, and it’s actually pretty badass:
so anyways. who up for a girl gang
i wanted to reflect on me 2018 and me 2024 as well (@punkitt-is-here did this and i love the way she talks abt transness shes so cool)
I wish you guys could see the gal on the right as a woman, too--because "woman" is just like the word "human." It's just what you are, not a set of regressive stereotypes, not makeup or clothing, not gender roles.
You don't have to stop being a woman to stop performing femininity (in fact, you can't really stop being one--not on a chromosomal level, not on the level of bone structure, nor even come close to true average male hormone levels without becoming severely sick, and not on a genital level. Aesthetic changes to the flesh under a surgical knife may ease dysphoria in some, but are not the same as truly replacing female genitalia with male genitalia.)
It reinforces that woman=femininity when your abandonment of femininity is coupled with your attempted abandonment of womanhood.
I'd be miserable if I thought I had to wear makeup and dress uncomfortably forever, too, which is why I don't. And yet, "woman," to me, is not lipstick and subservience--it's just the creature that I am, the animal, more ancient than gender, as natural as gazelles and dirt and trees.
These images really show us what trans people think of women who look like the woman on the right. It's such a patriarchal movement. Pushing and promoting insecurity and misogyny on Butches.
A German court has ruled that Google is directly liable for what its AI search overviews say. Previous case law shielding search engine operators from liability doesn't apply to AI overviews. The Regional Court of Munich hit Google with a temporary injunction barring the company from spreading false claims about two Munich-based publishers through its AI-generated search overviews (case no. 26 O 869/26). The court classified Google as a direct infringer because the "AI overview" is its own content, not just a list of search results. Google's AI overviews had falsely tied two publishing companies to scams, subscription traps, and shady business practices for certain search queries. According to the court, the AI mixed up information about other, genuinely sketchy companies with the plaintiffs and drew connections that didn't appear in any of the linked sources. The publishers sent Google a cease-and-desist letter, but Google didn't respond appropriately.
if it's so unethical to want to avoid giving birth to an unhealthy baby why should women avoid drugs and alcohol during pregnancy
all afab ppl r guilty of transmisogyny but saying all amab ppl r guilty of misogyny is an unfair and violent generalization. weird how tht works, i think
"love every trans woman before it's too late" and the "every trans woman" is trans women with pedophilic/zoophilic/rape fetishes and the "too late" is before her blog gets deleted for user guidelines violations for the 20th time
*terf makes a feminist post* "you people have nothing to talk about beside trans people" *terf posts about an interest she has* "why are there terfs in the fandom"
"We're just making up for the girlhood we never got to have!!"
My friend who left her Amish order at age 19, who was the eldest daughter to a family of nine, who never had a birthday party, whose days of cooking and cleaning and farm labor and taking care of her younger siblings started at 4:30 am, has never felt the urge to do ageplay
My coworker, who raised her violent younger brother and fended for herself in a filthy double-wide trailer where her parents were either gone or raging drunk at home, who couldn't even dare to invite a friend over because of how horrifying her home life was, has never felt the urge to have a slumber party pillow fight
My neighbor's mother, who grew up as a house girl in southern India, who was born into a life of drugery and hiddenness and abuse, who wasn't allowed to even touch the toilet or dining utensils of the house she was forced to work in for 10 hours a day as a child, has never felt the urge to drink out of a Disney princess sippy cup
MTFs do not want to experience girlhood. Girlhood as we lived it would have made these pampered, whiny, milksop men kill themselves. They want to live in the sexualized schoolgirl anime that was contrived entirely in the minds of men. None of us got to experience that girlhood, and yet none of us are desperately trying to recreate it as adults now.
"Parents usually try to protect girls more and dress them in pretty dresses" — yes, because for centuries, women's lives depended on whether the rich rapist would like them and buy them or not. Woman were literally raised for sale like cattle.
Just remember that "princesses," contrary to the stereotypes about their pampering, were mere bargaining chips. They were artificially pushed out of power, driven back to tea parties and dress fittings, because their primary function was to be sold and then regularly subjected to sexual and reproductive violence.
Your idea of womanhood or girlhood is literally built on the propaganda of misogynists (who don't want to lose the opportunity to rape women so they block women's right movement) and the mockery of femicide. Just think about that twice.
The female body, when lacking the nutrients needed to run the body properly, shuts down the female reproductive system first. Libido shuts down; the menstrual cycle quits; she does not want sex--unless it is for either the affirmation or degradation of her body-- nor is she able to birth a child. All of her body's resources go purely to the continuation of her survival.
After the female body recovers from her starvation, there is a distinct possibility that she will never be able to get pregnant or carry a pregnancy to term. Even if she is able to, this process will likely be far more difficult and unlikely than it would typically be.
These facts directly dispute the oft repeated claim that a woman's biological purpose is to reproduce. When given the choice between survival and reproduction, the female body chooses, time and time again, survival. Reproduction is not prioritized in the slightest; in fact, it is often the very first bodily function to be shut down--literally deemed the least important part of a woman's body. And this choice of survival--the prioritization of the heart, the lungs, the bones--over the reproductive system is not even to the purpose of allowing a woman to reproduce later in life; no, the reproductive system is at the very least damaged, if not debilitated for the rest of the woman's life.
If the female body, as so many claim, was biologically "meant" to first and foremost reproduce, perhaps it would choose to increase libido and prioritize the reproductive system in order to let the woman birth a descendant before ultimately dying. This is not what the female body does. The female body itself declares that its own life, not that of which it could create, is the most important, that the female body, alive, is worthy even if it never passes its genes on. The female body declares that it is not alive only to further humanity, to reproduce and then die, but instead to live; to live its own life, following the desires of the woman in command of it and no one else.
The next time someone tries to insist that women are biologically meant for nothing more than populating the earth in the cage of kitchens and bedrooms, remind them of the hundreds of thousands of women living their lives, making scientific discoveries, creating art, and leading nations who survived an attempt of making themselves small, and now take up space, for years, completely unable to reproduce.
I don’t agree with capital punishment but if someone vents about an abuser of theirs and say they wish they would suffer and you go on a speech about rehabilitative justice you are a horrible person idc. a leftist utopia where rapists get to walk around freely isn’t an actual utopia for anyone except rapists
It's Pride. So it's the time of year where I remind everybody that Fred Sargeant, a founder of the original Gay Pride and Stonewall riots veteran, does not support TQ gender evangelism, it's historical revisionism of gay history, and what it has done and is doing to the LGB and women's liberation movements.
Fred Sergeant, today:
Happy Pride.